Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

White House among targets of sweeping cyber attack

Wed Jul 8, 2009 11:07 AM EDT
politics, us, attack, south-korean, new-york-stock-exchange, cyber-attack
Lolita C. Baldor, Associated Press
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 3 photos
<p>Employees of Korea Internet Security Center work inside a monitoring room in Seoul, South Korea, Wednesday, July 8, 2009. South Korean intelligence authorities believe that North Korea or pro-Pyongyang forces in South Korea committed cyber attacks that paralyzed major South Korean and U.S. Web sites, an official said Wednesday.(AP Photo/Ahn Young-joon)</p>

Employees of Korea Internet Security Center work inside a monitoring room in Seoul, South Korea, Wednesday, July 8, 2009. South Korean intelligence authorities believe that North Korea or pro-Pyongyang forces in South Korea committed cyber attacks that paralyzed major South Korean and U.S. Web sites, an official said Wednesday.(AP Photo/Ahn Young-joon)

Advertise | AdChoices

WASHINGTON — The powerful Internet attack that overwhelmed computers at U.S. and South Korean government agencies for days was even broader than initially realized, pestering the White House, the Pentagon and the New York Stock Exchange and shutting down other official Web sites.

Targets of the most widespread cyber offensive of recent years also included the National Security Agency, Homeland Security Department and State Department, the Nasdaq stock market and The Washington Post, according to an early analysis of the malicious software used in the attacks.

The cyber assault on the White House site had "absolutely no effect on the White House's day-to-day operations," said spokesman Nick Shapiro.

Preventative measures kept whitehouse.gov "stable and available to the general public," Shapiro said, but Internet visitors from Asia may have experienced problems.

South Korean intelligence officials believe the attacks were carried out by North Korea or pro-Pyongyang forces, but many experts in cyberwarfare said it was simply too early to know where the offensive originated.

Many of the U.S. government targets appear to have successfully blunted the sustained computer assaults. But others, such as the Treasury Department, were knocked off-line at times.

Two government officials acknowledged that Treasury's site was brought down, and said the agency had been working with its Internet service provider to resolve the problem. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak on the matter.

As of last night, Shapiro said, "all federal Web sites were back up and running."

Ed Donovan, a spokesman for the U.S. Secret Service, said that the cyber attacks slowed access to the agency's Web site, which operates on the same computer server as Treasury's. But Secret Service's site remained in operation despite the crippling effects of the cyber offensive, Donovan said.

"Our site was never knocked down, but it was slowed down at points," Donovan said. He added that Secret Service's "operational side" was not affected by the attacks.

State Department spokesman Ian C. Kelly told reporters that the department's state.gov Web site has been under attack since July 5.

"It's still ongoing but I'm told it's much reduced now," Kelly said.

The Associated Press obtained the target list from security experts analyzing the attacks. It was not immediately clear who might be responsible or what their motives were.

The cyber attack did not appear, at least at the outset, to target internal or classified files or systems, but instead aimed at agencies' public sites, creating a nuisance both for officials and the Web consumers who use them.

Ben Rushlo, director of Internet technologies at Keynote Systems, said problems with the Transportation Department site began Saturday and continued until Monday, while the FTC site was down Sunday and Monday.

Keynote Systems is a mobile and Web site monitoring company based in San Mateo, Calif. The company publishes data detailing outages on Web sites, including 40 government sites it watches.

According to Rushlo, the Transportation Web site was "100 percent down" for two days, so that no Internet users could get through. The FTC site, meanwhile, started to come back online late Sunday, but even on Tuesday Internet users still were unable to get to the site 70 percent of the time.

Dale Meyerrose, former chief information officer for the U.S. intelligence community, said that at least one of the federal agency Web sites got saturated with as many as a million hits per second per attack — amounting to 4 billion Internet hits at once. He would not identify the agency, but said the Web site is generally capable of handling a level of about 25,000 users.

Meyerrose, who is now vice president at Harris Corp., said the characteristics of the attack suggest the involvement of between 30,000 to 60,000 computers.

He said it appears there was one attack on July 4, which some agencies were able to contain, and then a second round on Tuesday. Meyerrose said that since the attackers would have used surrogate computers, it is still too early to tell where it originated.

South Korea's National Intelligence Service, the nation's principal spy agency, told a group of South Korean lawmakers Wednesday it believes that North Korea or North Korean sympathizers in the South were behind the attacks, according to an aide to one of the lawmakers briefed on the information.

The aide spoke on condition of anonymity, citing the sensitivity of the information. The National Intelligence Service — South Korea's main spy agency — said it couldn't immediately confirm the report.

Amy Kudwa, spokeswoman for the Homeland Security Department, said the agency's U.S. Computer Emergency Readiness Team issued a notice to federal departments and other partner organizations about the problems and "advised them of steps to take to help mitigate against such attacks."

New York Stock Exchange spokesman Ray Pellecchia could not confirm the attack on the trading institution, saying the company does not comment on security issues.

Attacks on federal computer networks are common, ranging from nuisance hacking to more serious assaults, sometimes blamed on China. U.S. security officials also worry about cyber attacks from al-Qaida or other terrorists.

The widespread attack was "loud and clumsy," which suggests it was carried out by an unsophisticated organization, said Amit Yoran, chief executive at NetWitness Corp. and the former U.S. government cybersecurity chief. "This is not the elegance we would expect from sophisticated adversaries."

Web sites of major South Korean government agencies, including the presidential Blue House and the Defense Ministry, and some banking sites were paralyzed Tuesday. An initial investigation found that many personal computers were infected with a virus ordering them to visit major official Web sites in South Korea and the U.S. at the same time, Korea Information Security Agency official Shin Hwa-su said.

___

Associated Press writers Hyung-Jin Kim in Seoul, South Korea; Andrew Vanacore in New York; Pamela Hess in Washington and Pan Pylas in London contributed to this report.

___

On the Net:

Treasury Department: http://www.ustreas.gov

Secret Service: http://www.secretservice.gov/

Transportation Department: http://www.dot.gov

Federal Trade Commission: http://www.ftc.gov/

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Lolita C. Baldor's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: United States , South Korea , North Korea , China , Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (46)
SnotRag_DaveDeleted
AfricanMadman

I'm starting to get worried.....

Riots, uprisings, military coups, cyber attacks against government agencies.... It's like the early 80's all over again.... Except this time, it's with more people and more countries....

  • 6 votes
Reply#2 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 11:38 AM EDT
River-239955

I'm of a mind to think that cyber-attacks are much, much more sophisticated than before. And just think of allllllll those sweet new rides with allllll those little computer chips in them. There are loads of possibilities there, from tracking to detonating explosives, and beyond. I've been dreading the day that they figure that out.

Mmmmhhmmm.... And you was worried about the storm a'coming.

  • 5 votes
#2.1 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 1:21 PM EDT
Responsible-Adult

its like the movie hackers!

except without all the hot angelina jolie boobies :(~

  • 3 votes
#2.2 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 1:46 PM EDT
ffeineandsugar

Brings a whole new meaning to the term "hot silicone." ;:-(

  • 2 votes
#2.3 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 3:13 PM EDT
AfricanMadman

River-239955

All it'll take is a command and a wide-range EMP.....

  • 2 votes
#2.4 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 3:15 PM EDT
River-239955

All it'll take is a command and a wide-range EMP.....

Yep. I don't drive anymore, so I'll just be a bystander. No way I'd pay $25+k for a ride these days. Those gadgets that run them aren't made here.

  • 2 votes
#2.5 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 3:21 PM EDT
Reply
Shirley Draeger

This should worry people, really, really worry people.

  • 2 votes
Reply#3 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 12:03 PM EDT
jimi

No, it really shouldn't. It's a simple denial of service attack, that failed for most of the targeted sites. They did not gain access to systems, so it really is not that big a deal, just a nuisance.

Stuff like this happens every day, go google about botnet operators blackmailing offshore internet gambling sites (among other businesses)... now that is scary.

  • 2 votes
#3.1 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 2:56 PM EDT
Teodoro Leon 3

Your right,no it shouldn't. Propaganda. To promote Internet 2.

Big difference between intranet and internet. These sites are maintained to draw attacks so that they can be monitored and traced,surveilled.

Looks like it had the desired effect considering many of these comments.

Yes ,let's just give up more of our rights and demand more measures be taken against us to keep us safe...

Notice how verification is denied by many...except the source of the article.

These institutions are not in danger.

Watch the truth come out soon as to the true culprit.

  • 2 votes
#3.2 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 3:46 PM EDT
Lonnie-1003775

not that I wouldn't trust the government, but where is the evidence that they were hacked?

  • 1 vote
#3.3 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 4:41 PM EDT
Reply
orange-756308

How come we never back hack China? We need to hit them hard back and show them that you don't @!$%# with the US

  • 1 vote
Reply#4 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 12:22 PM EDT
matt12341

China limits their people's internet access enough already.

Besides, I'm sure we have hackers trying to get into their systems. Denial of Service attacks are fail unless they are leading up to something bigger.

  • 1 vote
#4.1 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 3:11 PM EDT
Reply
Locust

Time to re-write the rules - Electro Magnetic Pulse

:)

  • 3 votes
Reply#5 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 12:41 PM EDT
AfricanMadman

That would do more harm then good....

  • 1 vote
#5.1 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 3:07 PM EDT
Reply
why_am_i_here_again?

Wow you guys, here's a question to ponder about, why WOULDN'T they try to hack the White House? You can hack Banks, Credit Card companies, Businesses, but not the White House? I don't know about you, but if I was a hacker, another countries government mainframe would be my first aim.

  • 2 votes
Reply#6 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 12:47 PM EDT
Scott-317099

Other than symbolism, messing with The White's House's Internet web site has zero impact. It is of no use in the governing of the country. The real business performed in the White House is not accessible via that web site, and I assume would proceed unimpeded.

Some of the other sites, like ITC, being down are real issues as businesses rely on data on the ITC site to handle imports and exports.

  • 1 vote
#6.1 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 1:14 PM EDT
why_am_i_here_again?

Symbolism can be quite powerful. Mabey I'll go check with my neighbors if they are scared because the White House website got hacked ;)

  • 1 vote
#6.2 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 1:18 PM EDT
matt12341

It's not like that's where Obama gets his National Security briefings... It tells us @!$%# that most citizens don't even read.

  • 1 vote
#6.3 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 3:12 PM EDT
Reply
jameseg

This is a reminder of the vulnerability of online data. We ought not take online access for granted.

  • 3 votes
Reply#7 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 12:55 PM EDT
why_am_i_here_again?

Yes, but does it really need to be news? If any large company posted on the news every time people attempted to hack them, there would be no space for nothing else on the news.

  • 1 vote
#7.1 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 1:02 PM EDT
jameseg

I agree with you about the "attempted" hacking of individual corporations, why_am_i_here_again?

But successful hacking attempts that affect several agencies of the federal government are hopefully rare enough to deserve news coverage.

  • 1 vote
#7.2 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 3:21 PM EDT
Reply
Sir. Thinkswaytoomuch

Looks like like it was probably just a large DDoS attack. All it did was slow the sites, from what I've heard. It doesn't really affect anything else...

  • 1 vote
Reply#8 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 12:55 PM EDT
why_am_i_here_again?

Yeah, the only problem with DDoS attacks is that they are hard to trace back (unless whoever was doing it is a real idiot) because since it's a one way attack, you don't need to send your i.p. for the information to be sent back, so you can just place a different i.p. on the packets.

  • 2 votes
#8.1 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 1:05 PM EDT
Sir. Thinkswaytoomuch

Yep.

But it's really not that big of a deal. They end up being more of a nuisance than a major threat.

  • 1 vote
#8.2 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 1:09 PM EDT
alkimija

Yeah, the only problem with DDoS attacks is that they are hard to trace back (unless whoever was doing it is a real idiot)

Like here?

Why is characterized as cyber-attacks and cyber-terrorism when the target is US government websites and not when it is done to "unpopular" countries like Iran?

I wonder what Newvine staff's response would be to viners advocating, organising, and participating in DDOS attacks against US government websites?

  • 1 vote
#8.3 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 1:36 PM EDT
why_am_i_here_again?

Haha that's funny, should've put some emphasis on "(unless whoever was doing it is a real idiot)". Anyways, if you were Iran wouldn't it be alright to DDoS the U.S.? It's all a question of which side you are on.

  • 1 vote
#8.4 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 1:44 PM EDT
Reply
Andromeda-510639

I suspect the White House is making every effort to ensure that the "Organizing for America" website is unscathed, especially taking great pains to protect the "Donate Now" button from hacker-attack.

All the money this country spends on so much "junk" and we can't shield our governments' computers from cyber attack? Homeland Security spent how much money, only to forget to guard the government's computer network?

The Cybermen are on the march... "delete....delete", so are the Daleks far behind.... "exterminate... exterminate"?

By the way, there’s a lot of Davros in Kim Jong-il; part of his charm.

  • 1 vote
Reply#9 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 1:23 PM EDT
why_am_i_here_again?

Rather, if it was any worthy information, it would have preferably been "copy....copy".

    #9.1 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 1:46 PM EDT
    Andromeda-510639

    Point well taken, why...

      #9.2 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 2:00 PM EDT
      Reply
      Max101st

      This is an act of war. North Korea will not go away and will continue to provoke the United States. We need to face this problem with a military response...the only thing they understand.

      • 1 vote
      Reply#10 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 2:00 PM EDT
      Road Rash

      Yes, of course we do. Nuke 'em, I say. The nerve of those little gooks, attacking our sovereign computer systems.

      But what if turns out the attacks came from China? Or Russia? Should we nuke them?

      • 1 vote
      #10.1 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 3:59 PM EDT
      cappiez

      A DDoS is FAR FAR an act of war. Hacking the Pentagon, and stealing information on the next big project is an act of war. Not letting people view page that says "The current president is Barack H. Obama." is not. It's a nuisance, and inevitable.

      • 2 votes
      #10.2 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 4:21 PM EDT
      Reply
      Rixar13

      Well so much for "Homeland Security". It seems we are powerless against this kind of act.

      Other targets of the attack included the National Security Agency, Homeland Security Department, State Department, the Nasdaq stock market and The Washington Post, according to an early analysis of the malicious software used in the attacks.

      • 1 vote
      Reply#11 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 2:58 PM EDT
      Bobby_USA

      This is an act of war if backed by North Korea.

        Reply#12 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 3:10 PM EDT
        matt12341

        Stopping us from accessing a website or two is an act of war?

        • 1 vote
        #12.1 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 3:13 PM EDT
        Sir. Thinkswaytoomuch

        Not only that, but it might not even be North Korea...

        • 1 vote
        #12.2 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 4:05 PM EDT
        River-239955

        This could very easily be the European Union with any number of countries as a front.. North Korea, China, Russia, Japan, Turkey....those come to mind first... It's important to remember that we never really know who is using who, or who they are visiting with, or their true intentions.....

        America has made some very real mistakes in the big bad world in recent times. It's not being taken lightly, by any means, not even by allies.

        • 2 votes
        #12.3 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 7:50 PM EDT
        Sir. Thinkswaytoomuch

        Doubtful. Like I said, it's a pretty basic DoS attack. Anyone could do it, let alone a government. Somehow, I think that if it were a government, it would have been more prolonged. This reeks of a small scale thing.

        DoS attacks do exactly the same thing as the death of MJ. They drive up traffic so high that sites crash... There are better ways for sophisticated countries to wage digital warfare than DoSing a couple websites.

        • 3 votes
        #12.4 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 8:47 PM EDT
        Reply
        StarSmiles

        Wow just wow

          Reply#13 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 4:40 PM EDT
          Beldapriest

          This smells of misleading information. We need more facts and evidence before we nuke them.

          • 1 vote
          Reply#14 - Wed Jul 8, 2009 4:57 PM EDT
          Jeff198524Deleted
          Jeff198524Deleted
          breelaboyDeleted
          Leave a Comment:
          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
          You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
          (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
          Newsvine Privacy Statement
          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
          FUN STUFF:
          • Leaderboard |
          • E-Mail Alerts |
          • Top of the Vine |
          • Newsvine Live |
          • Newsvine Archives |
          • The Greenhouse
          COMPANY STUFF:
          • Code of Honor |
          • Company Info |
          • Contact Us |
          • Jobs |
          • User Agreement |
          • Privacy Policy |
          • About our ads
          LEGAL STUFF:
          • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
          • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
          • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com