WASHINGTON — Former Vice President Dick Cheney directed the CIA eight years ago not to inform Congress about a nascent counterterrorism program that CIA Director Leon Panetta terminated in June, officials with direct knowledge of the matter said Saturday.
Subsequent CIA directors did not inform Congress because the intelligence-gathering effort had not developed to the point that they believed merited a congressional briefing, said a former intelligence official and another government official familiar with Panetta's June 24 briefing to the House and Senate Intelligence committees.
Panetta did not agree.
Upon learning of the program June 23 from within the CIA, Panetta terminated it and the next day called an emergency meeting with the House and Senate Intelligence committees to inform them of the program and that it was canceled.
Cheney played a central role in overseeing the Bush administration's surveillance program that was the subject of an inspectors general report this past week. That report noted that Cheney's chief of staff, David Addington, personally decided who in Bush's inner circle could even know about the secret program.
But revelations about Cheney's role in making decisions for the CIA on whether to notify Congress came as a surprise to some on the committees, said another government official. All spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the program publicly.
An effort to reach Cheney was unsuccessful.
A former intelligence official, who was familiar with former CIA Director Gen. Michael Hayden's tenure at the CIA, said Hayden never communicated with the president or vice president about the now-canceled program and was under no restrictions from Cheney about congressional briefings. The official said Hayden was briefed only two or three times on the program.
Exactly what the counterterrorism program was meant to do remains a mystery. The former intelligence official said it was not related to the CIA's rendition, interrogation and detention program. Nor was it part of a wider classified electronic surveillance program that was the subject of a government report to Congress this past week.
The official characterized it as an embryonic intelligence gathering effort, and only sporadically active. He said it was hoped to yield intelligence that would be used to conduct a secret mission or missions in another country — that is, a covert operation. But it never matured to that point.
The government official with direct knowledge of the Panetta briefing and the former intelligence official said the CIA has numerous efforts ongoing under its existing authorities that have not yet been briefed to Congress. He said they are not yet known to be viable for intelligence gathering.
The Cheney revelation comes as the House of Representatives is preparing to debate a bill that would require the White House to expand the number of members who are told about covert operations. The White House has threatened a veto over concerns that wider congressional notifications could compromise the secrecy of the operations.
That provision, however, would have no effect on programs like this one.
The former intelligence official familiar with Hayden said Congress has a right to contemporaneous information about all CIA activities. But he said there are so many in such early stages that briefing Congress on every one would be too time consuming for both the CIA and the congressional committees.
The New York Times initially reported about Cheney's direction not to tell Congress of the program on its Web site Saturday.
Of course this is not a surprise. Dick Cheney is one of the most chilling characters our generation has seen.
I recommend anyone interested in the Dick Cheney pattern of behavior read this book...even though it was written in 2008 before the most recent revelations.
So when are the corporate media and the liberal class whores going to call for the prosecution of these Nazis.??? Protecting the fascist and criminal CIA, which the corporat media has done throughout their history, and a Bi Partisan coverup BY OBAMA AND THE DEMOCRATS, WITH THE HELP OF corporate filtering of torture, fascist policies, makes all class elites, including the mainstream media complicit. Time to call for criminal trials, AP, what you say????
Seymore Hersch, like so many outside the corrupt corporate media is and was ignored when he said that the Bush administration, and under Cheney had his own personal death squad, EXTRA JUDCIAL MURDEROUS POLICIES, like the Zionist, ISRAELI and American Empire covert judicial NAZI, fascist foreign policies, that always denied their criminality, but now are exposed as CRIMINAL WESTERN FASCIST/ZIONIST THUGS.
Of course this is not a surprise. Dick Cheney is one of the most chilling characters our generation has seen.
No better than Nixon.
9-11 changed a lot of things in this country and not everything that the CIA does is going to be briefed to Congress. From what I can gather it appears that this program would get going and then because of budget restrictions it would be stopped, then something would come up and somebody would remember this "old ass program that had promise", and then someone else would be put in charge and shut it down.
More than likely it never yielded any results and thus didn't warrant Congress being briefed. It was one of those things that when asked the VP said something in the order of, "Let's get something to show them first."
I give President Bush and VP Cheney the benefit of the doubt. They were in charge when 9-11 happened and no matter what anybody has to say, that just isn't an easy thing to live with. I don't think there is anybody in our country who would have wanted to be a Politician on the day of 9-11 including President Bush. I believe and always will that on that day we changed but something has happened and it's like 9-10 again.
We don't believe in our Politicians, you hate the right, I hate the left, and though it makes great comedy it just isn't funny. At least not anymore. If I met you in a shop or came across you in the bookstore we could be good friends. The best thing Obama could do is get in front of the world and say, "From 9-11 to current I pardon President Bush and his administration for all crimes that may come up. It is my firm belief that our President did what he thought was in the best interest of this country. He did it to protect us and continuing to look back does us no good. We must move forward as a group and to never look back but always continue to move forward. Republican, Democrat, all of that is just names but who we are... who we really are is American, and the only ones who can take that from us is us. God Bless this Country and for Everything it stands."
We as a group, as Americans, need to stop looking back. We've gone through one of the worst wounds that this country has ever recieved but me and you... We are still standing and it is up to us to remember and carry on the dreams of those who didn't.
We need to remember United 93. We need to remember that when they came together there was no Political Divide, no racism, no Religous Factor. They came together as one group, against a common enemy, and though they may have died, we should never forget they died as family.
The best thing Obama could do is get in front of the world and say, "From 9-11 to current I pardon President Bush and his administration for all crimes that may come up.
In a court of a law, you can't use 9/11 as an excuse. The American people deserve better than that.
Not chilling - just greedy.
Thanks to Halliburton's war contracts and Cheney's stock portfolio, Cheney made hundreds of millions of dollars by putting this country into two wars.
I'm tired of the Witch Hunts, the next "We got him this time!', and the pure hatred that is just brewing. What Court of Law? What excuse? I disagree we "Deserve" better. We don't deserve anything. What we can do is work to become "better", but we can't get better if we keep looking back, to keep living in the past and not the present, to keep hoping for a day that the Witch will burn. What if the Witch is innocent? What good does this do for our Country except to just split it and destroy it even more?
My hand is out in friendship and in hope that we can begin to walk forward. To forgive but not to forget. If we cannot begin to move forward then the Terrorist will have won and the World will be more Sorry for it. Our Founding Fathers had a Dream and it was a good one. We can continue moving that dream forward together or we can destroy it. The next move belongs to us.
If the Dems had anything real on Cheney, they would have already arrested him.
They are smoken mirrors again...
My hand is out in friendship and in hope that we can begin to walk forward. To forgive but not to forget. If we cannot begin to move forward then the Terrorist will have won and the World will be more Sorry for it. Our Founding Fathers had a Dream and it was a good one. We can continue moving that dream forward together or we can destroy it. The next move belongs to us.
Huh? That makes very little sense. How do you "move forward" when you don't know where you are moving from? I'm sorry but if my government is screwing me over I'd at least like to know with whom and when.
Anyone that throws around the term Nazis is probably younger than 60 years of age, poorly read, or just does not care that the Nazis were one of the most cruel classes of people in history. They gas millions, they starved millions, they tortured by means that put the dark ages to shame. They raped, stole and burned whole villages.
Even evil people like Idiamin, Saddam Hussein, and Poi Pot, were bad but not like the Nazi's.
So dear people please use some common sense and stop using a term that has never been equalled and has no current simular event in our history. It belittles those of us how lost loved ones in fighting the Nazi's. The Nazis were responsible for over 15 million deaths at the minimum. If that was all Americans in the 1940's, that would have been more than 10% of our total population.
Bill Reese
the Terrorist will have won
According to some estimates, approximately 8 million human beings have already died due to that phrase. Unfortunately, its unlikely that their deaths made the world a safer place.
When will it be time to make peace?
We as a group, as Americans, need to stop looking back. We've gone through one of the worst wounds that this country has ever recieved but me and you... We are still standing and it is up to us to remember and carry on the dreams of those who didn't.
You were not even bruised compared to the kind of death and destruction America has heaped upon completely innocent and unsuspecting peoples and nations across the globe. It is your kind of arrogant commentary that just generates more hatred against America and rightly so. We whine about 3000 while we murder 300,000 wantonly and without any provocation. We continue to support with billions of our tax payers money, the completely unjustified Occupation of Palestine, in retaliation for the crimes of Nazi Germany. What kind of twisted logic is this? By doing so we do not recognise the rights of millions of human beings rendered refugees by our criminal actions. We own the United Nations and have the muscle to bully and bulldoze a coalition of the unwilling, but this does not and will never mean that we are, or ever have been right. It is time to rethink our priorities and make amends with those we have wronged and with our God.
Linus - take Dr. Phil's advice and get over it. The people in Vietnam have moved forward. And no matter how you spin it, far more innocent Vietnamese suffered and died compared to 500,000 Palestinians who fled ten or fifteen miles during Israel's war for independence.
You sound just like all the disgruntled people in Europe, the Arab world and other places that haven't learned the meaning of "it's pointless to cry over spilled milk."
People like them will find any excuse to hate America. It's sad when American citizens adopt this repulsive attitude.
Prove me wrong. Otherwise stop whining. It's babyish.
Not everything is perfect. No matter how hard we try there will always be someone to see the negative. Where we have brought Freedom and Democracy to countries like Germany, France, Japan, Iraq, Afghanistan there will be some who can only see devestation. Where we built roads, schools, and hospitals in some of the worlds most impoverished nations there will be others who can only see destruction.
How many people have we inspired to be free? Even in Iran you can see handwritten signs asking for Freedom and Peace. Israel fought three countries at once and won a hard earned battle without help from any nation. Nobody gave Israel anything and thus they earned everything. Respect, their country, and the right for no Country or Leader to tell them to do anything.
So what would you ask for Linus? Would you have us lie down like dogs and grovel till those with more power came along and shoot us like a dying horse? To kiss the feet of some Foreign Dictator who kills and murders for fun? Would you have us apoligize for make believe fairy tales of Supposed US sins? If your vision of the US is as you have written then maybe your home lies across the seas. No one is telling you that you must live in a place that you hate. There is plunty of countries across the oceans with people that believe as you do and if your belief is that Palestine has recieved some great ill then maybe you should find your home in Palestine.
In Poland, Hungary, Chez, and Slovakia, you won't find an ear for your voice. In the Eastern Parts of Europe they remember what it's like to starve and suffer under a real Communist Regime. In Honduras when a President tried to make himself a Dictator it was American Ideals of Freedom that sounded the loudest and thus now this wannabe Dictator finds himself an enemy to the very people he hoped to enslave.
This Experiment in Democracy has indeed flourished. Understand Linus that as Americans we have nothing to be ashamed of. We have always been a people who inspires and promotes the best of everyone and has overcome the worst. It is these values of Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness that has made this a Great Republic and thus the Greatest Nation. We have never been a country that gurantee's happiness, instead we are a country that gives you a chance to chase those dreams. Should you succeed or fail is up to you. You will fall though and it is how you pick yourself up that determines success.
There will be those who will always hate the ideals of America. As seen their will be those who would rather strike at an open hand of friendship than grasp it and shake it with hope. For those who would rather attack the hand of friendship understand that those Countries that have chosen to go down that route have never succeeded but only met disaster. Hate begets even more hate and that road leads to a road of darkness and despair.
The only thing I have left for Linus is pity.
Amen. Friend request sent.
I don't know if this is in the book. In 1953 a scientist (Frank Olson) working for the governmnet on chemical warfare had died from a fall from his hotel room. During the Ford presidency it was learned that, the CIA had slipped him LSD, the person sharing the hotel room with him was a CIA operative, and he was considered a security risk because he was having a hard time justifying the type of work he was doing for the governmnet. After these facts were made public President Ford promised the family the truth would come out, and ordered an investigation into Frank Olson's death. The two people in Ford's staff who did everything in their power to keep information from the family the president promised full disclosure to, the public, and even those doing the investigation were Cheney, and Rumsfeld! If Obama is all he claims to be, and promised in his campaign. He'll take steps to prosecute Cheney if he broke any laws at any time during his tenure to make sure the penalty of doing so is too terrible to even think about for present, and future elected officials and their staff! Now we know why Cheney thought the presidential office's powers were too limited to "legalities" in the constitution, and the bill of rights!
Jason Burnham:
If we cannot begin to move forward then the Terrorist will have won and the World will be more Sorry for it.
I think you're missing the point: Cheney is one of he terrorists, and, if we don't let everyone know the USA will not tolerate terrorism, it's then that the terrorists will have won.
Bill Reese:
Anyone that throws around the term Nazis is probably younger than 60 years of age, poorly read, or just does not care that the Nazis were one of the most cruel classes of people in history. They gas millions, they starved millions, they tortured by means that put the dark ages to shame. They raped, stole and burned whole villages.
And they did this under the initial premise of saving Germany from non-existent terrorists.
The Nazi PARTY began as a legitimate political group in a largely democratic and progressive nation very similar to the modern-nited States . (i.e. They didn't run on the platform of martial law, World War, genocide and world domination.)
Many of the players in our own current government have direct ties to -- related to, even -- people who carefully and deliberately moved the Nazi PARTY down the road to eugenics, the Holocaust, mass murder etc.
And these people have either helped to write, or endorse, exactly the same Nazi propagnda regarding a Master Race that Hitler championed for their predecessors.
It's very easy to write off the Nazis as being only a bunch of genocidal maniacs.
But they were -- and still are -- an organized and ideological bunch of maniacs who managed to coerce, bamboozle and drag a country of free people into being their worst selves based, not on the hatred and genocide that was in their -- the Nazis' -- hearts, but, rather, on the salvations from manufactured -- world-ending -- terrors that was in their words.
In short: By buying into this Nazi-esque "War on Terror" propaganda, and by buying into this manmade global warming nonsense, we are each of us taking one step closer to arriving exactly the same destination our leaders' predecessors took the people they led.
The Nazi PARTY wasn't an organic group or place that Hitler and others just stumbled upon.
The Nazi PARTY was the name that already evil men gave to the political vehicle that they used to create their alleged New World Order.
I try not to get distracted by the name Nazi.
Rather, I try to keep an eye on the people behind the Nazi PARTY, who most recently called their political enterprise NeoConservatism., and who are now re-labelling it in Earth-saving "green" nomenclature, based on a familiar fiction of "saving the world."
Jason Burnham:
I'm reading your comment #1.13, and I keep wanting you to ask yourself more questions -- look below the soundbites and superficial sloganeering that you're mistakenly ofering as your own well-considered opinion.
By stopping for just a moment to ask yourself where you got those "opinions" fom, you may end up with exactly the same opinions that you currently hold, but at least you'll understand why you hold opinions.
I think that I'm just frustrated when I see people who clearly are capable of removing their critical thinking training wheels and engage in truly independent thought, but who, for reasons I don't fully understand, refuse to.
If this sounds like a personal attack on you, then I apologize in advance. I truly don't mean it to be.
My goal is to simply encourage you to shake your head and to "snap out of it."
If you're going to have enough faith in the mass media, and in the philosophy of the corporate CEOs who control it, that you're willing to happily repeat their propaganda, then at least understand what their agenda is.
Anyway, like I said. This post is more about my own frustration at the dearth of critical thinking among the US population generally than it is a statement aimed at you personally.
And they did this under the initial premise of saving Germany from non-existent terrorists.
The Nazi party promoted a purifying the gene pull so the first victims of the purification were the people considered to be deviant in their behavior - Gypsies and the homosexuals.
The premise for purification was philosophically based on Darwin's theory of Evolution. To strenghten the race, the impurities should be purged.
Ironically, the concept of race is a political tool not a scientific fact. We all the same species.
This is no surprise. What surprises me is that so many are so shocked not thinking it out. Does anyone really think similar actions have not taken place for decades under all others administrations? Do you really thinks that Presidents and Vice-Presidents have not hidden actions that would be viewed as illegal or immoral today? No one party is a sole perpetrator and no one person is- this goes across all lines. It does have to make you wonder just what is going on in those offices with all those ego-maniacs running our country.
I am not excusing it at all- I just think we need to put it into perspective- Bay of Pigs , Laos , Cambodia, Atomic Nuclear Tests with our people as guinea pigs, LSD testing - all down in secret without knowledge at the time and all , by the standards of today, more than a bit illegal/immoral.
My problem is we can't trust the media and we should. There always seems to be some agenda or someone tied to some political party wanting to see the destruction of the other for some unknown reason. We are supposed to be able to trust the media but with each one trying to get the next Nixon story we have entered a time when even the smallest things are taken to a whole new level.
There is no doubt that Bush and Cheney were unpopular to the world and they took steps that were questionable at best. We all know that after 9-11 we found some of the worlds worst terrorist and they were not treated very nicely. We know that some of the worlds worst human beings reside on an island called "Gitmo".
Did a CIA Program start and then stop and was never told to Congress? I believe so. I am sure there was many programs that were started and stopped that were never told to Congress. I am sure this one program was started and then stopped many times over the years and I am sure Cheney is scratching his head wondering which one it was. I want Congress to be briefed on all Programs showing substance but those that don't and are shut down or just in the initial testing phases I wouldn't. I don't want Congress to be micro-managing our Goverment or trying to run a war. To much Politics and things just wouldn't get done.
There is a much bigger story here and that is Nancy Pelosi and protecting her after she stated the CIA lied to her about the Water Boarding of the three Terrorist that were in our hands. Do I think she was briefed? She was the head of the House and at that period of time we were still angry with the terrorist. I'm sure she made no objections to the water boarding of those terrorist. Now that it has become a Politically hot topic, and she has been caught screaming and yelling about it, she is caught with her pants down.
So, we are at the next big "Witch Hunt" to burn the Witch that really is turning our children into sexual deviants. Nobody likes Cheney so he makes an easy target. He's the big bad witch and must burn for his crimes. "Drown him! Burn him! Kill him!" the mob screams but hold on for a second what about the nice old lady who seems to always be taking another child into her hut for hours at a time. I think it's time we all took a breath and calmed down.
Of course this is not a surprise. Dick Cheney is one of the most chilling characters our generation has seen.
I recommend anyone interested in the Dick Cheney pattern of behavior read this book...even though it was written in 2008 before the most recent revelations.
And president Obama is protecting him, president Bush and Cheney did so much harm to the country that we may never get over the stench, the constitution was just paper for the Bush administration, the laws of the country was not important and congress new all of this and did not have the balls to do their jobs, Pelosi and Reid should go to jail alone with Bush and Cheney, I know why the president don't want to take on the last administration because that would get in the way of bringing us back from the destruction of America that Bush and Cheney did with no regard for the law of the country, and congress new all about what was going on in the Bush administration. every day something new comes out about Bush and Cheney.
We live in a great country and we will rebuild the damage that was done but it wii take a long time, and what is pissing me of the most is that Cheney is out telling the world that this is what America is all about, he is telling the world that America dose not have any morals and everything we say we are we are not.
malan:
Thanks for the info re: Nazis and the gene pool.
whiteracist:
Upswing,
It sounds to me like you're one of the terrorists.
Me and everyone you don't like and/or agree with. Be sure to report us all to your Stassi superiors.
Keep up the good work, my Nazi friend..
caylee:
If you want people to understand what you are trying to say then you should write less.
And in crayon for folk like you.
If you don't want to read something, don't read it. Why do you need to shoot your mouth off at the writer?
And why would anyone take any advice about writing from someone who obviosuly doesn't like reading?
Newsvine is no place to stroke your ego college boy.
Not for you. I'm sure you're too busy stroking something else...
ignored.
Didn't we fight this really long proxy cold war with a country with behaviours similar to what was brought to us by the last administration?
I don't think the world will soon forget the lies and deceit of the Bush/Cheney administration. They have been a disgrace to their own political party and to the country. They own the saying that the "ends justify the means". They are the poster boys for the corruption of power and make Nixon look like novice. This will be their legacy.
Spectator99,
How I wish that all the peoples of the world operate within the "rules" but the sad reality is that terrorists don't play by our "rules".
Intelligence gathering is no longer a "genleman's game".
Our surveillance system survived for many years with court oversight which even allowed after the fact filings. Bush/Cheney were power drunk.
Seems that with Pelosi as Speaker of the House for the last several years, the Dems in Congress either don't have a real case against Bush/Cheney or lacked the political will to pursue it.
Sorry you all feel this way but your leadership is all talk and no action.
I and the vast majority of Democrats weren't happy when Speaker Pelosi took impeachment off the table. The Republicans impeached Clinton over zippergate while we sat by and watched Bush/Cheney destroy the Constitution.
Clinton lied under oath. He also lied directly to the everyone on TV... And then there was the blue dress. Scooter Libby is in jail for the same offense. Clinton was disbarred.
As Clinton was disbarred - his actions were a greater violation of the Constitution than anything Bush/Cheney have been convicted of doing.
President Obama's use of Czars is a true violation of the Constitution. The Constitution has no Czars. Czars are simply cabinet positions without congressional approval.
Pelosi and Ried asleep on the job again. I guess their oath to protect the Constitution didn't mean much to them.
That's it malan? Those are the worst sins of Clinton, Obama, Pelosi, and Reid? I can come up with a better list for Bush and that would be before even getting past his firts term. Then I could start listing all of the wonderful accomplishments by Cheney, De Lay, Hastert, Libby. Gonzalez, and on and on.
You can call them whatever you want, but Czars are NOT cabinet level positions. The Constitution allows for the president to make non-Cabinet appointments without Congressional approval.
You're just talking smack until Bush or Cheney is arrested, tried and convicted. Dems are bullies - they talk a big line but have no follow through. Obama - he doesn't have the backbone or politcal fortitude to go after them. I hope his AG goes rogue on this one.
Either arrest them, put them on trial, and convict them or recognize that in the US everyone is innocent until proven guilty. Dems da rules. The trial end all of the misconceptions.
Until then, you are just hot air. Remember, Pelosi said the CIA lied... riiiight.
I do write a lot but only on the things I feel most strongly about. I try and explain where I am coming from, why I feel the way I do, and in the best way I can. I also try to be thought provoking and to give people a feeling that I really do care what they have to say about this subject because I do care. Usually, these subjects are areas that I could be moved from one position or the other or people have such heavy opinions on the topic that I find it interesting.
I would like to find out more on the Program and how succesful it was before I can call for the heads of anyone. I think that certain Democrats are playing a very dangerous game and it's been noted that over half of the Democratic Party in Congress is keeping very far from giving an opinion on the matter.
There will be some secrets conducted by Cheney/Wolf/LIbby/Rove that is so bad, it most likely going to ruin the US reputation forever.
Who knows what else is Cheney gang hiding?
Have you seen this recent seed on more possible war crimes covered up?
Physicians for Human Rights Call for Investigation into War Crimes Cover-up
So what secrets are those?
Unless we uncover a pit a mile deep filled with the corpses of innocent people murdered directly on the orders of GWB, I guarantee you, America's reputation will not suffer irreparable damage.
As things stand, there are only a few categories of countries left in the world. There are powers like China and Russia with an atrocious track record in the realm of human rights. They envy the U.S., are among the first to condemn any U.S. military action, then act bewildered when anyone points out their sheer hypocrisy.
There are the harmless countries (Fiji, Madagascar, New Zealand ) that will never be global economic or military powers, but they breathe a sigh of relief that the U.S. will protect them if push comes to shove.
Then there are the perpetual gripers like Iran, Venezuela, Syria, and N. Korea that hate the U.S. and the "West" because we refuse to kowtow to their dogsh!t regimes or regard their totalitarian systems as worthy of one iota of respect.
The sooner the world puts the hurt on countries like these, the better.
Major a$$beatings worked for Japan and Germany during WWII, and today they are among our closest allies.
Sometimes the ends definitely justify the means...
BJK-
Since we have had our hands entirely full with Iraq, and Afghanistan is going to have to be pulled back from the brink, I think it would be really presumptuous for us to think that we could give any nation a major a$$beating--short of nuking them, and I seriously doubt that will happen.
I agree with you on the "mile deep grave" thing. I think the cat is already out of the bag. All the damage to our reputation that was going to be done, has already been done. Fortunately, the world pretty much accepts that when we elect a new president, the slate is wiped somewhat clean.
With America it always depends on the reason. If the people in America believe in the cause they can kick anyone's ass in anything. Right now Al-Queda is realizing that fact and they have even written a book about how bad they are getting destroyed. There is a perception that our hands are filled with Iraq and Afghanistan because we are actually fighting three wars. The Korean War never ended and thus we have troops over there fighting that war. They're not doing anything but we are staffed as if we are currently fighting that war. We have enough troops in Europe to hold off a major Russian attack and enough troops in Japan to make China rethink any actions.
Our current troop levels in Afghanistan are about what we have in South Korea. I believe that our current Millitary Levels are 140k Iraq, 25k South Korea, 25k Afghanistan, 10k-15k Japan, and around 50k Europe.
So, Cheney's career as a public servant began with him turning tail and running from a war that he said was necessary to protect the USA, and ended with him committing treason.
His family and friends must be very proud of him...
Color me not shocked.
Panetta has now admitted that the CIA does lie, mislead, and withhold critical information from Congress, his previous "our sh*t don't stink" statements notwithstanding. The current mechanism for checks and balances simply does not work, and so the House of Representatives is rightly taking steps to rectify the matter.
The term "in the interest of national security" has been overplayed and abused ever since the Nixon Administration to use fear-mongering to expand Executive Branch authority to conduct surveillance on U.S. citizens and to avoid critical scrutiny of questionable clandestine activities by the White House, NSA, and CIA.
The CIA and the White House (wheneither party is in power) has too much autonomy and not enough oversight, especially when a staunch Machiavellian such as Dick Cheney is pulling the puppet strings.
Yeah... I said the same thing pretty much on another thread about this.
Like...
No way... get out.... really ..... so shocked.... bet he still gets away with it and there is just a whole lot of talk about it.
Can we get to fixing this damn country?????
I leave folks like Cheney and Bush to the 7th levels of Hell where they belong.
Dick Cheney is a coward chicken hawk chicken $hit.
Exactly what the counterterrorism program was meant to do remains a mystery. The former intelligence official said it was not related to the CIA's rendition, interrogation and detention program. Nor was it part of a wider classified electronic surveillance program that was the subject of a government report to Congress this past week.
This entire frikn NSA CIA PROGRAM destroyed my $500 million real estate business! how would i know?......... i found the s.o.b. 5 years ago my self....so much for the touted......... TOP SECRET SPY PROGRAM ah? and the results were that i has left me homeless with out a paddle, a penny, a family, a country, a constitution!!! now take that and chew on it........all you Closed Eye'd non Patriots. For you see, even though the intent was good, the results have tortured this American to the homeless point, but revenge is mine to be had, and have I shall......the NSA to admit they screwed me over, and compinsate me under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments!
I don't care if Cheney is out of office, he desperately needs to be impeached. All the Republican Rushbots that support need to share the same small prison cell!!!
Remember guys, if you drop the soap in the communal showers given your choice of friends, do not bend over to pick it up!!!
moutainmike,
I don't care if Cheney is out of office, he desperately needs to be impeached.
You can't make an impeachment retroactive.
You can't make an impeachment retroactive.
Can we deport him? From the planet? Or anywhere that he can't get on the TV or radio and continue to spread his hate and lies?
Xerxes727854: I'm not sure. Here in South Texas, Samuel B. Kent a Federal Judge for life, was recently sent to federal prison, convicted on two separate counts of sexual harassment and misconduct. The Senate and The House are just now deliberating "Articles of Impeachment" so he will not receive his almost $200,000. annual salary. I honestly don't know. I will have to research. Dammed good topic for discussion though.
MichaelBasham, as a fellow Texan myself, I've been reading a book on Texas government (I want to test out of the class), Texan law is in many ways very different than federal law. I'm guessing that one cannot be retroactively impeached on the federal level, but I don't know.
Where in South Texas by the way? I live near Corpus Christi.
Galveston/Harris County. Texas Law does not supersede Federal Law! Not as long as Texas is a member of the Union, which they (we) can actually secede from, but that would be insane as 7 out of $10 Texas dollars are tied to some federal program. If Texas seceded, it would be insolvent overnight. As of this week, they moved this Court, this bench to McAllen, Texas permanently. And for good reason! And yes, Judge Kent is being impeached, even after conviction. The United States Government does not wish to pay him $200,000. Per year, for the rest of his life, even while in Federal Prison. It is merely protocol, the law, and what must be done. Selective enforcement. Less one falls from Grace with the “Powers that be”?
I know he's white. But I think this a good reason to keep the "N" word in the English vocabulary a while longer. At the same time I can visualize him in a white pointy mask (or a pillow case) standing beside a burning cross? Evil is still evil in anybody’s name. Including George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, even Halliburton and Backwater, the civilian logistical and paramilitary (mercenary) limbs of The United States C.I.A. (a.k.a "The Company?). Do you really think there is such a thing as Secret? Confidential? When they’re all on the public dole selling our country out to the highest bidder. And we bid on theirs as well. Please?
Is it not ironic that the Bush-Cheney team became what they claimed to despise in other governments tactics of distortion, half truths, and leading their people down the garden path.
officials with direct knowledge of the matter said Saturday.
Names?
Cheney may not have followed protocol, but this was the years when the New York Times and ABC were printing leaks on secrets to give comfort to the enemy.
Wow. Didn't see this one coming. Dick Cheney? That nice old man in the wheelchair at Obama's inauguration?
Wow, now you've got him. That good for nothing Dick Cheney, the arch nemesis of American hating Marxist dolts.
CODE PHRASE: Bigger Than A Bread Basket
DECODED PHRASE -- the fastest way to get big, big (bigger than a bread box) secret US defense information to Al Qaeda leadership is to give it to Democraps in Congress or Jimmy Carter.
It seems that all these blogs are nothing but people venting, using language below a first grade level and writing wishes instead of fact or common sense.
It is time this all changes and some common sense added to the Newsvine or it is not worth reading or placing a blog.
this blog today is a prime example of just idiotic behavior. It means nothing and no one in their right mind will or would take action on any of these negative comments. Dick Chaney did his best to keep another 911 from happening, but most bloggers on here seem dead set on the idea that they wish President Bush, Dick Cheney and company had let the terrorist win, then they would be happy and all Americans dear and alive would live in harmony. Fools, and idiots.
Thats right Bill, the laws of our land all have a terrorism clause, you can break what ever law you want as long as you say its to "protect us from another 9/11"
bumpkiss!
Bill. The pontificating nature of the first sentance of your post is balanced perfectly by the hypocracy of the last sentance.
You are so right Bill. It is going to take another attack from Muslim renegades on American soil to wake America up. I am in no way blaming Islam, just stating the facts.
Yes! Cheney concealed information...Look what happens when you let Democrats get a hold of intel....They just dont get what secret service actually means, obama is going to invite dictators from countries that are our enemies and go play in the sandbox...They are the same ones who sent Jimmy Carter to the Middle east to codemn the Israelis and prise the palestinians for lauching 3000 rockets into Israel, when he was Preseident he solved the middle east problem in 78 since then there has never been an issue...Camp David solved everything!
Billy-
What happens when you let Dems get hold of Intel?
What does the "Secret Service" actually mean?
Carter was not sent to the Middle East to condemn the Israelis and praise the Palestinians. He did that on his own.
Camp David was the first step, and a remarkable one, that opened the door for ensuing presidents to work towards a ME solution. Reagan let it die on the vine. He wasn't interested. Niether was Bush, Clinton, or Bush.
Good thing Cheney did not inform Congress, whatever the program is (or was).
The liberals in Congress would have leaked it to the NYT, like the surveillance program, and they would have revealed it to our enemies.
Thank God for Dick Cheney.
It's very easy to be confused when people start throwing around terms like 'liberal' and 'conservative' and get them tangled with 'Democrat' and 'Republican'.
A liberal, by definition, is a person who favors changes to the status quo. A conservative is a person who wants to maintain the status quo. For instance, regarding slavery, Republicans held the liberal position because they wanted to change that status quo whereas the southern states held the conservative view because they wanted to preserve the status quo. Northern Democrats were conservative because they favored ending the war even if that meant allowing slavery to continue. After the war, people like Nathan Bedford Forrest were conservative (or even reactionary) as they wanted to return to slavery. George Wallace was 'conservative' - he did not want equality of the races or even mingling of people of different races. Al Gore Sr., William Fulbright, Robert Byrd, etc were all 'conservatives' when they opposed the Voting Rights Act whereas the Republicans were acting as 'liberals' because they favored changes to the status quo by expanding voting rights. Lyndon Johnson was a Democrat President but he favored the Voting rights Act and was acting as a liberal in siding with the Republicans on the VRA.
During the Revolution, those who favored separating from Great Britain were liberals; those who favored staying colonies were conservatives.
In more recent years 'liberal' has come to mean 'socially progressive' and liberals who now identify themselves as Democrats are big on social welfare and big federal government programs. This was not the case as recently as the 60's when JFK was big on defense and introduced tax cuts to stimulate the economy though he tended to be socially liberal. The whole liberal/conservative dynamic is further confused because 'liberals' want to stay out of your bedroom and your reproductive system but are real happy to get into your wallet; conservatives, particularly Christian conservatives, tend to want to get into your reproductive system because their Christian beliefs lead them to want to protect the life of unborn children but they want as little gov't intrusion into your wallet as possible. Liberals need tax money to support their social programs; conservatives want smaller less expensive government but are all into big defense programs.
It's really best to resist the urge to pigeon hole people and look at their positions on an issue by issue basis. Richard Nixon was conservative, but he signed the EPA into existence; Ronald Reagan was conservative but a big supporter of affirmative action, Bill Clinton was liberal but created NAFTA which still pisses off the unions, Eisenhower was conservative but used the military to enforce desegregation while Wallace was liberal and fought desegregation.
Interesting...
I always took liberal to mean, in the classical sense, anyone who supports freedom. Which sounds beautiful on paper.
In the past few decades, liberals in American politics have largely become a group of conservatives who have never been robbed. Like fans of Disney Sunday movies, they always want the noble side of human nature to triumph, and it makes them sad to have to resort to force to resolve an issue.
They waste their time worrying about the death penalty, CIA secrets, and Dick Cheney instead of the important issues of the day, esp. regaining U.S. dominance in science, technology, and economics, not to mention dealing a death blow to the global terrorist network.
For the record, I am for the death penalty, I've always wanted to work for the CIA, and I never liked Dick Cheney...
I do like my political science professor's definition of government: "the institution that wields a monopoly on the legitimate use of force." Too many liberals ignore this definition of government.
BJK-
They waste their time worrying about the death penalty, CIA secrets, and Dick Cheney instead of the important issues of the day, esp. regaining U.S. dominance in science, technology, and economics, not to mention dealing a death blow to the global terrorist network.
This is as astonishingly twisted assertion as I've read here today.
I think your definition of liberal is entirely inadequate. As a consequence your characterizations are oversimplified and lack understanding of what being liberal is all about.
Now, regaarding "U.S. dominance in science, technology, and economics," it has been the Republicans that cut schooltaxes, that cut grants to univerisities, that block federal contributions to scientific research because it isn't in keeping with their religious beliefs, that still refuse to accept the otherwise universal belief that climate change is real, and that according to the CIA poses a real and immediate security threat to our country.
It was the economic policies of the last administration that put us in a collosal economic hole and at a disadvantage to countries like China, and that was before the crash. It was the foreign policies of the past administration that antagonized so many nations that had once been our allies. Take a look at who fought with us in the first Gulf War and did not in the second. Without close relationships with other nations of the world, we cannot hope to get control of terrorism.
The last administration had the opportunity to deal the proverbial "death blow to terrorism," and they blew it, thrice. First they short-armed the invasion of Afghanistan, allowing bin Laden and his organization to slip thorugh their fingers. Second they short-armed the campaign in Afghanistan, not only failing to apply sufficient effort to destroy the Taliban and al Qaeda there, but allowing a resurgance. And third, invading Iraq, resulting in the deaths of 4000 Americans, who knows how many tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis, and costing Americans over half-a-trillion dollars, weakening our economy, weakening our international standing, and weakening the resolve and morale of the American people.
"Thank God for Dick Cheney"? Shirley you jest!
It always amazes me to read posts from people that consider themselves traditional conservatives yet they think it is OK for Cheney to blatantly violate the constitution of the United States. You can't have it both ways. If you support Cheney in this, you are NEO CONS - not traditional conservatives. And you supported the Bush administration in growing government to a gargantuan size while doubling the national debt. It seems to me you have no concept of traditional conservatism.
mountainmike-1199289
"Thank God for Dick Cheney"? Shirley you jest!
No, I jest you not, and don't call me Shirley.
First, you have no idea if Cheney violated the Constitution or not. When involved in intelligence, any government has to have secrets, out of necessity. And like I have already noted, when the liberals were informed of the NSA surveillance program, they were fine with it...
...until they decided they could score political points, so they blabbed it to the NYT, who gleefully put it on the front page...
...knowing full well they were aiding the enemy in a time of war in the process.
So no, I don't blame Cheney at all. What has now become the Obama Cult has proven without doubt that they cannot be trusted with national security, if they think they can gain politically by revealing it to our enemies.
A lame attempt by friends of Pelosi to pull her ass out of the fire. Not going to work. She sucks.
A lame attempt by friends of Pelosi to pull her ass out of the fire. Not going to work. She sucks.
And i will agree with that, she and Reid have not done their jobs, they should go to jail just like Bush and Cheney.
Here Here JC
Shocking.
The evidence is relevant look at how huge bank buildings are in compared to the government because there the government that we are not supposed to no' The fake government is deposed -n- just like dick they will let him burn just like bush w soon will weather its by our law or the lord god almighty the corrupt mind will burn.
And this hidden secret will manifest Intel they let America' be what it was meant to be the land of god Almighty not the corrupt banks.
As in every child born of those that oppress us are taken by the hand of god.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |