AP source: Holder considering torture probe

Sat Jul 11, 2009 10:11 PM EDT

politics, us, barack-obama, white-house, eric-holder, holder, interrogations

WASHINGTON — Contrary to White House wishes, Attorney General Eric Holder may push forward with a criminal investigation into the Bush administration's harsh interrogation practices used on suspected terrorists.

Holder is considering whether to appoint a prosecutor and will make a final decision within the next few weeks, a Justice Department official told The Associated Press. The official spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak on a pending matter.

A move to appoint a criminal prosecutor is certain to stir partisan bickering that could create a distraction to President Barack Obama's efforts to push ambitious health care and energy reform.

Obama has repeatedly expressed reluctance to having a probe into alleged Bush-era abuses and resisted an effort by congressional Democrats to establish a "truth commission," saying the nation should be "looking forward and not backwards."

Justice Department spokesman Matt Miller said Holder planned to "follow the facts and the law."

"We have made no decisions on investigations or prosecutions, including whether to appoint a prosecutor to conduct further inquiry," he told the AP on Saturday. "As the attorney general has made clear, it would be unfair to prosecute any official who acted in good faith based on legal guidance from the Justice Department."

Newsweek magazine, which first reported the development, said Holder was aware of the political implications of having a probe and preferred not to create unnecessary trouble for the White House. Still, the attorney general was troubled by what he learned in reports about the treatment of prisoners at the CIA's "black sites."

The probe would focus in part on whether CIA personnel tortured terrorism suspects after Sept. 11, 2001. Holder has said those who acted within the government's legal guidance will not be prosecuted, but has left open the possibility of pursuing those who went beyond the guidance and broke the law.

Holder has discussed with his staff the possibility of a prosecutor, saying he needed someone with "gravitas and grit," the magazine reported. In the end, the attorney general asked for a list of 10 candidates, five from within the Justice Department and five from outside.

"I hope that whatever decision I make would not have a negative impact on the president's agenda," Holder told Newsweek. "But that can't be a part of my decision."

3 Votes
Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

Nedra Pickler's Column, All of Newsvine
Groups: none
Regions: Washington DC

Public Discussion (3)

What's this?

Who's leading the conversation?

This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.

0.9

{"commentId":8166020,"authorDomain":"punsons-flora"}

Punsons FloraDeleted

{"commentId":8168678,"authorDomain":"davepat2002"}

DavePat

While this stuff comes out a little at a time, it doesn't become any better smelling. Better to get it all out in the open and punish those who are responsible and move on from there. Until that is done, this issue will never be resolved.

{"commentId":8168678,"threadId":"624709","contentId":"3018511","authorDomain":"davepat2002"}

1 vote

#2 - Sun Jul 12, 2009 9:33 AM EDT

{"commentId":8172727,"authorDomain":"mimacarol"}

c anderson

Because it's a game of
good cop, bad cop." Obama publicly says he's opposed while telling Holder to go ahead behind closed doors.

Just simple politics 101, that's all.

It's like Obama saying he won't release the abuse photos. If he really didn't want them released, he would simply classify them. Notice he hasn't done that. So, they can be "leaked" and he can say,"It wasn't me!!!"

{"commentId":8172727,"threadId":"624709","contentId":"3018511","authorDomain":"mimacarol"}

#3 - Sun Jul 12, 2009 3:27 PM EDT

{"canLink":false,"threadId":"624709","isPrivate":false}

Backyard

AP source: Holder considering torture probe

Published to:

FUN STUFF:

COMPANY STUFF:

LEGAL STUFF:

Democrats push for probe into Bush policies	Associated Press	Sun Jul 12	67
Republicans resist Justice interrogation probe	Associated Press	Sun Jul 12	6
Report: Holder may yet initiate torture probe	Raw Story	Sat Jul 11	4