Senate panel OKs plan to revamp health care system

advertisement

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama achieved a milestone Wednesday when a Senate committee approved a plan to revamp the U.S. health care system. The Senate panel's action, which attracted no Republican votes, came as the president's campaign organization rolled out television ads to build support for his top domestic priority.

Obama met with Republicans at the White House in search of an elusive bipartisan compromise on his call to expand coverage to the nearly 50 million uninsured Americans as well as restrain spending increases in health care.

But the 13-10 party-line vote in the Senate health committee signaled a deepening rift in Congress. While Democrats respond to Obama's call for action with renewed determination, Republicans are using harsher words to voice their misgivings.

In the House, Democrats began pushing legislation through the first of three committees, although moderate and conservative members of the rank and file were demanding changes. In the Senate, lawmakers were considering fees on health insurance companies as a new source of potential financing for a $1 trillion package that's short on funds.

"We have delivered on the promise of real change," Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., said as he presided over the Senate health committee vote, alluding not only to his bill but also to Obama's campaign promise.

The president was in the Rose Garden for the latest in a daily series of public appeals to Congress to "step up and meet our responsibilities" and move legislation this summer. Obama also pushed his message in network television interviews, telling employers that his plan would require them to offer benefits or face a fine.

"If you can afford it, either give your employees health insurance or pay into the pot so that we're not subsidizing you," Obama told CBS News.

He also reversed a campaign stance against requiring everyone to buy health care coverage.

"I'm now in favor of some sort of individual mandate as long as there's a hardship exemption," he said. "If somebody truly just can't afford health insurance even with the subsidies that the government is now providing, we don't want to double penalize them."

Wednesday's Senate health committee vote "should make us hopeful — but it can't make us complacent," Obama said. "It should instead provide the urgency for both the House and the Senate to finish their critical work on health reform before the August recess."

The health panel's $615 billion measure would require individuals to get health insurance and employers to contribute to the cost. The bill calls for the government to provide financial assistance with premiums for individuals and families making up to four times the federal poverty level, or about $88,000 for a family of four, a broad cross-section of the middle class.

Obama wants the House and Senate to act on health care this summer so lawmakers can reconcile differences in their respective bills after Labor Day and put final legislation on his desk this fall.

Obama's all-out effort since he returned from his overseas trip last week has "galvanized things," Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., said.

Obama met at the White House with Republican Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Saxby Chambliss of Georgia, Bob Corker of Tennessee and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska.

"I urged him not to rush consideration of the bill," Collins told reporters later. "This bill is going to affect virtually every American. If the president tries to rush this through in the next two weeks ... I fear the process will be very divisive."

Another senior Republican, whom Obama courted only a few months ago to become his commerce secretary, also sounded alarm bells.

"This supposed health care fix is a health care failure and a disaster for the American people," Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., said. "We still have time to turn this process around instead of steamrolling our country into a sub-par government-run plan, but it will require serious action from Democrats and Republicans and a pledge to put politics aside."

The debate is taking on a campaign-like edge. In the cross-hairs are moderate senators, Democrats and Republicans, whose votes could make the difference in a closely divided Senate.

Obama's political organization launched a series of 30-second television ads on health care, which were to begin airing Wednesday in Washington and on cable TV nationally. A version will run for two weeks on local stations in Arkansas, Indiana, Florida, Louisiana, Maine, North Dakota, Nebraska and Ohio to prod senators to back the health care effort.

In the ads, private citizens describe problems they've had with the medical system and say it's time for action. The sponsor is Organizing for America, Obama's campaign organization, which has become part of the national Democratic Party. The group would not reveal the cost.

Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb., one of the lawmakers targeted, said the ads would not affect his decision. He has concerns that the evolving Democratic plans would give government too big a role.

Obama supports a government-run insurance plan to compete with private insurers, but he says he doesn't want to overturn the system of employer-sponsored health benefits that has served middle-class families for better than half a century. He wants the legislation to be fully paid for and the total cost kept around $1 trillion over 10 years.

"The American people have to recognize that there's no such thing as a free lunch, right?" Obama told NBC News. "So we can't just provide care to everybody that has no costs whatsoever."

Wednesday's vote in the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions committee took the Senate only part of the way toward passage of an overhaul bill. Another panel, the Finance Committee, still has to unveil its approach. The plan is to combine the two bills for a floor vote.

Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., met Wednesday with committee Democrats to try to settle how to pay for the bill and other issues.

"We're just not quite there," Baucus said after the meeting. Obama has pushed Baucus to have a bill ready by week's end, but Baucus declined to say whether he'd made a timetable commitment to the president.

Finance Committee members are considering a proposal from Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., that would raise $100 billion over 10 years by imposing new fees on health insurance companies.

___

Associated Press writers Erica Werner and Alan Fram contributed to this report.

  • 9 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
3.6
2.5
0.9
{"commentId":8176260,"authorDomain":"magnoliabel"}

Why do these Communist want to hurry with this hugh health care bill? Obama has already said he won't let his family or himself use this system but the rest of us will be forced to or will do jail time it we don't pay into it.

{"commentId":8176260,"threadId":"625115","contentId":"3019921","authorDomain":"magnoliabel"}
    Reply#1 - Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:41 PM EDT
    {"commentId":8179111,"authorDomain":"goseerich"}

    They want to "push this through" because they want all the campaighn money they are being promised by drug manufactures, HMO's and large employers that don't give all their employees medical coverage (like China Mart..... I mean Wal Mart). It will also allow millions of retired union workers to be taken out of the larger companies profits and added to tax payers responsibilities. Fed Med is a bad joke for tax payers and a boom for politicians and their greedneedy owners.

    {"commentId":8179111,"threadId":"625115","contentId":"3019921","authorDomain":"goseerich"}
    • 1 vote
    #1.1 - Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:23 PM EDT
    {"commentId":8185040,"authorDomain":"kealascoffee"}

    What's with the sly use of terms? "Communists", "China Mart"? Really? This health care bill is a plan to provide comprehensive health care to over 40 million of our fellow Americans. It is not expensive. It will lower costs in many different ways. First it will be in direct competition with for-profit health insurance companies. This will bring costs down. A public option will spread the cost of health care over millions of Americans. This is how insurance companies make their money - by lowering costs through a large pool of participants. The problem with insurance companies is that they don't share the lowered costs with their customers like you and me. The public option will. Also by creating a healthier America through earlier health check-ups, health education, consistent health care - all of us will need less visits to the hospitals. This will lower costs also. So the bill will cost something. But in terms of the savings over our current system, as a nation we will be saving a huge amount. Obama is already in a public health insurance that we pay for with our taxes. He won't need to opt into our public option. No one will go to jail for not opting into this plan. That's why it's called a public option health plan. If you don't want free health insurance, don't take it. Or if you are satisfied with your employer provided health insurance, stay with it. Providing a more competitive market is not communist. It is the most democratic thing we can do. And we need to push this through because this has been over twenty years in the making. We've been waiting for health care legislation for decades. Health insurance companies are paying out over a million dollars a day right now in lobby money to prevent this bill from passing. The top five CEOs for health insurance companies made between 10 and 30 million dollars each last year. What does that tell you? Where do you think this money comes from? How much longer do we need to wait for this?

    {"commentId":8185040,"threadId":"625115","contentId":"3019921","authorDomain":"kealascoffee"}
      #1.2 - Mon Jul 13, 2009 11:35 AM EDT
      {"commentId":8191320,"authorDomain":"goseerich"}

      Kealascoffee, When has our government got involved with anything and the price has gone down? History tells the story, you must be very young!

      {"commentId":8191320,"threadId":"625115","contentId":"3019921","authorDomain":"goseerich"}
      • 2 votes
      #1.3 - Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:21 PM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":8180917,"authorDomain":"ziggyarticles"}

      It's amazing how Republican Reps continue to utter words like: "Rash and Irresponsible"
      After 8 Years of Bush Tax Cuts & Extreme overspending, the party of "Fiscal Responsibility"
      (Responsible for ruining the Economy) - has lost its credibility to pass judgement on spending.

      Watch this program if you want to see how deep the 'Rabbit Hole' goes...

      FRONTLINE - Ten Trillion and Counting

      The American people spoke Loud & Clear
      They said "We Want Change"
      They voted FOR Nationalized Health Care

      It's about time we catch-up with The Rest of the Industrialized World!

      {"commentId":8180917,"threadId":"625115","contentId":"3019921","authorDomain":"ziggyarticles"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#2 - Mon Jul 13, 2009 3:44 AM EDT
      {"commentId":8248183,"authorDomain":"mybellyaches"}

      At least we had jobs.

      Try talking to people who live with Nationalized Health care and see how they have to wait years to be seen by a doctor and if you're elderly you're seen as someone who should just step aside and die. I've had first hand experience with grandparents who passed away in other countries because they didn't get the care that the elderly get here. The technology exists, they were just too old to justify using it to save their lives. If that's the care you want, then you can have it. But you may want to make sure you're an important person because if not, it won't be worth saving your life.

      Americans did NOT vote for nationalized health care.

      {"commentId":8248183,"threadId":"625115","contentId":"3019921","authorDomain":"mybellyaches"}
        #2.1 - Thu Jul 16, 2009 12:28 PM EDT
        {"commentId":8290172,"authorDomain":"ziggyarticles"}

        Highlighting issues that other countries may or may not have doesn't erase the problems that we have right here in the United States of America.

        People in our country are being burned by the "Health" Industry.
        There are over 180,000 Stories right here - Health Care: Stories for Americans

        It's also estimated that 1.5 Million people are going to go bankrupt in our country this year due to medical bills. Ironically, 0 People in places like Japan, Australia, New Zealand, and pretty much all of Europe will go bankrupt due to medical bills forever.

        When you figure out why there's a debate in our country about having a Healthcare Overhaul, and why UHC is widely accepted EVERYWHERE it exists, you might realize that Nationalized Care isn't as bad as the anti-health reformists make it out to be.

        2/3's of Americans are for UHC.
        Sorry, you may have missed it but we voted for "Change".

        {"commentId":8290172,"threadId":"625115","contentId":"3019921","authorDomain":"ziggyarticles"}
        • 1 vote
        #2.2 - Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:23 AM EDT
        Reply
        {"commentId":8181097,"authorDomain":"richardsaenz"}

        How is it that we are such idiots for allowing health care to be so expensive! health care should be free!!! like most other countries!!!! We are being ripped off, raped, and made out to be idiots by our government and its greed!!!!

        It's sad when insurance companies let people DIE because insurance companies feel some procedures are NOT necessary or experimental!!! How f*cked up is that?

        We need to stop this B.S. and get smart!!! Too many are dying because of greed!!!

        {"commentId":8181097,"threadId":"625115","contentId":"3019921","authorDomain":"richardsaenz"}
        • 1 vote
        Reply#3 - Mon Jul 13, 2009 5:02 AM EDT
        {"commentId":8248305,"authorDomain":"mybellyaches"}

        If healthcare people are so greedy, explain why most cutting edge medical technologies originate in the US. That's right, it's because there is an incentive to do so. Wow... imagine that. Kiss your healthcare goodbye because there won't be any incentive to make it better after this plan gets passed. Amazing how short sighted and discriminatory people can be. You just assume that people who work in healthcare are greedy. Get a clue - people who work in healthcare do so because they want to help people and improve their lives. If they are so greedy, there are plenty of industries where these smart people can go and make money that are not as closely regulated as the healthcare industry. Why don't you try going to medical school or get a Master's in Business Administration. Then maybe you can speak your mind. Otherwise, maybe you should stop talking about something you clearly don't know about.

        {"commentId":8248305,"threadId":"625115","contentId":"3019921","authorDomain":"mybellyaches"}
          #3.1 - Thu Jul 16, 2009 12:34 PM EDT
          Reply
          {"commentId":8181568,"authorDomain":"davidemeadows"}

          The enemy here are the Blue Dog Democrats who should be purged by local elections. Like the GOP. the BD's have been bought out.

          {"commentId":8181568,"threadId":"625115","contentId":"3019921","authorDomain":"davidemeadows"}
          • 2 votes
          Reply#4 - Mon Jul 13, 2009 7:29 AM EDT
          {"commentId":8204495,"authorDomain":"9sling"}

          Will this Health Bill and other changes made by the Obama admin stand if Obama actually gets impeached over his eligibility? I cant believe it but the Orly Taitz eligibility case will be heard by Federal court. HOLY COW!

          {"commentId":8204495,"threadId":"625115","contentId":"3019921","authorDomain":"9sling"}
            Reply#5 - Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:27 AM EDT
            {"commentId":8218047,"authorDomain":"jlunn1053"}

            I believe in a health care system but not if it is going to take 1/2 fo your monthly income. I had insurance until July 1s when my boss cancelled our health insurance across the board. I have been trying ever since to get insurance and they want anywhere from $550 to $700 a month for the premiums. That does not even cover the copay. I cannot afford that kind of premiums even if I wanted to. I would be living in my car, or for that matter in the street. The cost of medical care is totally out of control. I am to a point where I am going to let the government take care of me when my medications run out because I supposedly make too much money. I don't even clear $1,500 a month and they want me to pay half of that on medical premiums. The medical coverage in this country really sucks.

            {"commentId":8218047,"threadId":"625115","contentId":"3019921","authorDomain":"jlunn1053"}
              Reply#6 - Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:00 PM EDT
              {"commentId":8234799,"authorDomain":"GulfSider"}

              If the government ends up owning our health care then I want a healthcare Bill Of Rights. They need to promise to save your life at any cost. They need to promise quick and timely access to specialists and treatment. Without these promises (and perhaps with them) I fear for the sick and old of our nation

              {"commentId":8234799,"threadId":"625115","contentId":"3019921","authorDomain":"GulfSider"}
              • 3 votes
              Reply#7 - Wed Jul 15, 2009 4:40 PM EDT
              {"commentId":8248378,"authorDomain":"mybellyaches"}

              Since when has the government been known to do anything well or in a timely manner? A Bill of Rights is wishful thinking as they are the ones who will have to pass it. It's not cost effective to save your life at any cost. As far as specialists and treatments go, there won't be any incentive to become an MD and practice in the US so there goes your timeliness. And, treatments won't be cost effective either. So, again, wishful thinking. Promises the government will make but break as usual.

              {"commentId":8248378,"threadId":"625115","contentId":"3019921","authorDomain":"mybellyaches"}
                #7.1 - Thu Jul 16, 2009 12:38 PM EDT
                {"commentId":8318780,"authorDomain":"davidemeadows"}

                Gulf

                That is a good idea. Dems could save face and action could be taken thru the courts if nothing else.

                {"commentId":8318780,"threadId":"625115","contentId":"3019921","authorDomain":"davidemeadows"}
                  #7.2 - Tue Jul 21, 2009 8:04 AM EDT
                  Reply
                  {"commentId":8239688,"authorDomain":"rockymountains"}

                  Nothing is free and GulfSider hit the nail on the head. While the Medical, drug and insurance industries might be paying some in dollars, people with disabilities and the elderly will be paying with their (our) lives. Not many of us will never be elderly or disabled. Instead of helping the small number of people who need help the most, like those with terminal illness, the elderly and wheel chair bound, health care reform will provide alot of healthy people with a little bit of coverage. When we need medical care the most, we won't have it. Keep a close eye on what's happening with Medicare and Medicaid throughout this whole health care reform process.

                  {"commentId":8239688,"threadId":"625115","contentId":"3019921","authorDomain":"rockymountains"}
                    Reply#8 - Wed Jul 15, 2009 9:20 PM EDT
                    {"commentId":8248384,"authorDomain":"mybellyaches"}

                    This is a direct assault on personalized medicine. Hope you're status quo because if not, then it won't be cost effective to save you.

                    {"commentId":8248384,"threadId":"625115","contentId":"3019921","authorDomain":"mybellyaches"}
                      Reply#9 - Thu Jul 16, 2009 12:39 PM EDT
                      {"canLink":false,"threadId":"625115","isPrivate":false}
                      Leave a Comment:
                      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                      {"threadId":"625115","contentId":"3019921"}
                      Start TrackingStart Tracking
                      Stop TrackingStop Tracking