Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Senate panel OKs plan to revamp health care system

Sun Jul 12, 2009 2:20 PM EDT
business, politics, health, us, white-house, health-care, barack-obama, care, overhaul, house-democrats, health-care-overhaul, house-democratic, senate-finance-committee, finance-committee
Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar, Associated Press
Republican Congressman Roy Blunt says the Democrats' plan is wrong in a number of ways.
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 23 photos
<p>Vice President Joe Biden speaks about a White House deal with hospitals to help pay for President Barack Obama's overhaul of health care, Wednesday, July 8, 2009, in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building in Washington. At right is Rich Umbdenstock, President of the American Hospital Association.    (AP Photo/Ron Edmonds)</p>

Vice President Joe Biden speaks about a White House deal with hospitals to help pay for President Barack Obama's overhaul of health care, Wednesday, July 8, 2009, in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building in Washington. At right is Rich Umbdenstock, President of the American Hospital Association. (AP Photo/Ron Edmonds)

Advertise | AdChoices

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama achieved a milestone Wednesday when a Senate committee approved a plan to revamp the U.S. health care system. The Senate panel's action, which attracted no Republican votes, came as the president's campaign organization rolled out television ads to build support for his top domestic priority.

Obama met with Republicans at the White House in search of an elusive bipartisan compromise on his call to expand coverage to the nearly 50 million uninsured Americans as well as restrain spending increases in health care.

But the 13-10 party-line vote in the Senate health committee signaled a deepening rift in Congress. While Democrats respond to Obama's call for action with renewed determination, Republicans are using harsher words to voice their misgivings.

In the House, Democrats began pushing legislation through the first of three committees, although moderate and conservative members of the rank and file were demanding changes. In the Senate, lawmakers were considering fees on health insurance companies as a new source of potential financing for a $1 trillion package that's short on funds.

"We have delivered on the promise of real change," Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., said as he presided over the Senate health committee vote, alluding not only to his bill but also to Obama's campaign promise.

The president was in the Rose Garden for the latest in a daily series of public appeals to Congress to "step up and meet our responsibilities" and move legislation this summer. Obama also pushed his message in network television interviews, telling employers that his plan would require them to offer benefits or face a fine.

"If you can afford it, either give your employees health insurance or pay into the pot so that we're not subsidizing you," Obama told CBS News.

He also reversed a campaign stance against requiring everyone to buy health care coverage.

"I'm now in favor of some sort of individual mandate as long as there's a hardship exemption," he said. "If somebody truly just can't afford health insurance even with the subsidies that the government is now providing, we don't want to double penalize them."

Wednesday's Senate health committee vote "should make us hopeful — but it can't make us complacent," Obama said. "It should instead provide the urgency for both the House and the Senate to finish their critical work on health reform before the August recess."

The health panel's $615 billion measure would require individuals to get health insurance and employers to contribute to the cost. The bill calls for the government to provide financial assistance with premiums for individuals and families making up to four times the federal poverty level, or about $88,000 for a family of four, a broad cross-section of the middle class.

Obama wants the House and Senate to act on health care this summer so lawmakers can reconcile differences in their respective bills after Labor Day and put final legislation on his desk this fall.

Obama's all-out effort since he returned from his overseas trip last week has "galvanized things," Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., said.

Obama met at the White House with Republican Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Saxby Chambliss of Georgia, Bob Corker of Tennessee and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska.

"I urged him not to rush consideration of the bill," Collins told reporters later. "This bill is going to affect virtually every American. If the president tries to rush this through in the next two weeks ... I fear the process will be very divisive."

Another senior Republican, whom Obama courted only a few months ago to become his commerce secretary, also sounded alarm bells.

"This supposed health care fix is a health care failure and a disaster for the American people," Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., said. "We still have time to turn this process around instead of steamrolling our country into a sub-par government-run plan, but it will require serious action from Democrats and Republicans and a pledge to put politics aside."

The debate is taking on a campaign-like edge. In the cross-hairs are moderate senators, Democrats and Republicans, whose votes could make the difference in a closely divided Senate.

Obama's political organization launched a series of 30-second television ads on health care, which were to begin airing Wednesday in Washington and on cable TV nationally. A version will run for two weeks on local stations in Arkansas, Indiana, Florida, Louisiana, Maine, North Dakota, Nebraska and Ohio to prod senators to back the health care effort.

In the ads, private citizens describe problems they've had with the medical system and say it's time for action. The sponsor is Organizing for America, Obama's campaign organization, which has become part of the national Democratic Party. The group would not reveal the cost.

Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb., one of the lawmakers targeted, said the ads would not affect his decision. He has concerns that the evolving Democratic plans would give government too big a role.

Obama supports a government-run insurance plan to compete with private insurers, but he says he doesn't want to overturn the system of employer-sponsored health benefits that has served middle-class families for better than half a century. He wants the legislation to be fully paid for and the total cost kept around $1 trillion over 10 years.

"The American people have to recognize that there's no such thing as a free lunch, right?" Obama told NBC News. "So we can't just provide care to everybody that has no costs whatsoever."

Wednesday's vote in the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions committee took the Senate only part of the way toward passage of an overhaul bill. Another panel, the Finance Committee, still has to unveil its approach. The plan is to combine the two bills for a floor vote.

Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., met Wednesday with committee Democrats to try to settle how to pay for the bill and other issues.

"We're just not quite there," Baucus said after the meeting. Obama has pushed Baucus to have a bill ready by week's end, but Baucus declined to say whether he'd made a timetable commitment to the president.

Finance Committee members are considering a proposal from Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., that would raise $100 billion over 10 years by imposing new fees on health insurance companies.

___

Associated Press writers Erica Werner and Alan Fram contributed to this report.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: United States , Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (17)
magnoliabelDeleted
ZiggyArticles

It's amazing how Republican Reps continue to utter words like: "Rash and Irresponsible"
After 8 Years of Bush Tax Cuts & Extreme overspending, the party of "Fiscal Responsibility"
(Responsible for ruining the Economy) - has lost its credibility to pass judgement on spending.

Watch this program if you want to see how deep the 'Rabbit Hole' goes...

FRONTLINE - Ten Trillion and Counting

The American people spoke Loud & Clear
They said "We Want Change"
They voted FOR Nationalized Health Care

It's about time we catch-up with The Rest of the Industrialized World!

  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Mon Jul 13, 2009 3:44 AM EDT
mybellyaches

At least we had jobs.

Try talking to people who live with Nationalized Health care and see how they have to wait years to be seen by a doctor and if you're elderly you're seen as someone who should just step aside and die. I've had first hand experience with grandparents who passed away in other countries because they didn't get the care that the elderly get here. The technology exists, they were just too old to justify using it to save their lives. If that's the care you want, then you can have it. But you may want to make sure you're an important person because if not, it won't be worth saving your life.

Americans did NOT vote for nationalized health care.

    #2.1 - Thu Jul 16, 2009 12:28 PM EDT
    ZiggyArticles

    Highlighting issues that other countries may or may not have doesn't erase the problems that we have right here in the United States of America.

    People in our country are being burned by the "Health" Industry.
    There are over 180,000 Stories right here - Health Care: Stories for Americans

    It's also estimated that 1.5 Million people are going to go bankrupt in our country this year due to medical bills. Ironically, 0 People in places like Japan, Australia, New Zealand, and pretty much all of Europe will go bankrupt due to medical bills forever.

    When you figure out why there's a debate in our country about having a Healthcare Overhaul, and why UHC is widely accepted EVERYWHERE it exists, you might realize that Nationalized Care isn't as bad as the anti-health reformists make it out to be.

    2/3's of Americans are for UHC.
    Sorry, you may have missed it but we voted for "Change".

    • 1 vote
    #2.2 - Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:23 AM EDT
    Reply
    R.SAENZ

    How is it that we are such idiots for allowing health care to be so expensive! health care should be free!!! like most other countries!!!! We are being ripped off, raped, and made out to be idiots by our government and its greed!!!!

    It's sad when insurance companies let people DIE because insurance companies feel some procedures are NOT necessary or experimental!!! How f*cked up is that?

    We need to stop this B.S. and get smart!!! Too many are dying because of greed!!!

    • 1 vote
    Reply#3 - Mon Jul 13, 2009 5:02 AM EDT
    mybellyaches

    If healthcare people are so greedy, explain why most cutting edge medical technologies originate in the US. That's right, it's because there is an incentive to do so. Wow... imagine that. Kiss your healthcare goodbye because there won't be any incentive to make it better after this plan gets passed. Amazing how short sighted and discriminatory people can be. You just assume that people who work in healthcare are greedy. Get a clue - people who work in healthcare do so because they want to help people and improve their lives. If they are so greedy, there are plenty of industries where these smart people can go and make money that are not as closely regulated as the healthcare industry. Why don't you try going to medical school or get a Master's in Business Administration. Then maybe you can speak your mind. Otherwise, maybe you should stop talking about something you clearly don't know about.

      #3.1 - Thu Jul 16, 2009 12:34 PM EDT
      Reply
      pcbynature

      The enemy here are the Blue Dog Democrats who should be purged by local elections. Like the GOP. the BD's have been bought out.

      • 2 votes
      Reply#4 - Mon Jul 13, 2009 7:29 AM EDT
      9sling

      Will this Health Bill and other changes made by the Obama admin stand if Obama actually gets impeached over his eligibility? I cant believe it but the Orly Taitz eligibility case will be heard by Federal court. HOLY COW!

        Reply#5 - Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:27 AM EDT
        J Lunn

        I believe in a health care system but not if it is going to take 1/2 fo your monthly income. I had insurance until July 1s when my boss cancelled our health insurance across the board. I have been trying ever since to get insurance and they want anywhere from $550 to $700 a month for the premiums. That does not even cover the copay. I cannot afford that kind of premiums even if I wanted to. I would be living in my car, or for that matter in the street. The cost of medical care is totally out of control. I am to a point where I am going to let the government take care of me when my medications run out because I supposedly make too much money. I don't even clear $1,500 a month and they want me to pay half of that on medical premiums. The medical coverage in this country really sucks.

          Reply#6 - Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:00 PM EDT
          GulfSider

          If the government ends up owning our health care then I want a healthcare Bill Of Rights. They need to promise to save your life at any cost. They need to promise quick and timely access to specialists and treatment. Without these promises (and perhaps with them) I fear for the sick and old of our nation

          • 3 votes
          Reply#7 - Wed Jul 15, 2009 4:40 PM EDT
          mybellyaches

          Since when has the government been known to do anything well or in a timely manner? A Bill of Rights is wishful thinking as they are the ones who will have to pass it. It's not cost effective to save your life at any cost. As far as specialists and treatments go, there won't be any incentive to become an MD and practice in the US so there goes your timeliness. And, treatments won't be cost effective either. So, again, wishful thinking. Promises the government will make but break as usual.

            #7.1 - Thu Jul 16, 2009 12:38 PM EDT
            pcbynature

            Gulf

            That is a good idea. Dems could save face and action could be taken thru the courts if nothing else.

              #7.2 - Tue Jul 21, 2009 8:04 AM EDT
              Reply
              choochoo-1167113

              Nothing is free and GulfSider hit the nail on the head. While the Medical, drug and insurance industries might be paying some in dollars, people with disabilities and the elderly will be paying with their (our) lives. Not many of us will never be elderly or disabled. Instead of helping the small number of people who need help the most, like those with terminal illness, the elderly and wheel chair bound, health care reform will provide alot of healthy people with a little bit of coverage. When we need medical care the most, we won't have it. Keep a close eye on what's happening with Medicare and Medicaid throughout this whole health care reform process.

                Reply#8 - Wed Jul 15, 2009 9:20 PM EDT
                mybellyaches

                This is a direct assault on personalized medicine. Hope you're status quo because if not, then it won't be cost effective to save you.

                  Reply#9 - Thu Jul 16, 2009 12:39 PM EDT
                  Leave a Comment:
                  You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                  You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                  (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                  Newsvine Privacy Statement
                  As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                  FUN STUFF:
                  • Leaderboard |
                  • E-Mail Alerts |
                  • Top of the Vine |
                  • Newsvine Live |
                  • Newsvine Archives |
                  • The Greenhouse
                  COMPANY STUFF:
                  • Code of Honor |
                  • Company Info |
                  • Contact Us |
                  • Jobs |
                  • User Agreement |
                  • Privacy Policy |
                  • About our ads
                  LEGAL STUFF:
                  • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com