Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Judge sets hearing on BofA-SEC settlement

Mon Aug 3, 2009 1:28 PM EDT
us-news, business, politics, us, of, america, sec, bank-of-america, exchange-commission, merrill-lynch
Ieva M. Augstums, AP Business Writer

FILE - In this May 7, 2009 file photo, people move past a Bank of America branch is shown in downtown Philadelphia, Thursday, May 7, 2009. Bank of America on Monday, Aug. 3, 2009 agreed to pay a $33 million penalty to settle government charges that it misled investors about Merrill Lynch's plans to pay bonuses to its employees. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke, file)

Advertise | AdChoices

CHARLOTTE — A judge has ordered a hearing on a $33 million proposed settlement between the Securities and Exchange Commission and Bank of America Corp. over executive bonuses.

Bank of America had agreed earlier this week to pay the penalty to settle government charges that it misled investors about Merrill Lynch's plans to pay bonuses to its executives.

But the settlement is subject to court approval, and Judge Jed S. Rakoff declined to grant it pending a hearing on Monday.

In a statement late Wednesday, Rakoff said the proposed settlement "would leave uncertain the truth of the very serious allegations made in the complaint."

In seeking approval to buy Merrill, Bank of America told investors that Merrill would not pay year-end bonuses without Bank of America's consent. But in its complaint filed with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the SEC said Bank of America had already authorized New York-based Merrill to pay up to $5.8 billion in bonuses and didn't share that information with shareholders.

That meant a statement Bank of America mailed to 283,000 shareholders of both companies about the Merrill deal "materially false and misleading," the SEC contends.

Bank of America agreed on Monday to settle the charges without admitting or denying the allegations.

Bank of America, along with Citigroup Inc. and insurance giant American International Group Inc., is among the largest recipients of government aid. It has received $45 billion from the federal $700 billion bank rescue program.

In his statement Wednesday, the judge said the proposed settlement between Bank of America and the SEC "in no way specifies the basis for the $33 million figure or whether any of this money is derived directly or indirectly" from public funds advanced to Bank of America as part of its bail out.

It is not the first time Rakoff has refused to rubber-stamp a major SEC settlement. In 2003, he put the brakes on a proposed $500 million settlement with WorldCom Inc. for massive accounting fraud.

Lawyers for WorldCom and the SEC pleaded with Rakoff to sign off on the fine. He asked about options including giving shareholders a new stake in the company, called MCI once it emerged from bankruptcy.

WorldCom eventually paid $750 million in cash to the SEC and set aside MCI stock for former WorldCom investors.

Spokesmen for both the SEC and Bank of America said their parties are looking forward to appearing before the court and addressing any questions the judge may have regarding the settlement.

Charlotte, N.C.-based Bank of America agreed to purchase Merrill in a deal that was hastily arranged Sept. 13-14, 2008, the same weekend that Lehman Brothers collapsed. Bank of America CEO Ken Lewis and Merrill Lynch CEO John Thain announced the deal Sept. 15.

The acquisition came as Lehman's collapse caused panic in the financial markets and investment banks such as Merrill faced billions of losses on soured mortgage investments.

Merrill ended up paying $3.6 billion in bonuses in 2008, the SEC said, even though it lost $27.6 billion that year, a record for the firm. The bonuses amount to nearly 12 percent of the $50 billion that Bank of America paid for Merrill.

The acquisition and bonus payments have also caused the bank internal issues and has angered some shareholders. Lewis' management ability has been questioned and shareholders stripped him of his chairman's title in April.

However, Richard Bove of Rochdale Research said the Merrill merger has actually benefited the bank.

"The stock price is up from the time of the merger," Bove wrote in a research note Thursday. "Net conclusion, Bank of America's shareholders benefited from the deal."

Shares of Bank of America rose 4 cents to $16.70 Thursday. When the deal closed, the stock traded at $13.

___

AP Business Writer Daniel Wagner in Washington contributed to this report.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Ieva M. Augstums's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (14)
MichelleUT

Only $33M? Hmm, not enough for this breed of swine.

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Mon Aug 3, 2009 1:44 PM EDT
Jay Butler

Understand that these bonuses are not just going to executives. Many of them are going to workers who might earn a small base salary (like $25,000). The bonus is actually performance pay that gets them into industry competitive compensation for their level of skill/performance.

There are thousands of individuals being paid from that pool of bonus money.

Are you against paying the people who produce revenue for the firm? I think that the people who produce the revenue should be paid well and those that lose it, like Stanley O'Neal, should not be (and should be fired sooner).

  • 1 vote
#1.1 - Mon Aug 3, 2009 2:37 PM EDT
MichelleUT

I think when you're hurting for cash, perhaps bonuses should not be a priority. Especially when getting government money.

Truthfully, I'm more pissed off that they lied to their shareholders and got such a small fine for it.

  • 1 vote
#1.2 - Mon Aug 3, 2009 2:39 PM EDT
Sandra-293107

Jay Butler, you have NO idea what you're talking about. Bonuses are ONLY paid to Manager-level positions, or Sales Teams; never to the $25K person who does most of the work.

Shame on you!

PS: And, no I'm not blue collar; I've been a white collar worker for more than two decades.

    #1.3 - Mon Aug 3, 2009 2:50 PM EDT
    Sandra-293107

    Correction: Manager-level positions and ABOVE .... or to the Sales Teams (which, quite frankly share in only a fraction of the dividends)

      #1.4 - Mon Aug 3, 2009 3:17 PM EDT
      Average_Guy

      Sandra - sorry to burst your bubble, but Jay DOES have an idea. I have worked for a number of companies that paid bonus to me when I was a worker. I work for one now.

      MichelleUT - why all the hostility toward banks? Have you fallen prey to the Liberal viewpoint that profit is bad? What does it matter how much Bank of America pays in bonus, they post several billions of dollars of profit each year (which means after bonus and taxes). If BAC violated the law then they were duly fined by the gov't (SEC). That's the end of it. You don't like it - bank somewhere else. That is your right as a consumer.

      Typical gov't anyway - they forced BAC to buy Merril after BAC tried to back out - and then came behind and fined them for it - nice!

      • 1 vote
      #1.5 - Mon Aug 3, 2009 3:21 PM EDT
      MichelleUT

      I don't back at BOA for a reason. You get government money, you don't get a bonus.

      • 1 vote
      #1.6 - Mon Aug 3, 2009 3:39 PM EDT
      Andromeda-510639

      A bit of camouflage may be apropos; instead of giving bonuses simply increase salaries to an exorbitant level; same effect just a different set of smoke and mirrors.

        #1.7 - Mon Aug 3, 2009 3:51 PM EDT
        Jay Butler

        you have NO idea what you're talking about. Bonuses are ONLY paid to Manager-level positions, or Sales Teams; never to the $25K person who does most of the work.

        Sandra: I know more about this particular situation than you think. What do you think base salary is for many of these sales people? It is about as low as it can be with the expectation that a reasonable salary can be attained via performance-based bonuses.

        If you are going to be angry about ML, direct your anger at Stan O'Neal and his team that decimated the previously strong firm.

        • 1 vote
        #1.8 - Mon Aug 3, 2009 6:01 PM EDT
        Sandra-293107

        Jay Butler and Average Guy, OK, I stand corrected. Yes, bonuses may be paid out to employees across the board. I was thinking of big $$$ bonuses being paid out to the executives.

          #1.9 - Mon Aug 3, 2009 6:05 PM EDT
          Reply
          enigma

          As usual, Wall Street engages in criminal activity and suffers nothing. 33 million? not even a drop in the bucket -- and they'll probably use taxpayer money to pay it (if they pay any of it) anyway.

            Reply#2 - Mon Aug 3, 2009 2:43 PM EDT
            Andromeda-510639

            My question is why even bother to impose a fine? This is a slap on the wrist; is this what our government views as real punishment for misleading investors and the public? This penalty is so harsh it must have corporations shaking in their boots; and it sends a great message: whatever you want to do, do it because the worst that could happen is a very superficial, if not choreographed, chastisement.

            Why aren't small and mid-size businesses accorded the same type of treatment when subject to penalties of any kind? Because we can afford to have them fail; even though they generate 80% of our nation's jobs? This action is a disgrace.

            BofA, this is a no-brainer, pay the $33 million and the $5.8 billion given in bonuses is forgiven; is there something wrong with this picture? The settlement represents 0.6% of the total payout. Anyway, it's a great deal, jump at it; particularly since BofA will use our TARP money to pay for it.

            Maybe the reason the fine is so low is because the SEC realizes that BofA will use its government bailout money to settle the matter? In fact, both Merrill Lynch and BofA should have been permitted to fail, to go bankrupt from the beginning - the markets would have made the necessary corrections.

            • 2 votes
            Reply#3 - Mon Aug 3, 2009 2:53 PM EDT
            Bubba-939441

            Banks and auto companies are now government entities.  Government can impose wage and price controls on them.  It's the way socialism works. 

              Reply#4 - Mon Aug 3, 2009 3:07 PM EDT
              boo-1253308

              what a fatbank account they have

                Reply#5 - Mon Aug 3, 2009 7:37 PM EDT
                Leave a Comment:
                You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                Newsvine Privacy Statement
                As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                FUN STUFF:
                • Leaderboard |
                • E-Mail Alerts |
                • Top of the Vine |
                • Newsvine Live |
                • Newsvine Archives |
                • The Greenhouse
                COMPANY STUFF:
                • Code of Honor |
                • Company Info |
                • Contact Us |
                • Jobs |
                • User Agreement |
                • Privacy Policy |
                • About our ads
                LEGAL STUFF:
                • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com