Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Arkansas family prepares for baby No. 19

Tue Sep 1, 2009 8:41 AM EDT
life, only-on-msnbc-com, children, child, michelle, josh, vieira, parenting--family, duggar
msnbc.com News — Mike Celizic, msnbc.com - Only on msnbc.com

TODAY

Advertise | AdChoices

— After 18 children, Michelle Duggar thought she knew what it feels like to be pregnant. But even she was caught by surprise to learn that just eight months after she gave birth to Jordyn-Grace, Duggar baby No. 19 is on the way.

“We are thrilled to announce that we found out we’re expecting our 19th child,” a glowing Michelle Duggar told TODAY’s Meredith Vieira Tuesday from the family’s home in Springdale, Ark.

Michelle and family patriarch Jim Bob Duggar sat on the staircase of their home, surrounded by their 18 other children. Behind them and in the center were eldest son Josh and his wife, Anna, who is expecting the first Duggar grandchild — a girl — on Oct. 18.

The name game
They, too, had an announcement: They’ve settled on a name for their baby, and it starts with an M.

Vieira had been holding out hope that the girl would be named for her. “Obviously I would love that. It would make me a very happy person,” she said.

But it is not to be: Josh and Anna’s baby will be christened Mackynzie Renee. (Josh has a cousin named Mackynzie, and Anna's middle name is Renee.)

However, Josh told Vieira not to despair, given the Duggar talent for having children. “There is hope for ‘Meredith’ still,” he assured her.

With just six weeks to go before delivery, Anna said, “I’m feeling good. I’m feeling really pregnant. It’s neat. It’s exciting. I definitely have great role models, and it’s neat to watch Mrs. Duggar teach and love her children.”

“Children are a blessing and a gift if you raise them right, and I think my parents have definitely shown that,” added Josh.

Although she was smiling and chipper, Michelle said she’s dealing with the usual first-trimester nausea. “I’m feeling sick and tired, which is a good way to be feeling about right now,” she told Vieira. “I always tell myself that’s a good way to be, because that means good things are happening.”

“We are so excited about this new arrival, and also our grandbaby coming,” added Jim Bob.

Running the numbers
The number 18 is big with the family right now. Not only do they have 18 children, the newest baby is due on March 18. Josh and Anna’s child is due on Oct. 18. And Jim Bob celebrated his birthday on July 18.

The Duggars, who star in the long-running reality show “18 Kids and Counting” on TLC, will have a grandchild who is older than their own child.

Vieira asked if that would be strange.

“My sister and my mother were having babies at the same time, so I have nieces and nephews older than me,” said Michelle, who is the youngest of seven. “It was a great time because we really have close relationships with my nieces and nephews.”

The newest Duggar is coming a bit ahead of schedule. The average gap between the children is 18 months, and Michelle was just eight months away from giving birth to Jordyn when she noticed her body wasn’t quite right: She was following the Weight Watchers program to shed the weight she’d put on in her latest pregnancy, but wasn’t losing any pounds. Also, Jordyn would fuss every time she nursed, which wasn’t normal.

Michelle said those two clues should have registered, but they didn’t. Finally, she took a home pregnancy test and learned that, at the age of 42, she was pregnant again.

Michelle has now been pregnant 147 months of her life, with five more to go. That’s 12-plus years and counting.

For those who are counting, the Duggars report that they have changed an estimated 90,000 diapers and do approximately 200 loads of laundry a month. They feed their entire family on less than $2,000 a month and say that they live debt-free.

Jim Bob Duggar has one sibling and Michelle is the youngest of seven. When they got married, they thought they’d have two or three children. Not wanting to have a child immediately, Michelle went on the birth control pill as they waited three years to have their first child, Josh, who is now married and expecting his first child.

After Josh was born, Michelle went back on the pill. She got pregnant anyway and suffered a miscarriage, which her physician told them was probably caused by the pill. As conservative Christians, they decided after that to let God decide how many children they would have.

They adhere to a Christian movement called Quiverfull, whose members take seriously the biblical exhortation to be fruitful and multiply and believe that every child is a gift from Providence.

All the children are home-schooled and all learn to play the violin and piano. The older children help raise the younger ones under a buddy system. Jim Bob, a former state legislator, is involved in a number of businesses, including commercial real estate.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Mike Celizic's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: WTF?
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (1480)
  • WTF? (0)
Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 32
Stevo-Deleted
Bren-305313

I just can't help but wonder why.

  • 13 votes
#2 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:11 AM EDT
falconer33

"They adhere to a Christian movement called Quiverfull, whose members take seriously the Biblical exhortation to be fruitful and multiply and believe that every child is a gift from Providence."

They also take the idea of a womens place is in the kitchen and submits to the husband to the same level. I've read some really horrible stories of women who escape the movement.

  • 14 votes
#2.1 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:21 AM EDT
addiem

And, it's a bountiful tax deduction, wow.

  • 17 votes
#2.2 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:40 AM EDT
Porkbevr

Quiverfull = nutcases, a cult - should be investigated and shut down.

  • 10 votes
#2.3 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 11:19 AM EDT
Shan-man

It should NOT be that way though, Addiem!

Definitely a gene pool that needs to be diluted or washed away!

These people are NOT acting Responsibly OR Rationally!

If one parent ends up out of work, 90% of this family will end up on Welfare!

Keep your Richard in your pants.....OOPS too late that boy has been born already!

  • 5 votes
#2.4 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 11:22 AM EDT
Regina-1126387

Tax deduction? Do you have kids? because if you did, you would know the maximum deduction is only 2 or 3, no matter how many kids you have! Be nice :)

  • 2 votes
#2.5 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 11:22 AM EDT
Upscheidt Creek

a cult - should be investigated and shut down

Obviously you don't know anything about this family. He is a successful business man in the area that they live in. Granted, it's not something most people would want to do (have that large of a family)......but... a cult? Typical....start calling people names and labeling them.

  • 4 votes
#2.6 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 11:51 AM EDT
Jay Thomson

So many sad people on here that would never admit to any kind of jealousy of the stability of this family. It's pretty clear that this entire family is happy in their situation. Some will be honest and wish they had that...others will only hide their sadness behind insults.

  • 5 votes
#2.7 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 11:53 AM EDT
kj031056-1

Regina, you can deduct as many children as you have, that meet the requirements for deduction. You have to be able to prove you provide over 1/2 of their support, that they lived with you for over 1/2 the years.

I work with a young man (33), he and his wife have been married for 11 years and have 10 children. He doesn't have any federal withholding deducted from his check because he has all the children to deduct from his taxes.

  • 5 votes
#2.8 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 12:27 PM EDT
Gayle-324397

Jay - I agree with most of what you are saying.

I don't, however, believe these (me included) posters are Jealous. That word is so over used!! If you don't agree with someone, you always get labeled jealous, especially on these boards.

I do admire the Duggars for their happiness and their stability. That is one thing (stability) my former husband and I could never offer our 2 kids. My sisters and I had stability while growing up. Security, stability. Nothing can beat that!

I do think they (Duggars) take the Scriptures too seriously. I don't think God wants us to have a colony all on our own. There are too many people already. While they will never go hungry or be homeless. they will suffer limitations that a smaller family will not. And I do think 19 kids are too many. I think more than 4 are too many.

Especially since they have been on TV - Now it just seems to be a game they are playing. Seriously, I'm a woman and I cannot even imagine being pregnant that many times!! I can't believe how they find time to have SEX!?!?!

Of course, This is AMERICA, where we are free to procreate at our will and wouldn't want it any other way. And what the Duggars do are their business. As long as they are happy with their actions and continue to take responsiblity for those actions, I say more power to them!!

But I won't watch their TV show. Somehow, TV, in my mind, has made them less believable. I mean, would they continue to have children if they didn't get to announce it on TV and then have a TV show about how many children they have?

  • 7 votes
#2.9 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 12:41 PM EDT
Jay Thomson

Gayle, I understand what you mean. Not everyone is making fun of them out of jealousy. I understand that some disagree, but many are disagreeing without understanding. I realize we all have been guilty of that. It's human ignorance. Don't you think God is happy that there are more people on this earth that trust him and rely on him as a result of what this family has done? This family is very different from the whole Octomom situation. I won't say they don't have their problems, but you can see they have consistency.

  • 4 votes
#2.10 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 12:52 PM EDT
verdugo60

Yeah, Jay, they're "consistent" all right. Jealous? Pleeeeeze! I can't speak for the rest of the women out there, but I'd rather be tied to an anthill in Baghdad or run naked through the Mall of Americas than have 19 kids.

  • 14 votes
#2.11 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 1:28 PM EDT
JustThinkin

I'd be curious if the whole family ever got to go on vacation together? Via bus I guess? How do you find something that entertains the span of ages? If the older children still have to "parent' the younger children even then, is that really a vacation?

What would happen to all of these children if something were to happen to either of the parents? As a parent we owe our children that we are responsible. Having this many pregnancies has to be very hard on the mother's body. I just believe it is selfish on the part of the parents.

  • 5 votes
#2.12 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 1:30 PM EDT
lauriesarno

Gosh....this family reproduces faster than my zucchini plant produces zucchini!

  • 6 votes
#2.13 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 3:01 PM EDT
jojo-471242

"Don't you think God is happy that there are more people on this earth that trust him and rely on him as a result of what this family has done?"

Jay Thomson: Just so you know, for future postings, when referring to God, it's "Him" not "him".

  • 9 votes
#2.14 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 3:18 PM EDT
Jay Thomson

Good catch jojo. Consistency in grammar is important to communication in our society. I try to uphold that as I preach it.

  • 2 votes
#2.15 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 3:23 PM EDT
Jay Thomson

For all of you who are worried about the population, instead of trying to stop this couple from producing hard working American citizens, why not gas the murderers and rapists in the prison system instead of paying tens of thousands of dollars a year for them to live in a cage... Or could you people really be that sick that you'd rather stop people from having children like China does?

  • 7 votes
#2.16 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 3:35 PM EDT
Sepulchre

When it finally reaches the point where human existance is dependant on our keeping our population under control because of mass starvation, you may change your mind. We have already exceeded our carrying capacity. At the exponential rate of population growthg already far out pacing the growth of food production and capacity, it is only a matter of time.

  • 6 votes
#2.17 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 4:17 PM EDT
Jay Thomson

I may change my mind when I damn well please. In the meantime, I recommend looking at the prison population that remains alive because of our tax dollars. How stupid do we look when complaining about a family of 19, law abiding citizens, taking care of themselves, when we pay for murderers and rapists to live in prisons!!! I wouldn't expect people to be yelling at the Muslims that are having millions of babies in different countries. Why make such a fuss over a few people doing it here?

  • 6 votes
#2.18 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 4:20 PM EDT
Sepulchre

You do know that if you killed every person in prison it woudn't even touch on the number of population growth we are experienceing right? Even if you killed every one of them around the world? You get how population growth is mantained, correct? You have seen the world wide numbers, correct?

This isn't an us of them thing, when it is finally fully felt it will be an all of the human race thing.

  • 1 vote
#2.19 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 4:22 PM EDT
MTB-934099

Bren, they are trying to take over the state. That's why they are "doing it". Or maybe they're just severely damaged material...

    #2.20 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 4:28 PM EDT
    Aggie-345886

    And people criticzed the Catholics!!! I certainly don't think it's a good idea to have that many children, (or even close) but what the heck, it's no skin off my nose. If they can afford it, and manage their family and the children know they are each one loved, how about we all just worry about our own kids.

    • 2 votes
    #2.21 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 6:02 PM EDT
    Pat-#@!&!#@

    stevo, that was hillarious and

    phlan, are you saying Jesus made her pregnant? :-)

    • 1 vote
    #2.22 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 6:20 PM EDT
    Sheri-78

    Jay, everyone here has a right to be appalled by their actions...and the only person I believe is jealous is Michelle. How convenient for this pregnancy to happen right as her daughter-in-law is getting deserved attention for her first child. Michelle is taking the attention to be taken off the first grandchild so she can be pampered again. She and her husband are selfish. Just because these families are all sunshine and roses on television doesn't mean something isn't happening behind closed doors. People get upset because of classrooms being overcrowded because the children cannot get the attention they need. Who in their right mind is going to believe that a family that has a sign-up sheet to have one-on-one time with their parents while the older children raise the younger ones while mom's planning the next baby shower is stable?

    • 2 votes
    #2.23 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 10:10 AM EDT
    Carin C

    Gayle-324397... Your comment at #2.9 was great other then the last paragraph. I disagree that this family has anything to prove for the TV show or anyone else when it comes to their choice to have children. They are not J&K, who are being supported by their children. The Duggar's made good financial investments long before doing the TV show.

    Jay Thomson... You made an excellent post at #2.10. I have agreed with some of your other posts over all and I understand where you are coming from.

    • 1 vote
    #2.24 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 10:23 AM EDT
    Kshark

    Jay Thomson-

    For all of you who are worried about the population, instead of trying to stop this couple from producing hard working American citizens,

    Well yeah it is hard working being a baby factory.

    Have you actually read ANYTHING about Quiverfull? You do realize the girls will never go to college or university. They will be made to breed. There is no contraception, no pre-natal care, surgical sterilizations are reversed, it is sacrificing your body for more babies, etc

    There mission statement

    Missionary effort

    Quiverfull's principal authors and its adherents also describe their motivation as a missionary effort to raise up many Christian children to affect the world for the cause of the Christian religion.[2] Its distinguishing viewpoint is to eagerly receive children as blessings from God,[2][5] eschewing all forms of contraception, including natural family planning and sterilization.[6][18]

    wiki

    I'm all for happy, stable families, just not ones that include double digits of kids. It is too many.

    The female is supposed to get pregnant every 2 years, in that time frame. It is like a breeding cycle of non-human animals. The female is well basically like a breeding slave.

    The story of Vyckie Garrison a former follower that got out. Interesting information of her life within and given the fact her husband had a work accident and that was their source of income, and be apparently became abusive.

      #2.25 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 12:21 PM EDT
      Elistra

      All the intelligent, self-respecting women I've ever known fit into one of two religious categories.

      1) Christian, but extremely liberal in biblical interpretation, or

      2) Non-christian and quite satisfied with their choice.

      Reactionary nutballs like Quiverful only serve to illustrate the reason why, imo. :P

      • 1 vote
      #2.26 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 10:49 PM EDT
      Reply
      Helen in GA, USA

      These folks are "screw" balls......I feel so sorry for the kids, just a number. They may as well name this one "Nineteen".....they are using religion as an excuse for a lack of birth control....sheer stupidity.

      • 22 votes
      #3 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:11 AM EDT
      Kimberly-1306067

      I think there is something in the bible about gluttony. She and her husband need to think that just because her uterus will accomodate yet another pregnancy, that maybe it just isn't that good of an idea! Maybe instead of birth control, either of them should think about getting sterilized. God made man, man can sterilize one of these crazy parents? Sounds good to me.

        #3.1 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:31 AM EDT
        genuinerysk

        They use the "buddy system" to raise the kids, which means the parents gave control of the newborns over to one of the other kids to raise. That is ridiculous. They quit taking responsibility for the children that they create a long time ago. That is just plain lazy and as far as I am concerned, amoral. After all, if you are going to give birth to these children, shouldn't you take responsibility for their care and upbringing? That's why they keep having kids, because they found a way to get out of taking care of them.

        I wish the media would quit glorifying abnormally large families like this, the Octomom, and John and Kate. There is nothing to aspire to with these families. It's disgusting.

        • 23 votes
        #3.2 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:32 AM EDT
        Donna-397760

        I totally agree. Children are not cattle, you shouldn't just shoot them out and run them down the chute to count them. They are human beings that need love and attention. How can you possible give that number of children all the attention they need. It's impossible, and these parents are totally irresponsible. Shame on them!

        • 18 votes
        #3.3 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:36 AM EDT
        Simplistic Reality

        How the hell does one transport 19 kids around....... do they have a school bus? Can you imagine how much medical bills must be? The house itself? Food, clothes, diapers, presents... my God. You'd have to be rich to just survive day to day.

        • 10 votes
        #3.4 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 11:44 AM EDT
        Jay Thomson

        Donna, it's not impossible. This family has done it. It just takes hard work and consistency; something that our pussified country is now deathly afraid of. Try watching the show a few times and you'll see what I mean. It's not impossible, it's just really really hard to do nowadays, but they are actually able to do it.

        Simplistic Reality,
        They travel in a tour bus type motor home for trips and they buy in bulk to save money. Yes, they do have money, but look at what they spend it on. When you see that they don't buy much of the useless crap that the rest of us buy, you'll see how they can afford to live. It's budgeting and being wise with your resources. Something people used to do in our country 100 years ago.

        • 6 votes
        #3.5 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 11:57 AM EDT
        Dessa-817148

        And I'll bet the husband controls all of the money too. I'm glad they are able to live on such small amounts of money, but it sounds like abuse to me and I'll bet he LOVES to control his wife and kids!

        • 5 votes
        #3.6 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 12:32 PM EDT
        Jay Thomson

        Again, watch the show and you'll see that's not the case. We live in a society that loves to fight against this type of family that has specific roles. It's easy for a lot of people to assume this is about control, but if you look, there are actually men out there who love and don't want to simply control their wives, and there are women out there who respect and do not want to control their husbands. Some people just believe in a basic balance and when they agree on it and follow it, they have a happy, successful family of which people quickly become jealous.

        • 4 votes
        #3.7 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 12:48 PM EDT
        Stevie McMichael

        I'm sure what you see on the show does not reflect their real lives. The fact that they HAVE a show is pretty disgusting to me, since you know that's how they make most of their money. They're exploiting their gigantic family.

        • 7 votes
        #3.8 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 1:22 PM EDT
        smith-j

        re: 3.3 Simplistic-the duggars bought the land they live on a long time ago. they designed and built the house themselves. the entire family built that house. they installed a commercial kitchen by buying used appliances. they do things like make their own soap, shampoo and laundry detergent and household cleaners. clothes and shoes are purchased 2nd hand. they have a huge garden to grow their own vegetables (weather permitting) and buy in bulk with fistfuls of coupons. they travel in a 1993 prevost 15 bed tour bus (also bought 2nd hand). and they live debt free. their income is from commercial land rentals (a business they started right after they got married), their show and books they've written.

        • 5 votes
        #3.9 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 2:06 PM EDT
        Simplistic Reality

        Oh! Is that the family that had a special on TV about there kids and the house? If so I have seen it. Was nuts. Kitchen and storage area looked like a restaurant size thing. Was crazyness.

        • 4 votes
        #3.10 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 2:09 PM EDT
        Jeanmarie-456447

        Another thing that irritates meabout this family, that no one else has commented on, so far, is the fact that they all the kids names have to start with the letter J. That drives me nuts. Maybe if they sent the kids to school, they would find out that there are 25 other letters in the alphabet.

        • 4 votes
        #3.11 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 5:05 PM EDT
        Carin C

        Many people use that same system when naming their children. It's a choice and not something to be concerned with. Some parents give their children very difficult names that are hard to pronounce and even more difficult for the child to spell it.

        Neither parent seems to have any kind of control issues, with money or other areas in their life. Just a lot of respect for each other. We are not use to seeing this in our everyday lives so I can understand why some would thing this way.

        • 2 votes
        #3.12 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 10:38 AM EDT
        Mainebound

        I agree with Helen.... enuff already.

        This family is self-sufficient due to Jim Bob's "investments" in real estate, and whatever else he has. The TV show $$ probably is nice, but not what they live on.

        My problem with all this rabbit-esque behavior is what about their current 19 kids when they grow up? Assuming they adopt the same beliefs of allowing God to decide how many children they have, what happens if those children don't have the $$ or investments to care for them all. Who pays for them then??? That's an awful lot of kids/grandkids to cover in a will even with lots of personal wealth.

          #3.13 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 11:54 AM EDT
          Carin C

          IMO,,, That would be their business.

          More should worry about their own families then giving advice to others who do not need or want it. Your neighbors 2 children may be needing your help and advice more so then the Duggars.

          This is America where people are free to choose and I do believe this family most likely have made long term plans. The children are not obsessed with name brands or having the best of everything like most kids are now a days. You would be surprised at the money families could save and put towards the future if the kids did not have to have 150.-200. dollar runners or top of the name brand clothing.

            #3.14 - Mon Sep 7, 2009 1:31 PM EDT
            Reply
            Sandra-1157508

            I think there is something wrong with this mother. I think she has grown so accustomed to the attention focused on her and her having all of these children that she was jealous of her daughter-in law getting any of the attention that was previously hers alone. So she quickly got pregnant after finding out her daughter-in-law was pregnant to take back the spotlight. I also think it is unfair to the other children because obviously they will have to raise these babies,and i think this is abnormal behaviour by the mother. Its not just the octo-mom with mental problems. It may be that reality tv does seriously affect the mental state of its stars, perhaps they need to consider cancelling this show.

            • 12 votes
            Reply#4 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:14 AM EDT
            abaker1234

            I think it also has something to strongly do with the father. His name is Jim Bob and all 18 soon to be 19 of the children's names start with the letter "J". It is like he has to show his manhood by how many children he can procreate and name after himself. It is sick really, I totally feel badly for the children. The only reason they aren't still living in their 4 bedroom ranch house, with 8 kids per room and making their own clothes, is because they were able to land a TV show with their freak show family. Those are two of the MOST SELFISH people I have ever seen.! They are contiuning to have children for all the wrong reasons!

            • 25 votes
            #4.1 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:22 AM EDT
            falconer33

            No you have it wrong! In this country when its your religion we have to respect it and its alwayd correct. <sound of head pounding on desk>

            • 5 votes
            #4.2 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:23 AM EDT
            Gayle-324397

            abaker - I did see the show in the beginning, like the 'specials'. They were in the process of building that big house they live in back then. They were building the house BEFORE they got their own show.

            • 3 votes
            #4.3 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 2:13 PM EDT
            Jeanmarie-456447

            I saw that show. That was when I decided I could not stand this family. I mean, honestly, the father uses his kids to do all the work. Does this father who made his living by renting out storage sheds, know what he is doing? These homeschooled kids are not contractors, or experienced construction workers. Give me a break. By the way, aren't there child labor laws in their state.

            • 3 votes
            #4.4 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 5:18 PM EDT
            DoNotSteal-1294400

            Jeanmarie-456447 wrote:

            "Another thing that irritates meabout this family, that no one else has commented on, so far, is the fact that they all the kids names have to start with the letter J. That drives me nuts. Maybe if they sent the kids to school, they would find out that there are 25 other letters in the alphabet."

            * * * *

            JEANMARIE, perhaps if your mother had spared the use of the letter j, she could have named you MeanMarie.

              #4.5 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 4:56 PM EDT
              smith-j

              re: @ #4.5 hahaha good one!

              what about george forman naming all his sons george? what does it have anything to do with anything? it's their right to name their children whatever they please & beginning with whatever letter they want.

                #4.6 - Tue Sep 8, 2009 12:56 PM EDT
                Reply
                abaker1234

                I agree totally Helen. At this point it no longer becomes a desire to have children, but a reason to not have to be responsible. Poor child, just another number in their eyes.

                • 7 votes
                Reply#5 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:16 AM EDT
                Pennie-719911

                I'm not trying to sound mean but if I was her I would worry about my uterus falling out ( maybe at somewhere really embarrasing like the supermarket or walmart, ). 19 kids is a whole lot and I really wish them congrats and a lot of luck, they'll need it.

                • 4 votes
                Reply#6 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:18 AM EDT
                genuinerysk

                The best thing that could happen is that her uterus falls out. Then maybe the other kids will be able to have a childhood!

                • 13 votes
                #6.1 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:43 AM EDT
                LS-415070

                The older a woman gets the higher risk the pregnancy becomes. Perhaps it's going to take a special needs child to get these two to quit!

                • 10 votes
                #6.2 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:51 AM EDT
                Cathy-1306112

                LS- 415070 - They don't care. Afterall, it's the older children that raise the younger ones!

                • 9 votes
                #6.3 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 11:29 AM EDT
                sunnybunny1269

                I know. Thats what I would worry about too (damage to the mothers body, and the risk of complications and/or birth defects). What's going to stop her? Menopause?

                • 8 votes
                #6.4 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 11:41 AM EDT
                MichelleUT

                I'm not 40, and I am pregnant with my first child. I cannot even imagine 19. She's been nothing but a baby factory, and those children have raised children. Selfish and unfair.

                • 11 votes
                #6.5 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 12:11 PM EDT
                JWills

                Their last child was born a few weeks early amid some minor scary circumstances. This next one has a very high risk of being in a similar situation add on the inflated risk for a special needs child and they are playing with fire. With each child Michelle takes time off her own life expectancy as she doesn't wait the recommended amount of time between pregnancies. Incubating life is hard work and takes a toll on a woman's body and not just externally. She's setting herself up for early death and She will be no good to her collection when she's dead. I can't belive they aren't responsible enough to care about such matters. It's a tradgedy for their 18 already born children- just as it will be for their grandchildren when their children raise just as many.

                • 8 votes
                #6.6 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 12:25 PM EDT
                sensebility

                If the baby is special needs, then that was God's will to? Some god they have there!

                  #6.7 - Sun Sep 6, 2009 1:26 AM EDT
                  Reply
                  noreasontolie

                  Even if you could financially afford 19 children, how in the world could you have the time to give each child the attention he/she needs to grow up well-adjusted and to feel fully loved.

                  It's impossible.

                  • 16 votes
                  Reply#7 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:18 AM EDT
                  Kimberly-1306067

                  I second that emotion!

                    #7.1 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:42 AM EDT
                    Sheri-78

                    They have a sign-up sheet for one-on-one time. I stopped watching the Today Show because they keep glorifying this mess of a family.

                    • 3 votes
                    #7.2 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 10:14 AM EDT
                    Ringo-559810

                    its not for you or obama to decide you left wing kook

                      #7.3 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 11:48 AM EDT
                      Sheri-78

                      Wow...it only took how many hours for one of you birther/bircher/whatever to try to bring up Obama? I guess next you'll say it's his fault Michelle Duggar confused her nether-regions with an assembly line? Or are you going to blame Obama for knocking her up?

                      Seriously...let it go!

                      • 1 vote
                      #7.4 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 2:57 PM EDT
                      Reply
                      krm9211

                      Even though they can financially support all their children what makes them any different than the Andrea Sullemans of the world? There was an article not too long ago about women who were addicted to being pregnant. It was because they were in the spot light and it made them feel special. I just wonder how much of this is actually their wanting this many children or for their own selfish glorification.

                      • 16 votes
                      Reply#8 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:18 AM EDT
                      abaker1234

                      At least Andrea Suleman admitted she made a mistake. This couple uses religion to justify their lack of responsibility. This is worse than a teen pregnancy. At least with a Teen Pregnancy the lack of responsibility is somewhat understandable. These two are 50 year old adults.....no excuse!

                      • 10 votes
                      #8.1 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:24 AM EDT
                      Gayle-324397

                      That would be NADIA SULEMAN (octomom). And ANDREA YATES (stupid bitch who drowned her kids).

                      • 1 vote
                      #8.2 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 2:17 PM EDT
                      Vicki-427762

                      Ah yes - Andrea Yates, who was: basically forced by her husband to have a fifth child, despite having had crippling post-partum depression after the fourth child; forced to raise and home-school her children IN A TRAILER without assistance from anyone, including her husband; and was not allowed to seek treatment for her depression after the fifth birth. Yeah, she and Octomom are really alike.

                      • 5 votes
                      #8.3 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 7:19 PM EDT
                      EENAR

                      I agree with you Vicki. I think of Andrea Yates as a victimof her faith, so sad and unnecessary.

                      • 1 vote
                      #8.4 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 8:39 PM EDT
                      Sheri-78

                      Thank you for setting the record straight, Vicki!

                        #8.5 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 10:15 AM EDT
                        Kshark

                        Gayle-324397--

                        Calling Andrea Yates a stupid b*tch, as I am presuming you called her that name, is going a bit too far. She was mentally sick. There is a difference between purposefully killing your children such as Susan Smith who let her kids drown in the car, and Andrea Yates who was suffering mentally and did not really understand what she was doing, thus why she is in a mental ward.

                        Look at Brooke Shields when she suffered PPD, she tried to run her car off the road to kill herself and her child. Then she got treatment.

                        Nadya Suleman ok she is mentally unstable that has been proven, however she willingly and was in the right and sound frame of mind making a conscious decision to become a baby factory.

                        • 2 votes
                        #8.6 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 10:27 AM EDT
                        Reply
                        jeanette-385183

                        hellllllllllllllllo have your tubes tied

                         

                        • 10 votes
                        Reply#9 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:19 AM EDT
                        john3578

                        Jim Bob just needs to learn to pull out

                        • 7 votes
                        #9.1 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 11:47 AM EDT
                        sony-465076

                        That doesn't work! you can get a women pg even if you pull out. The clear fluid that comes ahead...the lubricating fluid a guy has sperm in it. So pulling out isn't reliable method.

                          #9.2 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 7:10 PM EDT
                          sony-465076

                          The lubricating fluid...can have sperm in it. Is what I should have posted.

                            #9.3 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 7:19 PM EDT
                            Reply
                            jj-1130329

                            Not that I care - they are self sufficient and seem to take good care of the kids - -but I can't wait for this woman to go through menopause. I can't read one more account of this woman having another child! How can she always have that glazed-over smile on her face with all those kids? I can barely handle 2.

                            • 8 votes
                            Reply#10 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:20 AM EDT
                            MomAtHOME

                            Teach them how to behave appropriately and you would have no trouble.  I had a horrible time with our first 2.  It was so easy to be sloppy with their training.  Having more but better behaved children has been so much easier for me and them.  There is so much less conflict when we all behave respectfully of each other.  I have many now and have been forced to learn to organize.  I actually find that I spend much more one on one time with each child now than I did with only a few because I have to be deliberate about it.  It is a non-negotiable part of my day.  Go for a walk with one, share an extended coffee time in the morning with one, etc.  We are have a great time talking about whatever they want to talk about.  I am also more structured with meal and chore planning.  We have way more time to be free and play than we used to just because we try to use our time wisely instead of watching tv or wasting time on things that don't matter.  Please don't judge this family when you don't know them (I have for many years.)  They love each other and others more than anyone I have ever met.  The children are happier, better adjusted, better socialized, and better behaved than any children I have ever known.  There would be public outcry if the Duggars or anyone else started publicly saying it was horrible that people have only a few children that they can barely stand because they haven't taken the time to love them and teach them. 

                            • 6 votes
                            #10.1 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:38 AM EDT
                            addiem

                            Momathome - Sorry, not buying it. But thanks for the stern advice at the beginning. (rolls eyes) No one is going to publicly, or privately (except your religious clan?), criticize ANYONE for having a FEW kids - so that conjecture is just not even justified. These people may be financially able, thankfully for society, able to care for that brood, but it offends - obviously, per the comments.

                            At least these people have a big tax write-off at tax time, geez. Their kids will probably qualify for financial aid big time, come college age.

                            • 5 votes
                            #10.2 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:52 AM EDT
                            merg

                            momathome - it is the Duggar's and your own business to have all the children you can properly care for but I resent your implication that only these supersized families provide love and care for their children. There are millions of families with 2 or 3 children who love and respect each other and the children and the children are well adjusted, happy, well socialized and well behaved. I'm sorry that in your narrow world you never had the opportunity to meet them.

                            • 7 votes
                            #10.3 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 11:07 AM EDT
                            tna-1306148

                            merg, it may be legal to have so many children, but that does not make it ethical. It took from the beginning of time to 1800 for the population to reach 1 billion. Now it is almost 7 billion and by the year 2037 it will be over 10 billion. It is unfair to those of us who have two or fewer children to have them suffer famine and pollution and wars because so many think they have the God given right to have so many children. Again, they may have the right, but if they care about other people at all, they would not do it. Love thy neighbor.

                            • 9 votes
                            #10.4 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 11:22 AM EDT
                            Cathy-1306112

                            momathome- thanks for over populating this troubled world...

                            • 8 votes
                            #10.5 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 11:33 AM EDT
                            ferrferr

                            Hey MomatHome .. as a person who actively seeks to reduce the foot print I leave on this earth I feel more than validated in condemning the Duggars for their actions. It takes a bus to transport their family. They do more laundry in one day than I do in a whole month. Not to mention the 90,000 dirty diapers they've sent to the landfills to rot for 500+ years (imagine how many Duggars will populate the Earth by the time the eldest child's first diaper finally decomposes). The amount of energy it takes to power their home. Or the amount of trash that a family of 20 produces (even excluding the diapers). It's pointless to pop out kids claiming it's in Gods hands, when you're playing a role in ruining the planet God made.

                            Oh and as a mother of 2 I can spend plenty of time with both my kids without having to organize and schedule my life. One child stays home with daddy and plays or watches a favorite movie, while the other comes with me to do shopping. Both kids are generally well behaved, but they have their moments because they are after all only children. I have gotten many complements by strangers as to how well behaved my kids are. Amazing how it can be done and I don't have to have more kids to accomplish it.

                            • 10 votes
                            #10.6 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 12:33 PM EDT
                            Stevie McMichael

                            How can they be better socialized when they're home schooled? I'm sorry, I don't buy it. I've known quite a few home-schooled kids and they've all been socially awkward to one degree or another.

                            • 7 votes
                            #10.7 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 1:47 PM EDT
                            ferrferr

                            It is possible if the parents take the proper approach to home schooling for the children to have very good socialization. There are many home schooling groups that meet up on a regular basis. I know back in Texas there was a gymnastics place that did classes specifically for home schooled children. There are plenty of opportunities out there, you just have to have the dedication and desire to find and utilize them. The Duggars seem to stick mainly to their religious group so their interaction with other children is more limited. A kid in public school who is subjected to ridicule from classmates is likely to be socially awkward too. You can't always win by placing a child in a setting with lots of their peers.

                            • 2 votes
                            #10.8 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 2:12 PM EDT
                            Stevie McMichael

                            Very true, public schools can produce some pretty poor results. However, the fact that these children are not exposed to the world outside their religious circle means that if they ever do get out into the 'real world', they're going to be woefully inequipped to deal with it.

                            • 8 votes
                            #10.9 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 2:14 PM EDT
                            Reply
                            Mike N-366459

                            It bothers me that they credit God for this. That shows a lack of responsibility and logic. God could have just as easily inspired 'ol Jim Bob to put a hat on it like most responsible people. A quiverfull? They have a Holiday Inn full.

                            • 14 votes
                            Reply#11 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:20 AM EDT
                            jon5444

                            Instead of popping another kid they need brain transplants, especially that woman. I think stupid describes her perfectly.

                            • 12 votes
                            Reply#12 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:20 AM EDT
                            tracey-602481

                            I was thinking attention whore. If someone in their family farts, they call a press conference to announce it and tell everyone how blessed they are.

                            • 16 votes
                            #12.1 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:54 AM EDT
                            sfs

                            LOL Tracey!

                            • 2 votes
                            #12.2 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 2:02 PM EDT
                            tracey-602481

                            Seriously. The local stations carry the news. "J____— Duggar farted today. Michelle Duggar reports that the family was so blessed to get to share the smell. 'We'll take all of the farts the lord gives us,' she was quoted as saying." Major league attention whore.

                            • 4 votes
                            #12.3 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 2:44 PM EDT
                            Sheri-78

                            LOL Tracey!

                            • 1 vote
                            #12.4 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 10:17 AM EDT
                            Reply
                            krislynn

                            Michelle was obviously having children waaay before the ridiculousness of reality tv came around. It's sad that people hate on this family but LOVE to hear about psychos like the octo-mom. Typical modern America.

                            • 7 votes
                            Reply#13 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:22 AM EDT
                            Dessa-817148

                            No, octomom is even more disgusting because she could not provide for these kids in the first place! Even Kate Gosselin is fake in front of the camera!

                            • 4 votes
                            #13.1 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 12:39 PM EDT
                            krislynn

                            Right, but we still keep hearing about them both which means obviously someone somewhere is still reading/watching/listening to stuff about them.

                            • 3 votes
                            #13.2 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 1:01 PM EDT
                            Gayle-324397

                            Kristynn

                            Who told YOU that WE LOVE to hear about psychos like the octo-mom?????

                            • 4 votes
                            #13.3 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 2:25 PM EDT
                            krislynn

                            Gayle-

                            Just an example of the kind of smut people will pay for or watch.

                            Maybe I made my point poorly; I basically meant to say look at the stuff people WILL watch (let's use some other reality show...let's say anything on VH1, that'd be a good place to start), but can't just say, "Ok, I would never live like the Duggars or agree with it, but at least they are (or seem to be--TV never shows everything) decent, hard-working, caring people." Doesn't anyone see any value in that? Of course not. They're just talking about how the family is sucking up Mother Earth's resources. Oh my gosh people give me a BREAK! Seriously?!

                            • 1 vote
                            #13.4 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 2:43 PM EDT
                            teresa van remortel

                            Please don't lump me into "all those  people who love to hear about psycho octomom" because I certainly DO NOT.  Personally all these baby factories are unhinged IMO and I hardly ever watch TV because of all the dumb reality shows on these days.  If everyone adopted, the "let's be fruitful and multiply attitude" in this country we'll become another China where, because of over-population, the government will be telling us how many kids we can have here.

                            Thanks to those of us responsible and exercise our rights to use birth control, we're not there YET and I pray it stays that way.  This planet simply cannot sustain the amount of people on it now as resources are getting consumed faster then nature can supply them.

                            • 2 votes
                            #13.5 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 5:14 PM EDT
                            krislynn

                            First, I didn't lump you in....I said "...people hate on this family..." Obviously lots of people enjoy reality tv and if you don't, then you're not included in that group of people.

                            "...the government will be telling us how many kids we can have here."

                            Isn't that what those of you who are arguing against this family are doing? Or at least saying that someone should be doing?

                              #13.6 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 7:31 PM EDT
                              Reply
                              nova guy

                              What an irresponsibe pair of boobs!  In this day and age this is utterly stupid behavior.  How much do you want to bet by this time next year she will be announcing number 20. 

                              • 8 votes
                              Reply#14 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:23 AM EDT
                              Sheri-78

                              Especially if anyone else threatens her permanent baby shower registry at Wal-Mart by daring to have a family themselves.

                              • 1 vote
                              #14.1 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 3:00 PM EDT
                              Reply
                              SDB-339490

                              Did someone say puppy mill??

                              • 18 votes
                              Reply#15 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:23 AM EDT
                              brzy

                              Amen! People warn against the over breeding of dogs in puppy mills, the female has no time to recover before the next litter etc. I can't believe this crap makes the news, but that is what happens when you go to 24/7 news they have to fill the time slots with something...oh look religious twits pregers again....who friggin cares. The reality shows just prove what a lack of imagination TV world has anymore.

                              • 2 votes
                              #15.1 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 6:05 PM EDT
                              Reply
                              krm9211

                              I wonder if they go to an obstetrician/gynecologist during the pregnancy? If they do I'd like to know if it is an medical responsibility of the Dr. to tell this woman that she is not a dog and should stop having children at the detriment of her health and possibly her childrens. Not only is she an older mother but older mothers have a MUCH higher risk of birth defects.

                              • 12 votes
                              Reply#16 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:24 AM EDT
                              MomAtHOME

                              They do see an ob regularly and deliver at the hospital and everything. They use a very nice female doctor that comes highly recommended around the state for her expertise and skill.

                              • 5 votes
                              #16.1 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:42 AM EDT
                              Lily-1155928

                              Last time they had to search for an OBGYN who would deliver her (and put up with the media bliss). She had to have a C-section (which she has had before).

                              In one interview it looked like she wanted to pop out a few more in hope of securing her record holding position (there is another family popping them out and that woman in much younger, so personally I think Michelle is going to come in second).

                              These people are a bunch on hicks and that daughter-in-law is really dumb.

                              When thier son got married and kissed his bride for the first time by holding both sides of her face (controling if you ask me) I wanted to puck. What kind of a first kiss was that?

                              • 2 votes
                              #16.2 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 11:20 AM EDT
                              teresa van remortel

                              How this woman has not had uterine prolapse before now should be considered a "miracle", not to mention what her poor breasts have been through after nursing so many babies. OUCH!!!!

                              • 4 votes
                              #16.3 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 5:19 PM EDT
                              sony-465076

                              Well there is still time for that to happen. Of course if she is having C/S's then a prolapse prob not gonna happen. But there is tons of other things that she may have to contend with if not already...ie: pelvic floor relaxation, leaking urine, rectocele, cystocle.

                              • 1 vote
                              #16.4 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 7:32 PM EDT
                              Reply
                              Diana-1063024

                              I'm sorry, but 19 kids is way too many.  I think this woman and man have some mental issues that need to be addressed.  Having this number of kids is not only not normal, but what about what it's doing to this woman's body?  They said after using birth control pills and having problems that they decided to let God decide how many kids that they would have - don't they realize that there are other means of birth control besides pills?  Also, if they must have that many kids, did they ever think about all the kids in the U.S. that are looking for a home - maybe they should have looked into adoption or being foster care parents instead of taking pride in "popping out" kids every 18 months.

                              • 12 votes
                              Reply#17 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:24 AM EDT
                              sunnybunny1269

                              It's pretty common here in Arkansas for women to say they have had bad experiences with birth control. It makes me wonder if the doctors are not explaining them properly. Like for instance, there are a lot different hormonal combinations and the first one you try might not be the right one for you (try a different one?) Also, there is the idea that other methods are largely unknown (pills or condoms seem to be the only options widely accepted)

                              • 2 votes
                              #17.1 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 11:48 AM EDT
                              Dazed and Amazed

                              Hate to say this, but I don't believe they used birth control pills, unless it was one time for about 2 weeks.

                              If they were serious about birth control one of them would have been "fixed" by now.

                              • 4 votes
                              #17.2 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 1:47 PM EDT
                              Ringo-559810

                              Thanks for diagnosis doctor

                                #17.3 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 11:43 AM EDT
                                Sheri-78

                                Once again Ringo, your comment is completely inapplicable.

                                Diana, I completely agree with you. And no matter what kind of comparisons anyone here tries to draw between her and Suleman, Suleman is in no way near the attention-whore level that Michelle and Jim Duggar are. And shame on the Today Show for constantly giving them a forum to encourage this behavior!

                                  #17.4 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 3:03 PM EDT
                                  Reply
                                  Lzrdsgal

                                  I just LOVE this family, they are wonderful parents and the kids are wonderful too. I have no problem with them having 25 kids if that is what they want. The Duggars love each other and their children and show it all the time. They take care of their kids, feed and put clothes on them with out help from anyone. And the kids are well behaved and respectful. We should all take a lesson from them!

                                  • 4 votes
                                  Reply#18 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:24 AM EDT
                                  falconer33

                                  yeah, other than belonging to a cult their super!

                                  • 2 votes
                                  #18.1 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:29 AM EDT
                                  Cathy-1306112

                                  If people think we should actually be learning lessons from them, then this show needs to be taken off the air ASAP!!!

                                  • 4 votes
                                  #18.2 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 11:37 AM EDT
                                  ferrferr

                                  Google "Blanket Training". That's how they start their kids off to make them so wonderfully well behaved. Yes, lets all take lessons from them on how to raise a child.

                                  http://www.ffministry.org/blanket_training.htm

                                  "Blanket training" has been one of the most helpful tools for me! I only wish that I had heard about it before my 7th child came along!! The sweet lady who explained blanket training to me called it her "playpen in a purse"! This concept involves placing your baby or toddler on his/her favorite blanket, explaining to the best of their understanding that they must stay on their blanket, and then demonstrating the consequences of getting off the blanket with a small rod or switch. Simply switch the floor or carpet all around the outside edges of the blanket and firmly but sweetly say, "No, No! Don't touch!" Give your child few favorite toys to keep his attention, and switch the toys out every little bit, and that child will learn to stay on his blanket for quite a long period of time. Begin with just 3 - 5 minutes with very young children, and after practicing every day for several weeks, he will build up his time to play happily on that blanket until he can stay there for an hour or more! What a joy and a help this was to me when I had the older 6 children in school and needed to spend time with them! The joy of this training is that you can fold that blanket up, put it in the diaper bag, and take it easily to a friend's house, or visiting new church members, and your child will sit quietly without disrupting the visit! One of my pet peeves is when folks come to visit and just "unleash" their children to invade every room of your home! What chaos! This blanket training is easily converted to "church training" when you begin taking your young child into the services. Simply fold the blanket and put it on the pew and your child will already understand the limitations and rules!

                                  I think I will let my baby be a baby and teach her as she gets older. I do not, nor would I ever, expect my 26 month old to sit still for an hour or more at time. She's a child her job in life right now is to explore her environment and learn as much as she can.

                                  • 12 votes
                                  #18.3 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 12:05 PM EDT
                                  Stevie McMichael

                                  ...They HIT THEM if they leave the blanket? God I hope these parents somehow really screw up and get all those poor kids taken away from them.

                                  • 3 votes
                                  #18.4 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 1:26 PM EDT
                                  GloballyConcern

                                  I wouldn't even train my dog that harshly!!

                                  • 5 votes
                                  #18.5 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 2:09 PM EDT
                                  Vicki-427762

                                  According to that excerpt, they don't actually hit the child - they "simply switch the floor or carpet all around the outside edges of the blanket". HOWEVER - I would be concerned that anyone who uses this sort of training will sooner or later fall victim to the temptation to use that "small rod or switch" ON the child. I'm also concerned about this mother saying that the "blanket training" was great because it allowed her to spend time with her school aged children. Does this mean that she's not watching the youngest child because he/she has been "trained" to stay on the blanket?

                                    #18.6 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 7:28 PM EDT
                                    Kirk-523228

                                    You're not getting the point.

                                    1. They are using more of the world's resources than is even remotely responsible.

                                    2. The kids will eventually grow up to be psychotic.

                                    3. Once the reality show is canceled, this family will NOT be able to afford all of these kids ... then we all will be paying for them.

                                    • 3 votes
                                    #18.7 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 7:36 AM EDT
                                    Ringo-559810

                                    liar

                                      #18.8 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 11:40 AM EDT
                                      Sheri-78

                                      Ringo, I'm rapidly coming to the conclusion that you are just another troll.

                                        #18.9 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 3:05 PM EDT
                                        Reply
                                        steve2

                                        Sick people! The kids get to raise their siblings. Great life for them!

                                        And by the way, a quiver full is an archery term. A full quiver is 5, not 19.

                                        • 12 votes
                                        Reply#19 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:24 AM EDT
                                        Julia ARNP, Pepperell, MA

                                        steve2-just curious because I can't find any information to verify your remark.  Where did you find that a full quiver is five?

                                          #19.1 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 12:45 PM EDT
                                          Sheri-78

                                          Steve, that was TOO funny! LOL!

                                          Julia, you actually tried to confirm a remark that was obviously a joke? Seriously?

                                          • 1 vote
                                          #19.2 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 3:05 PM EDT
                                          Julia ARNP, Pepperell, MA

                                          Well Sheri,

                                          You are obviously smarter and more in tune than I. It wasn't obvious to me that Steve was joking. He comment didn't even seem sarcastic to me.

                                          • 1 vote
                                          #19.3 - Thu Oct 22, 2009 2:16 PM EDT
                                          Reply
                                          roseinwinter

                                          They let the older kids raise the babies! These people are sick and attention seekers! Stop printing stories about them! We don't care! I feel sorry for the kids! They'll never know a normal childhood! She is worse than the neighborhood stray cat having kittens every cycle!!! Close your legs already!!!

                                          • 11 votes
                                          Reply#20 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:24 AM EDT
                                          5thsmith

                                          Enough already with the Duggars! Why is NBC & the TODAY show glorifying these people? There are thousands of stories waiting to be told about people working to help others, lifting up the down trodden and quietly leading a life of service to others and you choose to sit on their doorstep waiting for them to announce that they are adding another numeral to their family. Is anyone else creeped out by the matching costumes they wear? I've always been a Today Show fan but I'm sorry to say you are making Good Morning America look better every day.

                                          • 13 votes
                                          Reply#21 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:26 AM EDT
                                          LS-415070

                                          The Today Show is nothing more than the Enquirer on TV. Remember how they glorified that woman who gave birth to twins that have 2 different fathers? They called that a "medical marvel". I called her a slut.

                                          I used to watch the Today Show. Not anymore. After all they think Nadya Suleman is a wonder woman too!

                                          • 11 votes
                                          #21.1 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:56 AM EDT
                                          Teresa-326227

                                          I have to agree somewhat here. NBC's TODAY Show has covered their announcements but never follow up with going to Dr. Nancy so she can tell us what happens to a woman's body when she does that. Nor do they bring on anyone to explain what happens to a childs well being when they have 17 or 18 siblings to compete with for parental attention. True attention. As a mother and father when do they sit quietly and read together, one on one? To obligate your children to take care of your children is pretty darn selfish. Chores and helping out are one thing, but making them responsible for the children you decided to have is entirely another matter. Today Show...be careful...be resonsible...

                                          • 2 votes
                                          #21.2 - Wed Sep 2, 2009 4:11 PM EDT
                                          Reply
                                          teb-573635Deleted
                                          tommi-1165822

                                          good god sew that damned thing shut,,octo mom in hyperdrive,,come on,,it ainty your job to repopulate the damned planet,,keep em shut

                                          • 4 votes
                                          Reply#23 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:30 AM EDT
                                          dbtmellis

                                          Give me a break..i have more respect for this woman than that Octomom.

                                          The Duggars concvied all of their children naturally, somethign that the Octomom cant claim to have done.

                                            #23.1 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 5:22 PM EDT
                                            Sheri-78

                                            So it's OK to be irresponsible breeders as long as you don't get help for it? It's not deliberate unless you see a doctor? And if you respect the Duggars for over-breeding while condemning Suleman, there is a word for that: hypocrisy.

                                            • 2 votes
                                            #23.2 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 3:08 PM EDT
                                            Reply
                                            Tammy-1306063

                                            Why in god's name don't these people stop having kids???? I have never heard of such ignorance in my life. Nobody in their right mind would want to have that many kids or think that it is ok to do so. Have these idiots never heard of overpopulation?

                                              Reply#24 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:30 AM EDT
                                              wanda-1306065

                                              Talking about taking more than your share of the existing resources. Man don't blame your selfishness on God. Just think we get to look forward to their children spiting out just as many. Man lady get a job, intead of being a baby machine.

                                              • 11 votes
                                              Reply#25 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:30 AM EDT
                                              thought-770948

                                              This is a circus......break out the cotton candy and the elephants on parade.....oops, it is the Duggars on parade. My thoughts are silly, compounded by the thought that she is 42 and has a doctor that says to his staff" Here come the Duggars-life is good!". Is there a practicing OB GYN physician that would say to her....time to slow it down? No, there is big ol smilie faced Jim Bob saying though that smile to himself in the mirror" Hey, I did it again-yeah, I am a man"

                                              At her age, she will be 62 or 63 when this conception is in college-or do they home school college at that house too?

                                              She has a the household help she needs, she keeps adding to the staff...again.

                                              When is NBC going to cease the recognition, is it in their contract? Why not take us to CA and interview the other baby factory-no brains, only egos all of them!

                                              • 10 votes
                                              Reply#26 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:32 AM EDT
                                              DeeToo

                                              Disgusting. 19 children. This is not biblical - it is twisted.

                                              Cats and dogs can have litters but no big TV shows about that. What makes these people so arrogant as to think that GOD thinks they are special, so they can make babies? Insane people and mentally impaired people can have babies. People in prison, people who are starving. Procreation takes no talent at all.

                                              This planet was created without humans - and humans are definitely nothing special. We have scraped the vegetation from the land, polluted the water, turned the Pacific ocean into a large Glad trash bag, burned the forests and cut them down, killed off entire species like the Carolina parrot - just to get some brightly colored feathers, or still killing whales when there is no eathly need to......... Just what the world needs - more of us "special" humans.

                                              I wonder how many land fills full of diapers and baby food bottles they have created. GOD is not creating this irresponsible couple's scenario - if He does watch, he is shaking his head in sadness as he watches his beautiful world turn into man's garbage dump.

                                              • 11 votes
                                              #26.1 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 2:34 PM EDT
                                              K-779196

                                              I completely agree..

                                              I think it socially/ morally wrong.. Pretty frick'in arrogant to think that you and your family (the duggars) are entitled to suck up all these resources with no thoughts/ consideration for the other six or is it seven billion people on the planet now..??

                                              • 5 votes
                                              #26.2 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 8:15 PM EDT
                                              Jeffrey-290742

                                              Exactly. It is utterly selfish & morally wrong. Now, if 19 kids each have ONLY 5 kids that makes 95, and if those 95 have 5 that equals 475.....

                                              The amount of food, gas, electricity needed, along with pollution all that creates is the last thing this planet needs right now. But, they got their money and attention so I'm sure they don't bother to consider the rest of the people who share this planet. We don't have the "one child rule" like China does, but due to people like the Duggars, that may become a reality here in the future as well. We are overpopulated as it is. These people are ignorant and irresponsible. Yeah, they have the "right" to have as many children as they want...and I have the "right" to waste as much food, gas, electricity & pollute as much as I want, too...that doesn't make it right.

                                              • 6 votes
                                              #26.3 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 6:14 AM EDT
                                              Ringo-559810

                                              Jeff you are a bumbling idiot. the world is not over populated even though you left wing morons think it is.

                                              • 1 vote
                                              #26.4 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 11:36 AM EDT
                                              Ringo-559810

                                              oh look a home school aphobe, how nice. But i bet you think its ok when your left wing hero Larry king has a kid at age 85. typical left wing hate speech.

                                              • 1 vote
                                              #26.5 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 11:39 AM EDT
                                              thebigd-829931

                                              NBC is not a news channel. It's a forum for Obama. Have you ever seen NBC post anything not favorable to Obama

                                              • 1 vote
                                              #26.6 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 11:50 AM EDT
                                              Mattstadon

                                              Remind me again how this story is about Obama? God you're dumb

                                              • 1 vote
                                              #26.7 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 2:13 PM EDT
                                              Sheri-78

                                              Mattstadon, are you really surprised that one of those types popped up here and tried to turn it into an Obama conspiracy? I'm surprised they haven't tried to blame Obama for the conception as a vast left-wing conspiracy to raise the price of cloth diapers.

                                              Ringo, let it go...

                                              • 1 vote
                                              #26.8 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 3:11 PM EDT
                                              Reply
                                              Susan-1174013

                                              I have always been a huge fan of this family and their show...but once again the "reality show curse" has struck. OMG 19 kids...what are they thinking? I am not one to tell people how to conduct their reproductive issues...but come on...enough already...enjoy the ones that are already here and give your older children a break...they are not your younger childrens' parents, you are...STOP!!!!! People will still enjoy your show and all the attention is not on Josh and Anna...get a grip before it's too late...SAVE YOUR UTERUS, shut it down, no more construction...jeez

                                              • 7 votes
                                              Reply#27 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 10:32 AM EDT
                                              sunnyday1982

                                              I know, I feel bad for them, not even married for a year and here comes the first baby...poor Anna, married into a crazy family

                                              • 2 votes
                                              #27.1 - Tue Sep 1, 2009 11:07 AM EDT
                                              Mattstadon

                                              I'm sick of people like this claiming it's God's will that they have so many children. Did you forget GOD GAVE MAN FREE WILL! Have you ever heard of a condom or for christ sake at least pulling out?

                                              • 4 votes
                                              #27.2 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 2:09 PM EDT
                                              DoNotSteal-1294400

                                              this is a FAMILY story, not a place suitable to evil swearing. no place is.

                                                #27.3 - Sat Sep 5, 2009 5:25 PM EDT
                                                Reply
                                                Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 32
                                                Leave a Comment:
                                                You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                                                (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                                                Newsvine Privacy Statement
                                                As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                                FUN STUFF:
                                                • Leaderboard |
                                                • E-Mail Alerts |
                                                • Top of the Vine |
                                                • Newsvine Live |
                                                • Newsvine Archives |
                                                • The Greenhouse
                                                COMPANY STUFF:
                                                • Code of Honor |
                                                • Company Info |
                                                • Contact Us |
                                                • Jobs |
                                                • User Agreement |
                                                • Privacy Policy |
                                                • About our ads
                                                LEGAL STUFF:
                                                • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                                                • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                                                • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com