Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Before Lucy came Ardi, new earliest hominid found

Thu Oct 1, 2009 10:30 AM EDT
science, us, sci, before, lucy
Randolph E. Schmid, AP Science Writer
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 4 photos
<p>These undated handout images provided by the U.S. Postal Service show some of the 44-cent postage stamps in the Nature in America series. From left are, a Treefish, Brown Pelican, Yellowtail Rockfish, Western Gull and Pacific Rock Crab under a Jeweled Top Snail. The stamps will be officially released on Thursday, Oct. 1,2009, at the Monterey Bay Aquarium in California. (AP Photo/USPS)  </p>

These undated handout images provided by the U.S. Postal Service show some of the 44-cent postage stamps in the Nature in America series. From left are, a Treefish, Brown Pelican, Yellowtail Rockfish, Western Gull and Pacific Rock Crab under a Jeweled Top Snail. The stamps will be officially released on Thursday, Oct. 1,2009, at the Monterey Bay Aquarium in California. (AP Photo/USPS)

Advertise | AdChoices

WASHINGTON — The story of humankind is reaching back another million years as scientists learn more about "Ardi," a hominid who lived 4.4 million years ago in what is now Ethiopia. The 110-pound, 4-foot female roamed forests a million years before the famous Lucy, long studied as the earliest skeleton of a human ancestor.

This older skeleton reverses the common wisdom of human evolution, said anthropologist C. Owen Lovejoy of Kent State University.

Rather than humans evolving from an ancient chimp-like creature, the new find provides evidence that chimps and humans evolved from some long-ago common ancestor — but each evolved and changed separately along the way.

"This is not that common ancestor, but it's the closest we have ever been able to come," said Tim White, director of the Human Evolution Research Center at the University of California, Berkeley.

The lines that evolved into modern humans and living apes probably shared an ancestor 6 million to 7 million years ago, White said in a telephone interview.

But Ardi has many traits that do not appear in modern-day African apes, leading to the conclusion that the apes evolved extensively since we shared that last common ancestor.

A study of Ardi, under way since the first bones were discovered in 1994, indicates the species lived in the woodlands and could climb on all fours along tree branches, but the development of their arms and legs indicates they didn't spend much time in the trees. And they could walk upright, on two legs, when on the ground.

Formally dubbed Ardipithecus ramidus — which means root of the ground ape — the find is detailed in 11 research papers published Thursday by the journal Science.

"This is one of the most important discoveries for the study of human evolution," said David Pilbeam, curator of paleoanthropology at Harvard's Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology.

"It is relatively complete in that it preserves head, hands, feet and some critical parts in between. It represents a genus plausibly ancestral to Australopithecus — itself ancestral to our genus Homo," said Pilbeam, who was not part of the research teams.

Scientists assembled the skeleton from 125 pieces.

Lucy, also found in Africa, thrived a million years after Ardi and was of the more human-like genus Australopithecus.

"In Ardipithecus we have an unspecialized form that hasn't evolved very far in the direction of Australopithecus. So when you go from head to toe, you're seeing a mosaic creature that is neither chimpanzee, nor is it human. It is Ardipithecus," said White.

White noted that Charles Darwin, whose research in the 19th century paved the way for the science of evolution, was cautious about the last common ancestor between humans and apes.

"Darwin said we have to be really careful. The only way we're really going to know what this last common ancestor looked like is to go and find it. Well, at 4.4 million years ago we found something pretty close to it," White said. "And, just like Darwin appreciated, evolution of the ape lineages and the human lineage has been going on independently since the time those lines split, since that last common ancestor we shared."

Some details about Ardi in the collection of papers:

— Ardi was found in Ethiopia's Afar Rift, where many fossils of ancient plants and animals have been discovered. Findings near the skeleton indicate that at the time it was a wooded environment. Fossils of 29 species of birds and 20 species of small mammals were found at the site.

— Geologist Giday WoldeGabriel of Los Alamos National Laboratory was able to use volcanic layers above and below the fossil to date it to 4.4 million years ago.

— Ardi's upper canine teeth are more like the stubby ones of modern humans than the long, sharp, pointed ones of male chimpanzees and most other primates. An analysis of the tooth enamel suggests a diverse diet, including fruit and other woodland-based foods such as nuts and leaves.

— Paleoanthropologist Gen Suwa of the University of Tokyo reported that Ardi's face had a projecting muzzle, giving her an ape-like appearance. But it didn't thrust forward quite as much as the lower faces of modern African apes do. Some features of her skull, such as the ridge above the eye socket, are quite different from those of chimpanzees. The details of the bottom of the skull, where nerves and blood vessels enter the brain, indicate that Ardi's brain was positioned in a way similar to modern humans, possibly suggesting that the hominid brain may have been already poised to expand areas involving aspects of visual and spatial perception.

— Ardi's hand and wrist were a mix of primitive traits and a few new ones, but they don't include the hallmark traits of the modern tree-hanging, knuckle-walking chimps and gorillas. She had relatively short palms and fingers which were flexible, allowing her to support her body weight on her palms while moving along tree branches, but she had to be a careful climber because she lacked the anatomical features that allow modern-day African apes to swing, hang and easily move through the trees.

— The pelvis and hip show the gluteal muscles were positioned so she could walk upright.

— Her feet were rigid enough for walking but still had a grasping big toe for use in climbing.

The research was funded by the National Science Foundation, the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics of the University of California, Los Alamos National Laboratory, the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and others.

___

On the Net:

Science: http://www.sciencemag.org

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Randolph E. Schmid's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (19)
gamerk2

See, we didn't evolve from Apes; we both evolved from yet another creature.

Are the Creationists happy now? [/sarcasm]

  • 5 votes
Reply#1 - Thu Oct 1, 2009 11:54 AM EDT
Save Me Jebus

Ha ha. I suppose we can pray for the creationists to see the evolutionary light.

  • 7 votes
#1.1 - Thu Oct 1, 2009 1:22 PM EDT
Lkessler

That's very cool and very interesting. Evolutionary theory continues to surprise us all. :)

Then again, I've always believed in evolution... :D

  • 5 votes
#1.2 - Thu Oct 1, 2009 2:52 PM EDT
Reply
newsblog903

Every day there is a new and interesting discovery made in science. Good going and wonderful find and wonderful analysis.

  • 4 votes
Reply#2 - Thu Oct 1, 2009 3:13 PM EDT
ImaWitness

Man I didn't mean to vote for this article but whatever. The theories of evolution, ID, and creationism are just that. A theory. No man has the right answer. When we make a choice to believe in any one of these theories that's what we say is "real." There have been many fine and astute people that have been fired from great institution because of what theory (other than evolution) they believed in. Why? I don't know. But that silly to fire someone over a belief. The earth has evolved, humans have evolved, and animals have evolved. I don't believe we came from a simple glob. Humans are very complex. Every creature is unique. One question I like to ask is how does a sperm and an egg create something that is complex? I would say first they are complex and something that is complex creates complexity not simplicity. Not that they are simple and create complexity. Every cells in our body knows what to do and when to do it. Everything in us has a purpose and every person has a purpose and everything in earth has a purpose. Our purpose is far greater than what we have been taught in school. We weren't just made to create. We were made to relate and serve. We all have a higher calling than to live in our own carnality.

    Reply#3 - Thu Oct 1, 2009 3:51 PM EDT
    Scott-1380983

    Science is always changing their answers and theories ! God's Word never changes !

      Reply#4 - Thu Oct 1, 2009 4:12 PM EDT
      newsblog903

      Creation is science and are one and the same- always changing always creating, always dynamic.

      • 1 vote
      #4.1 - Thu Oct 1, 2009 4:24 PM EDT
      Save Me Jebus

      Scott-1380983 - which of the many versions of "God's Word" is the correct one?

      • 5 votes
      #4.2 - Thu Oct 1, 2009 4:49 PM EDT
      Scott-1380983

      version is not theory

        #4.3 - Thu Oct 1, 2009 5:53 PM EDT
        Save Me Jebus

        What does that mean? You said God's word doesn't change. I'm just asking you to clarify which version of God's word is the one you say is correct. You do realize there are many different sects that attribute different things as God's word.

        • 3 votes
        #4.4 - Fri Oct 2, 2009 10:23 AM EDT
        Scott-1380983

        I understand what you are saying, i guess i would have to say that the correct version is the one that claims Christ as the only way to the Father. Thats my belief, and i understand it no longer seems to be majority. i hope that clarifies my position,sorry if i was being to vague.

          #4.5 - Fri Oct 2, 2009 3:51 PM EDT
          Reply
          newsblog903

          #3

          When we make a choice to believe in any one of these theories that's ....

          Who said anything about believing? This is science not religion. No one is locked into a belief system. They are using scientific method which is quite a different thing altogether. Geez, are you saying because we have learned about something like biology or chemistry it is a belief rather than a discovery?

          • 5 votes
          Reply#5 - Thu Oct 1, 2009 4:22 PM EDT
          Save Me Jebus

          Agreed. When I put sugar in my coffee and stir it up, is it due to my belief that the sugar is dissolving? Or maybe it's the hand of God magically making the sugar disappear and making the coffee taste sweeter.

          • 5 votes
          #5.1 - Thu Oct 1, 2009 5:29 PM EDT
          newsblog903

          Exactly, every time there is a new discovery some people have to put a religious spin on it where none exists. I am sick of people making science the anti-Christ.

          • 3 votes
          #5.2 - Thu Oct 1, 2009 5:44 PM EDT
          Reply
          AprilRose

          Creation is not a theory.

          Belief- a mental attitude of acceptance or assent toward a proposition without the full intellectual knowledge required to guarantee its truth.

          http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/59442/belief

          I am interested in this discovery. I understand science is always changing because of new evidence and discoveries.

          • 2 votes
          Reply#6 - Thu Oct 1, 2009 4:57 PM EDT
          Al 616

          They should have named her "Ethel."

            Reply#7 - Thu Oct 1, 2009 7:38 PM EDT
            dsmith77

            "Did God create life? Ask a protein." :)

              Reply#8 - Fri Oct 2, 2009 2:46 AM EDT
              Sonia Kermaz

              In science, theories are useful and credible only insofar as they have predictive value. The theory of evolution combined with genetics has predictive value. Creationism has no predictive value whatsoever, but it has a comfort value for millions of people.

              • 2 votes
              Reply#9 - Sat Oct 3, 2009 5:57 PM EDT
              BJK-798627

              Rather than humans evolving from an ancient chimp-like creature, the new find provides evidence that chimps and humans evolved from some long-ago common ancestor — but each evolved and changed separately along the way.

              The idea that human and chimpanzees diverged from a common ancestor is not recent; it's been the dominant paradigm of biological anthropology for decades. Ever since molecular studies showed a greater degree of similarity between human and chimp DNA than human and gorilla DNA, the consensus became that humans and chimps were the last two hominids to diverge from a common ancestor.

              Obviously, chimpanzee evolution did not grind to a halt 5 million years ago. Chimpanzees today are as different from the "missing link"/common ancestor as humans are.

              Darwin would give anything to be alive today.

              • 3 votes
              Reply#10 - Sun Oct 4, 2009 12:14 AM EDT
              Leave a Comment:
              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
              You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
              (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
              Newsvine Privacy Statement
              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
              FUN STUFF:
              • Leaderboard |
              • E-Mail Alerts |
              • Top of the Vine |
              • Newsvine Live |
              • Newsvine Archives |
              • The Greenhouse
              COMPANY STUFF:
              • Code of Honor |
              • Company Info |
              • Contact Us |
              • Jobs |
              • User Agreement |
              • Privacy Policy |
              • About our ads
              LEGAL STUFF:
              • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
              • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
              • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com