Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Picking a fight: White House vs Fox News

Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:01 PM EDT
business, entertainment, us, white-house, barack-obama, tv, vs, fox
David Bauder, Associated Press
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 2 photos
<p>FILE - In this May 23, 2008 file photo, Anita Dunn in her Washington office.  (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, file)</p>

FILE - In this May 23, 2008 file photo, Anita Dunn in her Washington office. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, file)

Advertise | AdChoices

NEW YORK — President Barack Obama's communications director says it was Fox News Channel, not the White House, that picked a fight.

Yet it was Anita Dunn's words during a CNN interview last week, saying Fox is like "a wing of the Republican Party," that ignited one of the most unusual verbal volleys between a presidential administration and journalists since Vice President Spiro Agnew complained during the Nixon years about the "nattering nabobs of negativism."

Dunn's stance cheered many of the president's supporters who seethe over anti-Obama stories on Fox opinion shows, but has caused a backlash among some who say it exposed the administration as thin-skinned.

White House unhappiness had been building. The president himself said there is "one television station that is entirely devoted to attacking my administration." Fox's coverage of health care demonstrations over the summer, former administration official Van Jones and the community activists ACORN clearly knocked the administration off stride.

The White House blog attacked Fox commentator Glenn Beck for "lies."

"The administration was being attacked, members of this administration were being attacked, policies of this administration were being misrepresented — and that's a generous interpretation of how they were being described," Dunn said. "The reality is that at some point, the administration has to defend itself."

Fox has fought back hard. Network executive Michael Clemente said it was "astounding" that administration critics couldn't distinguish between news and opinion programming.

"It seems self-serving on their part," he said.

Fox said network executives have been told that no one from the administration would appear on a Fox show as a guest through the end of the year. Dunn denied there was a White House ban on Fox appearances. "We haven't said that to them," she said.

Last week on his show, Beck placed a red phone on his desk, saying it was a hot line available to Dunn anytime she thought something untrue about Obama was being said on his show.

"I don't think the White House actually wants a dialogue," Beck said. "They want to smear, isolate and destroy."

Dunn on Beck: "He's always good for a laugh."

Beck uncovered a speech Dunn had given where she referred to Mother Teresa and Mao Tse-Tung as "two of my favorite political philosophers." He said it was "insanity" that she was quoting the late Chinese dictator; Dunn said she was being ironic and got the idea for the reference from GOP strategist Lee Atwater.

Dunn also criticized Fox's Chris Wallace for referring to the administration as filled with "crybabies." ("We kept ourselves from ... responding, `I am rubber, you are glue,'" Dunn said). But there was a specific provocation: The president appeared on five Sunday morning public affairs shows on Sept. 20, every one except Wallace's.

"I would think that what this reflects is a pent-up frustration or rage at the coverage they get, not only from Fox but elsewhere," said David Gergen, a CNN commentator and former White House aide.

Gergen said he understands the temptation to go on the attack — he's done it himself — but it frequently turns out to be a mistake.

"My experience has been when the White House engages in personal or organizational attacks, it elevates the other side to virtually the same level of the White House, which is not their intent," he said. "It's going to spike Fox's ratings," which are already high this year.

If the White House wants to fight back, it's better to let surrogates do the work, he said.

Several critics have questioned the wisdom of Obama's approach.

"Whether or not you like Fox News, all of us in the press need to be concerned about the administration of President Barack Obama trying to `punish' the cable news channel for its point of view," wrote television critic David Zurawik in the Baltimore Sun.

Among grass-roots Democrats, many think it was important for the president to put his foot down, said Karen Finney, a Democratic strategist. Many strongly believe that the president and his staff should have nothing to do with Fox, she said.

But research has shown that Fox, easily the top-rated cable news network, has independents and moderates in its audience that the president shouldn't ignore, she said.

"There is room for a more nuanced strategy," she said: Stay away from Beck or the morning "Fox & Friends," she suggested, but an interview with Wallace could be beneficial.

Dunn said the administration still deals with Fox reporters such as Major Garrett in the White House. Obama "has appeared on Fox shows in the past (and) he certainly will appear on them in the future," she said. There have been no backstage "peace talks" in the past week; Obama adviser David Axelrod met with Fox chief Roger Ailes about a month ago.

On Sunday, Axelrod reiterated on ABC's "This Week" that administration officials would appear on the channel, even as he said Fox News shouldn't be treated as a news organization.

In a written statement Sunday, Clemente accused the White House of continuing to "declare war on a news organization" rather than focusing on issues such as jobs and health care.

"The door remains open and we welcome a discussion about the facts behind the issues," he said.

"Given the challenges facing the country, you would think there were a lot better things to talk about, for a news network," Dunn said. "Maybe they would want to cover some of these issues — if they were a news network."

Gergen suggested it's time for a cooling-off period for an administration that finds itself in the usually no-win position of fighting a 24-hour news organization.

"The notion ought to be to restore professional relations to the extent possible and not make this a long-term war," he said.

___

On the Net:

http://www.foxnews.com

http://www.whitehouse.gov

___

EDITOR'S NOTE — David Bauder can be reached at dbauder(at)ap.org

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • David Bauder's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: MSM Incinerator, ObamaExpress, ObamaVine
  • Regions: United States , New York
  • Public Discussion (13)
Paul Lucero

This lady is expendable. Do you think Rahm told her that before she started talking?

  • 3 votes
Reply#1 - Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:16 PM EDT
ComSen

Yeah, it sounds like it was White House policy that they didn't want to publicly admit.

  • 2 votes
#1.1 - Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:35 PM EDT
M. Remmers

Fox News and it's allegiance to the Republican party is hardly a secret to the public much less a secret to the White House. Santa Clause is still a bigger secret than the slant of Fox News. The real secret is why some people still insist it isn't biased...

  • 2 votes
#1.2 - Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:59 PM EDT
Peter17

The real reason that the White House is angry with Fox News is that they have the audacity to actually "fact check" statments made by administration officials.

I am sure that Obama and his aides want to be able to say whatever they want, claim whatever they want, whenever they want, and have the media sit silently nodding their heads in agreement. I guess it is really upsetting to them that someone out there is checking whether or not Obama and his aides are making true statements.

  • 3 votes
#1.3 - Sun Oct 18, 2009 4:30 PM EDT
onomatopoeia

Fox fact checks the White House while CNN fact checks SNL. No wonder Fox has all the ratings in the bag.

  • 4 votes
#1.4 - Sun Oct 18, 2009 7:53 PM EDT
jdl-28

The white house is scare of the truth, if both stupid party would work together instead of going after each other maybe our country wouldn't have the problems we have now. I do not believe either parties are smart enough to do anything rights, and the people of this country just keep putting the stupid idiots back in office what does that say about us. We do need to go down for if we even care at all about this country the American citizens would of stood up to the government and made them listen, but they just sit back and allow their government to do what ever they want.

Say good-by to the United States Of America it is all over, learn how to live a poor life and no toys to play with you didn't need that truck, big screen TV or a home living in a tent will work out just fine.

  • 1 vote
#1.5 - Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:34 AM EDT
my-pockets-r-mt

Is the current administration making such a stink about FOX because they are telling truths or lies? What my understanding is they are upset because FOX doesn't cowtow to them (as other networks do) and tells it like it is. Even if FOX is presenting their opinions and it turns out to be correct the administration doesn't want Americans to know that.

  • 1 vote
#1.6 - Tue Oct 20, 2009 9:36 AM EDT
Reply
SofaKing

The laughable part is that the Republicans are no longer Conservative and Fox is definitely leaning Conservative.

  • 2 votes
Reply#2 - Sun Oct 18, 2009 5:15 PM EDT
George-369262

The Republicans have not been conservative for a very long time... The GOP leadership didn't much care for Reagan, much less conservatism.

"Dunn also criticized Fox's Chris Wallace for referring to the administration as filled with "crybabies." ' So the Administration official crybaby is in the position of complaining about being called 'crybabies'.

  • 1 vote
#2.1 - Mon Oct 19, 2009 5:45 AM EDT
Reply
indytx

From my point of view this story has much less to do with Fox than it does with the administration. What does it say about them to act like children? "We didn't start it mommy, they did. It is one thing to complain about the media as being biased, both sides do, but to start going off claiming they are part of some political conspiracy out to get them, well that is just paranoid. Fox is ok with the reporting of the news but most of the time is spent with opinion shows, which like talk radio, are not my source of information.

  • 1 vote
Reply#3 - Sun Oct 18, 2009 7:16 PM EDT
George-369262

Maybe, but I sure like listening to Charles Krauthammer. He makes me laugh, and there is darn little to laugh about of late.

  • 1 vote
#3.1 - Mon Oct 19, 2009 5:46 AM EDT
Reply
CFunston

Fox is to conservatives, what MSNBC and CNN are to liberals. All of them are biased and anybody that tries to claim MSNBC with Olberman and Maddow aren't in the bag for the democrats is lying to themselves. I don't recall Bush whining about the coverage he got from those networks, and he definitely didn't duck them and refuse to be interviewed by them.

Obama needs to quit his crying, man up, and answer some real questions about his policies instead of hiding behind Olberman's skirt. If his policies and ideas are really so superior, they should have no problem expressing them and delivering his message on the most watched cable news network.

  • 1 vote
Reply#4 - Mon Oct 19, 2009 4:01 PM EDT
ltsandDeleted
Thomas Fiore

The Project on Excellence in Journalism report in 2006 showed that 68 percent of Fox cable stories contained personal opinions, as compared to MSNBC at 27 percent and CNN at 4 percent. The "content analysis" portion of their 2005 report also concluded that "Fox was measurably more one-sided than the other networks, and Fox journalists were more opinionated on the air."--From Wikipedia's Fox News controversies

This is talking about the news, not the commentary portion, of Fox News. If that is what you want go for it, but it speaks less to the truth than to what someones bias happens to be and people are not allowed to have their own facts, just opinions.

As far as appearing on Fox News programs, it makes more sense for Democrats to not say anything about it but just tell them no thank you when invited onto the air. It may that politicians are constitutionally unable to say no to a TV appearance, but what do they have to gain by walking into that meat grinder? The best thing for the Democrats to do is to treat them like a child acting out and ignore them when you can't give them a time out.

    Reply#6 - Mon Oct 19, 2009 5:57 PM EDT
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
    (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
    Newsvine Privacy Statement
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    FUN STUFF:
    • Leaderboard |
    • E-Mail Alerts |
    • Top of the Vine |
    • Newsvine Live |
    • Newsvine Archives |
    • The Greenhouse
    COMPANY STUFF:
    • Code of Honor |
    • Company Info |
    • Contact Us |
    • Jobs |
    • User Agreement |
    • Privacy Policy |
    • About our ads
    LEGAL STUFF:
    • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com