Pakistani gov't pressured on post-offensive plan

advertisement

ISLAMABAD — As Pakistan's army plows ahead with its offensive in South Waziristan, its success is at risk because the government has yet to come up with a plan to run and rebuild the lawless territory so that the Taliban and al-Qaida don't re-emerge.

The Pakistani army launched a ground offensive in the Afghan border region in mid-October, pitting some 30,000 troops against up to 8,000 insurgents in an operation praised by U.S officials. In recent days, the soldiers have entered three major Taliban bases in South Waziristan, largely securing one of them, though many militants are believed to have simply fled the fighting.

But the army's battlefield success could be pointless in the long-run, critics say, because lawmakers have yet to present a clear post-conflict plan for the tribal region — a dithering that could give space for the Taliban and their al-Qaida allies to regroup.

"I think they are running out of time," said Rasul Bakhsh Rais, a Pakistani political expert.

Pakistan's northwest tribal regions lie outside the normal government structure in the rest of the country. Power is vested in tribal elders and appointed "political agents." Residents are subject to colonial-era laws whose features include collective punishment.

Many of the tribal leaders are dead or in hiding, brought down by the Pakistani Taliban in their climb to power in recent years. Much of the economy is based on drugs and weapons smuggling. Islamic conservatism is the norm, and education is so limited that the female literacy rate is just 3 percent.

The army has undertaken four major operations in South Waziristan since 2004, the most recent being the biggest. And the military has pledged this time to avoid the peace deals and stalemates that undermined previous offensives.

But an October report by the Brussels-based International Crisis Group warned that unless Pakistan brought South Waziristan and the rest of the tribal belt into the mainstream political system, extremism would continue to spread, despite the army offensives.

Army and paramilitary forces fought the Taliban in another part of the tribal belt, Bajur, late last year and early this year. The army declared it had vanquished the Taliban there in February. But the governance system has not changed, rebuilding efforts have been patchy — and insurgents have again stepped up attacks.

Leading newspapers on Friday urged the civilian government to come up with a plan for the impoverished region, where lack of opportunities — and fear — have led many in the population of 500,000 to aid or sympathize with the Taliban.

"Unless this happens, the victory being anticipated now could be rendered meaningless, with a new generation of militants rising," wrote The News, an English-language daily.

Lawmakers have made only the vaguest of promises. Last Monday, Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani's office said a provincial government had been asked to devise a strategy to rebuild South Waziristan, but provincial officials did not respond to numerous requests for comment.

Tariq Hayat, an official with the tribal Secretariat, a government body that deals with those areas, said only that local tribal leaders will be brought on board after the offensive ends.

Bringing back the elders is the best way to govern South Waziristan in the short-term, said Mahmood Shah, a former security chief for the tribal areas.

"It's a highly traditional area and attempting to change it through radical reform is never advisable," Shah said.

It could be a while before the elders in hiding are brave enough to go back. Once they do, however, they are less likely than before to take a soft line with Taliban who re-appear in their midst, he predicted.

During a recent trip to South Waziristan, reporters repeatedly quizzed military spokesmen about how long they expected to stay in the region, but were given few specifics. Some said the major fighting could end in two months.

The army commanders said they expected to spend an unspecified amount of time occupying the region, but that it is up to the civilian government to come up with a plan for reconstruction and governance. They also declined to give any specifics about whether tribal police or other security agencies would play a role in bringing some semblance of law and order to the area.

Rais, the political analyst, said federal lawmakers were too distracted by power games in the capital to give a post-conflict South Waziristan the attention it deserves. The ruling party is bickering with its allies over an amnesty bill that would cover the president and other leaders accused of corruption.

Rais said the media, civil society and the army have to push the government to act on a plan for South Waziristan.

"If you don't realize that now is the time to restructure it, then when are you going to do it?" he asked.

__

Associated Press Writer Riaz Khan contributed to this report from Peshawar.

  • 2 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
2.0
0.5
{"commentId":10558278,"authorDomain":"Leafydebater"}

Build some schools, create jobs, build up some towns, give local tribes 90% control over the region, and KEEP the military there!

{"commentId":10558278,"threadId":"719606","contentId":"3474439","authorDomain":"Leafydebater"}
    Reply#1 - Sun Nov 8, 2009 11:25 AM EST
    {"commentId":10558568,"authorDomain":"eric-albert"}

    That is because when military thugs, both in Pakistan and within American Empire create abstracted enemies, "militants", "Al Qaida", "Taliban", where mostly Pushtan tribes are fighting occupation, aggression, illega drones, endless Wedding bombing massacres and Funerals, the result is real enemies, caused by State Terrorism, feeding the flames of counter terrorism. The corporate media and AP, continue to cheerlead illegal policies, criminal policies, and never question these proto fascist assumptions.

    {"commentId":10558568,"threadId":"719606","contentId":"3474439","authorDomain":"eric-albert"}
    • 1 vote
    Reply#2 - Sun Nov 8, 2009 11:41 AM EST
    {"commentId":10559842,"authorDomain":"eric-albert"}

    I think that the corporte media and AP need to start reading, how the majority view their corrupt role:

    From the Downing Street Memo to Katrina How the Media Enables Government Lies

    http://www.counterpunch.org/bovard11062009.html

    excerpt:

    Why do politicians so easily get away with telling lies? In large part, because the news media are more interested in bonding with politicians than in exposing them. Americans are encouraged to believe that the media will serve as a check and a balance on the government. Instead, the press too often volunteer as unpaid pimps, helping politicians deceive the public....

    Flora Lewis, a New York Times columnist, writing three weeks before 9/11, commented in a review of a book on U.S. government lies on the Vietnam War, “There will probably never be a return to the discretion, really collusion, with which the media used to treat presidents, and it is just as well.” But within months of her comment, the media had proven itself as craven as ever. The Washington Post’s Dana Milbank, who did some of the best exposés of George W. Bush’s falsehoods in his first term, noted that it was not until July 2002 that “the White House press corps showed its teeth” in response to administration deceptions. Even the exposés of FBI and CIA intelligence failures in May 2002 did not end the “phase of alliance” between the White House and the press, as political scientist Martha Kumar observed....

    After the war started, the falsehood of Bush’s claims was often treated as a one-day story, buried in the back of the front section or on the editorial page.

    Afterward, most papers quickly returned to printing the president’s proclamations as gospel. Eric Alterman, author of When Presidents Lie, observed,

    Virtually every major news media outlet devoted more attention to the lies and dissimulations of one New York Times reporter, Jayson Blair, than to those of the president and vice president of the United States regarding Iraq. Given that these two deceptions took place virtually simultaneously, they demonstrate that while some forms of deliberate deception remain intolerable in public life, those of the U.S. commander in chief are not among them....

    The character of the Washington press corps also shone bright in its nonresponse to the Downing Street Memo. On May 1, 2005, the London Times printed a memo from a British cabinet meeting on July 23, 2002, that reported the findings of the visit by Britain’s intelligence chief to Washington to confer with CIA chief George Tenet and other top Bush administration officials. The memo quoted the intelligence chief: “Military action was now seen as inevitable. Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy.”....

    Deceit has become ritualized in U.S. foreign policy. From 2002 onwards, the White House Iraq Group spewed out false information that the New York Times and other prominent media outlets routinely accepted without criticism or verification. After many of the assertions were later discovered to be false, the White House and much of the media treated the falsehoods as irrelevant to the legitimacy of the U.S. invasion. The lack of attention paid to political lies is itself symptomatic of the bias in favor of submitting to rulers regardless of how much people are defrauded......"

    {"commentId":10559842,"threadId":"719606","contentId":"3474439","authorDomain":"eric-albert"}
    • 1 vote
    #2.1 - Sun Nov 8, 2009 12:59 PM EST
    Reply
    {"commentId":10558661,"authorDomain":"iqballatif"}

    Build schools, more schools and more schools. Connect them to the world through technology, let them see what their chlidren are missing.

    In this world of knowledge they live in dark ages lets bring knowledge to them.

    {"commentId":10558661,"threadId":"719606","contentId":"3474439","authorDomain":"iqballatif"}
    • 1 vote
    Reply#3 - Sun Nov 8, 2009 11:47 AM EST
    {"commentId":10566310,"authorDomain":"salmann111"}

    Based on the previous records thats a very very remote possibility since most of the aid money is going to build ghq's and more govt./mil secrity appratus (bullet proof cars and limos). Thats why the military and govt. does not want accountability proposals in the aid package. Based on past records military will make some lashkars armed and fed by military (disguised talibans as has happened in swat), pack up and leave to make an excuse again later to return another day if and when westreners start to cry and enough miltary aid is delivered as a pre-condition for any operation. Business as usual while the millions displaced must wait for the UN to come and help. Case to be closed soon.

    {"commentId":10566310,"threadId":"719606","contentId":"3474439","authorDomain":"salmann111"}
      #3.1 - Sun Nov 8, 2009 9:09 PM EST
      Reply
      {"commentId":10686149,"authorDomain":"imran-qadeermrbrhq"}

      there is one interesting point to be noted regarding what is happening in the border areas in pak-afghan. and that is the afghan taliban are continuing activities against the nato led forces and local authorities especially the police and armed militia and further their spokesmen say that we have no links and concerns with the pakistani taleban. the pakistani taliban on the other hand are not actually fighting against the army or armed militia- they are actually targetting innocent civilians. this is a big difference and one is right to argue that there are hidden hands behind the scenes.

      if u know one pathan u actually know all of them - i say so beccause i know the tribal culture where u cannot just hide in the mountains . it is not like big cities where neighbours living side by side to each other for deccades dont know the names of eachother. a tribe in fact is a big family and in pashtun areas you cannot live for a single night without a your tribe.

      there is enough evidence with pak authorities and even the commoners know who is behind the recent incidences

      the fact is in 80s and early 90s saying somthing against pakistan was forbidden and now against these hidden hands is forbidden

      {"commentId":10686149,"threadId":"719606","contentId":"3474439","authorDomain":"imran-qadeermrbrhq"}
        Reply#4 - Sun Nov 15, 2009 6:53 AM EST
        {"canLink":false,"threadId":"719606","isPrivate":false}
        Leave a Comment:
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
        {"threadId":"719606","contentId":"3474439"}
        Start TrackingStart Tracking
        Stop TrackingStop Tracking