Terror training camps smaller, harder to target

advertisement

WASHINGTON — Under growing pressure from U.S. missile strikes, the al-Qaida terror network is relying more heavily on local insurgent groups along the Pakistan border to house training camps that are growing smaller and more mobile, according to counterterrorism officials and analysts.

The changes in the terror group's training operations — often hidden inside walled compounds deep in Pakistan's mountains — have made them increasingly difficult to target by U.S. intelligence forces as they have stepped up drone attacks over the past year.

While the training still includes forays into deserted hillsides to practice planting and detonating explosives, al-Qaida trainers are now also taking their instruction on the road, moving temporary training operations from compound to compound, where fellow insurgents welcome them.

The attacks on the camps, which have become an integral part of the Obama administration's war against the terror group, also risk civilian casualties — which in turn have inflamed anti-American sentiment among the Pakistanis, critical allies in widening the anti-terror campaign.

The camps took on a heightened profile in recent months as U.S. investigators probed the case of accused New York terror suspect Najibullah Zazi. The Afghan emigre reportedly flew to Pakistan late last year and traveled to Peshawar, in the northwest frontier, where he received training on weapons and explosives.

Counterterrorism officials estimate that Zazi is one of 100 to 150 westerners who have gone to the Pakistan border region for terror training in the last year. Their ability to filter in and out of the isolated camps has fueled fears that "sleeper" operatives bearing U.S. or western passports are traveling back and forth with ease to train and plot attacks destined within America's borders.

Several officials provided details about the camps on condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters and other experts acknowledged the trends.

Counterterrorism officials and analysts say an exact number of camps along the border is impossible to pin down, but say they are easily in the dozens.

Vahid Brown, a researcher at the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point, said that recent trends suggest al-Qaida is now moving its trainers and resources around, operating within camps operated by a variety of militant groups, including some that have long-standing relationships with Pakistan's Directorate for Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and military intelligence.

That indirect protection offers al-Qaida some degree of security it might not have on its own, he said.

Militant groups that have provided al-Qaida with training centers include Jaish-e-Mohammed, Lashkar-e-Janghvi, and Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan — factions that have connections to Taliban insurgents and have also been linked to brutal attacks against the government. Jaish-e-Mohammed was known for ties to the Pakistani military, but more has recently sided with Taliban militants to fight security forces along the border.

The groups have reportedly hosted al-Qaida training in compounds in Waziristan and Swat Valley, and officials have more recently started seeing similar activities in the Punjab province, where some militant groups have stronger ties to the Pakistani government.

"Al-Qaida doesn't have local relationship that allow for these kinds of camps to be operated in more or less full view," said Brown. "It makes more sense for al-Qaida strategy to not put their eggs into one stable basket and try to be its own training provider, but rather to use its portable training resources and assets as a means of extending the violence."

Gone are the days, said officials and analysts, when al-Qaida leaders filled sprawling open-air training camps inside Afghanistan with terror recruits from around the world. Such bases as Tarnack Farms, a massive camp outside Kandahar's airport where Osama bin Laden was believed to have plotted the Sept. 11 attacks, contained busy firing ranges and other facilities, but were also easy to detect.

Now, smaller temporary camps hidden inside stark stone buildings blend in with surrounding nondescript mountain compounds that can house innocent civilians.

"All you need is a shack or a house to learn how to fabricate explosives using homemade or commercially available ingredients," said Bruce Hoffman, a counterterrorism expert at Georgetown University and a longtime government adviser.

Hoffman adds that in these harder-to-find camps, "they're not training insurgents, they're training terrorists for deployment to the west ... Some of them may be deployed in the insurgency, but I think its obvious that their value to these groups is not fighting on the battlefield in South Asia but in being deployed back to their home or adopted countries as sleepers."

In a recently released al-Qaida Internet video filmed inside one nameless camp, a camera pans across open laptop computers and lingers on a sleeping bag covered with explosives and electronic equipment. Shelves are filled with canisters holding unknown material, as well as electronic scales, often used to measure explosives.

Hanging from the walls are a panoply of automatic weapons and other guns, and outside, spread across a blanket, lay rocket propelled grenade launchers and an ammunition display.

According to the Washington-based Site Intelligence Group, which monitors militant Web sites and made the video available, the footage — posted on jihadist forums about a month ago — supposedly shows a training camp in Pakistan's Waziristan region. The anonymous Web poster, according to Site, suggested the video showed a camp where slain al-Qaida chemical weapons expert Abu Khabab al-Masri trained militants.

Al-Masri was killed in a drone strike in July 2008 — one of as many as 50 such attacks in the last year conducted by the U.S. Most of the strikes have been coordinated by the CIA, but U.S. officials will not discuss or acknowledge details of the drone program.

Between 100 and 200 hard-core al-Qaida leaders and operatives filter in and out of these small bases near the border, U.S. intelligence officials have said. But for westerners such as Zazi, the path to the training camps often begins with a religious pilgrimage of sorts, linked inside Pakistan to a charitable organization, missionary or school known as a madrassa.

According to Brown, the madrassas, which are historically nonviolent organizations, have also had long-standing ties with jihadi groups.

"They can be used as a revolving door by folks from the west who want to make it to training camps," said Brown. People within those nonviolent organizations, he said, will say, "if you want to be violent, you have to leave us, but here's an address and a letter of introduction" for a recruiter from one of the militant groups.

Officials stress that even though the terror training is now far more mobile than it once was, it remains no less sophisticated or deadly.

"Certainly their ambition is to mount headline-grabbing attacks, visual spectaculars," said Richard Barrett, coordinator of the monitoring team for the U.N.'s Al-Qaida and Taliban Sanctions Committee. "They are extremely suspicious of anyone coming in and are very careful of security, so it's quite difficult to make these contacts and to develop them."

The militants, he said, "are patient people. They will wait for the tide to turn or a lucky break."

___

On the Net:

Combating Terrorism Center at West Point: http://www.ctc.usma.edu/

  • 1 Vote
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
1.0
{"commentId":10572636,"authorDomain":"black-spider"}

Having trouble finding the target?

That's simple. Blanket bomb the whole area with nukes. They crawl back into their caves for another 1200 years where they belong.

The only way to rid the Afghan and Pakistan problem is full scale nuclear blanket.

Sounds crazy? Well, what they do is crazy too. We either absorb the economic and human costs or we do something really really nasty.

We ought to pull out of those countries and let China deal with it. Besides, China is developing their resources just like Britain did back 100 years ago.

China IS the new British Empire, searching for land, resources and imperialistic targets.

Why are US troops protecting Chinese copper developments? This is NUTS!

{"commentId":10572636,"threadId":"720122","contentId":"3476224","authorDomain":"black-spider"}
    Reply#1 - Mon Nov 9, 2009 10:47 AM EST
    {"commentId":10574886,"authorDomain":"black-spider"}

    If you want to win in Afghanistan, and why I am not sure, I think it's a waste of money, lives and resources, but if you military industrialist really get a kick out of this war mongering,

    then you need to add about 500,000 troops from international brigades.

    you will need to set up a puppet international government permanently, because the typical citizen is something like a barbarian from the year 800 AD, have no interest in Western ideas, democracy and other modern entities.

    so basically, eradicate the poppy fields permanently to save our children dying and rotting out from heroine addiction, then leave the stone aged place.

    And if the Chinese want to stay there and keep mining copper, let them do it on their own, providing their own protection.

    Of course then you will say: oh, China has an imperialist footprint in the middle east!

    So?

    {"commentId":10574886,"threadId":"720122","contentId":"3476224","authorDomain":"black-spider"}
      Reply#2 - Mon Nov 9, 2009 12:33 PM EST
      {"canLink":false,"threadId":"720122","isPrivate":false}
      Leave a Comment:
      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
      {"threadId":"720122","contentId":"3476224"}
      Start TrackingStart Tracking
      Stop TrackingStop Tracking