LOS ANGELES — Suddenly, the moon looks exciting again. It has lots of water, scientists said Friday — a thrilling discovery that sent a ripple of hope for a future astronaut outpost in a place that has always seemed barren and inhospitable.
Experts have long suspected there was water on the moon. Confirmation came from data churned up by two NASA spacecraft that intentionally slammed into a lunar crater last month.
"Indeed, yes, we found water. And we didn't find just a little bit. We found a significant amount," said Anthony Colaprete, lead scientist for the mission, holding up a white water bucket for emphasis.
The lunar crash kicked up at least 25 gallons and that's only what scientists could see from the plumes of the impact, Colaprete said.
Some space policy experts say that makes the moon attractive for exploration again. Having an abundance of water would make it easier to set up a base camp for astronauts, supplying drinking water and a key ingredient for rocket fuel.
"Having definitive evidence that there is substantial water is a significant step forward in making the moon an interesting place to go," said George Washington University space policy scholar John Logsdon.
Even so, members of the blue-ribbon panel reviewing NASA's future plans said it doesn't change their conclusion that the program needs more money to get beyond near-Earth orbit. The panel wants NASA to look at other potential destinations like asteroids and Mars.
"This new and terrific result reassures us about lunar resources, but ... the challenges currently facing the human spaceflight program remain," Chris Chyba, a Princeton astrophysicist who is on the panel, said in an e-mail.
President George W. Bush had proposed a more than $100 billion plan to return astronauts to the moon, then go on to Mars; a test flight of an early version of a new rocket was a success last month. President Barack Obama appointed the special panel to look at the entire moon exploration program. The decision is now up to the White House, and NASA's lunar plans are somewhat on hold until then.
As for unmanned exploration, previous missions had detected the presence of hydrogen in lunar craters near the moon's poles, possible evidence of ice. In September, scientists reported finding tiny amounts of water in the lunar soil all over the moon's surface.
But it was NASA's Oct. 9 mission involving the Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite, LCROSS, that provided the stunning confirmation announced Friday — water, in the forms of ice and vapor.
"Rather than a dead and unchanging world, it could in fact be a very dynamic and interesting one," said Greg Delory of the University of California, Berkeley, who was not involved in the mission, led by NASA's Ames Research Center in Mountain View, Calif.
The LCROSS spacecraft only hit one spot on the moon and it's unclear how much water there is across the entire moon.
The October mission involved two strikes into a permanently shadowed crater near the south pole. First, an empty rocket hull slammed into the Cabeus crater. Then, a trailing spacecraft recorded the drama live before it also crashed into the same spot four minutes later.
Though scientists were overjoyed with the plethora of data beamed back to Earth, the mission was a public relations dud. Space enthusiasts who stayed up all night to watch the spectacle did not see the promised giant plume of debris.
NASA scientists had predicted the twin impacts would spew six miles of dust into the sunlight. Instead, images revealed only a mile-high plume, and it was not visible to many amateur astronomers peering through telescopes.
Scientists spent a month analyzing data from the spacecraft's spectrometers, instruments that can detect strong signals of water molecules in the plume.
"We've had hints that there is water. This was almost like tasting it," said Peter Schultz, professor of geological sciences at Brown University and a co-investigator on the LCROSS mission.
Astronaut Buzz Aldrin, who in 1969 made his historic Apollo 11 moonwalk with Neil Armstrong, was pleased to hear the latest discovery, but still believes the U.S. should focus on colonizing Mars.
"People will overreact to this news and say, `Let's have a water rush to the moon,'" Aldrin said. "It doesn't justify that."
Mission scientists said it would take more time to tease out what else was kicked up in the moon dust.
___
AP Science Writer Seth Borenstein contributed to this report.
___
On the Net:
LCROSS mission: http://www.nasa.gov/mission(underscore)pages/LCROSS/main/
This is amazing, especially when one considers that a generation or two ago many scientists might have poked fun at a person who claimed there was ice or water on the moon.
I'm thirsty. Anyone else headin' to the moon tonight?
I'm sure there's a hangover joke in there, somewhere, but I just can't think of it... :)
Lets see......we slammed a remote controlled vehicle into the moon and found water. This is great news......if you happen to be on the moon and your thirsty. Before you start saying we should start a colony there, bear in mind that the cost of getting any signicant payload out of our earths atmosphere is prohibitive.
On another note, 12 Americans have supposedly walked on the moons surface. They found no water? It just came to be in the past 40 years? Someone is not telling us the whole truth....look at some of the pictures from the moon.......oh yeah, you can't....NASA LOST THE PICTURES......our government, who saves EVERYTHING, can't figure out what happened to all of the moon footage........something is amiss here.
If there was no water then.......but there is water now......well then it would seem that if you werent lying then, your lying now........or vise- versa......
When I was a kid, I believed wholeheartedly in America's space program. Even when the Rocket scientist experts messed up and lost vehicles on the launchpad. And worse, lost people on the launchpad. Apollo 13 almost didn't make it. Challenger was lost with all hands aboard OVER AN 'O' RING !!!! We lost another shuttle during re-entry. I still believe we should be conducting research in space. But I think NASA needs to be more upfront with what they are doing there.
I believe NASA knows a lot more about space then they are letting on. I also believe that what they know is going to be used for military purposes.....to hell with everything else.
I think its sad
I agree, gary-1157637, that "military purposes" will be a huge part of what NASA uses its information for. The space program has been rooted in military purposes since its beginning during the Cold War. I would love for the world to cooperate peacefully in the pursuit of knowledge and wisdom.
Regarding water, I am not convinced that NASA has deliberately lied. I think it more likely that they knew less than they thought they did in the 1960s -- and even now know less than they claim to.
Who knows? There may be another explanation for what they saw than it being water. But the publicity and belief may help inspire public support for more dollars to expand NASA's space exploration in upcoming years.
Water can't exist on the bright side of the moon. Landing on the side in continual darkness would be exactly as hard as it sounds, so no, we didn't find water where we landed.
Water + electricity from solar panels + some robots = rocket fuel. Finding water means we can have an ideal gas station out there, easy to get to and easy to launch from with a full tank.
I read in another article that the US was planning on going to the moon again in 2020. Again, that's funny.
I think they got the headline slightly wrong.
It should read;
Splash! NASA Pelosi's brain strikes found significant water
The rocket booster that crashed into the moon initially was fueled by the liquid fuels hydrogen and oxygen. Unless the fuel tanks were completely dry, those tanks exploding together on the surface would make some water. As much as 25 gallons, perhaps?
I would prefer that there really be lots and lots of water in those southern lunar craters, maybe even water with a high deuterium and tritium ratio. The moon is rich in titanium and the backside offers locations for observatories completely without ground jiggling from planetary tremors and shielded from radio interference from Earth
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |