Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Bernanke makes case for strong Fed role on banks

Sat Nov 28, 2009 1:25 PM EST
us-news, business, us, congress, federal-reserve, bernanke
Eileen Aj Connelly, AP Personal Finance Writer

FILE - In this Oct. 23, 2009 file photo, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke listens to businessmen following an address in Chatham, Mass. Bernanke is concerned that congressional efforts at financial reform could weaken the central bank's ability to handle future crises and may politicize monetary policy. He made the comments in an Op-Ed piece to appear in the Washington Post, five days before the Senate Banking committee holds a hearing on his nomination for a second term. (AP Photo/Charles Krupa)

Advertise | AdChoices

NEW YORK — The chairman of the Federal Reserve is concerned that congressional efforts at financial reform could weaken the central bank's ability to handle future crises and may politicize monetary policy.

Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke made the comments in an Op-Ed piece to appear in Sunday's Washington Post, five days before the Senate Banking committee holds a hearing on his nomination for a second term. His current four-year term expires Jan. 31.

Bernanke wrote the nation is challenged to design a financial oversight system that will "embody the lessons of the past two years and provide a robust framework for preventing future crises and the economic damage they cause."

But two proposals being considered "are very much out of step with the global consensus on the appropriate role of central banks, and they would seriously impair the prospects for economic and financial stability in the United States," he said.

The first item in question is a bill before the Senate that would strip the Fed of its bank regulation authority and give the Senate a role in selecting the 12 regional Federal Reserve bank presidents, proposed by Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd, D-Conn.

Dodd says his measure would return the Fed to its core mission of setting monetary policy, claiming it proved itself "an abysmal failure" by not cracking down on risky lending practices that led to the financial meltdown.

Bernanke countered that the Fed played "a major part in arresting the crisis."

In what will likely be seen as an implicit defense of Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, who was president of the New York Federal Reserve Bank last year, Bernanke said some government actions may have been "distasteful and unfair" but were needed to avoid a global economic catastrophe rivaling the Great Depression.

"My colleagues at the Federal Reserve and I were determined not to allow that to happen," Bernanke wrote.

Notably, he makes no mention of the bill's language that would strip the Fed of consumer protection authorities, which he has previously opposed. That may indicate a concession to political and populist demands for a new pro-consumer agency.

The second piece of legislation Bernanke comments on is an amendment from Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, in a House financial regulatory bill that would repeal a 1978 ban on congressional audits of Fed interest-rate decisions.

Paul maintains the repeal would bring more transparency and accountability, and notes it contains language that states it should not be construed as interference in or dictation of monetary policy by Congress.

Bernanke said the Fed's ability to set interest rates and provide stimulus through lending and asset-purchase programs depends upon being able to operate independently of political influence. Opening monetary policy decisions to the scrutiny of Congress "would undermine the confidence the public and the markets have in the Fed to act in the long-term economic interest of the nation."

The Fed chairman recognized that the proposals are in part born of public anger over the financial crisis and the rescues of big financial firms. He said he strongly supports measures to ensure that such interventions never happen again. He wants tougher oversight of large, complex financial firms to make sure that no one company is "too big to fail," and that the costs of future failures are not borne by taxpayers.

"There is a strong case for a continued role for the Federal Reserve in bank supervision," he said, citing expertise needed to supervise "highly complex financial firms" and the information gleaned from regulating banks that is used to set monetary policy. He also pointed to the results of the "stress tests" done on banks earlier this year, maintaining they helped restore public confidence in the banking system.

____

Associated Press writer Jim Kuhnhenn in Washington contributed to this report.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Eileen Aj Connelly's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: New York
  • Public Discussion (32)
flyfishva

You will never convince me there was no political influence when we had to bail out the too big to fail last year...sorry, I don't buy it.

  • 6 votes
Reply#1 - Sat Nov 28, 2009 2:04 PM EST
brianfromPA

Political in the sense of Republican and Democrat? No... Political in the sense that all of his friends still work on Wall Street and to allow Goldman Sachs and AIG to fail would have brought to light the secret criminal activity going on for the last 4 decades?... Yes

The FED is the front for the ruination of the global economic structure... If my somewhat broad statement is too broad, then I apologize... there are VOLUMES about the FED available to anyone with a few days to Google search it.

  • 3 votes
#1.1 - Sat Nov 28, 2009 3:58 PM EST
seahawks76

Exactly Brian-

Of course its "Political"...the banks own the government now.

  • 2 votes
#1.2 - Sat Nov 28, 2009 4:14 PM EST
Brandon-801865

I voted for Obama, but absolutely distrust anything that Bernanke, Summers, or Geithner have to say.

They are carryovers from the criminal Shrub Administration.

  • 4 votes
#1.3 - Sat Nov 28, 2009 5:17 PM EST
freebirdreaming

and may politicize monetary policy.

first clue that he thinks we are stupid.

  • 2 votes
#1.4 - Sun Nov 29, 2009 11:04 PM EST
Reply
Rob-510663

The Federal Reserve is not the organization to do this. In May 2009 the Federal Reserve came to capital hill and could not account for 9 trillion of balance sheet transactions. To this date they still cannot. I own my own business if I cannot account for something on my balance sheet its called embezzlement and I go to jail. In Washington we give them more power.

I urge all to call their congresspeople and tell them the only way to let the Federal Reserve have this type of control is a to have a full blown audit. There is a reason Mr. Frank, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Schumer, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Bohener, and Mr. Wyatt are against the audit of the Federal Reserve is they know number 1. The Federal Reserve would not pass an full blown audit. Number 2 they know the money is and are afraid to allow that to come out.

Wake up America!!!! Before its too late.

  • 7 votes
Reply#2 - Sat Nov 28, 2009 2:11 PM EST
tony1234

I have been pressing my Senator and Congressman since Feb. when Ron Paul filed HR1277- Audit the Fed. The bill had 313 co-sponsors. But this week the Financial Committee decided to attach the bill to the other in consideration. That is why the FED is fighting. If they pass the law, they are going to have more power, but no more secrets either. This private central bank has been sucking us dry since 1913 and people have begun to realize it.

I am awake and kicking!

  • 3 votes
#2.1 - Sat Nov 28, 2009 5:18 PM EST
Jivatman

The Bloomberg Reporter who sued the Fed died today. I doubt the timing of this message is a coincidence.

It's sad Americans give so little recognition or gratitude to those who want to restore of Democratic-Republic form of government

I know that men like him and Ron Paul know they are putting their lives on the line, but there is no room for fear inside of them.

  • 2 votes
#2.2 - Sat Nov 28, 2009 6:02 PM EST
Rob-510663

Right on everyone, let's keep the pressure on. I write my congresspeople every week asking them where the 9 trillion is the Fed cannot account for. I won't stop until I get an answer. To give them more power without the transparency is very dangerous.

    #2.3 - Sat Nov 28, 2009 7:31 PM EST
    Reply
    More Than Happy

    Absolutely, the inmates have been running the asylum on Wall Street for way too long. The convoluted derivatives must be brought under control comparable to normal stocks, bonds, and options, with things like reserve requirements and separation of financial powers. The Fed should have done this a long time ago, before it took a giant crash to convince people.

    • 3 votes
    Reply#3 - Sat Nov 28, 2009 3:52 PM EST
    JoulesBeef

    reserve requirments were removed under teh bush admin.
    as for derivatives.. even phds in economics have trouble explaining those things.
    I like the idea, if you cant explain it, than you cant sell it.

    and really in finances, you cant have a legitimate and fair market.. without transparency.. yes that costs money for business in the form of reporting and compliance .. but it is the only way to make things fair.
    WHen you buy a car they have to tell you the wrecks it has been in... well when i buy stock i should be able to find out the truth in a corporate bottom line.

    • 2 votes
    #3.1 - Sat Nov 28, 2009 4:27 PM EST
    Rob-510663

    The Federal Reserve is as bad as the Wall Street people are. 9 trillion unaccounted for since May 2009.

    http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/05/federal-reserve-can-not-account-for-9.html

    Read it and learn. You want these people running more of the financial markets?

    While your at it look at what the FHA is doing. They are becoming the largest sub-prime lender in the country. If I remember properly isn't that what started this to begin with, with the Federal Reserve help, were building another bubble.

    • 1 vote
    #3.2 - Sat Nov 28, 2009 7:33 PM EST
    Reply
    Eric AlbertDeleted
    JoulesBeef

    with all the bitching about the fed,.. no one seems concerned with the alternatives.

    yes the fed can suck.
    yes they arent as transparent as some peopel think they ought to be.
    yes i thank the big banks have too much influence on the gov.
    yes i dont like seeing the same faces from the fed get the same jobs with every admin.

    But what we had before sucked even worse.
    yall see with health care and cap and trade and other things.. how hard it is to get anything done in government?
    yeah once in a while they act fast.. wars.. the bailout(well actually that took a year of recession before they even admited there was a problem but it felt fast and was fast after they admitted there was a problem)

    can you imagine how hard it would be to do something that seems relatively minor like lower or raise interest rates? Things like that could have huge effects on the economy. Yes i get the irony since we are in a recession and congress doesnt have the control of the fed.. But we would have far more frequent, longer lasting recession if we give all that power back to congress.

    hey I am for change.. but it is far to easy to bitch at status quo and far harder to come up with a BETTER alternative.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#5 - Sat Nov 28, 2009 4:24 PM EST
    brianfromPA

    It would be better if the Gold Standard were not removed... If you do the research you find a trail of individuals that work in the now unregulated Financial industry on Wall Street and the Federal Reserve behind that change.

    It would be better if the laws put in place to prevent another Recession in the 30's were not removed. It would be better if the FED were never created in the first place since we wouldn't have these corporations operating on such a level as to be above the law on a global scale.

    The FED is actually bad for small businesses, and for the Free Market. At this point we have no alternatives you are right... We have made the bed, and now we must lie in it. The real reset is coming... Get ready and prepare... the ride will be ugly, and perhaps... we will get a real free market capitalism in the end. One can dream anyway.

    • 4 votes
    #5.1 - Sat Nov 28, 2009 4:39 PM EST
    Jivatman

    At this point nothing can prevent a massive recession. It's in the cards, the bailouts and stimulus really only made things worse by allowing people to hide their derivatives. Until the derivatives are accounted for, there will be no recovery. Period.

    The derivatives must be marked to market. This will hurt. The Fed must be audited and made transparent. This will hurt.

    But a free and stable market cannot be returned until those steps are made, as well as restoration of simple and common sense regulations like glass-steagall.

    In the long run, the Fed is profoundly anti-democratic. Fully auditing it at least occasionally removes the most malicious aspects of it's power, but ultimately we can return to greenbacks, U.S. Issued currency that brought about the most prosperous and equitable period in American history.

    If this mischievous financial policy [greenbacks], which has its origin in the American Republic, shall become permanent, then that government will furnish its own money without cost! It will pay off its debts and be without debt.
    It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous without precedent in the history of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to America. That government must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe.
    - Times of London newspaper, 1865

    Andrew Jackson destroyed the prior, private bank due to it's rampant corruption.

    U.S. Notes are exactly what the bankers don't want.

    • 3 votes
    #5.2 - Sat Nov 28, 2009 5:04 PM EST
    Rob-510663

    The better alternative is to fully audit the Federal Reserve.

    Do not force the banks to lend money to people who cannot afford it.

    Go back to the days of 20% down on housing. Like every house i have owned. If I can do it so can everyone else, its called work and sacrifice. No where does it state everyone has the right to own a house.

    Go back to the "Gold Standard" and get rid of the "Fiat Currency" That way the dollar cannot be devalued as much as it is today with the 24/7 printing of money.

    Do not bailout companies because they give campaign contributions to politicans

    We stop doing this and guess what we will survive.

    • 1 vote
    #5.3 - Sat Nov 28, 2009 8:01 PM EST
    Reply
    tony1234

    Thomas Jefferson said, "If the America people ever allow private banks to control the issuance of their currencies, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their prosperity until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."

    • 4 votes
    Reply#6 - Sat Nov 28, 2009 5:52 PM EST
    tony1234

    President Woodrow Wilson, pressured by his political and financial backers, signed it on December 23, 1913. Later, he apologized to the american public for signing this law. "I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men." -Woodrow Wilson, after signing the Federal Reserve into existence

    • 4 votes
    #6.1 - Sat Nov 28, 2009 5:54 PM EST
    Reply
    raymond-392453

    That picture(above) of Bernanke says it all --- The Portrait of Arrogant,Secretive,Malicious,Greedy Oligarchy of men that run this Nation !!!

    • 3 votes
    Reply#7 - Sat Nov 28, 2009 6:22 PM EST
    Lonnie-1003775

    agree 100%

    • 2 votes
    #7.1 - Sat Nov 28, 2009 7:47 PM EST
    Reply
    Atsidi

    I am sure everyone on this thread so far knows it, but it constantly amazes me how many people do not understand that the federal reserve bank is not federal at all, it is a private bank owned by several different groups and people, some of whom are not even US citizens. It is banks, loans, credit and interest that got us into this financial mess in the first place.

    Everybody seems inclined to blame any one of several presidents for all our problems. In my opinion the problem started in 1913 when the fed was formed. The people have been played like a finely tuned instrument for a lot of years and now take for granted the existence of the fed. Like several have already said, "Wake up people."

    • 4 votes
    Reply#8 - Sat Nov 28, 2009 6:36 PM EST
    tony1234

    A year ago I started e-mailing my class mates, about 140, with this info and links about the FED. Only two e-mail me with a thank you. One of them, asked to be removed from the mail list because "I must be crazy in believing that crap". Most people just don't care with news about economy. I posted links on Facebook about all this for years and nobody even comments a thing.

    • 1 vote
    #8.1 - Sat Nov 28, 2009 7:12 PM EST
    Atsidi

    Seems that that is mostly it, nobody cares. Even if people did care, nothing will change with out the action of congress, and that just won't happen under the current system. We are headed into bankruptcy and hyper inflation and probably the most anybody that saw it coming will be able to do is say I told you so.

    • 1 vote
    #8.2 - Sat Nov 28, 2009 7:52 PM EST
    Reply
    Chuck101

    The American government sucks at regulation and managing any type of service or financial institution. How can congressmen regulate the very people they take bribes from?

    • 2 votes
    Reply#9 - Sat Nov 28, 2009 7:00 PM EST
    Beta Test Victim

    Watch the movie Fall of The Republic for some answers to that question. Not all are crooks. We need to vote more good people into these positions to remove the criminal element.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VebOTc-7shU

      #9.1 - Sun Nov 29, 2009 12:27 AM EST
      Reply
      jbdaad

      The Fed chairman recognized that the proposals are in part born of public anger over the financial crisis and the rescues of big financial firms. He said he strongly supports measures to ensure that such interventions never happen again.

      And why should he care? They have all kinds of ways to feed their buddies money without this..."intervention"?

      Daily Kos: A $1.2 Trillion Slush Fund: My Boss Grilled the Vice ...

      Jan 14, 2009 ... Congressman Alan Grayson needs your help to find $1.2 trillion of ...... it is not a tax obligation, but lending from the FED Reserve through the ..... the fed the best way to dismantle, its a back door way of finding ...

      • 2 votes
      Reply#10 - Sat Nov 28, 2009 7:47 PM EST
      Rixar13

      Dodd says his measure would return the Fed to its core mission of setting monetary policy, claiming it proved itself "an abysmal failure" by not cracking down on risky lending practices that led to the financial meltdown.

      Should have let the Banks Fail. What happened to Free Market???? Audit

      • 3 votes
      Reply#11 - Sat Nov 28, 2009 8:00 PM EST
      atthebeachinsd

      Any bets the Fed will get off the hook again now that the general public are asking questions. The Fed does not have to answer these questions.

      1) Who are you giving money to and what are terms

      2) What kinds of swap agreements do you have with other central banks

      How much longer will the American public allow this institution to rob them of their savings.....

      • 2 votes
      Reply#12 - Sun Nov 29, 2009 10:11 PM EST
      tony1234

      Have you contacted your congresspeople about this? It works if we all do it.

      • 1 vote
      #12.1 - Sun Nov 29, 2009 10:38 PM EST
      BelindaK

      I absolutely intend to contact some people about this. The Fed needs to be audited. Period. There is obviously some hinky stuff going on there and we have a right to know what it is and who is responsible.

      • 2 votes
      #12.2 - Mon Nov 30, 2009 7:14 AM EST
      Reply
      seahawks76

      So top 3 bailout banks? Yeah...they've just passed out 30 BILLION in bonuses this last year. Meanwhile we pay for their debt through bailouts:

      http://seahawks76.newsvine.com/_news/2009/11/29/3564182-15-signs-american-society-is-coming-apart-at-the-seams

      • 2 votes
      Reply#13 - Sun Nov 29, 2009 11:01 PM EST
      Leave a Comment:
      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
      You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
      (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
      Newsvine Privacy Statement
      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
      FUN STUFF:
      • Leaderboard |
      • E-Mail Alerts |
      • Top of the Vine |
      • Newsvine Live |
      • Newsvine Archives |
      • The Greenhouse
      COMPANY STUFF:
      • Code of Honor |
      • Company Info |
      • Contact Us |
      • Jobs |
      • User Agreement |
      • Privacy Policy |
      • About our ads
      LEGAL STUFF:
      • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
      • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
      • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com