Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
advertisement
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

World's largest atom smasher breaks power record

Mon Nov 30, 2009 4:43 AM EST
world-news, technology, science, eu, big, machine, big-bang, bang
Alexander G. Higgins, Associated Press Writer
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 3 photos
<p>Scientists look at a screen at the European Organisation for Nuclear Research (CERN) data quality satellite control center of the ATLAS detectors during the restart of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Meyrin, near Geneva, Switzerland, Monday, Nov. 23, 2009. Scientists turned on the Large Hadron Collider on Friday night, Nov. 20, 2009, for the first time since the machine suffered a failure more than a year ago and had to be shut down shortly after the start. (AP Photo/Keystone, Laurent Gillieron)</p>

Scientists look at a screen at the European Organisation for Nuclear Research (CERN) data quality satellite control center of the ATLAS detectors during the restart of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Meyrin, near Geneva, Switzerland, Monday, Nov. 23, 2009. Scientists turned on the Large Hadron Collider on Friday night, Nov. 20, 2009, for the first time since the machine suffered a failure more than a year ago and had to be shut down shortly after the start. (AP Photo/Keystone, Laurent Gillieron)

advertisement

GENEVA — The world's largest atom smasher broke the world record for proton acceleration Monday, firing particle beams with 20 percent more power than the American lab that previously held the record.

The power of the Large Hadron Collider's proton beams is essential to the project's ultimate goal: smashing particles into each other with enough force to shatter them into the smallest building blocks of matter.

The early-morning test continues a recent sequence of successes that have elated scientists who were disappointed by the $10 billion machine's collapse last year during its opening in a 17-mile (27-kilometer) tunnel under the Swiss-French border. The breakdown required extensive repairs and improvements.

The collider fired two particle beams at 1.18 trillion electron volts early Monday, surpassing the previous high of 0.98 1 TeV held by the Chicago-area Fermilab since 2001, according to the European Organization for Nuclear Research.

Physicists measure the energy of the hair's-width beams, not their speed, because the protons are already traveling close to the speed of light and cannot go much faster.

One proton at 1 TeV is about the energy of the motion of a flying mosquito. When a beam is fully packed with 300,000 billion protons with 7 TeV energy — the goal of the LHC — it is like an aircraft carrier traveling at 20 knots. That is why the scientists are carefully learning how to run it and make sure all protection systems are working, said James Gillies, spokesman for the European Organization for Nuclear Research.

The power level reached Monday isn't significantly higher than Fermilab's. More significant advances are expected during the first half of next year when the LHC plans to raise each beam to 3.5 TeV in preparation for experiments create conditions like those 1 trillionth to 2 trillionths of a second after the Big Bang.

Physicists hope that will help them understand suspected phenomena such as dark matter, antimatter and supersymmetry and, ultimately, the creation of the universe billions of years ago.

CERN Director-General Rolf Heuer said the early advances have been "fantastic."

"However, we are continuing to take it step by step, and there is still a lot to do before we start physics in 2010," he said. "I'm keeping my champagne on ice until then."

It may take several years before the LHC will in theory be able to detect the elusive Higgs boson, the particle or field believed to give mass to other particles. The discovery would rank among the greatest in physics.

Physicists have used smaller, room-temperature colliders for decades to study the atom. They once thought protons and neutrons were the smallest components of the atom's nucleus, but the colliders showed that they are made of quarks and gluons and that there are other forces and particles.

The LHC operates at nearly absolute zero temperature, colder than outer space, which allows some 2,000 superconducting magnets to guide the protons most efficiently.

More than 8,000 physicists from labs around the world also have work planned for the Large Hadron Collider. The organization is run by its 20 European member nations, with support from other countries, including observers from Japan, India, Russia and the United States, which have made big contributions.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Alexander G. Higgins's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: Geneva
  • Public Discussion (13)
AnCap

Holy cow. $10 billion dollars to confirm that we have no clue how the universe started. Was there really nothing better to spend all that tax money on?

    Reply#1 - Mon Nov 30, 2009 3:06 PM EST
    CodeSculptor

    Well, what else would we spend the money on? We could take off a week or two from the wars. We could feed the homeless or put money into searching for cures for cancer.

    But wait - we had decades to do that already, and guess what, didn't help there.

    Also, the countries funding the LHC have very little poverty, and homelessness, and universal health insurance already and push very little of their GDP into defense.

    What is better than discovering what kind of building blocks the universe is made of.

    BTW, we actually have pretty good idea on how the universe started.

    • 2 votes
    #1.1 - Mon Nov 30, 2009 7:21 PM EST
    MarkD-555

    The USA is no longer the home of technology and innovation.

    And good estimate of the war costs. You aren't that far off. We would have to take 5.5 weeks off from the war to pay for this 100% ourselves. (1.8 billion per week - link here) (But it is a joint international effort)

    Even if we paid for just a slightly larger portion of it, we could have had it on our soil with the 10,000 top scientists and engineers from across the globe.. and they most likely would stay here creating new tech and new jobs.

    • 2 votes
    #1.2 - Tue Dec 1, 2009 5:56 AM EST
    Reply
    moes

    very much worth it, anything that advances science and understanding on the level this will...

    • 3 votes
    Reply#2 - Mon Nov 30, 2009 3:49 PM EST
    Dan-1494727

    I have no doubt the $10 Billion will lead to the answers they are seeking... right around the year 2012!

      Reply#3 - Mon Nov 30, 2009 4:41 PM EST
      Lisa Simpson

      Rofl.

        #3.1 - Mon Nov 30, 2009 9:18 PM EST
        Reply
        DSMc2gal

        42 !

        • 2 votes
        Reply#4 - Tue Dec 1, 2009 12:12 PM EST
        Torabu

        I thought the world was supposed to end. I see the LHC's true purpose was a dismal failure. Either that or the kooks were blowing hot air again.

        • 1 vote
        Reply#5 - Tue Dec 1, 2009 6:11 PM EST
        Rocket Engineer

        They still won't find the answer to the most fundamental of questions. If protons and electrons are made of quarks and gluons and those are made of something else, where did these initial particles come from? They didn't just appear out of nowhere. So did someone/something create the universe or has it all been around forever and ever and what we are researching is just the most recent big bang?

        If from these tests they find the most basic building block, where did that building block come from?

        • 1 vote
        Reply#6 - Wed Dec 2, 2009 4:39 PM EST
        CodeSculptor

        Umm.. actually, they do already have a good idea of where that came from.

        They probably did come from "nothing". Please see physicist Lawrence Krauss's hour long lecture "A Universe from Nothing"

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ImvlS8PLIo&feature=player_embedded

        What is or are the most fundamental questions?

        • 1 vote
        #6.1 - Wed Dec 2, 2009 5:27 PM EST
        Rocket Engineer

        Can't watch this now but I'll be interested to see how he explains the birth of the most fundamental building block from nothing.

          #6.2 - Thu Dec 3, 2009 7:56 AM EST
          CodeSculptor

          He covers it rather simply. The discover was awarded a nobel prize a few years back. He shows a slide from the prize-winners' report(s). Although much of the video cycles back and forth to the point, he includes an animation from the nobel ceremony in physics regarding the empty space inside a proton, the results of mathematically modeled and tested/verified calculations showing that the empty space itself is where the mass is, and where the teeming sea of virtual particles are...

          But that part is initially presented around 19-ish minutes (I mention that because it's a long video, which I think actually should be longer).

          • 1 vote
          #6.3 - Thu Dec 3, 2009 9:13 AM EST
          Rocket Engineer

          Well thanks for the info, I'll have to watch this sometime.

            #6.4 - Thu Dec 3, 2009 10:45 AM EST
            Reply
            Leave a Comment:
            You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
            You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
            (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
            Newsvine Privacy Statement
            As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
            FUN STUFF:
            • Leaderboard |
            • E-Mail Alerts |
            • Top of the Vine |
            • Newsvine Live |
            • Newsvine Archives |
            • The Greenhouse |
            COMPANY STUFF:
            • Code of Honor |
            • Company Info |
            • Contact Us |
            • Jobs |
            • User Agreement |
            • Privacy Policy |
            • About our ads
            LEGAL STUFF:
            • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
            • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
            • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com