Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

US settles royalty dispute with Indian tribes

Tue Dec 8, 2009 10:45 AM EST
business, politics, us, money, indian, american-indians
Matthew Daly, Associated Press
Advertise | AdChoices

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration says it will spend more than $3 billion to settle a long-running and contentious lawsuit over royalties owed to American Indians.

President Barack Obama hailed the settlement of the case, known as Cobell v. Salazar, as an important step to reconcile Indian tribes and the federal government.

"As a candidate, I heard from many in Indian Country that the Cobell suit remained a stain on the nation-to-nation relationship I value so much," Obama said in a statement issued by the White House. "I pledged my commitment to resolving this issue, and I am proud that my administration has taken this step today."

Under the agreement announced Tuesday, the Interior Department will distribute $1.4 billion to more than 300,000 tribe members to compensate them for historical accounting claims, and to resolve future claims. The department also will spend $2 billion to buy back and consolidate tribal land lost by previous generations. The program will allow individual tribe members to obtain cash payments for divided land interests and free up the land for the benefit of tribal communities.

The settlement resolves a 13-year-old dispute in which Indian tribes claim they were swindled out of billions of dollars in oil, gas, grazing, timber and other royalties overseen by the Interior Department since 1887.

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar called the settlement a historic, positive development for Indian country and a major step to reconcile decades of acrimony between Indian tribes and the federal government.

Elouise Cobell, a member of the Blackfeet Tribe from Montana who was the lead plaintiff in the case, called the proposed settlement crucial for hundreds of thousand of Native Americans who have suffered for more than a century through mismanagement of the Indian trust funds.

Cobell said she is hopeful that the settlement can "help break the cycle of poverty that has held too many families in poverty for generations."

The proposed settlement still must be approved by Congress and a federal court judge.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Matthew Daly's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: United States , Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (12)
pashat

That's it - just $1.4 bil! 122 yrs denial of royalties and that's all they come up with!!!

  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Tue Dec 8, 2009 11:20 AM EST
BlumpkinDeleted
lakotaidaho

I think they money they make in the casinos will make up for it. That is plenty to sustain oneself to a life of sitting around drinking beer.

Nice assumption that all tribes have casinos and that all casinos are major money makers.

Plus, no one born in the last 100+ years ever took land from anyone or had their land stolen from anyone.

Perhaps you should talk to the Shoshone who had a "settlement" forced on them for their lands.

Do you even know what the Cobell lawsuit was about?

  • 2 votes
#1.2 - Tue Dec 8, 2009 11:59 AM EST
BlumpkinDeleted
lakotaidaho

Tell that to the Washington fishing industry who had half the Salmon run stolen from them and given to the native Americans in order to pay for the actions of people who have been dead for over a hundred years.

Stolen???? LOL

Well then, you should probably complain to the GOVERNMENT who willingly entered into treaties with the tribes and obligated itself to the terms of those treaties. Good luck going back in time. LOL

US Constitution, Article 6

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in
Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the
Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land
; and the
Judges in every State shall be bound thereby
, any Thing in the Constitution or
Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

  • 1 vote
#1.4 - Tue Dec 8, 2009 1:54 PM EST
Real World Engineer

blumpkin your arguements are flawed.

Plus, no one born in the last 100+ years ever took land from anyone or had their land stolen from anyone.

Proceeds / benefits from the crime are completely legit to go after. Doesn't matter is those who did it have been gone for a hundred years. If their decendants are still sitting on or benefiting from the illegal gains.

Americans in order to pay for the actions of people who have been dead for over a hundred years.

They have had no problems getting the benefits from those actions and building upon the ill gotten gains. So they are equally liable for consequences.

    #1.5 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 6:02 PM EST
    Reply
    lakotaidaho

    I think the last judge ruled that the case was only worth $455 million, based off the government's accounting methods. Of course, the judge also said that the government was incapable of providing a correct accounting for the trust fund.

    • 2 votes
    Reply#2 - Tue Dec 8, 2009 11:56 AM EST
    G. H.

    It is a good first step, but notice the last sentence. It still has to be approved! Think it will? It really bothers me that some people think all the tribes have casinos and are getting rich. N.A.s are one of the poorest races in this country!

    • 3 votes
    Reply#3 - Tue Dec 8, 2009 1:18 PM EST
    fstwarrior

    Sure, the court will approve payment - but when it hits Congress??? They will give us what they have always given us.

    Yeah, it's hilarious 'bout the casino comments. They ought to see some of the ones down here in the SW - not even break'n even.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#4 - Tue Dec 8, 2009 1:28 PM EST
    Chris in PHX

    I think Americans should take better history lessons and really learn who the NA were and what we did to them and continue to do so.

    The settlement is a nice start.

      Reply#5 - Tue Dec 8, 2009 2:11 PM EST
      BlumpkinDeleted
      fstwarrior

      If Israel had had any property in the 20's, 30's or any years before then - sure. They didn't, so why are they trying to force Palestine off of their country of thousands of years. Funny - that's how the U. S. operates - guess it makes sense then.

        #5.2 - Tue Dec 8, 2009 3:58 PM EST
        Real World Engineer

        What we did to them? I didn't do anything. Unless you are pushing the ripe old age of about 150, you didn't either.

        Your life like mine is built on the criminal acts.

        While generation have reaped the rewards we are also liable for the damages.

          #5.3 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 6:07 PM EST
          Reply
          jameseg

          Assuming the settlement is approved by Congress and the judge, it seems to be a step in the right direction.

          Obviously nothing can truly repay the Native American Indians for what their ancestors suffered, though.

          • 1 vote
          Reply#6 - Tue Dec 8, 2009 6:10 PM EST
          Rumana AkterDeleted
          Leave a Comment:
          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
          You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
          (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
          Newsvine Privacy Statement
          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
          FUN STUFF:
          • Leaderboard |
          • E-Mail Alerts |
          • Top of the Vine |
          • Newsvine Live |
          • Newsvine Archives |
          • The Greenhouse
          COMPANY STUFF:
          • Code of Honor |
          • Company Info |
          • Contact Us |
          • Jobs |
          • User Agreement |
          • Privacy Policy |
          • About our ads
          LEGAL STUFF:
          • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
          • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
          • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com