Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

House panel passes college football playoff bill

Wed Dec 9, 2009 1:36 PM EST
business, politics, us, congress, bcs
Frederic J. Frommer, Associated Press
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 7 photos
<p>In this Dec. 5, 2009, photo Alabama defensive back Rod Woodson (18),  linebacker Jonathan Atchison, center, and defensive lineman Darrington Sentimore (94) celebrate after their 32-13 win over Florida in the NCAA college football SEC championship game at the Georgia Dome in Atlanta. A House panel will debate and vote on a bill on Wednesday, Dec. 9, 2009, that would ban the promotion of a postseason NCAA Division I football game as a national championship unless it's the outcome of a playoff. The vote on the legislation by Texas Rep. Joe Barton, the top Republican on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, comes just three days after college football officials announced the BCS selections, including the Jan. 7 national title game between No. 1 Alabama and No. 2 Texas. (AP Photo/John Amis)</p>

In this Dec. 5, 2009, photo Alabama defensive back Rod Woodson (18), linebacker Jonathan Atchison, center, and defensive lineman Darrington Sentimore (94) celebrate after their 32-13 win over Florida in the NCAA college football SEC championship game at the Georgia Dome in Atlanta. A House panel will debate and vote on a bill on Wednesday, Dec. 9, 2009, that would ban the promotion of a postseason NCAA Division I football game as a national championship unless it's the outcome of a playoff. The vote on the legislation by Texas Rep. Joe Barton, the top Republican on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, comes just three days after college football officials announced the BCS selections, including the Jan. 7 national title game between No. 1 Alabama and No. 2 Texas. (AP Photo/John Amis)

Advertise | AdChoices

WASHINGTON — Dismissing complaints from some members that Congress had more pressing matters, a House subcommittee approved legislation Wednesday aimed at forcing college football to switch to a playoff system to determine its national champion.

"We can walk across the street and chew gum at the same time," said the subcommittee chairman, Illinois Democrat Bobby Rush, one of the bill's co-sponsors. "We can do a number of things at the same time."

The legislation, which still faces steep odds, would ban the promotion of a postseason NCAA Division I Football Bowl Subdivision game as a national championship unless it results from a playoff. The measure passed by voice vote in the House Energy and Commerce Committee's commerce, trade and consumer protection subcommittee, with one audible "no," from Rep. John Barrow, D-Ga.

"With all due respect, I really think we have more important things to spend our time on," Barrow said before the vote, although he stressed he didn't like the current Bowl Championship Series, either.

The BCS selections announced last weekend pit two unbeaten teams, No. 1 Alabama and No. 2 Texas, in the Jan. 7 national title game. Three other undefeated teams — TCU, Cincinnati and Boise State — will play in a BCS bowl game, but not for the championship.

"What can we say — it's December and the BCS is in chaos again," said the bill's sponsor, Rep. Joe Barton of Texas, the top Republican on the House Energy and Commerce Committee. He said the BCS system is unfair and won't change unless prompted by Congress.

The legislation, which goes to the full committee, would make it illegal to promote a national championship game "or make a similar representation," unless it results from a playoff.

There is no Senate version, although Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, has pressed for a Justice Department antitrust investigation into the BCS.

Shortly after his election last year, Barack Obama said there should be a playoff system.

In a statement before the vote, BCS executive director Bill Hancock said, "With all the serious matters facing our country, surely Congress has more important issues than spending taxpayer money to dictate how college football is played."

Yet Barrow wasn't alone in criticizing his colleagues' priorities; Reps. Zach Space, D-Ohio, and Bart Stupak, D-Mich., made similar arguments. Space said that with people facing tough times, the decision to focus on college football sends the "wrong message."

The legislation has a tough road ahead, given the wide geographic representation and political clout of schools in the six conferences that have automatic BCS bowl bids — the ACC, Big East, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-10 and SEC.

The current college bowl system features a championship game between the two top teams in the BCS standings, based on two polls and six computer rankings. Eight other schools play in the Orange, Sugar, Fiesta and Rose bowls.

Under the BCS, the champions of those six big conference have automatic bids, while other conferences don't. Those six conferences also receive far more money than the other conferences.

___

On the Net:

Information on the bill, H.R. 390, can be found at http://thomas.loc.gov

Bowl Championship Series: http://www.bcsfootball.org

House Energy and Commerce Committee: http://energycommerce.house.gov

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Frederic J. Frommer's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (68)
Jump to discussion page: 1 2
MobTown

I agree, for some teams the BCS bids are unfair because it means not laying claim to National Champion, but if you eliminate BCS bowl games you also eliminate the revenue generated for the schools on account of them accepting bids. Instead of having 8 schools that get anywhere from $5 Mil to $20 Mil, you now only have 2 teams in the national championship that will receive a purse from the sponsor or co-sponsors.

For example, Tostitos gets a pub every single time the Fiesta Bowl logo is displayed, their logo is on the field and on the jerseys. Everywhere you look, Tostitos are getting pub. You can't honestly say that Nokia is going to shell out the money it does for the Sugar bowl if it means that their logo won't be on every product.

What this will boil down to is the top two teams receiving less money, and the other eight teams receiving significantly less money for their programs.

If they can definitely say that the 4 winners of the quarter finals get a sum of money, then the 2 winners of the semi-final get a sum of money, then the National Champion takes home the grand prize and each game leading up to that is sponsored by a different company then you could make a case.

It all comes down to the money.

  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 2:09 PM EST
NHFishercat

These corporations can still get the "big bucks" by sponsoring the "Final Four" in the NCAAF brackets.

So, if you take the top 24 teams, have 12 teams on each side of the bracket, the early round games can be hosted by the smaller corporations much like the early bowl games are done today, then, as you get closer to the Final Four, the Sugar Bowl, Fiesta Bowl, Rose Bowl etc host those (plus final game) and advertise the crap out if them. They are STILL getting the best teams represented to bring in viewers and they still get their cash.

The real problem is not the corporations, it's the universities wanting there guaranteed spots in the BCS even if they send a team that totally sucks to a BCS game. Really, it's getting tiring to see a team like Ohio State get whooped by an SEC team year in and year out (just as an example). The universities are just as greedy as the advertisers, if not worse.

But for some reason this is all OK for Basket Ball?

  • 1 vote
#1.1 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 3:05 PM EST
whatajokewehavehereDeleted
MsWheezer

PLEASE explain to me how this is even remotely considered part of Congressional duties?

  • 11 votes
#1.3 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 3:13 PM EST
whatajokewehavehereDeleted
Buckeye Voter

PLEASE explain to me how this is even remotely considered part of Congressional duties?

You got me, chief.

  • 4 votes
#1.5 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 3:44 PM EST
MobTown

Really, it's getting tiring to see a team like Ohio State get whooped by an SEC team year in and year out (just as an example).

AMEN!

    #1.6 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 4:09 PM EST
    Leo Katz

    NHFishercat

    "… it's getting tiring to see a team like Ohio State get whooped by an SEC team year in and year out (just as an example)."

    That was a pathetic excuse for an example. I suggest you go back and research the topics you write about. It appears you did not do so and lack any knowledge on this subject.

    "… it's getting tiring to see a team like Ohio State get whooped by an SEC team year in and year out…"

    That was a pathetic excuse for an example. I suggest you go back and research the topics you write about. It appears you did not do so and lack any knowledge on this subject.

    • 1 vote
    #1.7 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 5:04 PM EST
    Andy-827327

    PLEASE explain to me how this is even remotely considered part of Congressional duties?

    It's not.

    • 1 vote
    #1.8 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 5:12 PM EST
    NHFishercat

    That was a pathetic excuse for an example. I suggest you go back and research the topics you write about. It appears you did not do so and lack any knowledge on this subject.

    Sure, I guess I didn't witness LSU and UF just completely wipe the floor with OSU in the last 3-4 years, nope, not at all. Maybe you are talking about Lacrosse or something, or women's basketball. Stop doing drugs, it's KILLING your short term memory.

      #1.9 - Thu Dec 10, 2009 4:28 PM EST
      jaker023

      agreed that this is not only a waste of time and money for our congress to work on, but more importantly, the gov't should not be dictating how the NCAA crowns its champions. no surprise that this bill originated out of Texas....

      anyhow, here is my proposal for fixing the BCS:

      http://jaker023.newsvine.com/_news/2009/10/22/3411078-fix-the-bcs?category=sports

        #1.10 - Thu Dec 10, 2009 4:29 PM EST
        Reply
        LTKiwi

        Well, at least our government has their priorities straight. They should work on a bill that proposes a uniform yellow color for road stripes. Next a bill that proposes that all companies that use television advertising have a cute little spokes-animal since kids think they are funny. After that, they should debate a bill that proposes they have chicken salad sandwiches for lunch.

        It's not like our government has anything better to do right?

        /SARCASM

        Capitol Hill = The biggest waste of time, money, space, resources, and humanity in the country.

        Actually, I don't consider them human. I think our politicians are a step and a half above spore mold, but below head lice. Lobbyists are even with spore mold. Anyone that works with, for, or at the "news organization" TMZ is three steps below spore mold.

        • 4 votes
        Reply#2 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 2:20 PM EST
        sidereal

        It's not like it's taking time away from important bills. Have you seen a typical House schedule? Half their day is dedicating airports and declaring it National Chipmunk Day or whatever. They obviously have some free time. And a vast majority of the BCS schools are public institutions, so it's not like the gubmint is sticking its nose in private business.

        • 5 votes
        Reply#3 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 2:28 PM EST
        Longhorn78759

        They obviously have some free time

        Until they need to read a bill. "Oh, it's too long, blah blah. Let's vote on sports instead!"

        • 3 votes
        #3.1 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 3:29 PM EST
        Reply
        Shawn-552481

        You have got to be kidding me. This is what we are paying congress for?

        • 9 votes
        Reply#4 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 2:30 PM EST
        DirtyRelic

        Yea no joke, this is absurd.

        • 8 votes
        #4.1 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 2:39 PM EST
        EnuffBull

        Seriously, Congress must love it when crap like this hits the media..wait a minute..what do you mean..WE PAY THEM ?!! Lol

        • 3 votes
        #4.2 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 2:44 PM EST
        Monmichka

        I guess nobody understands what multi-tasking is. I would hate to think that I elected people into office who had one track minds and couldn't focus on multiple things at once. Any mother in America would agree that if you can't do that, you are a pretty simple individual.

        This issue has been a problem for a long time. I'm sure the football players of the schools that never make it to bowls but should, appreciate the consideration.

        The sky won't fall because they took five minutes to pass this bill. Big freaking deal.

        • 1 vote
        #4.3 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 3:06 PM EST
        Mark-702026

        With the magnitude of the issues on the table I think they have all they can handle. They have not even read the bills in front of them, I think they mutil-tasked as far as I am comfortable with.

        The skill of mutil-tasking is highly overrated. My definition of mutil-tasking, you were able to do a good enough job on several things at once than a great job on one or or a couple of things at once.

        I will take a single tasking person over mutil-tasking any day.

          #4.4 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 3:14 PM EST
          whatajokewehavehereDeleted
          Shawn-552481

          I guess nobody understands what multi-tasking is.

          Multitask????I would be happy if they could read the GD bills in front of them now!

          • 6 votes
          #4.6 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 3:19 PM EST
          Bootie

          The problem I have is not whether or not congress has the time to deal with this stuff. I don't care if they have all the time in the world to deal with it, it's simply not a matter of government. Stick with issues that involve running our country and leave issues of the private industry, sports and entertainment, etc... to us.

          • 1 vote
          #4.7 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 4:18 PM EST
          Monmichka

          Still, people. It's five minutes. Big whoop. Get over it.

          • 1 vote
          #4.8 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 4:36 PM EST
          Upscheidt Creek

          Still, people. It's five minutes. Big whoop. Get over it.

          You're missing (or ignoring) the point.....it's NOT government business!!

            #4.9 - Thu Dec 10, 2009 12:49 PM EST
            Reply
            R. Donald Snyder

            I support the idea of a college playoff system, but Congress has more important things to do then this.

            • 10 votes
            Reply#5 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 2:35 PM EST
            sscott

            Hey, they are so much smarter than us, this must be good.

            Thank goodness we have so many highly intelligent people running this country. Without them, hey we might have a crisis, or do something stupid like spend our granchildren's money. No wait...

            • 1 vote
            Reply#6 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 2:41 PM EST
            MyMindIsMyOwn

            ....we have a +10% rate of unemployment, but WHO CARES! We need to figure out how we are going to crown a college football national champion!! Thats SO much more important..... </sarcasm>

            • 4 votes
            Reply#7 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 2:46 PM EST
            California Militia

            thats only because they have already rid professional baseball of PED's. If sports arent kept in check they will run amok and be the ruin of this great nation.

            • 1 vote
            #7.1 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 3:58 PM EST
            Reply
            KyleN

            There is a hint of irony in this a actual possible regulation of interstate commerce between state institutions (state public universities) which does for once fall inside the Constitutional scope of Congress instead of their 'more important' business in passing un-Constitutional bills like dictating all American's buy health insurance.

            Which is worse, unimportant but legit work or important but illegit work? Why don't we shoot for important but legit work or is that too much to ask for?

            • 4 votes
            Reply#8 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 2:51 PM EST
            whatajokewehavehereDeleted
            Reply
            jeffcisme

            I couldn't find "football" (or any mention of sports) in the Constitution.....

            • 2 votes
            Reply#9 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 2:52 PM EST
            NHFishercat

            Well, there is nothing for health care or marriage either, it's the pursuit of happiness which can be anything now.

            • 5 votes
            #9.1 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 2:56 PM EST
            whatajokewehavehereDeleted
            NHFishercat

            Yup and they are infringing upon my Constitutional RIGHT to ... the pursuit of happiness!

            Exactly, you should have a doctor giving you a beer, your same sex partner cooking you dogs, all while watching December Madness (NCAAF Bracket towards national championship). The American dream... the constitutional right to everything... even though it doesn't say anything about any of it... heh.

            • 1 vote
            #9.3 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 3:32 PM EST
            Reply
            charnello

            "What can we say — it's December and the BCS is in chaos again," said the bill's sponsor, Rep. Joe Barton of Texas, the top Republican on the House Energy and Commerce Committee.

            Thanks for taking time away from unimportant matters like the economy, security, energy, healthcare, etc. and dealing with this Joe.

            • 1 vote
            Reply#10 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 2:52 PM EST
            hole_in_the_wall

            He is mad that Texas is going to get an ass whoopin from Alabama

            • 2 votes
            #10.1 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 4:13 PM EST
            charnello

            The tide is going to turn. Texas wins!!! :)

            • 2 votes
            #10.2 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 4:23 PM EST
            Shawn-552481

            The national championship has already been played. Gators lost.

              #10.3 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 5:18 PM EST
              Reply
              Mark-702026

              This is what we pay them to worry about?

              I do have to say if they would stick to trival matters and away from real issues we would be beter off.

                Reply#11 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 2:56 PM EST
                We the people....

                Is this real? i feel like i'm reading an artical out of the Onion.

                  Reply#12 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 2:58 PM EST
                  Midwestlady

                  The Congress needs to say out of these matters. Isn't there a university national committee for athletics? YES. Congress needs to keep their hands out of other's cookie jars. This is not their place.

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#13 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 3:11 PM EST
                  hvymtl83

                  I'm enjoying this. If Congress can find time to declare National Petunia Day, they can sure find time to do this. Besides, it'll pi$$ off the BCS folks, and they been pi$$ing me off for years.

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#14 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 3:15 PM EST
                  Kajun65

                  Plans are to set up a stimulus to pay for playoff system! Also setting up a system, similar to Electoral College, to select which teams will be in the playoff "Job Creation at its best"

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#15 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 3:21 PM EST
                  AlphaDogReporter

                  What people do not understand is that any time there is that much money involved, and Congress gets their fingers in it, follow the money and see where a bunch of it gets funneled off. There are payoffs somewhere.

                    Reply#16 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 3:30 PM EST
                    Longhorn78759

                    Let me see if I get this straight...

                    1. They have time to write and vote on a stupid bill like this
                    2. They don't have time to read a real bill that... you know, actually matters because it's too long

                    • 2 votes
                    Reply#17 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 3:31 PM EST
                    California Militia

                    well, the article didnt say that those who voted on it actually read it. I mean heck, you could probably just tell em its something completely different to get them to vote the way you want.

                      #17.1 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 4:05 PM EST
                      Reply
                      tomwcraig

                      While I believe that the NCAA FBS champion should be determined by a playoff; I disagree with Congress getting involved. HOWEVER, I understand WHY they think they can get involved. It all stems from the fact that EVERY school in the nation gets federal funds via student loan and grants. Plus, under the Interstate Commerce clause in the Constitution; Congress has the right to step in and regulate the schools and their athletic systems.

                      Most colleges and universities have students not only from multiple states, but from foreign nations. This fact results in each school crossing state and national boundaries. It is the job of Congress to regulate commerce running between the states and international trade. Those are their primary reasons for interfering with the NCAA's BCS Commission.

                      They have much more important matters to take up, but they always find time to take care of meaningless items that might help them get re-elected. That's the way it always has been, and that's the way it will always be.

                      • 2 votes
                      Reply#18 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 3:49 PM EST
                      Paddy Clarke

                      Barrow said before the vote, although he stressed he didn't like the current Bowl Championship Series, either.

                      The "he" in the above sentence (emphasis mine) in essence, sums up the attitude of this bunch of jokers. Who the f cares whether Barrow likes or hates the Championship Series ? What right does he have to tinker with a f#$^-ing game

                      tomwcraig,

                      It all stems from the fact that EVERY school in the nation gets federal funds via student loan and grants.

                      Good point. Another lesson (for those who need it anyways) that federal money (as with all money given as "help" (except in emergencies)) always comes with strings attached.

                      By the way, not every school accepts federal dollars, though I agree that such schools are so rare that they are statistically insignificant. Here's one.

                      • 2 votes
                      Reply#19 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 4:14 PM EST
                      tomwcraig

                      Hillsdale College can still be forced to meet federal requirements should Congress decide to invoke the Interstate Commerce clause, as long as Hillsdale accepts money or students from out of state.

                      • 1 vote
                      #19.1 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 4:19 PM EST
                      Paddy Clarke

                      The point was a rebuttal to your - "It all stems from the fact that EVERY school in the nation gets federal funds via student loan and grants."

                      There are exceptions and that's what I wanted to point out.

                      A legislative body can do pretty much whatever they want or rather whatever they can pass, I am not questioning that.

                      • 2 votes
                      #19.2 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 4:25 PM EST
                      MsWheezer

                      Okay, FINE, expand the 'interstate commerce clause' to its ultimate conclusion.

                      We can't buy/sell/trade any ding-dong thing without having approval from some Congressional oversight committee. This is NOT what the founding fathers had in mind. This is an extension of the quest for more power that Congress embarked on decades ago.

                        #19.3 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 4:35 PM EST
                        tomwcraig

                        Paddy,

                        You are correct in that not every college accepts federal aid. I had not realized that Hillsdale College does not accept federal money. I should have admitted that before stating the ability of Congress to force colleges to submit to their regulations via the Interstate Commerce clause of the Constitution.

                        MsWheezer,

                        On the increasing of Congress's power, I agree.

                        • 1 vote
                        #19.4 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 4:43 PM EST
                        Paddy Clarke

                        You are correct in that not every college accepts federal aid.

                        Glad you do. But you are right in a sense that the number of financial institutions refusing government money today are so small that they are statistically insignificant (that's what I mentioned towards the end of my comment #19).

                        Hillsdale is the only prominent college out there which is kinda "in your face" on this issue because not only are they proud of it but also they dare to stand up for what they believe in (via their Imprimis newsletter). Which leads me to believe that the infamous "Commerce Clause" may be brought against them pretty soon.

                        • 1 vote
                        #19.5 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 5:40 PM EST
                        Reply
                        JmetheSad

                        Hey Congress needed a little break from all the hard thinking. Don't employees goof off at work for a little bit every now and then? No one works 110% 24/7 at work. Come on now.

                        • 1 vote
                        Reply#20 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 4:18 PM EST
                        Paddy Clarke

                        The measure passed by voice vote in a House Energy and Commerce Committee subcommittee

                        Lookee here. What the hell is the House Energy and Commerce Committe doing discussing NCAA playoffs...... Have these idiots gone compeletely out of their minds.

                        The subcommittee chairman, Rep. Bobby Rush, an Illinois Democrat who co-sponsored the bill, said, "We can walk and chew gum at the same time."

                        Yep, aren't you a bonafide Einstein ?! ....... Priceless !

                        • 1 vote
                        Reply#21 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 4:21 PM EST
                        tomwcraig

                        Paddy,

                        See the one word in the Committee title: Commerce. I think they are using the Interstate Commerce clause to allow that committee to discuss it.

                        • 1 vote
                        #21.1 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 4:45 PM EST
                        Paddy Clarke

                        See the one word in the Committee title: Commerce.

                        Still, here's what I saw in the article above. :

                        The legislation, which goes to the full committee, would make it illegal to promote a national championship game "or make a similar representation," unless it results from a playoff.

                        Can anyone please explain how setting game rules has anything to do with either energy or commerce ... ?

                        • 1 vote
                        #21.2 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 6:01 PM EST
                        tomwcraig

                        Because the games are played ACROSS state lines by two schools usually from outside the state. The money is split between the schools and their conferences, all of which reside in multiple states. Therefore, the games actually can be considered Interstate Commerce.

                        • 1 vote
                        #21.3 - Thu Dec 10, 2009 9:40 AM EST
                        MsWheezer

                        Congress has warped the interpretation of the Constitution to the point the interstate commerce clause has become unrecognizable. Original intent was to keep states from setting up tariffs against each other. Going back to the days of the Articles of Confederation, the U.S. was a motley assortment of sovereign states. This clause was intended to unify the states a bit more and keep individual states playing fairly with each other. Sadly, it's now used by Congress to extend their powers.

                        I switch from anger at these shenanigans to a deep sadness. Angry yesterday and depressed about it all today.

                        • 2 votes
                        #21.4 - Thu Dec 10, 2009 11:03 AM EST
                        Paddy Clarke

                        Congress has warped the interpretation of the Constitution to the point the interstate commerce clause has become unrecognizable.

                        Thanks ! That's what I meant.

                        This clause was intended to unify the states a bit more and keep individual states playing fairly with each other.

                        This should be a lesson to people who believe that the government will somehow make everything fair.

                        • 4 votes
                        #21.5 - Fri Dec 11, 2009 11:53 AM EST
                        Reply
                        Alex, Lou KY

                        What in the blue blazes? There are lots of other more tangable and worth while things to look into other then the BCS. Let the NCAA deal with their own problems.

                        • 1 vote
                        Reply#22 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 4:36 PM EST
                        Leo Katz

                        “Shortly after his election last year, Barack Obama said there should be a playoff system.”

                        Why are you folks attacking efforts to improve the BCS system? I have finally found one thing that I can agree with Obama and his liberal twits about.

                        I would rather have the liberal jokers in congress messing with the NCAA rather than playing with and screwing up health care, cap and trade” crap, immigration & amnesty, etc. This keeps them busy until we can get the Democrats and Obama out of government.

                        “Reps. Zach Space, D-Ohio, and Bart Stupak, D-Mich., made similar arguments.”

                        To have the representative from Ohio agree with anyone on anything from Michigan is completely unnatural and unacceptable (even an abomination). They both must have gone to that school “up north” (Ann Arbor). Woody Hayes is probably rolling in his grave. This will improve you knowledge of important facts about Ohio State:

                        Woody was famous for his hatred for Michigan and anything that had to do with the state (he referred to it, of course, as "that state up north" or "that team up north") . One night on a recruiting trip in the state of Michigan, an assistant noticed that the car he was driving was going to run out of gas. He let Woody, who was dozing in the passenger seat, that he had to pull over for gas. Woody refused, and the assistant drove on. The assistant, who saw the weather was starting to get bad, began to become worried about getting stuck in the middle of nowhere, and once again stressed his desire to pull over and get gas. Woody erupted: "No, goddammit! We do NOT pull in and fill up. And I'll tell you exactly why we don't. It's because I don't buy one goddam drop of gas in the state of Michigan! We'll coast and PUSH this goddam car to the Ohio line before I give this state a nickel of my money!" The assistant knew he wasn't kidding, and they barely made it across the border and sputtered into the first gas station they found in Ohio. http://bucknuts.com/osuhistory/coachhayes.htm

                        • 2 votes
                        Reply#23 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 5:33 PM EST
                        gary-1157637

                        I thought this was a joke......sadly, it is not. For the umpteenth time this year, I am thoroughly ashamed to say that these jerks represent the American People. With a couple wars going, health care, the economy in shambles, rampant unemployment,and scores of other problems to address, they choose to fix college football ??? WTF ?

                        The college football championships are unfair. Really great teams don't get to compete for the title....due to corporate greed. But do we really need congress to fix this ?

                        Can't they find something more constructive to do with their time ?

                        Vote 'em out.

                        • 1 vote
                        Reply#24 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 8:35 PM EST
                        Naftel

                        a House subcommittee approved legislation Wednesday aimed at forcing college football to switch to a playoff system to determine its national champion.

                        I agree the BCS sucks and needs to be changed, but WTF does congress have to do with it? I just don't understand where our government is headed???

                        • 1 vote
                        Reply#25 - Wed Dec 9, 2009 8:57 PM EST
                        Paddy Clarke

                        I just don't understand where our government is headed???

                        I can't agree more with you. But an interesting point was made by one of the guys above when he/she mentioned that Obama wanted a playoff system when he got elected.

                        And as the prayer goes - "Thy will be done .... In Congress as In Senate" LOL !

                        • 2 votes
                        #25.1 - Sat Dec 12, 2009 12:51 AM EST
                        Reply
                        Jump to discussion page: 1 2
                        Leave a Comment:
                        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                        You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                        (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                        Newsvine Privacy Statement
                        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                        FUN STUFF:
                        • Leaderboard |
                        • E-Mail Alerts |
                        • Top of the Vine |
                        • Newsvine Live |
                        • Newsvine Archives |
                        • The Greenhouse
                        COMPANY STUFF:
                        • Code of Honor |
                        • Company Info |
                        • Contact Us |
                        • Jobs |
                        • User Agreement |
                        • Privacy Policy |
                        • About our ads
                        LEGAL STUFF:
                        • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                        • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                        • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com