Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Credit card's newest trick: 79.9 percent interest

Thu Dec 17, 2009 2:36 PM EST
business, us, card, credit-card, subprime-credit-card
Candice Choi, AP Food Industry Writer
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 2 photos
<p>In this undated image provided by Synovate, a marketing firm that tracks credit card mailings, a portion of a mailing for a pre-approved card offer from First Premier Bank sent in October of 2009 is shown. (AP Photo/Synovate) </p>

In this undated image provided by Synovate, a marketing firm that tracks credit card mailings, a portion of a mailing for a pre-approved card offer from First Premier Bank sent in October of 2009 is shown. (AP Photo/Synovate)

Advertise | AdChoices

NEW YORK — It's no mistake. This credit card's interest rate is 79.9 percent.

The bloated APR is how First Premier Bank, a subprime credit card issuer, is skirting new regulations intended to curb abusive practices in the industry. It's a strategy other subprime card issuers could start adopting to get around the new rules.

Typically, the First Premier card comes with a minimum of $256 in fees in the first year for a credit line of $250. Starting in February, however, a new law will cap such fees at 25 percent of a card's credit line.

In a recent mailing for a preapproved card, First Premier lowers fees to just that limit — $75 in the first year for a credit line of $300. But the new law doesn't set a cap on interest rates. Hence the 79.9 APR, up from the previous 9.9 percent.

"It's the highest on the market. It's the highest we've ever seen," said Anuj Shahani, an analyst with Synovate, a research firm that tracks credit card mailings.

The terms are eyebrow raising, but First Premier targets people with bad credit who likely can't get approved for cards elsewhere. It's a group that tends to lean heavily on credit too, meaning they'll likely incur the steep financing charges.

So for a $300 balance, a cardholder would pay about $20 a month in interest.

First Premier said the 79.9 APR offer is a test and that it's too early to tell whether it will be continued, according to an e-mailed statement. To comply with the new law, the bank said it will no longer offer the card that has $256 in first-year fees as of Feb. 21, 2010. However, customers will still be able to use their existing cards. The bank said "no final decisions" have been made regarding any rate changes for those cards.

First Premier noted that it needed to "price our product based on the risk associated with this market."

The bank declined to specify how many people were offered the 79.9 APR card.

According to First Premier's Web site, the credit cards are serviced by its sister organization Premier Bankcard. The company, based in Sioux Falls, S.D., says Premier Bankcard is the 10th largest issuer of MasterCard and Visa cards in the country, with more than 3.5 million customers.

In a mailing sent to prospective customers in October with the revamped terms, First Premier writes "...you might have less-than-perfect credit and we're OK with that." The letter notes that an online application or phone call is still required, but guarantees a 60-second status confirmation.

The letter also states there are no hidden fees that aren't disclosed in the attached form. That's where the 79.9 percent interest rate and $75 annual fee are listed. There's also $29 penalty if you pay late or go over your $300 credit limit.

Even if First Premier doesn't stick with the 79.9 APR, it will likely hike rates considerably from the current 9.9 percent to offset the lower fees, said Shahani of Synovate.

The revamped terms may not be the only changes; First Premier also appears to be moving away from the riskiest borrowers.

The bank typically mails offers to subprime households, meaning those with credit scores below 700. In the third quarter, however, 84 percent of its offers were sent to subprime households, down from 91 percent the same period last year, according to Synovate.

First Premier could be cleaning up its credit card portfolio since the new regulations will limit its ability to raise interest rates. That could mean First Premier won't issue cards as liberally to those with bad credit.

As harsh as First Premier's terms seem, that could be a blow to those who rely on the card, said Odysseas Papadimitriou, CEO of CardHub.com.

"Even when the cost of credit is astronomical, for people in true emergencies, it's much better than not having access to credit," said Papadimitriou.

Until Feb. 21, First Premier is still offering its even-higher-fee card online. So the price for credit the bank charges is at least $256 in first-year fees.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Candice Choi's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: United States , New York
  • Public Discussion (10)
Gailm

If this is a test....they are bound to fail. There are a lot of stupid people in this country...we all know that but I have a hard time believing that anyone is stupid enough to sign up for a card with a 79.9% interest rate!! I just tore up an offer for 18.9%!!

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:04 PM EST
Dennis Kemmerer

I don't know about that, Gailm.

Judging from the proliferation of the "payday advance" scammers, there's an awful lot of people who are willing to pay effective interest rates in the hundreds of percent.

  • 2 votes
#1.1 - Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:37 PM EST
Reply
erlo1988

Law is not always the solution. :) However, I would not be surprised that someone with a bad credit history would ignore an offer like this. We have consumer loans way worse. It is likely knowing our conspicuous consumption cultural norms.

  • 2 votes
Reply#2 - Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:05 PM EST
enigma

Anything to screw the poorest people and reward the richest. Greed is a black hole in the human heart.

  • 4 votes
Reply#3 - Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:34 PM EST
erlo1988

It's not only greed, but a way to make up for lost revenue due to the regulations. If the company does not make up for lost revenue, there is possibility it will tank in the market since it competes with bigger companies. There are other possible reasons as well.

I think we should start considering Islamic banking practices. After that statement, I to want see the criticisms from tellers, bankers and the rest of the goon squad.

http://money.cnn.com/video/news/2009/12/15/n_islamic_banking_interest.cnnmoney/

I think Dubai is the exception. The investments and lending were completely shortsighted. Also, Dubai is only one example?

  • 2 votes
#3.1 - Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:45 PM EST
Reply
Upper DeckerDeleted
EAS-E Auto Services

Just a new test to see who doesn't actually read what they sign up for, even if new laws say it has to be in plain English. That or to defend it when it comes to being told people were ill informed. Maybe to pass around the "check out what we got away with" list, then the biggies will get into the game. How's sales doing now at the local strip mall? As long as you have guaranteed income streams from some it guarantees long term big bonuses. At least they put it in writing hope it is big enough to see? Man are the next generation folks in trouble, we thought we did bad? Good lord 79.9% what percent of dimwits filled that TP out?

    Reply#5 - Thu Dec 17, 2009 5:02 PM EST
    follow the money

    absolutely

    ludicrous..

    who in their right mind, would even attempt to get such a card?

    • 1 vote
    Reply#6 - Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:36 AM EST
    Florida_kes

    Uhmmmm...well...since the U.S. economy is based on credit and having credit cards, some folks with bad credit may have to get a card like that just to do things that other's take for granted.

    • 1 vote
    #6.1 - Fri Dec 18, 2009 4:01 PM EST
    Reply
    DyNasty Ork

    Poor people..they are only targeting person with scores below 700. I read one of these offers and if you accept you are automatically in debt for $125 once you sign up for the card. These people are evil and the Repubs should be ashame that the CEO of the company is one of them.

      Reply#7 - Fri Dec 18, 2009 8:06 AM EST
      John Pollard

      This interest rate ISN'T a joke and it IS perfectly legal. New legislation will shortly impose upon credit card companies a requirement to be more truthful in their advertising of their products. These regulations were created by Congress and signed by the president (I am not certain which one). What does this actually mean - It means that Congress considers that it is perfectly fine for a credit card company to offer a credit card with a 79% interest rate. Many states have usury laws which limit the rate of interest that can be charged on most types of consumer loans. Many states exclude corporations from the effects of their usury laws under the implied notion that a corporation has enough understanding of what it is doing. Today most credit card companies are organized in such a fashion that they no longer are governed by the usury laws of individual states - they are only liable to the regulations promulgated and enacted into law by the United States Government. If this company was regulated by most states, most states usury laws would NOT permit this type of interest rate because the legislatures of these states had the common sense to recognize that with no type of regulation companies - incorporated or otherwise would likely prey upon those who didn't know any better. I am all for letting people make their own mistakes, but a nation state has an obligation to attempt to protect it's citizens in some reasonable fashion. What this says the most is that Congress and the president consider that an individual citizen need no protection from a company that wishes to charge them 79% interest. I agree 100% that NO one is forced to obtain a credit card - but this company is engaging in predatory lending. I believe that most people would find it repugnant to take advantage of someone who needed money by charging them 79% interest. I would. What this says to me the most is that Congress and the President who signed this bill are completely out of touch with the real world. They seem to think that it is just fine to allow companies to engage in predatory lending. The law that allowed this was written in such a fashion to allow this type of lending to occur. Has this new law actually protected American citizens from predatory lending? I don't think so. I don't know what any of the other forefathers of our country would have done, but I like in Pennsylvania and I am certain that William Penn would have run this company out of Pennsylvania if they would have been around when he founded this state. Most state legislatures currently would not permit this type of lending if this company was liable to be regulated by them - the federal regulations that regulate this type of action are nothing short of a farce. The most recent bankruptcy legislation was written nearly entirely by the credit card companies. I wonder how much of an effect their lobbying had upon this legislation. We don't need more regulation - we need more effective regulation. Allowing commerce of this sort to be engaged upon in the United States of America is nothing short of shameful and nothing short of a loud announcement of the utter disdain that our Congress and president has for everyday people. If this was the only credit card that members of Congress were allowed to have - this would be fixed very quickly. Since this mostly affects the poor and the ignorant (whether or not they know better or should know better ) , it is likely to be ignored. We no longer have statesmen - we have career politicians who don't seem to have much concern for the average person.

      And - I do understand the arguments -

      You don't NEED a credit card

      The credit card company is only charging a rate that reflects their risk

      People who are stupid enough to sign up for this type of credit card deserve what they get

      It's a free market and companies should be allowed to sell a product that is legal and that people want to buy-

      I know these arguments and others - but I still hold fast to my belief that this companies actions are predatory and damaging.

      • 1 vote
      Reply#8 - Sat Dec 19, 2009 6:27 PM EST
      Leave a Comment:
      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
      You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
      (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
      Newsvine Privacy Statement
      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
      FUN STUFF:
      • Leaderboard |
      • E-Mail Alerts |
      • Top of the Vine |
      • Newsvine Live |
      • Newsvine Archives |
      • The Greenhouse
      COMPANY STUFF:
      • Code of Honor |
      • Company Info |
      • Contact Us |
      • Jobs |
      • User Agreement |
      • Privacy Policy |
      • About our ads
      LEGAL STUFF:
      • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
      • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
      • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com