Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Owners: $5.4B NY housing complexes go to creditors

Mon Jan 25, 2010 1:56 AM EST
us-news, business, us, new-york-city, stuyvesant-town
Samantha Gross, Associated Press
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 3 photos
<p>FILE - The Peter Cooper Village and Stuyvesant Town apartment complex is seen in New York in this Oct. 17, 2006 file photo.   The owners of two massive New York City apartment complexes that sold for a record $5.4 billion a few years ago are turning them over to their creditors, a spokeman for the owners said in an e-mail Monday, Jan. 25, 2009.   (AP Photo/Mary Altaffer, file)</p>

FILE - The Peter Cooper Village and Stuyvesant Town apartment complex is seen in New York in this Oct. 17, 2006 file photo. The owners of two massive New York City apartment complexes that sold for a record $5.4 billion a few years ago are turning them over to their creditors, a spokeman for the owners said in an e-mail Monday, Jan. 25, 2009. (AP Photo/Mary Altaffer, file)

Advertise | AdChoices

NEW YORK — Like many homeowners who owe more than their properties are worth, the heavy hitters behind the most expensive real estate deal in U.S. history are giving up the two massive apartment complexes they bought during the nation's housing boom.

The 110 buildings and 11,000 apartments that make up Manhattan's Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village will be turned over to creditors who financed the $5.4 billion deal in 2006, the ownership team said Monday. Fitch Ratings estimates the property now is worth $1.8 billion.

The team, led by Tishman Speyer Properties and BlackRock Realty, was hurt by the real estate market collapse and couldn't make a $16 million loan payment due earlier this month. Partnership spokesman Bud Perrone said the decision to transfer control to lenders was the only viable alternative to bankruptcy.

A number of large-scale defaults have been happening around the country as owners grapple with the aftermath of the housing-bubble collapse, a fragile economy and constrained credit markets. Many property owners have been unable to refinance burdensome debt, and in some cases, commercial property landlords facing mounting payments have had to file for bankruptcy protection or walk away from their holdings.

It has been a "perfect storm of lending and credit markets," said Steve Kuritz, a senior vice president at the credit ratings agency Realpoint LLC. "You had aggressive lending, aggressive underwriting and then you had property values plummet. It was a combination of all of that."

In April, mall operator General Growth Properties filed for Chapter 11 protection after racking up some $27 billion in debt. In June, hotel operators Extended Stay Hotels LLC and Red Roof Inn Inc. each followed suit.

And in August, Los Angeles-based Maguire Properties Inc. said it would stop making payments on more than $1 billion in loans for seven office buildings in Southern California and try to sell them or turn them over to lenders.

The bankruptcies and defaults were part of the commercial real estate market's worst year in decades, and analysts expect the woes to deepen before a turnaround takes hold. Vacancies have soared as unemployment worsened and businesses and consumers reined in spending.

Nearly $31 billion worth of commercial apartment properties were in default, foreclosure or bankruptcy as of last month, according to Real Capital Analytics. And things are expected to get worse before they get better.

Apartment vacancies rose to more than 8 percent last year and are projected to dip slightly by the end of this year, according to Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services.

In New York, the decision to turn Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village over to creditors brings an end to a deal that had been a topic of much consternation among residents and politicians who wanted to protect what had long been a bastion of affordable housing.

Monday's announcement renewed those concerns. City Public Advocate Bill de Blasio warned in a statement that "changes in Stuyvesant Town's ownership must not be used as an excuse to hike rents and skimp on apartment services."

At the time of the sale in 2006, many real estate analysts had also voiced doubts about the record purchase price, but the partnership believed it had a winning strategy: It would aggressively convert thousands of rent-regulated apartments occupied by middle-class families into luxury units that would fetch top dollar.

The tactic failed as the city's housing market cooled.

Apartment conversions happened much slower than expected, many of the roughly 25,000 tenants fought back and a state court ruled that about $200 million in the partnership's new rent increases was improper.

It hasn't been determined when the ownership transfer of the sister properties will take place and who specifically the new owners will be, said Perrone, the partnership spokesman. In a statement Monday, Fitch Ratings said it believes the transfer of control of the property could be a lengthy process.

Tishman Speyer, whose other properties include Rockefeller Center and the Chrysler Building, said it wouldn't consider a long-term management contract to continue operating the apartment complexes if it didn't involve ownership.

The housing complexes, which are so big they have their own newspaper, were built by Metropolitan Life in the 1940s for returning World War II veterans. MetLife Inc. decided to sell them in 2005, when real estate prices were soaring.

Tenants launched their own bid to take over the 11,227 units, three out of four of which were rent-stabilized and priced far below the market rate, before MetLife announced it had closed a deal.

___

Associated Press Real Estate Writer Alex Veiga contributed to this report from Los Angeles.

© 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Samantha Gross's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: United States , New York
  • Public Discussion (13)
Paul Lucero

This is the first major shot across the bow of the US Economy from the USA COmmercial Real Estate Crisis you may have heard about in 2009.

I deal this mess every day in my office. The next thing to happen is the Banks that are holding these mortgages are going to panic. Sure the cash flow is great but it is not enough to Pay the debt service for the borrows and now the banks have their investors to explain how and what they plan to do with this series of dead loans!!!

Somebody is going to end up floating somewhere wrong side UP!!! I predict that soon there will be daily reports of certain investment divisions jumping from their 60th floor offices.

  • 3 votes
Reply#1 - Mon Jan 25, 2010 2:21 AM EST
blindsided-1194485

The crisis in commercial real estate had been forcast a while ago after the residential housing bubble burst. It was inevitable. Overpriced real estate, high unemployment, stagnant wages, bankruptsies soaring, and a economy propped up by the fed. The perfect storm. I just hope the President and the fed.chairman don't try to rescue this sinking ship with taxpayer money. They will be commiting political suicide if they do.

  • 2 votes
#1.1 - Mon Jan 25, 2010 7:09 AM EST
davidC123

"SNIFF" "SNIFF"..... Do you smell that smell? "SNIFF" "SNIFF," "SNIFF" "SNIFF".......

hmmmmm smells like another Goverment bailout a coming!!!!

I bet you anything.... fire up the printing press boys!!!!

You know, you hear on the news that things are getting better... and then you hear stuff like this....

Getting better where?

  • 1 vote
#1.2 - Mon Jan 25, 2010 8:14 AM EST
Paul Lucero

Crash 2.0 will be deeper and longer than before!!

  • 1 vote
#1.3 - Mon Jan 25, 2010 10:14 AM EST
Reply
Wizeguy

It would aggressively convert thousands of rent-regulated apartments occupied by middle-class families into luxury units that would fetch top dollar.

Their need for greed was their downfall. Most of these apartments are "rent controlled" handed down generation to generation. They tried (unsuccessfully) to break the cycle but the tenants prevailed. Power to the people!!!

  • 2 votes
Reply#2 - Mon Jan 25, 2010 7:05 AM EST
magz

Ironically, most of the value has to do with the land that the complexes sit on. The housing stock is sturdy but from the late 40's to early 50's and so 50 years behind in tech terms (you needed extra electrical work done to install your own AC unit for instance), but the tenants mostly are middle class and the property well maintained. As far as tenant activism is concerned, don't forget the total number of tenants would easily qualify it for statehood, if population density were a criteria (think Nebraska).

    #2.1 - Mon Jan 25, 2010 8:35 AM EST
    Reply
    Bob Jones-1211422

    While the US and it's people are suffering. the republican and democratic parties are both on the payroll of Wall Street and special interest. If these parties continue this way the US will be like Mexico, Brazil, or even Romania.

    • 2 votes
    Reply#3 - Mon Jan 25, 2010 7:48 AM EST
    gordo13

    Dang, that makes me feel good about some crazy deals Ive made in the past...!

    Bet much more of this type thing will happen in the near future...

      Reply#4 - Mon Jan 25, 2010 8:17 AM EST
      Ralph-482541

      Just the other day I read an article by a "financial guru" on one of the popular web sites that was saying how amoral it was for an individual to stop paying the mortgage on a home they owned now that they were "underwater on their mortgage balance even if it made personal financial sense to give the home back to the bank. I guess that corporations/equity fund types have no such morality as the stick it to the lender big time in cases such as this one and no one bats an eye. If I was to personally do the same I would be a dead beat. I thought the recent Supreme Court ruling on election contributions reaffirmed the "person hood" of corporation and yet we don't demand that they act in the same moral manner. I guess they can pick and chose their level of morality while tell the rest of us to keep paying like good citzens or is it drones.

      • 2 votes
      Reply#5 - Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:00 AM EST
      authorondo

      It's somewhat like a financial earthquake. There's going to be others. We have only just begun as the song begins.

      New York City and the state will need to par down at some point. Higher taxes only breeds more failure.

      The politicians will have to learn a new way forward. Less government and lower taxes will reverse the problems.

        Reply#6 - Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:03 AM EST
        River-239955

        11,000 apartments x a modest $500 per month (would be much higher in New York, of course) = $5,500,000. What have they been doing with the payments all along, I wonder?

        • 1 vote
        Reply#7 - Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:11 AM EST
        Charles Ciraolo

        All this mess was due to credit. Too much leverage. Now when things slow down they can't make payments. You can do a lot of things with somebody elese's money.

        • 1 vote
        Reply#8 - Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:45 AM EST
        Florida_kes

        And I bet that the financial geniuses who came up with this get rich scheme in the first place will just walk away without any negative impact to themselves, probably even personally richer than when they started this scam in the first place!

          Reply#9 - Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:01 AM EST
          Leave a Comment:
          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
          You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
          (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
          Newsvine Privacy Statement
          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
          FUN STUFF:
          • Leaderboard |
          • E-Mail Alerts |
          • Top of the Vine |
          • Newsvine Live |
          • Newsvine Archives |
          • The Greenhouse
          COMPANY STUFF:
          • Code of Honor |
          • Company Info |
          • Contact Us |
          • Jobs |
          • User Agreement |
          • Privacy Policy |
          • About our ads
          LEGAL STUFF:
          • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
          • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
          • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com