Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Exxon Mobil posts lowest annual profit since '02

Mon Feb 1, 2010 8:16 AM EST
us-news, business, us, earns, mobil, exxon-mobil
Chris Kahn, AP Energy Writer

FILE - In this Jan. 30, 2009 file photo, an Exxon tanker truck operated by Corey Moorer, right, of Clinton, Md., makes a refueling stop at an Exxon station in Arlington, Va. Exxon Mobil said Monday, Feb. 1, 2010, its fourth-quarter earnings tumbled 23 percent as higher oil prices squeezed profit margins in its refining business.(AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, file)

Advertise | AdChoices

NEW YORK — Exxon Mobil's earnings were cut by more than half to $19.3 billion in 2009, the lowest total in seven years, as company refineries struggled with a plunge in fuel consumption around the world.

But the world's largest publicly traded oil company remains the profit champ among U.S. public companies. Wal-Mart is expected to earn $14 billion for the year ended Jan. 31, and Microsoft earned $14.6 billion in the fiscal year ended in June 2009.

Exxon's results have swung with the price of oil and the impact of the global recession. When oil spiked above $147 a barrel in mid-2008, Exxon set ever-higher marks for earnings by a U.S. company. Then oil prices plummeted, and Exxon suffered a yearlong hangover that included its smallest quarterly earnings in several years.

The Irving, Texas company finished 2009 with a 23 percent decline in fourth-quarter income. Exxon earned $6.05 billion, or $1.27 a share, for the final three months of the year. That compares with $7.82 billion, or $1.54 a share, a year earlier. Revenue increased 6 percent to $89.8 billion.

Exxon now has posted lower profits for five straight quarters after setting a record of $14.83 billion in the third quarter of 2008.

The fourth-quarter results still beat analysts expectations of $1.19 a share and shares rose $1.30, or 2 percent, to $65.73 in morning trading.

For the full year, Exxon earned $3.98 a share. That compares with a record-breaking year in 2008, when Exxon recorded the highest profit ever for a U.S. company with earnings of $45.2 billion, or $8.66 a share. Exxon has been the highest-earning company in the S&P 500 index since 2000, following its acquisition of Mobil Corp.

The company said its U.S. refineries lost $287 million in the fourth quarter as oil prices rebounded and outpaced increases at the pump. Profits from the international downstream business dropped 96 percent.

As the recession crimped demand, Exxon responded by cutting back on production of gasoline, diesel and other fuels in 2009.

Other oil companies also struggled as their refineries failed to pass along higher oil costs to consumers.

Chevron Corp. said last week its fourth-quarter profit fell 37 percent after losing $613 million in its refining business. ConocoPhillips posted a $1.2 billion fourth-quarter profit, but its refineries lost $215 million.

Valero Energy Corp., America's largest independent petroleum refiner, lost almost $2 billion in 2009.

Despite the drop in annual revenue, Exxon didn't reduce capital spending and exploration. It boosted spending by 4 percent in 2009 to $27.1 billion.

In December, Exxon announced plans to buy XTO Energy in an all-stock deal that was worth about $29 billion at the time. XTO is a major holder of natural gas assets in the U.S., and the deal would make Exxon a major player in what is expected to be a robust market for the cleaner-burning fuel.

The deal, which is subject to approval by the government and XTO shareholders, would be Exxon's largest since its $75 billion purchase of Mobil Corp. in 1999.

© 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Chris Kahn's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Gas Prices,Climate,& more
  • Regions: New York
  • Public Discussion (45)
kim-1559631

BooHoo, poor babies!

  • 4 votes
Reply#1 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 11:29 AM EST
1standlastword

As the recession crimped demand, Exxon responded by cutting back on production of gasoline, diesel and other fuels in 2009.

This could be really great news if the declines in sales were due to people being more conservative in their uses of fuel.

  • 4 votes
#1.1 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 12:05 PM EST
Buckeye Voter

The news isn't that their profits were smallish. The news is that they still turned a profit.

  • 6 votes
#1.2 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 12:23 PM EST
nyghtshayde

Bet it won't interfere in their control over political processes or the millions they spend on their climate and pollution propoganda.

  • 1 vote
#1.3 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 1:07 PM EST
Reply
IAmEverydayPeople

We should bail them out with tax money.

  • 2 votes
Reply#2 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 11:33 AM EST
shekki_azziz

As the recession crimped demand, Exxon responded by cutting back on production of gasoline, diesel and other fuels in 2009.

The key words, "as the recession crimped demand". So, it makes sense that their profits would be down because less people are buying gasoline.

The way to interpret this story is this: Exxon is making less money because oil prices are being driven higher by speculators and the price at the pump is not following - since there are no fundementals of supply and demand driving the price of oil - it is a giant commodity crap game.

Exxon cuts production of gasoline and diesel, creating an artificially short supply, which in turn causes the speculators to go nuts, driving the prices higher.

It doesn't matter if we drive less and conserve. The price will still go up.

They are crying now, so that they can justify gasoline being $3.50 by memorial day.

  • 10 votes
Reply#3 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 11:45 AM EST
Buckeye Voter

They are crying now, so that they can justify gasoline being $3.50 by memorial day.

Give the man a cookie.

  • 7 votes
#3.1 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 12:22 PM EST
jamithy1

anybody notice that when the market puts oil up.... prices go up over night, when the market puts it down, prices takes days if not weeks to drop. Also prices go up not because there is a shortage now, but because speculators "anticipate" a shortage in the future. I think i'll go into my boss and say "I anticipate a labour shortage in 6 months, therefore my new hourly wage is $5 more than it was yesterday... thankyou"

it's all a SCAM

  • 7 votes
#3.2 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 12:24 PM EST
IAmEverydayPeople

I was thinking once, if supply and demand don't drive the price of gas at the pumps, which they don't, then why isn't the price higher?

The answer I found, was that the price is regulated by political forces more than economic forces, with the oil companies playing the role of king. If they raise the price too high, they'll have a revolt on their hands.

    #3.3 - Tue Feb 2, 2010 1:46 AM EST
    Reply
    Al 616

    Yeah...I bet their "top executives" are earning salaries well into tens of millions. The board of directors of that company may want to consider their salary protocols.

    • 3 votes
    Reply#4 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 11:57 AM EST
    Jay Butler

    well into tens of millions

    No. And, that information is easy enough to look up: Yahoo! Finance Profile XOM.

    • 3 votes
    #4.1 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 12:39 PM EST
    Al 616

    Yup. You're right. I was basing my statement off of the following:

    That was before new corporate documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission that revealed [Lee] Raymond's retirement deal and his $51.1 million paycheck in 2005.

    However, the salaries that are listed do not include "bonuses" and other "perks". They are not in the tens of millions. Their retirement packages are "insane."

      #4.2 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 7:31 PM EST
      Jay Butler

      the salaries that are listed do not include "bonuses" and other "perks".

      Wrong again. In the description right below the list:

      "Pay" is salary, bonuses, etc. "Exercised" is the value of options exercised during the fiscal year.

      • 1 vote
      #4.3 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 7:48 PM EST
      Al 616

      My bad, again. You're right.

      Good to know that they are cutting down from a couple years ago. Tillerson's bonus this year was 2.2 million. But in 2007:

      Exxon Mobil Corp (NYSE:XOM - News) on Tuesday said it gave Chief Executive Rex Tillerson a cash bonus and restricted stock currently valued at close to $20 million under its short-term incentive plan for 2007.

        #4.4 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 8:03 PM EST
        Reply
        kim-1559631

        Unbelievable. these greedy, life destroying, back stabbing, hostage holding traitors to America and our entire planet have the nerve to WHINE! Perhaps their karma would change if they started caring about the people that "MADE" them, while they paid OUR public servants to NOT push for massive public transit, train systems like the one that was NEVER built in Phoenix,Az because of them. They held Phoenix hostage for gasoline and the profits they made in 2008 should totally make up for it! maybe if they stopped spilling it all over our planet too! The economic enslavement that our public servants have "allowed" corporations to do to America is criminal and possibly treasonous if not terrorism!

        • 4 votes
        Reply#5 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 12:02 PM EST
        Bubba-939441

        "these greedy, life destroying, back stabbing, hostage holding traitors to America"

        Umm, Kim you should want them to make a profit so they can pay more taxes to the federal government. Lower income means the government gets less money for your entitlements. This greedy corporation paid 30 BILLION in taxes in 2007. How much did you pay?

        http://seekingalpha.com/article/63131-exxon-s-2007-tax-bill-30-billion

        • 1 vote
        #5.1 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 1:07 PM EST
        nyghtshayde

        Bubba-

        Say it ain't so,is that the Bubba I know?You defending an industry that is resposible for many illnesses among our children and society.An industry,who through the years has done it's best to hide the dangers involved and the damages they have done to communities around the world.

        • 4 votes
        #5.2 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 2:17 PM EST
        Florida_kes

        And how much money did your precious Exxon steal from consumers by over charging for it's product? And how much did it still have left over to pad it's pockets with?

        Wall $treet scum know no end to their greed and entitlements.

        • 4 votes
        #5.3 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 2:21 PM EST
        Bubba-939441

        Florida, the less they make the less the government gets. Exxon pays employee's social security taxes and Medicare payroll taxes. The government taxes every gallon of gasoline and Exxon pays income taxes as well. They also provide good jobs and benefits for employees. If a corporation does not make a profit there are no jobs and revenue to the Fed decreases. No profit No jobs. Why do ya'll want corporations to make less profit?? If government managed cash as well as Exxon we wouldn't all be on the hook for triillions to China.

        • 1 vote
        #5.4 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 2:27 PM EST
        shekki_azziz

        Since you brought up China, and this article is about Exxon:

        Exxon Mobil Corp. is betting big on China's seemingly endless hunger for fuel.

        The company started up a $4.5 billion refining and petrochemical complex in Fujian Province on Wednesday and recently opened its first gas station on the mainland. It plans to operate at least 750 gas stations there, even as it is selling all its company-owned stations in the U.S

        http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703808904574529551878012922.html

        I wonder if the billion$ they make in China will be subject to U.S. taxes?

        I wonder why they couldn't create more jobs and expand their facilities here in the U.S.?

        If we bought gasoline from Exxon then we helped pay for those facilities in China, didn't we?

        • 3 votes
        #5.5 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 2:43 PM EST
        Bubba-939441

        Good article. Americans will get new jobs in China and they will be paying federal income taxes to Uncle Sam. Good for everybody.

        • 1 vote
        #5.6 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 2:51 PM EST
        shekki_azziz

        Good for Exxon and their shareholders maybe.

        Good for the U.S.? Maybe not. Since demand in China and India is what is causing speculators to drive oil prices up.

        It means higher prices for us, and since the Chinese Government will most likely control the prices in China, (keeping them low) the American consumers will again be left holding the bag.

        Of course Exxon will pass on any losses in the Chinese market, to the American gasoline buying public, so that they can keep posting those record profits.

        • 2 votes
        #5.7 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 3:01 PM EST
        Bubba-939441

        shekki, the beauty of the big picture is that anybody can share in the profits of this well managed corporation. Buy Exxon!! It's a much better investment than social security.

        • 1 vote
        #5.8 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 3:04 PM EST
        Jay Butler

        Exxon will pass on any losses in the Chinese market, to the American gasoline buying public

        How exactly is Exxon going to do that? Raise its gasoline prices? Won't the customers patronize the station down the street?

        Gasoline is one of the most fungible consumer products. People will drive miles just to save a penny per gallon.

        • 1 vote
        #5.9 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 3:25 PM EST
        Al 616

        Bubba, I have no problem with corporations making lots of money. Yes, it's good for the economy for corporations to make money.

        What I do have a problem with are the CEOs who give themselves millions of dollars in bonuses that could be used to hire more workers, which would have a ripple effect through the economy. Ten million dollars divided by $100,000 (which is roughly equivalent to a $50,000 job plus benefits) could hire one hundred people, who could then go out and spend their money on necessities, services, electronics, clothes, etc...

        That means more people hired into the sales, services, and manufacturing industries. If you want to build an economic base, you have to do it from the bottom up. We've seen trickle down economics for the last 30 years. It doesn't work because of basic human greed, and the only thing that has trickled down from most of those greedy pricks is urine.

          #5.10 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 7:40 PM EST
          Jay Butler

          And, who are you going to get to lead this company with 100 additional people?

          I think that I would rather work for a company whose CEO is talented enough to grow the company by 100 (or more) workers at $100K each.

          Would you pay a painter $5,000 to paint your house? Or, would you prefer that he hire 50 people earning $100 each for the job? Is it possible that the painter actually has skills that make him worth his fee?

          It is easy to sit at a distance an paint all CEOs as overpaid, golf playing, cigar smoking, back room dealers. I have been fortunate enough to know a few CEOs from mid to large companies. Every one of them was very intelligent and was completely committed to the success of the company. The companies were their lives during their tenures at the top. They never stopped working. I am sure that there are lazy scheming CEOs in the world, but I have never encountered one.

          • 1 vote
          #5.11 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 8:14 PM EST
          Reply
          cnotebutbrokeDeleted
          blindsided-1194485

          Wah!, Wah! we only made over nineteen BILLION dollars! We're victims of the recession! We need a bailout! :)

          • 4 votes
          Reply#7 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 12:10 PM EST
          NC Slim

          In 2005, Exxon Mobil made $36.13b; 2006--$39.5b; 2007--$40.6b;2008--$45.2b. I hope the gods of oil are not bellyaching, crybabies. Most of us are not buying gas b/c we aren't driving to work, to the supermarket, on family trips--we don't have JOBS!

          • 5 votes
          Reply#8 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 12:20 PM EST
          shekki_azziz

          Most of us are not buying gas b/c we aren't driving to work, to the supermarket, on family trips--we don't have JOBS!

          How true. But, the real story is that they still made almost 20 BILLION in profits! Even though demand is way down. Why aren't they losing money?? Could it be that oil and gasoline are way over priced based on the current economy?

          Exxon and other oil industry people would have us believe that higher prices are based on supply and demand. Is it really?

          The price of oil is hovering around $80/barrel, gasoline is around $2.69 a gallon - wait until people do start going back to work and driving more - the prices will skyrocket, and so will the profits at Exxon.

          • 3 votes
          #8.1 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 12:38 PM EST
          Jay Butler

          we don't have JOBS!

          Interesting. Exxon-Mobil does have 104,000 employees. Remaining profitable certainly benefits them.

          • 3 votes
          #8.2 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 12:42 PM EST
          jamithy1

          big difference between "losing" money, and not making as much as anticipated.... I love how big companies twist it to make it sound like a loss.

          • 4 votes
          #8.3 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 1:03 PM EST
          Bubba-939441

          Jay, these people don't want corporations to make a profit. Profit means more tax revenue for the government. They don't get it.

          • 1 vote
          #8.4 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 1:10 PM EST
          Florida_kes

          They don't get it.

          Pot calling kettle! Hello kettle!

          • 2 votes
          #8.5 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 2:27 PM EST
          shekki_azziz

          Most people don't have a problem with corporations making a profit. It's the corporations that take advantage of consumers, in order to make profits at their expense, that people have a problem with.

          Is the price of oil and gasoline based on the fundamentals of supply and demand? This article is more proof that it is not. What is the price based on? Speculation? If so, then we are paying higher prices based on someone gambling and betting on oil prices.

          Someone is making loads of money at our expense.

          People have a right to complain and/or be upset about it.

          • 3 votes
          #8.6 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 2:32 PM EST
          MJV in Wisconsin

          Someone is making loads of money at our expense.

          Check this website out to find out exactly how the price of a gallon of gasoline breaks down (in California).

          Distribution Costs, Marketing Costs and Profits $0.14
          Crude Oil Cost $1.97
          Refinery Cost and Profits $0.25
          State Underground Storage Tank Fee $0.02
          State and Local Sales Tax $0.25
          State Excise Tax $0.18
          Federal Excise Tax $0.18
          Retail price $2.99

          So what it actually boils down to is the cost for crude is $1.97 per gallon, the oil company (Distribution and Refinery) gets ~$0.39 per gallon and state/federal and local taxes account for $0.63 per gallon.

          Cost of Crude = 65%
          Taxes = 21%
          Marketing, Distribution, Refining and Profits (Oil Company) = 13% (of which, all of it is not profit).

          Who's getting loads of money at our expense?

          • 3 votes
          #8.7 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 4:57 PM EST
          JOHNNY THE GREAT

          MJV in Wisconsin

          Good information

          • 1 vote
          #8.8 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 5:38 PM EST
          Bubba-939441

          Margins on gasoline are razor thin. Profit margins for software, computers and drugs are much higher. Bankers are also making a killing thanks to bailouts. You can't blame that on Exxon.

          • 1 vote
          #8.9 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 5:43 PM EST
          Reply
          Fred-45144444

          Well, no class envy with this seed.

          • 3 votes
          Reply#9 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 1:05 PM EST
          Florida_kes

          Huh? Try "disgusted with insatiable greed" and you might, at least, be on the same planet.

          • 3 votes
          #9.1 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 2:28 PM EST
          Fred-45144444

          Why are you so bitter? Your angry at an entity and an innate object. What do you gain by its loss. A feeling of getting even? Exxon is an entity made up of 1000'sand 1000's of different collaborations. It's like being mad at a rock. It has no emotion whether it shows a profit or loss. Oh, and the CEO will still make the same money either way.

          Maybe you should get angry at polar bears......they eat little baby seals you know.

          • 2 votes
          #9.2 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 2:59 PM EST
          shekki_azziz

          Fred is the CEO of Exxon.

          Little baby seals are tasty if you coat them with oil and deep fry them.

          MMMM, MMMM GOOOD!

          • 2 votes
          #9.3 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 3:05 PM EST
          Reply
          AmericanMOM-598098

          Well, good for them. They still made a pretty good profit, and have the capabilities to take over another company. It would be nice to see some people being put to work; I know several in the oil business that could use it; I'm sure that what they used that 4% increase in spending was. Must be reserves set aside from their record profits in 2007 & 2008. Looks like Walmart and Microsoft ended the year profitable too. Maybe Walmart will raise employees' salaries and benefits. Saving our economy one large corporation at a time; that's the new American way.

          • 1 vote
          Reply#10 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 1:49 PM EST
          Fred-45144444

          Ford's doing pretty good too. How about GM ? Not as well. I wonder why.

          • 2 votes
          #10.1 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 2:06 PM EST
          Reply
          JOHNNY THE GREAT

          These Big Oil Company don't need any more of our Money.

          Gasoline Prices should be way down than what they are.

          We need to get away from oil. We all know what going to happen as soon as people start going back to work. maybe $5.00 or $6.00 a gal. We will be back in the same fix.

          • 2 votes
          Reply#11 - Mon Feb 1, 2010 4:02 PM EST
          dfhsdfhdsfDeleted
          Leave a Comment:
          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
          You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
          (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
          Newsvine Privacy Statement
          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
          FUN STUFF:
          • Leaderboard |
          • E-Mail Alerts |
          • Top of the Vine |
          • Newsvine Live |
          • Newsvine Archives |
          • The Greenhouse
          COMPANY STUFF:
          • Code of Honor |
          • Company Info |
          • Contact Us |
          • Jobs |
          • User Agreement |
          • Privacy Policy |
          • About our ads
          LEGAL STUFF:
          • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
          • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
          • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com