Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Republican holds out hope on health care overhaul

Thu Feb 18, 2010 3:06 AM EST
us-news, health, us, overhaul, judd-gregg, gregg
Holly Ramer, Associated Press
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 3 photos
<p>FILE - In this Feb. 2, 2010 file photo, the Senate Budget Committee's ranking Republican Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H. meets with reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, watches at left. Unlike some of his lame-duck colleagues, Gregg isn't disillusioned with Congress. Bipartisanship isn't dead, he says, and neither is health care reform. (AP Photo/Cliff Owen, File)</p>

FILE - In this Feb. 2, 2010 file photo, the Senate Budget Committee's ranking Republican Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H. meets with reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, watches at left. Unlike some of his lame-duck colleagues, Gregg isn't disillusioned with Congress. Bipartisanship isn't dead, he says, and neither is health care reform. (AP Photo/Cliff Owen, File)

Advertise | AdChoices

CONCORD — Unlike some of his lame-duck colleagues, Sen. Judd Gregg isn't disillusioned with Congress. Bipartisanship isn't dead, he says, and neither is health care reform.

A year after he nearly became President Barack Obama's commerce secretary, the three-term New Hampshire Republican is reaching out to the White House with a plan to overhaul health care that has some key features in common with the Democratic bills passed by the House and Senate. For instance, it would require everyone over age 18 to get coverage.

But the plan is almost secondary to the approach Gregg is pushing: Start from scratch and work through the goals Republicans and Democrats agree on one by one rather than using the Democratic bills as a starting point or pitting them against a Republican-crafted alternative.

"There are a whole series of things that would improve the health care delivery system that both sides can agree on," he said this week. "When the president said he was looking for ideas, I sent him some. I think all those ideas could be agreed on in a bipartisan way."

It's unclear how seriously the Obama administration is taking Gregg, who famously accepted then turned down the commerce secretary nomination. The senator said he has spoken with White House staff, but as of Wednesday, he was still not on the invitation list for the televised health care forum Obama will moderate next week.

The first invitations went to congressional leaders and the top members of the relevant committees, but Gregg could attend the Feb. 25 summit as one of the four picks of Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.

"The opportunity is there," Gregg said. "I don't know if it's going to end up being theater. I don't know if it's going to end up being a substantive effort to accomplish something."

If the administration opts for a fresh start — a big "if," as Obama has said he doesn't want to begin anew — Gregg is well-positioned to play a key role. He is a former chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee and remains the ranking Republican on the Budget Committee.

"I think he brings some credibility as a fiscal conservative," said Wayne Lesperance, associate political science professor at New England College in Henniker, N.H. "And he seems, unlike a lot of his colleagues in the Republican Party, to have a sense of what the issues are with this debate."

Gregg, 63, who was elected to the Senate in 1992, announced a year ago that he would not seek re-election this year.

"The conventional wisdom is that an outgoing senator just sort of fades away, but clearly Judd Gregg does not want to go gentle into that good night," Lesperance said.

By inserting himself into the health care debate, Gregg is adding to his well-established legacy as a fiscal hawk, Lesperance said. But Gregg said that was not his motivation.

"I am not thinking of a legacy, rather of the need to get our fiscal house in order," he said. That includes reforming health care in a way that reduces costs and making sure that Medicare doesn't create an excessive burden for the next generation, he said.

Gregg's plan exists not in formal legislation but as a set of proposals grouped under the acronym CPR, for Coverage, Prevention and Reform.

It parallels some of the key ideas in the Democratic plans, but it is more aggressive in trying to control costs and less ambitious in extending the federal government's role as an insurance regulator.

Similar to that the Democrats, Gregg's plan would require everyone over 18 to carry at least basic coverage. And he would provide federal subsidies for households making up to three times the federal poverty level, or about $66,000 for a family of four.

The plan would be financed by taxing employer-sponsored coverage above certain limits. That's a nonstarter for many Democrats, but economists say adopting such a policy would begin to push down health care spending, allowing for expanded coverage without busting the budget.

Gregg would also encourage employers to offer discounted premiums for workers who take steps to live healthy lives, and his plan shifts payments for hospitals and doctors to reward quality care rather than sheer volume of procedures and visits.

Though he would like to apply a projected $500 billion in 10-year Medicare savings to a Medicare solvency fund, Gregg said he would be willing to split the difference with Democrats, using $250 billion to shore up Medicare and using the rest to fund expanded health coverage.

Speaking to a business group this week, Gregg was asked whether he thought passing health care overhaul was impossible and whether he believed — as Sen. Evan Bayh, D-Ind., expressed in announcing his retirement on Monday — that Congress has become impossibly partisan. Gregg answered no to both.

"There is still significant collegiality in the Senate," he said. "I deal with my colleagues on the other side of the aisle on big issues all the time."

___

Associated Press writer Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar in Washington contributed to this report.

© 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Holly Ramer's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: Boston
  • Public Discussion (5)
The Spirit

What a dope. He REALLY believes the democrats can be bipartisan? When the lion lays down with the lamb.

    Reply#1 - Thu Feb 18, 2010 3:20 AM EST
    bert2341

    I'm all for government run health care as long as: I don't have to participate; recipients pass a drug test; they can't smoke or drink and can't have any children after enrolling; must work for the government for free for the duration of their enrollment. Sounds fair to me.

      Reply#2 - Thu Feb 18, 2010 3:50 AM EST
      Lane Doomas

      We all know the republicans eat thier own and anything less than a resounding NO to anything is unacceptable. But he's not running for re-election anyway. lol

      Nicely played Mr. Gregg

        Reply#3 - Thu Feb 18, 2010 4:01 AM EST
        supergerbil424

        Hey Sen. Judd Gregg,

        Give us Universal Healthcare. Anything less is less than effective.

        Bi-partisanship was dead the day, Rush said he'd rather see America Fail than see Obama succeed.

        • 2 votes
        Reply#4 - Thu Feb 18, 2010 8:01 AM EST
        TomMichigan1

        Here we go again>a rupublican with idea's to Distort and deny anything that is concrete or a good plan for Americans...Republicans will spoil the Stew and then not (vote to support the bill,(Eat)and then hand it back in the democrats lap as a bad piece of legislation..I say Vote the Bums (Republican) OUT!

        • 1 vote
        Reply#5 - Fri Feb 19, 2010 7:29 AM EST
        Leave a Comment:
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
        (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
        Newsvine Privacy Statement
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
        FUN STUFF:
        • Leaderboard |
        • E-Mail Alerts |
        • Top of the Vine |
        • Newsvine Live |
        • Newsvine Archives |
        • The Greenhouse
        COMPANY STUFF:
        • Code of Honor |
        • Company Info |
        • Contact Us |
        • Jobs |
        • User Agreement |
        • Privacy Policy |
        • About our ads
        LEGAL STUFF:
        • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
        • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
        • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com