Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Analysis: Republicans setting filibuster record

Mon Mar 1, 2010 3:20 AM EST
politics, barack-obama, analysis, filibuster, gone, awry
Steven R. Hurst, Associated Press
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 5 photos
<p>FILE - In this Dec. 21, 2009, file photo Sens. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., left, and John Kerry, D-Mass., center, talk with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., following a 60-40 cloture vote, which is the first step on passing a health care bill on Capitol Hill in Washington.  in late November and December last year, minority Republicans used a variety of delaying tactics against the Democrats' health care reform bill for three weeks, causing the Senate to stay in session through the week and for three weekends running until Christmas. (AP Photo/Harry Hamburg, File)</p>

FILE - In this Dec. 21, 2009, file photo Sens. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., left, and John Kerry, D-Mass., center, talk with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., following a 60-40 cloture vote, which is the first step on passing a health care bill on Capitol Hill in Washington. in late November and December last year, minority Republicans used a variety of delaying tactics against the Democrats' health care reform bill for three weeks, causing the Senate to stay in session through the week and for three weekends running until Christmas. (AP Photo/Harry Hamburg, File)

Advertise | AdChoices

WASHINGTON — The filibuster — tool of obstruction in the U.S. Senate — is alternately blamed and praised for wilting President Barack Obama's ambitious agenda. Some even say it's made the nation ungovernable.

Maybe, maybe not. Obama's term still has three years to run.

More certain, however: Opposition Republicans are using the delaying tactic at a record-setting pace.

"The numbers are astonishing in this Congress," says Jim Riddlesperger, political science professor at Texas Christian University in Fort Worth.

The filibuster, using seemingly endless debate to block legislative action, has become entrenched like a dandelion tap root in the midst of the shrill partisanship gripping Washington.

But the filibuster is nothing new. Its use dates to the mists of Senate history, but until the civil rights era, it was rarely used.

A tactic unique to the Senate, the filibuster means a simple majority guarantees nothing when it comes to passing laws.

"The rules of the Senate are designed to give muscle to the minority," said Senate historian Donald Ritchie.

With the Senate now made up of 100 members, two for each of the 50 states, an opposition filibuster can only be broken with 60 votes — a three-fifths majority.

As a matter of political philosophy, the concept of the filibuster arises from a deep-seated, historic concern among Americans that the minority not be steamrolled by the majority.

It is a brake and protective device rooted in the same U.S. political sensibility that gave each state two senators regardless of population.

The same impulse gave Americans the Electoral College in presidential contests — a structure from earliest U.S. history designed to give smaller population states greater influence in choosing the nation's leader.

Given recent use of the filibuster by minority Republicans and the party's success in snarling the legislative process in this Congress, Democrats say the minority has gone way beyond just protecting its interests.

The frequency of filibusters — plus threats to use them — are measured by the number of times the upper chamber votes on cloture. Such votes test the majority's ability to hold together 60 members to break a filibuster.

In the 110th Congress of 2007-2008, with Republicans in the minority, there were a record 112 cloture votes. In the current session of Congress — the 111th — for all of 2009 and the first two months of 2010 the number already exceeds 40. The most the filibuster has been used when Democrats were in the minority was 58 times in the 106th Congress of 1999-2000.

During most of Obama's first year in office and for a few weeks this year, 58 Democratic senators and two Independents who normally vote with them held a filibuster-proof 60-seat majority in the Senate.

That vanished last month when Massachusetts Republican Scott Brown captured the seat of the late Sen. Ted Kennedy, who died last summer.

Most notably, Brown's victory has stymied Obama's push to overhaul health care just as the bill was approaching the finish line. Before Brown's election, both the Senate and the House of Representatives had passed separate versions of the reform legislation.

Brown broke the Democratic 60-seat majority before the two chambers could meld differences in their bills for a final vote in both houses.

However, one of Brown's first votes after taking office saw him joining four other Republicans to help Democrats break a threatened filibuster by his party's leaders against a job bill.

The measure, $13 billion in tax incentives for businesses to hire unemployed workers, was quickly passed the next day with 12 Republicans joining Brown and 55 Democrats in favor of it.

Filibusters to make the Obama administration and Democrats in Congress look inept are one thing. Quite another is a vote against creating jobs in an economy with nearly 10 percent unemployment and midterm elections nine months away.

___

EDITOR'S NOTE — Steven R. Hurst reports from the White House for The Associated Press and has covered international relations for 30 years.

___

On the Net:

http://www.senate.gov

(This version CORRECTS the number of filibusters in the 16th paragraph.)

© 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Steven R. Hurst's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (15)
Texasguy01

As long as it stops the Obama Marxist destruction of America I fully support it. If anything they have been too polite and indirect.

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Mon Mar 1, 2010 10:53 AM EST
Thomas-386852

I agree with Texasguy01. It's pretty sad that we are depending on the Republiclowns to SAVE us from the Demoncrats. If the Repubs had done the right thing, for the 8 years that they had control, we wouldn't be dealing with the new communist party which has taken control of this country. Yes, it's well past time to tame Wall Street greed and the insurance company's. THAT is what Bush should have been doing instead of pissing off every other country in the world promoting world domination. The Russians couldn't do it and neither can we. There so many thing wrong in THIS country. We don't have the time or the money to FIX every other country. The massive printing of funny money will bring us down. It's time to go back to the constitution before it's too late. It may already be too late.

    Reply#2 - Mon Mar 1, 2010 11:08 AM EST
    smith 1

    GOP a bunch of OLD white guys standing against the TIDE OF HISTORY !!! first CIVIL RIGHTS and now HEALTH CARE REFORM !!! these old F_CKERS don't mind sticking it to other people as long as they have THEIRS !!!

    p.s. I wonder how these A-HOLES would have felt in 1964 if their skins had been BLACK and they COULDN'T VOTE ???

      Reply#3 - Mon Mar 1, 2010 11:37 AM EST
      Terp

      You should check your facts, Mr. Kool Aid; it was the Republicans that gave you civil rights, not the racist Democrats....nice try, though. Keep believing everything this reporter writes. It was Senator KKK Byrd (D) who was staunchly against civil rights and holding it up....

      • 2 votes
      #3.1 - Mon Mar 1, 2010 6:27 PM EST
      smith 1

      dear terp A-HOLE

      the civil rights legislation of 1964 was signed into law by LYNDON JOHSON-A DEMOCRAT !!! CHECK YOUR FACTS F_CKER !!! but it is also true that racist YELLOW DOG democrats from the south stood against the tide of history.

        #3.2 - Tue Mar 2, 2010 12:23 PM EST
        Reply
        Duane Phinney

        Overhaul health care? He means control health care, big difference. This business about the big bad insurance companies is totally bogus. Insurance companies are regulated to death by the States. They can not raise their rates a nickle without State approval. The problem is that States like California demand insurance Co's cover everything from acupuncture to cosmetic surgery, sure they will cover it but someone has to pay for it. Adding 30 million uninsured to Medicaid is a joke, maybe 1 in every 600 Doctors treat Medicaid patients. Make no mistake about it, under Obama care health care will be rationed and rationed severely.

        As for Canada care, their Premier went to Florida for major heart surgery. All at risk pregnancies are flown to the US for care.

        • 1 vote
        Reply#4 - Mon Mar 1, 2010 6:10 PM EST
        Terp

        ...more biased AP reporting, Steve.

        You can't argue that "[t]he frequency of filibusters — plus threats to use them — are measured by the number of times the upper chamber votes on cloture."

        The Democrats vote for cloture on nearly ever single bill they introduce to the floor, in an effort to shut down all debate.

        Imagine this: during the recess, no Republicans return to the Senate, something this biased reporter would love, and the Democrats introduce 50 pieces of legislation; moreover, they maintain the status quo and vote cloture on all 50 pieces of legislation, so Republicans can not voice any debate.

        This would represent 50 Republican filibusters in the world of Steve, though no Republicans were there to filibuster.

        Nice try, Steve.

        • 1 vote
        Reply#5 - Mon Mar 1, 2010 6:23 PM EST
        ohgirl-379077

        MORONS!!!!!!!!!!!

        STUPID MORONS!!!!!!!!!!!

          Reply#6 - Mon Mar 1, 2010 6:53 PM EST
          Allan Stowe

          Story appears to be false. Previous record was set by the Republican minority in the 110th congress. More than 100 cloture/filibusters.

            Reply#7 - Mon Mar 1, 2010 8:02 PM EST
            Allan Stowe

            Report apears to be flawed; the previous record was also set by a republican minority in the 110th congress.

              Reply#8 - Mon Mar 1, 2010 8:12 PM EST
              Allan Stowe

              Report appears flawed; the previous record was also set by a repulican minority in the 110th congress.

                Reply#9 - Mon Mar 1, 2010 8:14 PM EST
                Allan Stowe

                Report appears flawed; previous record was set in 110th congress also by a republican minority.

                • 1 vote
                Reply#10 - Mon Mar 1, 2010 8:19 PM EST
                Allan Stowe

                Report appears to be flawed; previous record was set in 110th congress also by a republican minority.

                • 1 vote
                Reply#11 - Mon Mar 1, 2010 8:22 PM EST
                Allan Stowe

                duplicate removed

                • 1 vote
                Reply#12 - Mon Mar 1, 2010 8:29 PM EST
                FRED-1090120

                treat Obama like the democrats treated George Bush, All for it.

                • 1 vote
                Reply#13 - Mon Mar 1, 2010 11:07 PM EST
                Leave a Comment:
                You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                Newsvine Privacy Statement
                As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                FUN STUFF:
                • Leaderboard |
                • E-Mail Alerts |
                • Top of the Vine |
                • Newsvine Live |
                • Newsvine Archives |
                • The Greenhouse
                COMPANY STUFF:
                • Code of Honor |
                • Company Info |
                • Contact Us |
                • Jobs |
                • User Agreement |
                • Privacy Policy |
                • About our ads
                LEGAL STUFF:
                • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com