Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Senate-passed health care bill would cut deficit

Thu Mar 11, 2010 10:37 AM EST
politics, health, us, barack-obama, cost, overhaul, estimate
Associated Press
Advertise | AdChoices

WASHINGTON — Congressional budget referees say Senate legislation that's now the foundation for President Barack Obama's health care plan would cut the federal deficit by $118 billion over 10 years.

The Congressional Budget Office says the $875 billion, 10-year plan would provide coverage to 31 million people who'd otherwise be uninsured. And it says the cost would be more than offset in savings from changes in Medicare and other programs.

Obama's plan would build on the legislation passed by the Senate on Christmas Eve, by expanding subsidies for health insurance premiums, closing the Medicare prescription coverage gap, and making scores of other changes.

No estimates are yet available for Obama's latest proposal, but Democratic leaders want to keep the 10-year cost at around $950 billion.

© 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Associated Press's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (5)
Paul Lucero

I am sorry, the title of this article is right up there with "Satan is my Friend!"

Grow up people and do the the Math, if you are capable and if not go ask a teach to explain how adding 130 million to government tax burden will LOWER costs!

  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Thu Mar 11, 2010 11:23 AM EST
merleliz

By adding taxes, of course! People who cannot afford health insurance now will still be unable to afford health insurance...especially with the rise in premiums that this bill will cause...but, and here's the kicker...they will be fined and have to pay an additional TAX to the IRS! At that point, the government's interest in their health "care" will cease.

Follow the money, people, the only way you can cut a deficit is by increasing taxes or reducing spending. You either have to have more money coming in, or less going out, simple as that. If the provisions for reducing waste and fraud are going to help do that, then fine, enact them! But not this bloated monstrosity of government waste and control.

Do you really want your health care to be managed with the efficiency of the DMV and the compassion of the IRS?

    Reply#2 - Thu Mar 11, 2010 11:36 AM EST
    Texasguy01

    You start by cutting 500 billion from Medicare and taxing right away to only add services years down the road and only save 118 billion?. The reality is the mathematics of this are a huge Ponzi scheme. These numbers are carefully crafted to conceal the true cost years down the road.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#3 - Thu Mar 11, 2010 11:41 AM EST
    Olyman

    MMM.... let me see, 10 years of paying for 6 years of benefits, how does that math work out ???

    Nice try CBO

    • 1 vote
    Reply#4 - Thu Mar 11, 2010 2:56 PM EST
    bob-1478320

    The other part of this is the cbo has always said they caution people about the likelihood of those savings and the difficulty of predicting costs/savings over that period of time

      Reply#5 - Thu Mar 11, 2010 5:55 PM EST
      Leave a Comment:
      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
      You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
      (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
      Newsvine Privacy Statement
      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
      FUN STUFF:
      • Leaderboard |
      • E-Mail Alerts |
      • Top of the Vine |
      • Newsvine Live |
      • Newsvine Archives |
      • The Greenhouse
      COMPANY STUFF:
      • Code of Honor |
      • Company Info |
      • Contact Us |
      • Jobs |
      • User Agreement |
      • Privacy Policy |
      • About our ads
      LEGAL STUFF:
      • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
      • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
      • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com