Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Edwards mistress: Still in love, living 'truth'

Mon Mar 15, 2010 7:58 AM EDT
us-news, us, john-edwards, edwards, hunter, rielle-hunter, john-edwards'
Associated Press
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 4 photos
<p>FILE - In this Aug. 6, 2009 file photo, Rielle Hunter leaves the Terry Sanford Federal Building and Courthouse in Raleigh, N.C. John Edwards' mistress says she didn't want him to run for president and considered it "reckless" to stay in the race after his wife's cancer returned. Hunter said in an interview with GQ released Monday, March 15, 2010 that she and Edwards have been in love from February 2006 until now.  (AP Photo/Jim R. Bounds, File)</p>

FILE - In this Aug. 6, 2009 file photo, Rielle Hunter leaves the Terry Sanford Federal Building and Courthouse in Raleigh, N.C. John Edwards' mistress says she didn't want him to run for president and considered it "reckless" to stay in the race after his wife's cancer returned. Hunter said in an interview with GQ released Monday, March 15, 2010 that she and Edwards have been in love from February 2006 until now. (AP Photo/Jim R. Bounds, File)

Advertise | AdChoices

RALEIGH — The mistress of former presidential candidate John Edwards says she is helping him live "a life of truth" and the two remain in love even after their affair helped trigger his downfall from the pinnacle of U.S. politics.

"Everyone talks about how Johnny has fallen from grace," Rielle Hunter told GQ magazine in an interview released Monday. "In reality, he's fallen to grace."

In her first public comments since she became known as Edwards' other woman in 2008, Hunter didn't provide any details of their status but said Edwards is a great father who wants to be there full-time for their daughter, now 2.

"I know he loves me. I have never had any doubt at all about that," Hunter said. "We love each other very much. And that hasn't changed, and I believe that will be till death do us part."

Hunter also posed for photos for GQ that show her on a bed, barelegged in a man's white dress shirt and a pearl necklace. In another shot, she's lying on her back holding her daughter in her arms.

She said she and Edwards had an immediate connection when they met at a New York City hotel in 2006, and she said she knew then that she was a special person to him.

"He in fact did say to me the first night, 'Falling in love with you could really (expletive) up my plans for becoming president,'" she said.

Hunter said she told him he shouldn't run for the White House and suggested he at least wait until April 2007 because her intuition and astrology suggested he would have a difficult first three months of the year. Elizabeth Edwards' cancer returned in March of that year. Hunter said John Edwards wanted to exit the race but that Elizabeth Edwards wanted him to stay in.

"And my surprise was that they stayed in the race," Hunter said. "I was shocked. I really viewed it as reckless."

Hunter said Edwards' marriage was already in shambles before their romance, declaring, "I was not the home wrecker." She said people were wrong to believe Edwards had fallen because of the affair and its revelation.

Instead, "I think that he thinks that he is a much wiser and a much better and a more truthful and a more integrated human being," she said.

John and Elizabeth Edwards are now separated. Hunter said the affair ended in July 2008 and that the relationship is now something "different."

Edwards hired Hunter to work as a campaign videographer in 2006 as he plotted his second run for president. The former North Carolina senator's political action committee paid her video production firm more than $100,000.

Federal investigators have been looking into Edwards' campaign finances, with former aide Andrew Young saying a grand jury questioned him for hours about the large sums of money that changed hands during the period that he helped cover up the affair.

Hunter said the grand jury questioned her about Young and about her relationship with Edwards.

"They asked a lot of questions about the sex tape," she said. Hunter has sued Young for invasion of privacy, seeking the return of a videotape that he describes as Edwards and Hunter in a sexual encounter.

Young said in a statement Monday that he has a lot of empathy for what Hunter is going through.

"I hope she and Johnny and Elizabeth and their families can find happiness so that we all can move on with our lives," he said.

An attorney for Hunter declined to comment, and a spokeswoman for John Edwards said he would not comment. An attorney for Elizabeth Edwards did not immediately return a call seeking comment.

© 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Associated Press's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: Raleigh/Durham
  • Public Discussion (103)
Jump to discussion page: 1 2
buddym

This woman is a floozy. No woman gets pregnant today unless she wants to and no woman makes a sex tape unless she plans to use it later. This Babe was all about the bucks and nothing else. Also it was not up to her whether Edwards ran for president or not, she was not his wife, nor did she have any say in his life. However, she now has brought the man down to his knees, ruined his reputation, and any chance he ever had of having a political career. I hope this floozy was worth it to Edwards because that is all he is ever going to be remembered for.

  • 9 votes
#1 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 9:07 AM EDT
HappyToSeeYa

Elizabeth Edwards knew about John's affair with Rielle and still encouraged her husband to run for president. Even though it's none of my business, I want to know why Elizabeth wants to be separated/divorced long after the fact. John can show the most humanitarianism by staying, without rancor, by his wife's side. He does not have to be like Newt who went to his sick, cancer-stricken wife's hospital room to get divorce papers signed.

  • 2 votes
#1.1 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 9:49 AM EDT
rkymtnwoman

Where is the Sanford mistress story? How about Ensign?

Some juicy sex and adultry!! will always do when there is no celebrity masterbation story to distract the idiots of America with while we get converted to fascism.

  • 2 votes
#1.2 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 10:38 AM EDT
Checkmate-983933

Denial, mommy dearest? I believe she was hit with cancer around the time she learned of the affair. If this is true, that is a lot to take in. Notice that she didn't anounce the divorce until AFTER Edwards acknowledged the baby as his. I don't know if there was actual DNA proof or not; acknowledging and proof can be two different things.

  • 3 votes
#1.3 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 10:43 AM EDT
HappyToSeeYa

Checkmate, you're right about considering the timeline in this mess. It's my understanding that Elizabeth was living with cancer remission and her cancer kicked back into high gear when the presidential campaign was gaining steam. You are also right about denial. Elizabeth knew that the baby was John's. The proof of paternity was grist for public consumption only. We're not in Elizabeth's shoes or even their children's shoes. John let down a lot of people. I wish that he had the strength and grace to take close care of his wife and children for as long as Elizabeth is alive. After she dies, he needs to take care of their children even if he decides to have a closer relationship with Rielle and their child. It's messy and painful which didn't have to be.

  • 2 votes
#1.4 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 10:54 AM EDT
Star3

Buddym, very true, however, John Edwards knew from the begining the chances he was taking. He was the one who made the decision to have an affair with this broad, so he has no cause to whine now. Rielle Hunter was nothing more than a momentary fling for slimeball Edwards, he is not in love with her or anyone else, but himself, and his own selfish desires; guess he fancies himself another Clinton. As for staying with Elizabeth, why would she want him to? Anyone that weak assed should be kicked to the bottom of the mud heap. Hunter has the morals of an alley cat, and no respect for the sanctity of marriage. Even if John and Elizabeth were having marital problems, that is not the way to resolve them. I just hope the baby will grow up to be a better person than the parents.

  • 1 vote
#1.5 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 1:05 PM EDT
tweetheart44

Both John and his mistress are a couple of losers. I have ZERO respect for any woman who goes after a married man, especially when the wife has cancer. You can't get much lower on the "scuzz meter" than that. She looks like a cheap hussy to me. And, he's no better. For cripes sake, if you know your marriage is over, get divorced and then go nuts. What is it with all of these politicians these days, anyway? For that matter, what has happened to morals in general?

  • 2 votes
#1.6 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:22 PM EDT
IndependentVoter

she now has brought the man down to his knees, ruined his reputation, and any chance he ever had of having a political career.

He should have kept it in his pants

  • 2 votes
#1.7 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:26 PM EDT
Checkmate-983933

It's power, tweetheart. Politicians think they can get away with anything and will use money, threats, power, etc.. All they have to do is pull some strings and have a family name. It worked for Kennedy.

For cripes sake, if you know your marriage is over, get divorced and then go nuts. What is it with all of these politicians these days, anyway?

Votes. Out of all the people on Congress, how many are single/divorced (and didn't remarry OR is now a widow/widower)? By staying married, you give off the look of being 'stable' and committed to 'family.' In short, it's a PR tactic cleverly used. It says, 'look at me. I have a family that I take care of and I am like the rest of you. I am the ideal and represent your beliefs, etc. Vote for me."

  • 2 votes
#1.8 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:28 PM EDT
tweetheart44

she has now brought the man down to his knees

I have a sneaking suspicion that it was she who was down on her knees.

  • 1 vote
#1.9 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:37 PM EDT
daxy1979

If she was down on her knees there wouldn't be a child involved.. lol.. just sayin!

    #1.10 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:57 PM EDT
    tweetheart44

    I'm just saying, somewhere along the line, that was probably the case. Now, if they had just stopped there, you're right. However, I think that this cheap broad had every intention of getting pregnant.

    • 2 votes
    #1.11 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:01 PM EDT
    Jimster

    This woman is a total skank, and so is John Edwards

    Get off the stage.

    • 2 votes
    #1.12 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:01 PM EDT
    RF373Deleted
    kb in nc

    tweet-- I'm with you

    The problem with just getting divorced is that America thinks that something is wrong if you are a divorced politician. How can you holler 'Family Values' but you are on your second wife. And do not underestimate what a woman will put up with to stay in the public eye and still be relevant.

    Point being: If Edwards was a UPS driver, he wouldve been divorced long ago...

    • 1 vote
    #1.14 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:27 PM EDT
    worldcurmudgeon

    Sex is a problem world over, its hard for many men exposed to beautiful and sexy women to stay true to their wives. Edwards is no different than JFK, FDR, BC, and many, many more. As for his run to the presidency, that was over way back when.

    • 1 vote
    #1.15 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:42 PM EDT
    rkymtnwoman

    Fellow Americans, don't you agree that we have been spoiled by our conglomerated totalitarian media machine and that this story is just plain old boring?!

    In order to be really distracted from all the fascist crap going on in the USA right now, we need a better lurid fix. Maybe some S*M and bestiality, group, etc??

      #1.16 - Tue Mar 16, 2010 9:47 PM EDT
      Reply
      jbird

      I've said it before, I'll say it again-You can make as much profit out of publicizing/justifying the evil deeds as you want, but at the end of the long week, a harlot is still a harlot.

      • 6 votes
      Reply#2 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 9:32 AM EDT
      Star3

      Jbird, there is an old saying that comes to mind: "If they will cheat with you, they will cheat on you." Most mistress believe the jerk loves them and will divorce the wife to be with them, and that, almost, never happens. The mistress deserves the lesson she will learn. Sometimes, I think the only reason some men or women get married is to have someone to cheat on. Been there, done that, got the tee shirt, got rid of the cheat, (divorced) kept the kids, and now I am married to a wondeful man, who is a man, not a whimp.

      • 1 vote
      #2.1 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 1:17 PM EDT
      lee-1056586

      until the next time it happens Star3.....

        #2.2 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 1:36 PM EDT
        Star3

        lee, there won't be a next time, I am confident about that; my husband is not the type, and has no respect for anyone who is. After almost 40 years, we are still crazy about each other, and still hold hands in public. He has never given me any reason to doubt, plus at our age, if he even wanted to stray, there probably wouldn't be too many offers, hee, hee! :)

        • 1 vote
        #2.3 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:03 PM EDT
        Ann Osborn

        Judgemental people like you really like to call people nasty names, don't you. I think you probably hate women to label anyone a "harlot."

          #2.4 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:52 PM EDT
          NotThePest

          jbird--I agree with you 100% and I'm a female. A "harlot" is as a "harlot" does and it is a good biblical word.

            #2.5 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 6:58 PM EDT
            jbird

            No Ann. I am married to a wonderful woman. I just call em like I see em.

              #2.6 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 11:39 PM EDT
              Reply
              Darlene Bays

              It is sad that today's society to many is all about the money.........all about the "me" factor.

              • 2 votes
              Reply#3 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 9:32 AM EDT
              Star3

              And all about the status, Darlene, or what they think will be their status.

                #3.1 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:06 PM EDT
                Reply
                NotThePest

                Proverbs 30:20 KJV Such is the way of an adulterous woman; she eateth, and wipeth her mouth, and saith, I have done no wickedness.

                • 4 votes
                Reply#4 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 9:53 AM EDT
                Darlene Bays

                You shall not commit adultery. (NIV, Exodus 20:14)

                But a man who commits adultery lacks judgment; whoever does so destroys himself. (NIV, Proverbs 6:32)

                And a certain ruler questioned Him, saying, "Good Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?" And Jesus said to him, "Why do you call Me good? No one is good except God alone. You know the commandments, 'Do not commit adultery, do not murder, do not steal, do not bear false witness, honor your father and mother.'" (NAS, Luke 18:18-20)

                They are both at fault. They both knew the consequences. A family was destroyed.......which to me is the worst possible thing out of this terrible ordeal.

                • 5 votes
                Reply#5 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 10:04 AM EDT
                ingenjon

                Imagine that, another politician with God syndrome acting "reckless".

                • 1 vote
                Reply#6 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 10:31 AM EDT
                jeanette-1355722

                Wasn't she supposed to be having a thing with an actor at the same time? Doesn't sound like love to me, except love of money, fame and fortune. John was stupid and set up in my book. How do we know that Young wasn't involved in that also. Really makes a good story for him to write a book about doesn't it? Some of this seems really fishy to me.

                Here is the way I see it. A good-looking man running for president - problems with wife, but putting on a show of togetherness - find woman to seduce him, get all info, she purposely got pregnant- story gets out, write book, get money. End of story.

                  Reply#7 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 10:34 AM EDT
                  orangesqueeze

                  Was this before or after she had the affair with Obama?

                    Reply#8 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 10:48 AM EDT
                    Rixar13

                    Hunter recalled the first night she met Edwards in New York, saying she knew that she was a special person to him.

                    Whoa, a one liner ....? He had me almost sold.... $hit. ---- Smile :-)

                    • 2 votes
                    Reply#9 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 10:56 AM EDT
                    Star3

                    Yeah, she was "special" to him for all of a half hour, I imagine, just like Monica was "special" to Clinton. Why are some women so naive?!

                    • 1 vote
                    #9.1 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 11:16 PM EDT
                    Reply
                    pjwrites

                    And they deserve each other very much.

                    • 4 votes
                    Reply#10 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 11:12 AM EDT
                    going up

                    This lady should not be giving interviews. The fact that she is tells a lot about her.

                    She is part of an affair that ruined lives, and she can't even see that.

                    I wish she would shut up.

                    • 2 votes
                    Reply#11 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 11:19 AM EDT
                    jbird

                    Unfortunately, I believe GQ pays very well.

                      #11.1 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:10 PM EDT
                      GoldenGateMami_Susi

                      She better hope they do.

                      Once her baby daddy gets through his castra, I mean divorce, someone is going to have to bring the bacon home.

                      Oh yeah I am sure it was a profound connection alright.

                      Eegads! What a hot mess.

                        #11.2 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 1:35 PM EDT
                        Reply
                        writer21177

                        Ah love, yeah these two looked like thay really loved each other, Fair enough, A lot of these fake a** politicians are unhappily married because there lives are one big lie after another, big surprise. Anyway this chick is way cuter than Elizabeth. I love how these chicks stay with their husbands after they are totally disgraced, I am laughing so hard at Elin Woods what a loser. At least Sanford's wife kicked him to the curb

                          Reply#12 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 11:22 AM EDT
                          Ann Osborn

                          You are really dumb. You don't have a clue about what you say. Why are married women disgraced because their husbands had affairs? It's the choice of the husband to cheat. No wife knows what she will do when she learns of her husband's infidelity. Marriage is more than sex and maybe the rest of it is something they don't want to lose. Why do you care what they do? It's not your life.

                            #12.1 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:47 PM EDT
                            writer21177

                            Because who you chose to marry is often a reflection of yourself, if you marry for wealth prestige, looks, social status and all things shallow it might come back to haunt you, and I don't care what these people do, they are low life hypocrites just like you. Please see comment 12.3

                              #12.2 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:54 PM EDT
                              Ann Osborn

                              Wow, you really ARE dumber than I first thought. Why am I a hypocrit? You do not even know me. Your comment is really stupid.

                                #12.3 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 4:22 PM EDT
                                Reply
                                Mommareenie

                                My heart goes out to Elizabeth Edwards and their children. John, do right by your wife and children even the one by the gold digger tramp. But, come to your senses abouty Ms. Tramp. She was out to get you know matter who got hurt in the process. Remember the saying John, "what goes around, comes around". Make things right. Elizabeth stuck by you through thick and thin and during your campaign, she still committed herself to you and your career. By all standards, you owe this woman. I'm not talking monetary but obligation to fulfilling your wedding vows. John, you're a very intelligent man. Stop thinking with your male organ and start using the brains God gave you. Dump the tramp...

                                • 1 vote
                                Reply#13 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 11:32 AM EDT
                                writer21177

                                From what I hear Elizabeth was a power hungry gold digger herself and that's why she stayed w/ this huckster. High percentage of powerful intelligent men are non monogamous it goes w/ the territory. Think Bill Clinton, Sanford, Edwards, Woods, the list goes on and on.......Sometimes the wives don't even care like Hillary

                                • 1 vote
                                #13.1 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 11:36 AM EDT
                                jeanette-1355722

                                I do not know personally about Elizabeth, what she thinks, how she feels, but maybe we will never know. No one knows what goes on behind closed doors.

                                How do you know that Hillary didn't care? Maybe she did, but after putting up with so much, she just sighed and gave up. You can't change a man and you either live with it or get out of it whichever is the best for you.

                                Edwards is an attractive, intelligent man who women go for, just like John Kennedy. Jackie didn't divorce John she seemed to just have to live with it and so with Hillary.

                                • 3 votes
                                #13.2 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:18 PM EDT
                                writer21177

                                These women aren't about to give up the wealth, power, influence and noteriety being married to these guys gives them no matter what these guys do. Look at Ted Haggards wife, what a bunch of fake a** hypocrites. Their cheating spouse is a reflection of themselves.

                                  #13.3 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:44 PM EDT
                                  Mommareenie

                                  ok writer21177, if what you're saying is true, then why is Elisabeth divorcing her husband? Why isn't she hanging on to his tail for "his money and power"? And, like jeanette135572 stated, you don't know what goes on behind closed doors and how these women (Jackie and Hillary) felt and feel.

                                    #13.4 - Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:49 PM EDT
                                    Reply
                                    TBK

                                    Perfect example of a woman without a conscious and a man who's brains are located in his underwear region!

                                    • 3 votes
                                    Reply#14 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 11:44 AM EDT
                                    Kangalee

                                    Rielle, girly, don't kid yourself. He's a cheater and will cheat on you. HE DOESN'T LOVE YOU. HE PROBABLY NEVER HAS. Sex, for men does not always equal love. Despite his actions, he probably valued his (former?) spouse more the he ever will you. Sure he says he loves you. He's lying. If he loved you, he'd respect you and not put you in the situation of being the other woman. At least you should believe that YOU deserve better. And you baby....she may never be accepted by her siblings. Time will tell.

                                    Give it up, as soon as someone blonder, hotter, younger, childfree, with less stretch marks come around, he's moving on.

                                    • 2 votes
                                    Reply#15 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 11:45 AM EDT
                                    alexab-614

                                    hahaha!

                                      #15.1 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:55 PM EDT
                                      Reply
                                      writer21177

                                      Ladies always like these non monogamous successful cheater types, because they look the part talk the talk, walk the walk. but it's all lies once a cheater always a cheater, once a liar always a liar.

                                      • 1 vote
                                      Reply#16 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 11:50 AM EDT
                                      jbird

                                      And it takes two to tango in the plot. Lets be fair and not kid ourselves, "Oh Feminist One".

                                      • 1 vote
                                      #16.1 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:12 PM EDT
                                      writer21177

                                      That was my point, j bird try not to be so smart like everyone else on the vine, I never kid myself, dirtbags are attracted to dirtbags was my point and sarcasm is not a sign of intelligence.

                                        #16.2 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:07 PM EDT
                                        Ann Osborn

                                        Writer21177. Everyone lies. You too. You have no proof that because someone (understandably) lies about one thing, they will lie about something else. Get serious, now think about the lies you have told.

                                          #16.3 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:43 PM EDT
                                          writer21177

                                          Everyone is a liar especially you with your self righteousness.

                                            #16.4 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:57 PM EDT
                                            writer21177

                                            Actually Ann there is statistical data which indicates that men who are willing to lead a double life and lie to the extent of having an involved affair like a John Edwards have sociopathic tendencies, but you would just disagree with it if you read it.

                                              #16.5 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 4:17 PM EDT
                                              Ann Osborn

                                              You are too dumb to know that being self righteous has nothing to do with lying. Did you pass fifth grade? First grade?

                                                #16.6 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 4:25 PM EDT
                                                writer21177

                                                I can guarantee I have a higher IQ than you, slinging your insults on the Vine at anyone you disagree with, I bet you love Jesus too. Being self righteous has nothing to do with lying but has a lot to do with being a hypocrite.

                                                  #16.7 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 4:39 PM EDT
                                                  Ann Osborn

                                                  You cannot guarantee anything. You don't have a clue about me, but you keep saying things as if you know what you are talking about and that don't make any sense. What has Jesus got to do with anything? You just throw out whatever comes off the top of your head, don't you. This will be my last post to you.

                                                    #16.8 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 5:04 PM EDT
                                                    writer21177

                                                    Christians on the Vine usually call others dumb or question others education levels, I'm just going with the trends I see, You know nothing about me and called me dumb, fair is fair. I win, don't respond, because what I am saying makes plenty of sense.

                                                      #16.9 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 5:48 PM EDT
                                                      Reply
                                                      mutter-356236

                                                      John Edwards is about as low as you can get. He has an affair which he never admits and then fathers a child, which again he never admits. Wow and this jerk was running for President and excepting money from all the hard working Americans who thought he was forthright and honorable.

                                                      I don't care about a timeline, I feel so sorry for Elizabeth knowing that her days on this earth are probably numbered and this jerk will have to raise her children.

                                                      Then last and not least we get to Hunter. The excuse, well we just fell in love is bull. She seen dollar signs and could careless about what she had to destroy to get there. She and Edwards deserve one another. The are both selfish, selfcentered cheats and liars. Wow with a linage like that, what chance in life does their daughter have.

                                                      • 1 vote
                                                      Reply#17 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:22 PM EDT
                                                      jeanette-1355722

                                                      If you put hin in the same category as John Kennedy, Elvis, Clinton, Tiger, then I guess he is low. But so is she and the other women, he just chose an ugly one who likes to talk.

                                                      He really gave her a nice line at the first meeting or she gave him one. Maybe it was all in her head or she could be making it up.

                                                        #17.1 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:40 PM EDT
                                                        Reply
                                                        A Sergeant's Mom

                                                        Um..."...till death do us part...," doesn't appear to be likely with this man.

                                                        He had a gem in Elizabeth Edwards - and abandoned that very commitment to her.

                                                        Interesting to note - I followed the campaigns of each candidate. Whenever I heard Elizabeth Edwards speak - she was actually far more interesting and fact-based than her husband. She ought to run for president. She might be surprised with the support she could receive.

                                                        • 1 vote
                                                        Reply#18 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:42 PM EDT
                                                        Mike_P

                                                        Move along now.... nothing to see here.

                                                          Reply#19 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:44 PM EDT
                                                          Lady Bug

                                                          After readding all the hair pulling and scratching comments...All I have to say is the Baby is so darn cute...and let's not forget that she's just a baby and didn't pick her parents....

                                                          • 1 vote
                                                          Reply#20 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:49 PM EDT
                                                          Star3

                                                          Lady Bug, very true, and lets hope the child grows up to be a better person than her parents.

                                                          • 1 vote
                                                          #20.1 - Tue Mar 16, 2010 12:51 PM EDT
                                                          Reply
                                                          Leo61

                                                          After reading this article and Ms. Hunter’s view of the situation the only word I could think of was sociopath. Ms. Hunter’s thinking about the whole situation is textbook classic of how a sociopath thinks. It is scary when you read about the behaviors of sociopaths because she displays every trait. It is also very disturbing that no one around her is letting her know how bizarre her behavior actually is to almost everyone else. Are they all sociopaths too? Very scary!!!!

                                                          • 1 vote
                                                          Reply#21 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 1:08 PM EDT
                                                          lee-1056586

                                                          Im sure she has a good agent Leo....

                                                            #21.1 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 1:38 PM EDT
                                                            Reply
                                                            harrykid

                                                            Dam that Viagra again I say Dam that Viagra. Boink !!!!

                                                              Reply#22 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:02 PM EDT
                                                              kb in nc

                                                              I was discussing this with a few friends of mine last week (Tiger and Edwards)

                                                              so ladies here is the question:

                                                              Would you rather have a Edwards situation (pregnant girl on side) or an Ashburn/Larry Craig situation where they turn out to be gay?

                                                                Reply#23 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:28 PM EDT
                                                                jeanette-1355722

                                                                What a choice. If gay, then I wasn't his type in the first place and he just used me. I straight then I wasn't what he wanted and he just used me. Either way I would feel unloved and used.

                                                                  #23.1 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:43 PM EDT
                                                                  kb in nc

                                                                  The women said that they would rather it been another woman. At least then they felt they could compete.

                                                                  Wasnt Ashburn married for 20 years with 5 kids? How could the wife not know?

                                                                    #23.2 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 5:21 PM EDT
                                                                    Reply
                                                                    Mitsy-475766

                                                                    The Sanford, Ensign, and other affairs were not as noteworthy only because they were not ever presidential contenders. Nor, did they gain a lot of public allegiance because were not as well known as John Edwards was. Many people thought a lot of Elizabeth. Perhaps she wasn't the picture perfect wife people thought she was. Then again, I doubt that Hunter was his first affair either. I've often been told that many marriage dissolve after the death of a child. The Edwards' lost their son in 1996. That's a lot of years in between for people to grow apart. What's bad is that they did not divorce much sooner and perhaps have spared each other continued pain & heartache. Why they chose to have children very late in their marriage is anyone's guess. Now, there are 2 small children who are the collateral damage of a marriage that likely was over a very long time ago. Culpability still goes to Edwards for taking up with Hunter. He knew he was playing w/fire but continued to do so knowing the risks. And he agreed to making a sex tape for what reason???

                                                                    • 1 vote
                                                                    Reply#24 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:33 PM EDT
                                                                    Carolyn-1144975

                                                                    I feel for all the children involved. Don't grown people ever consider how this will affect the innocent children over time? They are the ones who will suffer the most because they will find out about this in the years to come.

                                                                      Reply#25 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:50 PM EDT
                                                                      writer21177

                                                                      No one cares about the children except you and your bleeding heart. "Oh the poor children" Please this is about wealth, power and influence. Politics is a tough, dirty business these people don't care about children.

                                                                        #25.1 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:56 PM EDT
                                                                        Carolyn-1144975

                                                                        Writer, I do realize what this is about and, perhaps I am a bleeding heart. I do care about the children, nonetheless. You are right. They do not care and it sounds like you don't either.

                                                                        • 1 vote
                                                                        #25.2 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:04 PM EDT
                                                                        writer21177

                                                                        No I'm just being mean, these politicians and actors and celebrities are into themselves and love the spotlight, I love the kids. I just think the women that marry these guys are just like them, Narcissistic, and the kids are the ones that suffer.

                                                                          #25.3 - Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:36 PM EDT
                                                                          Reply
                                                                          Jump to discussion page: 1 2
                                                                          Leave a Comment:
                                                                          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                                          You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                                                                          (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                                                                          Newsvine Privacy Statement
                                                                          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                                                          FUN STUFF:
                                                                          • Leaderboard |
                                                                          • E-Mail Alerts |
                                                                          • Top of the Vine |
                                                                          • Newsvine Live |
                                                                          • Newsvine Archives |
                                                                          • The Greenhouse
                                                                          COMPANY STUFF:
                                                                          • Code of Honor |
                                                                          • Company Info |
                                                                          • Contact Us |
                                                                          • Jobs |
                                                                          • User Agreement |
                                                                          • Privacy Policy |
                                                                          • About our ads
                                                                          LEGAL STUFF:
                                                                          • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                                                                          • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                                                                          • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com