Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Study: Small soda taxes don't dent obesity

Thu Apr 1, 2010 12:01 AM EDT
health, us, tax, med, soda-tax
Mike Stobbe, AP Medical Writer
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 2 photos
<p>File -- An Oct. 18, 2003 file photo shows Yale Professor Kelly Brownell  in Greenwich Conn.   Brownell says that most of the taxes on soft drinks  tend to be enough to bring in some extra money for struggling state budgets, but small enough not to rile soda manufacturers or significantly change buying habits.(AP Photo/Douglas Healey/file).</p>

File -- An Oct. 18, 2003 file photo shows Yale Professor Kelly Brownell in Greenwich Conn. Brownell says that most of the taxes on soft drinks tend to be enough to bring in some extra money for struggling state budgets, but small enough not to rile soda manufacturers or significantly change buying habits.(AP Photo/Douglas Healey/file).

Advertise | AdChoices

ATLANTA — Small taxes on soda do little to reduce soft drink consumption or prevent childhood obesity, but larger levies probably would, according to new research.

The study is being released as a recent wave of proposals would raise soda taxes or create new ones on sugared beverages. But they'll have to be a lot steeper than current taxes, which are generally 4 percent or less, said Roland Sturm, lead author of the new research.

"Small taxes will not prevent obesity," said Sturm, a senior economist at the Rand Corp. in Santa Monica, Calif.

Sturm and his colleagues used information from a 2004 national survey of about 7,300 fifth-graders. The researchers looked at how the children's height and weight had changed over the previous two years and how often the kids said they drank soda and sports drinks. The researchers also reviewed taxes on carbonated drinks that were in effect in 2004.

Roughly two-thirds of the children lived in states that had a tax on soda greater than on other food items. The highest was 7 cents tax on each dollar's worth of soda. The average was about 4 cents.

They found the taxes made no real difference on overall soda consumption or on obesity for kids overall. They did have a small effect on certain children — especially those from families with an annual income of $25,000 or less. Those kids — who drank about seven cans of soda a week, on average — drank one less can because of the taxes, Sturm said.

However, if the taxes were more like 18 cents on the dollar, Sturm calculated it would make a significant difference.

The research is being published online Thursday in the journal Health Affairs. The Rand study was funded by the federal government and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Most states exempt grocery food from sales taxes. But in recent years, candy and soft drinks have been increasingly targeted, either through a tax or removal of an existing sales tax exemption.

The children in the study were from 40 states, 20 of which had soda taxes when the study was done.

More than 30 states have some form of soda tax today, averaging about 5 cents per dollar of soda.

In the last month, Colorado removed a 3 percent sales tax exemption for candy and soda. Philadelphia's mayor proposed a 2 cents-per-ounce tax on sugary drinks, which would add 24 cents to the price of a can of Coke.

Most of the taxes tend to be enough to bring in some extra money for struggling state budgets, but small enough not to rile soda manufacturers or significantly change buying habits, said Kelly Brownell, director of Yale University's Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity.

"Taxes have to be large enough to affect consumption," said Brownell, who has called for a tax as high as 12 percent.

But most people don't want their soda taxed, according to the American Beverage Association, which represents soda manufacturers.

Association officials noted that Maine voters last fall rejected a soda tax. And in a press release last week, the organization pointed to a recent survey of 1,000 U.S. adults by Rasmussen Reports that found 56 percent of Americans are against taxes on candy and soda.

The beverage association did not pay for the telephone survey, said Debra Falk, a spokeswomen for the polling firm.

The Rand study confirms that small taxes on soda don't reduce obesity, and offers no evidence that larger taxes would do any better, said Christopher Gindlesperger, spokesman for beverage association.

"Taxes don't work. What does work is balancing the diet and exercise," he said.

___

On the Net:

Health Affairs soda tax study: http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/full/hlthaff.2009.0061v1

© 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Mike Stobbe's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: Atlanta
  • Public Discussion (8)
take2la

Do you really think if a persons been used to the local 55 gallon drum 'O HFCS everyday for the last decade they will stop when you charge them a ç5 (10, 25, 50) more for it.

Sheer physical addiction alone should tell you they will do almost ANYTHING to keep getting the fix.

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Thu Apr 1, 2010 11:23 AM EDT
Hon Lee

Let us recall some tax things. Does tax on alcoholic beverages reduce drunks ? Does cigarette tax reduce smoking by teenages ? Does tax on vehicles prevent accidents ? Do tax on food reduce obesity ? The only tax that works is our income tax so our government can work for us to keep us safe from harms way. Tax on soda is nothing but a dumb political suggestion.

    Reply#2 - Thu Apr 1, 2010 4:31 PM EDT
    supergerbil424

    Actually tax on all those things reduces their consumption. Cigarette consumption dropped when the city put increased the tax by $1 on each pack.

    Then they used the money to fund nicotine patches for those trying to quit.

    If a small tax doesn't work, then a higher tax is called for.

    • 1 vote
    #2.1 - Tue Apr 6, 2010 9:05 AM EDT
    Reply
    Peter Faden

    "Taxes don't work. What does work is balancing the diet and exercise,"

    This statement, more than all the others rings true to me...however, i don't see it happening for the majority of Americans...most people seem to almost be proud of their self indulgence.

      Reply#3 - Fri Apr 2, 2010 7:02 PM EDT
      tdk022755

      It does not matter what they charge for a can of soda, people will find money to drink it. Just like all other vices. If that is what you like you will put it first before anything else. I have patients who live in their cars or on the streets. And they have money coming in from disability. But they use it on drugs and alcohol. That is their priority. When the cigarette companies got in trouble, all they did was raise the prices of their product. Did that stop smokers, NO.

        Reply#4 - Sat Apr 3, 2010 6:04 AM EDT
        saheemnetDeleted
        coalbear_1

        stop the government from subsidizing sugar. Soda would then would not be cheaper than water. WE pay taxes to keep sugar practically free for mega soda corps.

          Reply#6 - Sat Apr 3, 2010 9:39 PM EDT
          supergerbil424

          You are right that the govt. is subsidizing Corn > HFCS > sodas.

          • 1 vote
          #6.1 - Tue Apr 6, 2010 9:07 AM EDT
          Reply
          Leave a Comment:
          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
          You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
          (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
          Newsvine Privacy Statement
          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
          FUN STUFF:
          • Leaderboard |
          • E-Mail Alerts |
          • Top of the Vine |
          • Newsvine Live |
          • Newsvine Archives |
          • The Greenhouse
          COMPANY STUFF:
          • Code of Honor |
          • Company Info |
          • Contact Us |
          • Jobs |
          • User Agreement |
          • Privacy Policy |
          • About our ads
          LEGAL STUFF:
          • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
          • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
          • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com