Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Obama: Fresh crisis without new financial rules

Fri Apr 16, 2010 1:56 PM EDT
business, politics, us, obama, barack-obama, wall-street, financial, reform, senate-democrats, senate-republicans, financial-reform
Darlene Superville, Associated Press
In his weekly address President Barack Obama criticizes Republicans and others who are waging "a relentless campaign" to block stronger economic rules.
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 4 photos
<p>President Barack Obama speaks during a meeting of the President's Economic Recovery Advisory Board, Friday, April 16, 2010, in the Roosevelt Room of the White House in Washington. From second from left are, are Commerce Secretary Gary Locke, Vice President Joe Biden, the president, and White House adviser Paul Volcker. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)</p>

President Barack Obama speaks during a meeting of the President's Economic Recovery Advisory Board, Friday, April 16, 2010, in the Roosevelt Room of the White House in Washington. From second from left are, are Commerce Secretary Gary Locke, Vice President Joe Biden, the president, and White House adviser Paul Volcker. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

Advertise | AdChoices

WASHINGTON — The U.S. is destined to endure a new economic crisis that sticks taxpayers with the bill unless Congress tightens oversight of the financial industry, President Barack Obama said Saturday.

The overhaul is the next major piece of legislation that Obama wants to sign into law this year, but solid GOP opposition in the Senate is jeopardizing that goal.

"Every day we don't act, the same system that led to bailouts remains in place, with the exact same loopholes and the exact same liabilities," Obama said in his weekly radio and Internet address. "And if we don't change what led to the crisis, we'll doom ourselves to repeat it.

"Opposing reform will leave taxpayers on the hook if a crisis like this ever happens again," the president said.

A proposal that Senate Democrats are readying for debate creates a mechanism for liquidating large financial companies to avoid a meltdown.

For the first time, the government would regulate derivatives, those financial instruments whose value depends on an underlying asset, such as mortgages or stocks. Derivatives can help hedge risks. But derivatives can produce steep losses, or huge profits, if the value of their underlying asset sinks.

The proposal also would create a council to detect threats to the financial system and set up a consumer protection agency to police people's dealings with financial institutions.

On Friday, Obama promised to veto the bill if it doesn't regulate the market for derivatives, which contributed to the nation's economic problems after their value plummeted during the housing crisis.

But Democrats haven't agreed on how far such regulation should go, and all Senate Republicans are united against the bill. That opposition complicates Democratic efforts to get the 60 votes necessary to overcome likely GOP procedural roadblocks.

Republicans contend that a provision creating a $50 billion fund for dismantling banks considered "too big to fail" would continue government bailouts of Wall Street. Obama administration officials say such a fund is unnecessary and they want Senate Democrats to remove it.

Obama criticized financial industry interests for opposing the proposed regulations and for waging a "relentless campaign to thwart even basic, commonsense rules." He repeated his call for Republicans and Democrats to work together to overhaul the system but made it clear that Democrats are prepared to go it alone.

"One way or another, we will move forward," he said. "This issue is too important."

In the weekly Republican address, House Minority Whip Eric Cantor of Virginia took note of the week's April 15 income tax filing deadline and criticized government spending and climbing deficits that he said are driving taxes higher.

Cantor said Obama has enacted 25 tax increases passed by the Democratic-controlled Congress that will cost families and small businesses more than $670 billion over the next decade and create a "bleak future for our kids and grandkids."

He urged a vote for the GOP in the November congressional elections.

"You have to take action so that we can begin to erase our deficits and free our children from our debt," Cantor said. "And rather than putting the squeeze on our nation's job creators and entrepreneurs, we believe in a pro-growth strategy to create jobs and empower the American entrepreneur and small business people to thrive."

___

On the Net:

Obama address: http://www.whitehouse.gov

Republican address: http://tinyurl.com/y3tv5m4

© 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Darlene Superville's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: United States , Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (26)
JohnFromNJ-1583208

Nice to see Obama found his balls. Also, I have a hard time figuring out what the GOP is thinking here. Who wants to be seen as the party of Wallstreet?

  • 12 votes
Reply#1 - Fri Apr 16, 2010 3:25 PM EDT
sendlo

Depends on who lines your pockets.

  • 10 votes
#1.1 - Fri Apr 16, 2010 3:32 PM EDT
KDWill

surprise surprise... republicans united in opposition... again

regulation is necessary. for the republicans, i don't understand what they think they will gain--politically--from opposing regulation. like you said john, they only appear to be supporting wall street and not the people. good for obama, though.

  • 5 votes
#1.2 - Fri Apr 16, 2010 3:53 PM EDT
GOZO-unlimited

My E-Mail From The President:

It has now been well over a year since the near collapse of our entire financial system that cost the nation more than 8 million jobs. To this day, hard-working families struggle to make ends meet.

We've made strides -- businesses are starting to hire, Americans are finding jobs, and neighbors who had given up looking are returning to the job market with new hope. But the flaws in our financial system that led to this crisis remain unresolved.

Wall Street titans still recklessly speculate with borrowed money. Big banks and credit card companies stack the deck to earn millions while far too many middle-class families, who have done everything right, can barely pay their bills or save for a better future.

We cannot delay action any longer. It is time to hold the big banks accountable to the people they serve, establish the strongest consumer protections in our nation's history -- and ensure that taxpayers will never again be forced to bail out big banks because they are "too big to fail."

That is what Wall Street reform will achieve, why I am so committed to making it happen.

We know that without enforceable, commonsense rules to check abuse and protect families, markets are not truly free. Wall Street reform will foster a strong and vibrant financial sector so that businesses can get loans; families can afford mortgages; entrepreneurs can find the capital to start a new company, sell a new product, or offer a new service.

Consumer financial protections are currently spread across seven different government agencies. Wall Street reform will create one single Consumer Financial Protection Agency -- tasked with preventing predatory practices and making sure you get the clear information, not fine print, needed to avoid ballooning mortgage payments or credit card rate hikes.

Reform will provide crucial new oversight, give shareholders a say on salaries and bonuses, and create new tools to break up failing financial firms so that taxpayers aren't forced into another unfair bailout. And reform will keep our economy secure by ensuring that no single firm can bring down the whole financial system.

With so much at stake, it is not surprising that allies of the big banks and Wall Street lenders have already launched a multi-million-dollar ad campaign to fight these changes. Arm-twisting lobbyists are already storming Capitol Hill, seeking to undermine the strong bipartisan foundation of reform with loopholes and exemptions for the most egregious abusers of consumers.

I won't accept anything short of the full protection that our citizens deserve and our economy needs. It's a fight worth having, and it is a fight we can win -- if we stand up and speak out together.

So I'm asking you to join me, starting today, by adding your name as a strong supporter of Wall Street reform:

http://my.barackobama.com/StandForWallStreetReform

Thank you,

President Barack Obama

  • 4 votes
#1.3 - Fri Apr 16, 2010 6:10 PM EDT
rkymtnwoman

Thank YOU, Mr. President.

  • 1 vote
#1.4 - Sat Apr 17, 2010 12:14 PM EDT
Simplistic Reality

Nice to see Obama found his balls

He never had any to start with. Michelle wears the pants and the balls.

  • 1 vote
#1.5 - Sat Apr 17, 2010 9:54 PM EDT
Reply
JohnFromNJ-1583208

sendlo:

Good point

    Reply#2 - Fri Apr 16, 2010 3:34 PM EDT
    fredegrar

    40 isn't 41. Snowe, I'm guessing, must be holding out. Good for her. Of course Lieberman will probably side with the GOP - at least long enough to make sure he gets the spotlight on him again.

    We all knew Republicans would stand up for Wall Street fraudsters. Doing it on a day that GS gets called out by the SEC is just awesome timing!

    • 2 votes
    Reply#3 - Fri Apr 16, 2010 3:36 PM EDT
    fredegrar

    Woops, guess I forgot to count the guy who wrote the letter. Ah, well. Nice job, GOP! Why don't you all take your wall street kickbacks and campaign cash and run off to Switzerland to get a job in some of their banks like your fellow scumbag pal Phil Gramm did after he successfully undid Glass-Steagall, setting the stage for his enrichment and his country's economic collapse. Of course, my apologies to the Swiss.

    • 1 vote
    #3.1 - Fri Apr 16, 2010 7:30 PM EDT
    Lola-984242

    I used to live in Victoria County, South Texas, there's a Hwy. down there named after that asshat Phil Gramm. I hated driving on the road, but it was the quickest way to get to Port Lavaca.

    • 2 votes
    #3.2 - Fri Apr 16, 2010 7:47 PM EDT
    rkymtnwoman

    remember when he stood with McSame and told us the economy was fine and we were whiners? What an Ahole. He fits Kinky Freidman's song so well:

    "A$$hole from El Paso"

    Victoria county toward Houston Victoria or is Beeville area isn't it? I like that area.

      #3.3 - Sat Apr 17, 2010 12:16 PM EDT
      Lola-984242

      "A$$hole from El Paso"

      You are correct ma'am!

      The city and county of Victoria, just south of Hallettsville, pretty much between Houston and Corpus Cristi and 28 miles from the coast.

      According to mapquest it's NE of Beeville.

        #3.4 - Sat Apr 17, 2010 1:31 PM EDT
        Reply
        The Merchant

        Personally, I don't get it.

        Why oppose financial reform of the very financial vehicles that wrecked our economy? I understand the need to maintain the free flow of the market, but this is like getting a second ride on a condemned roller coaster that has already killed someone.

        I thought conservatives were suppose to be conservative thinkers financially.

        Maybe they're not real conservatives?

        • 2 votes
        Reply#4 - Fri Apr 16, 2010 3:45 PM EDT
        smurph222

        You don't get it? Then you don't get the Republican mentality. Oppose everything Obama tries to do, make up lies to support your stance, flood the airwaves with propaganda, convince brainless voters of how outrageous the Democrats actions are, get back in power. Believe it or not, it works. Look at HCR.

        • 5 votes
        #4.1 - Fri Apr 16, 2010 4:19 PM EDT
        The Merchant

        You don't get it? Then you don't get the Republican mentality. Oppose everything Obama tries to do, make up lies to support your stance, flood the airwaves with propaganda, convince brainless voters of how outrageous the Democrats actions are, get back in power. Believe it or not, it works. Look at HCR.

        Oh, THAT part I do get. What I don't get is that the GOP is so desparate that they would run the country into ground. To me, that's not very American.

        What of the good of the country?

        • 2 votes
        #4.2 - Fri Apr 16, 2010 6:14 PM EDT
        Reply
        Borncorn

        Republicans started the derivatives mess. Goldman Sach's Synthetic CDO's, like the ones in question today, are just dressed up Credit Default Swaps. Prior to 1999, they were regulated by the State Gaming laws. During the right wing nut deregulation craziness which resulted in the repeal of Glass-Steagall, the States right to regulate these bets was taken away from the States. No Republican has ever taken credit for this part of the bill which was literally snuck in the night prior to passage. Nobody does backroom deals like the GOP. They now try to call the Cornhusker Kickback a backroom deal, but everyone knew the Senator who proposed it and the amount of money in question. Not exactly secrecy. Someone name the Republican who inserted the clause taking away the States right to regulate Credit Default swaps. I'm not going to hold my breath waiting.

        • 7 votes
        Reply#5 - Fri Apr 16, 2010 4:51 PM EDT
        jfrank

        Are the people on the right wing for or against the bail outs?

        • 1 vote
        Reply#6 - Fri Apr 16, 2010 7:17 PM EDT
        Lola-984242

        Are the people on the right wing for or against the bail outs?

        They were for it before they were against it. Kind of like health care reform.

        http://www.whereistheoutrage.net/wordpress/2010/04/11/they-were-for-it-before-they-were-against-it/

        "The Right wing all got behind Mitt Romney and his healthcare plan back in 2006. I don’t know if they thought they were supporting a future president or if they really believed in his policy. Everybody got on board. This would include the prestigious, conservative Heritage Foundation. They wrote ad nauseam. Now that liberals have passed a national healthcare plan that looks almost exactly like what former Governor Mitt Romney pushed in Massachusetts they (conservatives) are all up in arms. My question is were you lying then or are you lying now."

        • 5 votes
        #6.1 - Fri Apr 16, 2010 7:27 PM EDT
        The Merchant

        Very good question Lola. Either way it makes them questionable as far as their motives.

        • 1 vote
        #6.2 - Fri Apr 16, 2010 11:07 PM EDT
        Reply
        mike lonkouski

        Oh no!

        Another "crisis" used to justify further legislative haste and malfeasance!

        "Opposing reform will leave taxpayers on the hook if a crisis like this ever happens again," the president said.

        Utter bull@!$%#! Does he forget that the government "chose" to bail them out?

        Another lie from the team that vows "never let a good crisis go to waste".

        Oddly, they find everything is in a state of crisis, and I'm calling "bull@!$%#!" on the whole thing.

        • 3 votes
        Reply#7 - Sat Apr 17, 2010 1:22 PM EDT
        The Merchant

        Well, here is some food for thought:

        Goldman Sachs charged with fraud by SEC, Reuters.

        Well, whats wrong with a little financial reform?

        • 1 vote
        #7.1 - Sat Apr 17, 2010 2:31 PM EDT
        Lola-984242

        I found this extremely interesting;

        http://www.propublica.org/special/government-bailouts

        The majority of bailouts happen under Republican Presidents, and the biggest was under GWB.

        • 2 votes
        #7.2 - Sat Apr 17, 2010 2:38 PM EDT
        Reply
        Lane55Deleted
        Texasguy01

        That line is starting to get pretty stale. Been used way too much. I guess questioning him will make me a racist now. That one is getting pretty old as well.

        The real crises is removing him from office as fast as we can.

        • 2 votes
        Reply#9 - Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:13 PM EDT
        Leave a Comment:
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
        (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
        Newsvine Privacy Statement
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
        FUN STUFF:
        • Leaderboard |
        • E-Mail Alerts |
        • Top of the Vine |
        • Newsvine Live |
        • Newsvine Archives |
        • The Greenhouse
        COMPANY STUFF:
        • Code of Honor |
        • Company Info |
        • Contact Us |
        • Jobs |
        • User Agreement |
        • Privacy Policy |
        • About our ads
        LEGAL STUFF:
        • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
        • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
        • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com