Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

EPA says Ariz. uranium mine operating illegally

Tue May 4, 2010 9:19 PM EDT
business, mining, environmental-protection-agency, uranium, az, grand-canyon
Felicia Fonseca, Associated Press
Advertise | AdChoices

FLAGSTAFF — A uranium mine north of the Grand Canyon is operating in violation of the law, and its owner could face thousands of dollars in fines as a result, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said.

The agency issued a notice of violation this week to Denison Mines Corp. for its Arizona 1 Mine, which is about 20 miles from the Grand Canyon's northern border.

The EPA said Denison failed to notify the agency as to when it would resume mining and that it did not secure the necessary federal approval before ventilating the mine or testing emissions.

Denison President Ron Hochstein said Tuesday that he was surprised by the notice and believed the company was operating within the law. He said he was working with regulators to address those issues.

A determination on whether to assess fees or civil penalties would not be made until after a hearing is held on the violation notice.

Shelly Rosenblum, an environmental engineer with the agency's Pacific Southwest Region, said Denison has requested a hearing.

EPA approval was required before Denison began any construction or modification of the mine to allow ventilation and workers to enter, Rosenblum said.

A previous owner of the Arizona 1 Mine had that authorization from the EPA, but the approval is not transferable to another owner or operator and expires when the mine is inactive, the notice said.

Denison resumed mining at the site late last year after nearly two decades of inactivity. Hochstein said the company plans to extract 110,000 tons of uranium ore per year through 2012.

The EPA's notice of violation doesn't halt mining, but Rosenblum said Denison will be required to secure the necessary approvals, which could take months.

The Arizona 1 mine is the only active uranium mine within a 1 million-acre acre that Interior Secretary Ken Salazar set aside last year from any new hard-rock mining claims. His administration is studying whether mining on those lands should be permanently prohibited.

Salazar's action does not stop mining from going forward on claims already filed that have been proven. The Arizona 1 Mine sits on U.S. Bureau of Land Management land, about 35 miles away from Fredonia, which is a town of 1,000 closest to the mine.

Environmental groups sued the BLM last year, contending Denison's mine plan has expired, an environmental analyses is outdated and Denison has not proven its claims.

Roger Clark of the Grand Canyon Trust said the EPA's notice of violation is "just another example of how the uranium industry in general, and Denison in particular, tends to operate outside of the law.

"They keep telling us they're doing business differently than the uranium industry did 20 years ago," he said. "This indicates they are not doing everything that the law requires, to not only protect the landscape, but to protect the workers."

© 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Felicia Fonseca's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: United States , Phoenix
  • Public Discussion (1)
demmalition1

So...

Do they deport it now?

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Tue May 4, 2010 10:16 PM EDT
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
(XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
Newsvine Privacy Statement
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
FUN STUFF:
  • Leaderboard |
  • E-Mail Alerts |
  • Top of the Vine |
  • Newsvine Live |
  • Newsvine Archives |
  • The Greenhouse
COMPANY STUFF:
  • Code of Honor |
  • Company Info |
  • Contact Us |
  • Jobs |
  • User Agreement |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • About our ads
LEGAL STUFF:
  • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com