Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Americans are treated, and overtreated, to death

Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:01 AM EDT
health, us, med, days, final-days, overtreated, rosaria-vandenberg
Marilynn Marchione, AP Chief Medical Writer
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 7 photos
<p>This undated photo provided by Gail Sheehy shows the author Gail Sheehy. Sheehy's husband, New York magazine founder Clay Felker, spent 17 years fighting various cancers. (AP Photo/Courtesy of Gail Sheehy)           </p>

This undated photo provided by Gail Sheehy shows the author Gail Sheehy. Sheehy's husband, New York magazine founder Clay Felker, spent 17 years fighting various cancers. (AP Photo/Courtesy of Gail Sheehy)

Advertise | AdChoices

— The doctors finally let Rosaria Vandenberg go home.

For the first time in months, she was able to touch her 2-year-old daughter who had been afraid of the tubes and machines in the hospital. The little girl climbed up onto her mother's bed, surrounded by family photos, toys and the comfort of home. They shared one last tender moment together before Vandenberg slipped back into unconsciousness.

Vandenberg, 32, died the next day.

That precious time at home could have come sooner if the family had known how to talk about alternatives to aggressive treatment, said Vandenberg's sister-in-law, Alexandra Drane.

Instead, Vandenberg, a pharmacist in Franklin, Mass., had endured two surgeries, chemotherapy and radiation for an incurable brain tumor before she died in July 2004.

"We would have had a very different discussion about that second surgery and chemotherapy. We might have just taken her home and stuck her in a beautiful chair outside under the sun and let her gorgeous little daughter play around her — not just torture her" in the hospital, Drane said.

Americans increasingly are treated to death, spending more time in hospitals in their final days, trying last-ditch treatments that often buy only weeks of time, and racking up bills that have made medical care a leading cause of bankruptcies.

More than 80 percent of people who die in the United States have a long, progressive illness such as cancer, heart failure or Alzheimer's disease.

More than 80 percent of such patients say they want to avoid hospitalization and intensive care when they are dying, according to the Dartmouth Atlas Project, which tracks health care trends.

Yet the numbers show that's not what is happening:

_The average time spent in hospice and palliative care, which stresses comfort and quality of life once an illness is incurable, is falling because people are starting it too late. In 2008, one-third of people who received hospice care had it for a week or less, says the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization.

_Hospitalizations during the last six months of life are rising: from 1,302 per 1,000 Medicare recipients in 1996 to 1,441 in 2005, Dartmouth reports. Treating chronic illness in the last two years of life gobbles up nearly one-third of all Medicare dollars.

"People are actually now sicker as they die," and some find that treatments become a greater burden than the illness was, said Dr. Ira Byock, director of palliative care at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center. Families may push for treatment, but "there are worse things than having someone you love die," he said.

Gail Sheehy, author of the "Passages" books, learned that as her husband, New York magazine founder Clay Felker, spent 17 years fighting various cancers. On New Year's Day 2007, they waited eight hours in an emergency room for yet another CT scan until Felker looked at her and said, "No more hospitals."

"I just put a cover over him and wheeled him out of there with needles still in his arms," Sheehy said.

Then she called Dr. R. Sean Morrison, president of the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine and a doctor at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York.

"Nobody had really sat down with them about what his choices are and what the options were," said Morrison, who became his doctor.

About a year later, Felker withdrew his own feeding tube, and "it enabled us to go out and have a wonderful evening at a jazz club two nights before he died" in July 2008, Sheehy said.

Doctors can't predict how soon a patient will die, but they usually know when an illness has become incurable. Even then, many of them practice "exhaustion medicine" — treating until there are no more options left to try, said Dr. Martha Twaddle, chief medical officer of Midwest Palliative & Hospice Care Center in suburban Chicago.

A stunning number of cancer patients get aggressive care in the last days of their lives, she noted. One large study of Medicare records found that nearly 12 percent of cancer patients who died in 1999 received chemo in the last two weeks of life, up from nearly 10 percent in 1993.

Guidelines from an alliance of leading cancer centers say patients whose cancer has spread should stop getting anti-cancer medicine if sequential attempts with three different drugs fail to shrink their tumors. Yet according to IntrinsiQ, a cancer data analysis company, almost 20 percent of patients with colorectal cancer that has spread are on at least their fourth chemotherapy drug. The same goes for roughly 12 percent of patients with metastatic breast cancer, and for 12 percent of those with lung cancer. The analysis is based on more than 60,000 cancer patients.

Often, overtreating fatal illnesses happens because patients don't want to give up.

Saideh Browne said her mother, Khadija Akmal-Lamb, wanted to fight her advanced ovarian cancer even after learning it had spread to her liver. The 55-year-old Kansas City, Mo., woman had chemo until two weeks before she died last August.

"She kept throwing up, she couldn't go to the bathroom," and her body ached, Browne said. The doctors urged hospice care and said, "your mom was stubborn," Browne recalled. "She wanted her chemo and she wanted to live."

Browne, who lives in New York, formed a women's cancer foundation in her mother's honor. She said she would encourage dying cancer patients to choose comfort care over needless medicine that prolongs suffering.

It's easier said than done.

The American way is "never giving up, hoping for a miracle," said Dr. Porter Storey, a former hospice medical director who is executive vice president of the hospice group that Morrison heads.

"We use sports metaphors and war metaphors all the time. We talk about never giving up and it's not over till the fat lady sings .... glorifying people who fought to their very last breath," when instead we should be helping them accept death as an inevitable part of life, he said.

This is especially true when deciding whether to try one of the newer, extremely expensive cancer drugs such as Avastin, Erbitux and Tarceva. Some are touted as "improving survival by 30 or 50 percent" when that actually might mean living three weeks or months longer instead of two.

"It's amazing how little benefit those studies show," Storey said, referring to research on the new drugs.

Dan Waeger tried just about all of them. A nonsmoker, he was diagnosed with lung cancer at age 22, and pursued treatment after treatment before dying nearly four years later, in March 2009.

"He decided if there were odds to be beat, he was going to beat the odds," said his boss, Ellen Stovall, then-president of the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship, where Waeger worked as a fundraiser and development manager.

"He received just about every experimental new drug for lung cancer that I'm aware of in his last two years of life. He would get a treatment on a Friday afternoon, be sick all weekend and come to work on Monday," she recalled.

"He had these horrific rashes. He would get these horrible coughs that were not just the lung cancer. The treatments were making him cough up blood, just horrific side effects — vertigo, numbness, tingling in his hands and feet. He suffered."

Waeger's fiancee, Meg Rodgers, said they worried about exceeding the lifetime limits on his insurance, since the care was so expensive.

"I think every time he got a treatment, it was $10,000," though he paid only a $10 copay, she said.

Yet it was clearly worth any price to him — he died a week before they were to be married, after receiving home hospice care for only two weeks.

"I honestly believe he would have done anything he could to live one more day," Rodgers said.

Some health policy groups say cancer patients, as well as people with failing hearts or terminal dementia, should get better end-of-life counseling. Last year, a plan that would have let Medicare pay for doctors to talk about things like living wills was labeled "death panels" and was dropped.

Ultimately, how patients and their families make the journey is a matter of personal choice — and there are resources to help them, Stovall said.

"I've heard a lot of people over the years say what they would do if they had cancer until it is them. And then they will cling to even the smallest glimmer that something will help," she said.

"Cancer that can't be cured is often called daunting but not hopeless. So that's what patients hear. Hope is the last thing to go. People don't give that up easily."

___

AP Medical Writer Lindsey Tanner in Chicago contributed to this story.

___

Online:

State advance directives: http://www.caringinfo.org/PlanningAhead.htm

Physician's orders: http://www.ohsu.edu/polst/

Respecting Choices: http://respectingchoices.org

Engage with Grace: http://www.engagewithgrace.com

© 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Marilynn Marchione's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Mental Health and Wellness, Nurses on the Vine
  • Regions: United States
  • Public Discussion (9)
yes I CAN

More folks should consider comfort care and of course hospice and palliative care...We try too hard to stay alive ...at all cost...Prayer and wholistic approach good.......Modern medicine puts too much emphasis on aggresive save life treatment .....Death is a part of life and enough already ....people are making selves more sicker and upset with overaggresive treatment and less at peace and comfy with quality of care and bankrupting america....Its OK to die !!!!!!!!!!!!

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Mon Jun 28, 2010 6:14 AM EDT
ohiogal-479871

This article reflects the reality of what commenly happens in today's hospitals. Many patients would rather spend the time with their families than alone in a hospital bed. This is why the medical community is trying to modernize medicine and move to patient centered care instead of the non-customized procedural care of the past.

However, with the misrepresentation of living wills as "death Panels" our recent politics may have set the medical community back several steps and re-pushed people into picking a painful and prolonged care for an incurable disease, that wouldn't have otherwise, simply because reckless politicians have started a rumor about what simply isn't true.

A person should have the right to chose how they want to die in their remaining days. Keeping people on extensive treatment that doesn't make them any better, is a process that we as a society need to get away from.

  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:35 AM EDT
yes I CAN

I like the greater use and acceptance of hospice and palliative care models now and would like to see for famial acceptance also of greater push toward less aggressive measures in many cases and I believe when docs take time and explain and team and patient dialogue with family this occurs....Im convinced if more time to explain and to process issuues families and patients wouldnt act in such often drastic measures and more pastoral , social worker support also ....But so much time pressure and legalities to deal with ...Oh what a tangled web we have weaved in american medicine

    Reply#3 - Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:58 AM EDT
    ohiogal-479871

    There has been some studies where patients are allowed to watch videos of the treatments they may receive. Overall most patients felt they better understood their care, and could make a better decision on what they want and where they wanted to go (i.e. palliative care vs "do all you can" care). I think if we concentrated more on better communication with the patient sooner rather than later, we may be able to avoid some of the time pressure and legalities.

      #3.1 - Mon Jun 28, 2010 11:15 AM EDT
      yes I CAN

      Absolutely!!! But where when docs have a certain quick amount of time to see patient in primary care setting....And docs already overburdened in primary care and leaving in droves to specialties.....I would like to see the nurse practioner role increased and augment the MDs, perhaps more nurse case managers in primary care docs offices , more intervention in parish nurse settings .... And community !!!!! Way back when in college to be RN emphasized on community health...We have Headstart for children....Complex patients and all need assessment and headstart also ......We are a society with multisystemic diseases and aging and Yes I agree earlier intervention !!!!!!

        #3.2 - Mon Jun 28, 2010 2:26 PM EDT
        Reply
        angelaisafan

        good morning, ohiogal :)

        Well said. Agency is essential to well being.

          Reply#4 - Mon Jun 28, 2010 11:22 AM EDT
          Jackie-355788

          Not all Americans are over treated, I would say under treated because of no access to care.. The ones that do have some insurance, they want to keep you in the hospital for sure... and with this down turn in the economy no one has health insurance....

            Reply#5 - Tue Jun 29, 2010 4:23 PM EDT
            yes I CAN

            Its community model time and its already been developed and implemented in areas and coming to a place near you...I guarentee your gonna see more physican assistents, nurse practioners and house calls in many ways to include physical visits by various healers and phone call and computer monitering of medical data by the patient such as glucose readings to health care folks at distant area....Telemedicine...Especially in rural area where it is 70 miles to a health worker and no money for office visit of MD....Many healers ...There is a method of treatment called th healing touch some especially nurses know......there are voodoo medicine folks, medicine men , counselors who are social worlers some.....some have phd......some licensed just 4 yrs of college....every culture and situation different...hopefully big industrial plants in say poor indigent part of big city will bring back the plant nurse who may be the only medical person 1000 folks or at least 700 of em EVER SEE OR TRUST for years... I had the privilidge to spend 8 months at huge huge 1000 man and woman Sweetheart cup company as plant nurse and I got the shock of my life as I never saw the most wonderful folks in my life but physically and emotionally dying and few trusted a medical person nor could afford one .....I was a one NURSE MASH unit for almost 1000......And its not all about money or access to healthcare...Certain varied cultures like say black/ mexican blue collars for one example wont respond to a White nurse in a white jacket who hides in her office away from machines....But take an energetic young RN who wears colorful down to earth sporty shirts . Plays gospel black gospel music as workers enter plants or mexican music and goes for walks in plant and gets interested in them folksy and learns their job and tries it and suddenly a day later that person who hasnt seen a doc in years cause of trust and fear feels comfortable....Comes to office sits...I gently dim lights put on black gospel music and they tell a story how they sang with michael jackso as a kid whn he was a kid........And then they stick their arm out and take a blood pressure and repeatedly its not only elevated its 190/120 and this person on verge of a stroke ....And deep down knows . SO MANY MANY variables play into willingness to access healthcare , when , the healer , where healer placed....method of delivery.....AND I never in 25 yrs saw a happier yet physically sicker population in my life.....I felt for 8 months like say the only medical person in Haiti ....I was overwhelmed but my faith energy and love and negotiation with stodgy white risk managers and HR managers who didnt want me to initially teach "those people" ...or refer for further community services...I used every idea and method avail for every variation and refused to Deal with the establishment who was watchinbg the nicest people and hardest working bunch in so God awful poor health ticking time bombs about to and falling over left and right ...Initially wanting me to just put on a white coat and put a bamndage on a crippled limb and document no problem and ignore they also appear to have diabetes and teach and refer . But it finally became brutally apparent I was right...We had a one nurse and blue collar revolution of love and remarkable change and surreal outcomes and right paths and the establishment saw I was right ...So the greatest point being get the idea out of the mind Doctor Patient Hospital or Doctors office ........Thats not gonna be the future .....Its gonna be avail in many ways by many healers and played to many cultures and educations and the key is gonna be to TRUST of patient to who is able to be accessed to disclose and or let me for example get in their head and discern and figure out best way to attack it....Welcome to the NEW HEALTH CARE REVOLUTION

              Reply#6 - Tue Jun 29, 2010 8:40 PM EDT
              tdk022755

              A couple of things have to happen. 1. Physicians have to get comfortable talking to patients and families about death in plain language that they can understand. They have to be up front and realistic. I have observed that some oncologists will go forever trying to keep someone alive when their is no point at all. Some physicians see it as a failure if a patient dies. I see it as a failure when you allow a patient to suffer in the dying process. I have watched doctors give false hope to patients and families, to sit with patients to tell them that someone has died and never get to the point. It is sad. 2. Patients and families have to expect that sometimes their family members are going to die. We cannot save everyone. There are certain illnesses and cancers that do not have a good long term outlook. Most people can research these problems now on the internet and get data regarding outcomes. In addition, it is important to look frankly at your loved one and see exactly what they are going through. Do you really want them to have a feeding tube? Do you really want them to live in a coma? Do you really want them resuscitated if they start to die even though they are 91 years old, have had three strokes and can't talk? What is your expectation of the health care process? If your family member is bedridden at the nursing home with a feeding tube, unable to talk or care for themselves, they are probably not going to wake up and start participating.

              I, as a health care provider have seen so much long term suffering because the family cannot let go. There are some things that I absolutely will not live with and I have been very specific about those things with my husband. Others might choose to live with these illnesses but I will not because I refuse to live in any situation where I cannot care for myself or know that I may be subjected to be repeated infections or surgical procedures.

              My husband works in a neurosurgical ICU in a major trauma center where neuro trauma is a major part of what they do. They have a man there now in his 50's who had high blood pressure who had an aneurysm in his brain that blew up and he has a head full of blood. He is essentially dead and will not recover but the family will not allow him to die in peace. They want "everything done". But the doctors took them aside and just told them "This is it. We are not doing any more. This is futile because he is going to die. We are placing him on comfort care". Now that is the way to deal with this issue. Plain, and straightforward. Plus, this gets the monkey off the back of the family, keeps them from having to make the decision and feeling guilty.

              • 1 vote
              Reply#7 - Sat Jul 3, 2010 5:13 AM EDT
              Leave a Comment:
              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
              You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
              (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
              Newsvine Privacy Statement
              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
              FUN STUFF:
              • Leaderboard |
              • E-Mail Alerts |
              • Top of the Vine |
              • Newsvine Live |
              • Newsvine Archives |
              • The Greenhouse
              COMPANY STUFF:
              • Code of Honor |
              • Company Info |
              • Contact Us |
              • Jobs |
              • User Agreement |
              • Privacy Policy |
              • About our ads
              LEGAL STUFF:
              • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
              • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
              • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com