Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Judge rejects Schwarzenegger minimum wage request

Fri Jul 16, 2010 3:50 PM EDT
business, us, california, budget, arnold-schwarzenegger, minimum-wage, wage
Judy Lin, Associated Press
Advertise | AdChoices

WEST SACRAMENTO — A judge on Friday declined to make the state controller comply with an order by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to pay state workers minimum wage while the state remains without a budget.

Sacramento County Superior Court Judge Patrick Marlette denied the administration's request for a temporary restraining order that would have forced the controller to pay the federal minimum wage immediately to about 200,000 state workers.

Marlette ruled it would cause too much harm to employees.

Deputy Controller Hallye Jordan said the decision means state workers will continue to receive their full wages in July and August.

"We were very pleased that the judge took into consideration our arguments and the impact it would have on hundreds of thousands of state employees who have worked for their checks and expect the full amount," Jordan said after the ruling.

The judge did say he will allow the administration's lawsuit to proceed so the courts can sort out whether the controller must pay minimum wage in the future. The judge indicated he would like to set a full hearing for late August.

Lynelle Jolley, a spokeswoman for Schwarzenegger's Department of Personnel Administration, said the administration is confident it will ultimately prevail in the courts.

"We also hope that the Legislature is going to pass a budget in the meantime so we aren't forced to pay our employees minimum wage," Jolley said.

Earlier this month, a state appeals court in Sacramento ruled in favor of Schwarzenegger. It said the Republican governor has the authority to order minimum wage for civil service workers because the state has not passed a budget for the current fiscal year, which started July 1.

Schwarzenegger's order would cover about 200,000 of the state's work force of 237,000, who would be paid the federal minimum of $7.25 an hour if the courts ultimately find in his favor. Salaried managers who are not paid on an hourly basis would see their pay cut to $455 a week.

If wages are cut, employees would be reimbursed after a state budget is passed and signed.

Patricia Velez, an environmental scientist at the state Department of Fish and Game, said she was relieved by the judge's ruling Friday.

"It would do a lot of harm to state scientists and to all state employees not to get paid on time," said Velez, who also is president of the California Association of Professional Scientists. "I mean we all have the same bills to pay."

The Schwarzenegger administration filed its original lawsuit in Superior Court two years ago after the governor first attempted to impose the minimum wage during a previous budget deadlock. The controller, who cuts state paychecks, has refused to comply.

State Controller John Chiang has filed a counter lawsuit, arguing he cannot make the changes. He said California's decades-old computerized payroll system is incapable of handling the pay reduction.

The system was designed more than 60 years ago and was last revamped in 1970. The latest effort to update it is expected to be implemented in 2012.

During Friday's hearing, administration attorney Chris Thomas argued the interests of taxpayers aren't being represented because the controller has refused to comply with the wage law.

"We think an injunction is critical," Thomas told the judge. "This is our only recourse for preventing what we believe will be an inevitable violation of the law."

Marlette said the harm that would be done to state workers by cutting wages outweighs the conduct of the controller.

"That's pretty dramatic, don't you think?" the judge said.

Chiang, a Democrat who has received $190,000 in union campaign contributions this year, also warned that paying the minimum wage would violate the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act. That could lead to costly fines for the state.

In a second ruling Friday, the judge denied a request by several unions to join the lawsuit on Chiang's side. They included the Service Employees International Union Local 1000 and the California Correctional Peace Officers Association.

A possible pay cut would not apply to employees covered by unions that recently reached tentative labor agreements with the Schwarzenegger administration.

State doctors and lawyers would not receive any paycheck because minimum wage laws do not apply to those professions.

© 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Judy Lin's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: United States , Sacramento/Stockton/Modesto
  • Public Discussion (2)
JPM77

So, CA is broke, can't put together a budget, and can't pay their workers less...

Do they not expect layoffs then? What other option is there? States can't print money like the Fed nor borrow anywhere near what the Federal level can. And there isn't likely (hopefully) to be any bailouts of States that can't get their fiscal houses in order. What exactly are they expecting to happen here?

In the private sector, the economy downturns or the company misbehaves with it's money (and isn't a Wall St or Union buddy of the powers that be) they go bankrupt, cut the work force, or start cutting wages to save jobs and stay afloat.

It's maddening that government employees feel entitled to so much more than the rest of us, on our tax dime.

It'll be interesting to see them finally understand reality when the axe comes down.

    Reply#1 - Fri Jul 16, 2010 7:04 PM EDT
    Stop The Hypocrisy

    Apparently, State Controller John Chiang wields more power in California than the Governor does. Or, he has better lawyers.

      Reply#2 - Sat Jul 17, 2010 7:39 AM EDT
      Leave a Comment:
      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
      You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
      (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
      Newsvine Privacy Statement
      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
      FUN STUFF:
      • Leaderboard |
      • E-Mail Alerts |
      • Top of the Vine |
      • Newsvine Live |
      • Newsvine Archives |
      • The Greenhouse
      COMPANY STUFF:
      • Code of Honor |
      • Company Info |
      • Contact Us |
      • Jobs |
      • User Agreement |
      • Privacy Policy |
      • About our ads
      LEGAL STUFF:
      • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
      • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
      • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com