Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Aging gas pipe at risk of explosion nationwide

Mon Sep 13, 2010 4:17 PM EDT
us-news, business, us, explosion, pacific-gas, pipeline-explosion
Garance Burke, Associated Press
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 32 photos
<p>An emergency worker walks through an area of burned homes in San Bruno, Calif., on Saturday, Sept. 11, 2010. On Thursday, a gas line rupture caused a large explosion that killed at least four people and leveled dozens of homes. (AP Photo/Noah Berger)</p>

An emergency worker walks through an area of burned homes in San Bruno, Calif., on Saturday, Sept. 11, 2010. On Thursday, a gas line rupture caused a large explosion that killed at least four people and leveled dozens of homes. (AP Photo/Noah Berger)

Advertise | AdChoices

SAN BRUNO — An ominous theme has emerged from the wreckage of a deadly pipeline explosion in California: There are thousands of pipes just like it nationwide.

Utilities have been under pressure for years to better inspect and replace aging gas pipes — many of them laid years before the suburbs expanded over them and now at risk of leaking or erupting.

But the effort has fallen short. Critics say the regulatory system is ripe for problems because the government largely leaves it up to the companies to do inspections, and utilities are reluctant to spend the money necessary to properly fix and replace decrepit pipelines.

"If this was the FAA and air travel we were talking about, I wouldn't get on a plane," said Rick Kessler, a former congressional staffer specializing in pipeline safety issues who now works for the Pipeline Safety Trust, an advocacy group based in Bellingham, Wash.

Investigators are still trying to figure out how the pipeline in San Bruno ruptured and ignited a gigantic fireball that torched one home after another in the neighborhood, killing at least four people. Pacific Gas & Electric Co., the pipeline's owner, said Monday it has set aside up to $100 million to help residents recover.

Experts say the California disaster epitomizes the risks that communities face with old gas lines. The pipe was more than 50 years old — right around the life expectancy for steel pipes. It was part of a transmission line that in one section had an "unacceptably high" risk of failure. And it was in a densely populated area.

The blast was the latest warning sign in a series of deadly infrastructure failures in recent years, including a bridge collapse in Minneapolis and a steam pipe explosion that tore open a Manhattan street in 2007. The steam pipe that ruptured was more than 80 years old.

The section of pipeline that ruptured was built in 1956, back when the neighborhood contained only a handful of homes. It is a scenario that National Transportation Safety Board vice chairman Christopher Hart has seen play out throughout the nation, as suburbs have expanded.

"That's an issue we're going to have to look on a bigger scale — situations in which pipes of some age were put in before the dense population arrived and now the dense population is right over the pipe," he said.

Thousands of pipelines nationwide fit the same bill, and they frequently experience mishaps. Federal officials have recorded 2,840 significant gas pipeline accidents since 1990, more than a third causing deaths and significant injuries.

"In reality, there is a major pipeline incident every other day in this country," said Carl Weimer, Pipeline Safety Trust's executive director. "Luckily, most of them don't happen in populated areas, but you still see too many failures to think something like this wasn't going to happen sooner or later."

Congress passed a law in 2002 that required utilities for the first time to inspect pipelines that run through heavily populated areas. In the first five years, more than 3,000 problems were identified — a figure Weimer said underscores the precarious pipeline system.

Even when inspections are done and problems found, Kessler said, there is no requirement for companies to say if or what kind of repairs were made. And Weimer added industry lobbyists have since pushed to relax that provision of the law so inspections could occur once a decade or once every 15 years.

Other critics complain that the pipeline plans are drafted in secret with little opportunity for the public to speak out about the process.

The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration is the federal regulatory arm that enforces rules for the safe operation of the nation's pipeline system, and has direct authority over interstate pipelines. Most state public utility agencies have adopted the federal rules and carry out inspections and enforcement of pipelines running inside state boundaries.

Asked if it plans to step up oversight in response to the San Bruno accident, the PHMSA issued a statement saying it has investigators at the scene providing technical assistance to the California Public Utilities Commission and to the NTSB as they investigate the pipeline failure.

"We will evaluate what further action is necessary once we have complete information," the agency said.

The system often relies on the pipeline operators like PG&E to survey their own gas lines and decide which are high risk.

The American Gas Association disputes the notion that it cuts any corners and says the industry is subjected to stringent state and federal regulations.

"Safety is unequivocally the No. 1 priority for the natural gas transmission and distribution industry and always will be," spokesman Chris Hogan said. "The industry spends billions each year to ensure the safety and reliability of the natural gas infrastructure."

The challenge of ensuring pipeline safety is compounded by the sheer enormity of the nation's natural gas network. The federal pipeline agency says the U.S. has more than 2 million miles of pipelines — enough to circle the earth about 100 times.

The agency has only about 100 federal inspectors nationwide to ensure compliance, meaning there is no guarantee violators will be caught. "When you look at two-and-a-half million miles of pipeline with 100 inspectors, it's not reassuring," Weimer said. "To a grand degree the industry inspects and polices themselves."

Potential safety threats have grown as the pipeline network has expanded and age takes its toll on existing infrastructure. More than 60 percent of the nation's gas transmission lines are 40 years old or older.

Most of them are made of steel, with older varieties prone to corrosion. The more problematic pipes are made of cast-iron. A few places in Pennsylvania still had wooden gas pipes as of last year, according to officials there.

Pipelines in heavily populated locations like San Bruno fall into a category the industry refers to as "high consequence areas."

Those areas contain about 7 percent of the 300,000 miles of gas transmission lines in the country, or roughly 21,000 miles of pipeline. The category has nothing to do with the safety of pipelines, and was created to put the greatest emphasis on the most populous regions.

Industry watchdogs have criticized utilities for not being willing to spend the money necessary to avoid explosions like the one in California. The cost to replace lengthy stretches of pipelines can exceed $30 million.

"They (PG&E) will prioritize and put off work to maintain their level of earnings," said Bill Marcus, a California attorney whose firm consults nationally with consumer protection agencies and nonprofits on gas rate cases. "To some extent that's not bad, but it is concerning when those decisions endanger public health or the environment."

PG&E said it has spent more than $100 million to improve its gas system in recent years, and routinely surveys its 5,724 miles of transmission and 42,142 miles of distribution lines for leaks. The utility speeded up surveys of its distribution lines in 2008 and expects to have completed checks in December, it said.

PG&E President Chris Johns said the pipe that ruptured was inspected twice in the past year — once for corrosion and once for leaks — and the checks turned up no problems.

A section of pipe connected to the line that exploded was built in 1948, and flagged as a problem by PG&E in a memo. PG&E submitted paperwork to regulators that said the section was within "the top 100 highest risk line sections" in the utility's service territory, the document shows.

The fact that it's in an urbanized area that didn't exist when the pipe was built is emblematic of a bigger problem nationwide, experts say.

"People have been waiting for a while for this type of disaster to happen because of expanded construction near pipeline right of ways without adequate prevention," said Paul Blackburn, a public interest lawyer in Vermillion, S.D.

___

Associated Press writers Matthew Brown in Billings, Mont., and Joan Lowy in Washington, D.C., contributed to this report.

© 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Garance Burke's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: United States , San Francisco/Oakland/San Jose
  • Public Discussion (30)
Chunky-Monkey

That's nice, so we all shpould expect to see all P&G items in your local markets go up in price to pay for thisdonation. Sure they will take the credit, but we all know they make the people that buy their products (with price increases) pay the tab on this one, just like all others have been done, and like our current government that keeps handing out money to foreign countries at the taxpayers expense.

But it's all good until you go downtown Los Angeles and see all the homeless people on the streets.

It's interesting to see them so readily handing out this money right off the bat to these "wealthy people". I don't recall them doing this for all the poor folks in Louisiana after Katrina hit.

Bruno California is a very nice neighborhood and it's for the middle-class and rich folks.

Shame, shame, shame on P&G.

  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Mon Sep 13, 2010 4:42 PM EDT
redphish

What the heck are you talking about? The company in question is PG&E, the owners of the pipeline. There's no mention of Procter & Gamble.

  • 4 votes
#1.1 - Mon Sep 13, 2010 8:28 PM EDT
took43583

Redphish is correct. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. is not the same as Procter and Gamble, despite the "P" and "G" in each abbreviation.

"The people that buy their products" are gas and electric customers.

  • 4 votes
#1.2 - Mon Sep 13, 2010 9:09 PM EDT
Reply
David Zadareky

Hopefully they figure out what exactly caused this to happen in the first place sooner rather then later.

  • 3 votes
Reply#2 - Mon Sep 13, 2010 5:52 PM EDT
R. Donald Snyder

Our infrastructure in general has been badly neglected for years. We're, literally, falling apart.

  • 8 votes
Reply#3 - Mon Sep 13, 2010 8:13 PM EDT
took43583

Yes. Economic stimulus funds to replace old underground utilities would be money well spent: jobs created (even if only temporarily) and disasters averted.

  • 4 votes
#3.1 - Mon Sep 13, 2010 9:15 PM EDT
R. Donald Snyder

I agree. It would be a big investment in our economy and our future. Besides we really need it.

  • 4 votes
#3.2 - Mon Sep 13, 2010 9:17 PM EDT
Scarlet Termite

Yes, we do. Every single day I drive over an overpass bridge that has it's sides crumbling to the point of being able to see the rebar inside. I see that and wonder if I'll be one of the people on it when it finally falls onto I-71.

  • 2 votes
#3.3 - Mon Sep 13, 2010 9:21 PM EDT
took43583

You would think preventing deaths and injuries, and the resulting lawsuits over faulty equipment , would be enough motivation for the utilities themselves to replace worn materials, but apparently they have decided the costs for this would be less than the costs of upgrades.

"Every single day I drive over an overpass bridge that has it's sides crumbling to the point of being able to see the rebar inside."

Ditto

  • 2 votes
#3.4 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 7:08 AM EDT
Reply
rozdane

when are we going to stop sending our precious tax dollars to all those foreign countries, wars and middleast and start spending some on fixing the aging infrastucture in our own country.

We had a major bridge collapse in minnesota a few yers ago and now this. Too bad congress and all the administartion of the past never thought about it and just focussed on unnecessary wars overseas. Lets use some of our own paid money through our taxes to start helping our own people.

  • 3 votes
Reply#4 - Mon Sep 13, 2010 8:27 PM EDT
River-239955

Oil, gas, water, and anything else that has been in distribution since the 60's, 70's, or even earlier.... I've been saying this for years now. The electrical grids are woefully outdated, as well.

The industries should have been nationalized, so that oversight could have been regulated along the way. Instead, everyone insists on keeping it privatized, and there is no way possible for them to make the very necessary repairs and replacements without a dramatic increase in product. This country cannot absorb that kind of impact. You think we have economic troubles now? We haven't seen anything yet.

  • 4 votes
Reply#5 - Mon Sep 13, 2010 8:51 PM EDT
Amarjit

It is responsibility of the supplier to ensure safe & sound delivery to the customer. SupplierĀ is responsible for theft, pilferage & safety of the pipeline. If pipelines is subject to deteriration, it needs to checked & technology be inplace including replacement when needed under planned maintenance scheme. There has to be safety velve to shut off the supplies for maintenance & as well for any mishap like recent blast taking lives of 4 people & burning more than 30 houses. There has to be a safety valve for each house as well block of houses to sht off supply of gas as well water incase of line bursting to eliminate major loss to public as well supplier of the facility.

  • 1 vote
Reply#6 - Mon Sep 13, 2010 8:57 PM EDT
jgonad

Everthing costs money. When company taxes continue to go up, the costs go up, they cut on people and saftey to keep up their profits in turn jeoprdizing they saftey of people. Uncle Sam needs to dole it out now for the people of this country rather than keep spending (doling out handouts) overseas on wars and war mongers.

  • 2 votes
#6.1 - Mon Sep 13, 2010 9:10 PM EDT
Reply
foggdogg

Katrina was a natural disaster, this could have been prevented, people were reporting the smell of gas for weeks before this happened. I don't know of any rich ppl living in San Bruno, this area is middle class hard working people, you must be think of Hillsborough, that were the wealthy people in the peninsula live.

  • 1 vote
Reply#7 - Mon Sep 13, 2010 8:58 PM EDT
oneforall

Oh great, like we didn't have enough to worry about. Now we have to watch out for exploding neighborhoods and incendiary tap water, on top of gigantic oil spills, oil platform explosions, nuclear energy waste, coal ash, and chemically polluted air, water, and land. I realize that the US uses a lot of energy, but isn't there any way that we can speed up the development of wind, solar, and hydro power energy development? Really, we could eliminate a lot of the problems associated with the extraction of energy resources if we could just install a few solar panels on every house and building, build a bunch of windmills, and start driving electric or hybrid cars. What are we waiting for - more exploding neighborhoods?

  • 3 votes
Reply#8 - Mon Sep 13, 2010 9:00 PM EDT
my-pockets-r-mt

start driving electric or hybrid cars

How will we recharge the car, power companies can't hardly handle what they supply now?

install a few solar panels on every house and building

Takes more than a few to power a house.

The government (taxpayers money) has been doling out money for many many years for alternative energy, solar was the big one in the early 70s, and still no progress.

Think obama will put a moratorium on gas now? It's been how many explosions in the past month or so.

    #8.1 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 1:58 PM EDT
    TDR

    Solar may have been a big to do in the 70s but once Regan got into office he dismantled much of the countries burgeoning energy conservation push -- like taking the solar panels off of the White House.

    As for the amount spent on alternative energy, it is dwarfed by the subsidies we have provided to the oil industry. Plus, we are just now seeing progress in battery and solar technology.

    • 2 votes
    #8.2 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:30 PM EDT
    oneforall

    How will we recharge the car, power companies can't hardly handle what they supply now?

    In the interim, most vehicles would most likely be hybrids, which will require new fueling stations. New technology always breeds other new technologies and until alternative power sources, like hydrogen or lithium ion batteries, are developed, we will still have to rely upon fossil fuels and nuclear for many of our energy needs. The objective is to reduce the consumption of fossil fuels as much as possible without disrupting lives and commerce any more than necessary.

    Takes more than a few to power a house.

    Technology has to be developed before it can be used effectively. Even today, solar can substantially reduce a home owner's public power consumption, and with more development, it will become more efficient and less costly. Solar energy is clean and it costs nothing as a fuel source. Germany has taken full advantage of solar technology; it would be foolish for the U.S. to neglect this vital source of energy. All oil and gas subsidies should be rerouted into the development of clean alternative fuels, as well as taxes from fossil fuels.

    • 1 vote
    #8.3 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 8:20 PM EDT
    my-pockets-r-mt

    Solar energy is clean and it costs nothing

    I always said in the 70s the reason it failed was they couldn't figure out how to make money off of something that costs nothing.

    lithium ion batteries

    $11,000. a pop and that is provided the government funds it, I'm all for it BUT think I'll wait and see how efficient they really are. Still have many questions regarding the hybrid as to how much a person would really be on battery and how much on gas in a city. We'll keep carpooling for now.

      #8.4 - Wed Sep 15, 2010 7:15 AM EDT
      Reply
      Yeshua888

      http://www.memegenerator.net/Bohemian-Grove

        Reply#9 - Mon Sep 13, 2010 9:00 PM EDT
        shaunb

        Where does the profit go?

        And the cynical side of me says, "if one leaves it up to a company, one will get screwed, nicely, almost every time."

        • 2 votes
        Reply#10 - Mon Sep 13, 2010 9:33 PM EDT
        Cozzinator

        I find myself asking the same question many times...

        One doesn't have to look very far to realize that 'cash retention', or the lack of it at the corporate or administrative levels is the demise of the economy: auto industry, banking industry, education, health care etc...

        There is not a single penny 'saved for a rainy day' and when those pennies are badly needed to fix the crumbling infrastructure, payoff debt to suppliers and pension funds (auto industry) et al...

        ...it is much less painful for them to pass the buck onto the taxpayer when there is nothing left in the pot after their filthy hands have razed through it than it is to pay for 'maintenance' themselves.

        Shame, shame, shame.

        • 1 vote
        #10.1 - Mon Sep 13, 2010 9:46 PM EDT
        shaunb

        in my opinion, happenings like this are why i believe nationalizing certain industries might not be a bad thing.

          #10.2 - Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:23 PM EDT
          Reply
          A Sergeant's Mom

          I'm not a believer, sorry.

            Reply#11 - Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:04 PM EDT
            Lee B

            well that was vague..

            • 3 votes
            #11.1 - Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:18 PM EDT
            A Sergeant's Mom

            11.1 - Perhaps.

              #11.2 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 10:06 AM EDT
              Reply
              TDR

              China spends 9% of its GDP on infrastructure, Europe spends 5%, and the U.S.A. spends 2%. Why are we surprised?

              • 1 vote
              Reply#12 - Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:23 PM EDT
              mike lonkouski

              The oil rigs, now this?

              Am I smelling something odd?

              • 2 votes
              Reply#13 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 1:24 AM EDT
              Solidarity Nite

              who needs terrorists when you have lethal decrepitude?

              • 4 votes
              Reply#14 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 1:33 AM EDT
              Daniel A. Hallo

              $$$$$$$$$$ Money isn't the root of all evil... but sure is a damn good fertilizer for it. $$$$$$$$$

              • 2 votes
              Reply#15 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 1:44 AM EDT
              vnhbmnDeleted
              vnhbmnDeleted
              Leave a Comment:
              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
              You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
              (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
              Newsvine Privacy Statement
              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
              FUN STUFF:
              • Leaderboard |
              • E-Mail Alerts |
              • Top of the Vine |
              • Newsvine Live |
              • Newsvine Archives |
              • The Greenhouse
              COMPANY STUFF:
              • Code of Honor |
              • Company Info |
              • Contact Us |
              • Jobs |
              • User Agreement |
              • Privacy Policy |
              • About our ads
              LEGAL STUFF:
              • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
              • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
              • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com