Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Top economic adviser to leave White House

Tue Sep 21, 2010 5:19 PM EDT
business, politics, us, obama, white-house, barack-obama, adviser, economic-adviser, obama-economic
Julie Pace, Associated Press
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 2 photos
<p>FILE - In this Oct. 16, 2009, file photo, Lawrence Summers, White House chief economic adviser, speaks at the Buttonwood Gathering in New York. Summers, plans to leave the White House at the end of the year, a move that comes as the administration struggles to show an anxious public it's making progress on the economy.(AP Photo/Mark Lennihan, File)</p>

FILE - In this Oct. 16, 2009, file photo, Lawrence Summers, White House chief economic adviser, speaks at the Buttonwood Gathering in New York. Summers, plans to leave the White House at the end of the year, a move that comes as the administration struggles to show an anxious public it's making progress on the economy.(AP Photo/Mark Lennihan, File)

Advertise | AdChoices

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's top economic adviser, Lawrence Summers, plans to leave the White House at the end of the year, a move that comes as the administration struggles to show an anxious public it's making progress on the economy.

While administration officials Tuesday quickly sought to paint the announcement as an expected development, Summers' departure shakes up an economic team that has been under fire for its handling of the recovery. It's also a team already in transition following the recent departures of other high-profile Obama advisers.

In a statement, the president said he is grateful for Summers' service during a time of "great peril for our country."

"While we have much work ahead to repair the damage done by the recession, we are on a better path thanks in no small measure to Larry's wise counsel," Obama said.

Summers will return to Harvard University, a move a senior administration official said was always part of Summers' long-standing plans. The official said the president asked Summers last fall to stay through 2010 in order to see through the passage of financial regulatory legislation and the continued implementation of the economic stimulus package. The official spoke on the condition of anonymity in order to discuss internal White House matters.

Summers is the third high-level member of Obama's economic team to leave in recent months, following the departure of budget director Peter Orszag and Christina Romer, head of the Council of Economic Advisers, both of whom left this summer. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner would be the only one of Obama's top-tier economic advisers to remain with the administration should be stay through the end of the year.

There was speculation that Obama might turn to a corporate executive to replace Summers as a way to deflect criticism that his administration is antibusiness. Also, the White House is acutely aware that there are no women in top economic posts following Romer's departure, nor do the current team of advisers have significant private-sector experience.

Summers' departure was first reported Tuesday by Bloomberg News.

With unemployment hovering near double-digits and the public growing increasingly worried about the slow pace of the recovery, Democrats fear the economy could lead to sweeping losses for the party in the midterm elections.

Last month the top House Republican, Rep. John Boehner of Ohio, called on Obama to fire Summers, Geithner and other members of the economic team.

"Never before has the need for a fresh start in Washington been more pressing," Boehner said during a speech in Cleveland.

At the time, the White House dismissed Boehner's calls as politically motivated. But during a town hall Monday, Obama wouldn't rule out changes on the economic team, saying only that he hadn't yet made any determinations on personnel matters.

"This is tough, the work that they do," Obama said. "They've been at it for two years, and they're going to have a whole range of decisions about family that will factor into this as well."

Republicans will interpret Summers' departure as a sign that Obama is rethinking his economic policy. But even some Democrats might quietly rejoice.

Summers, often seen with a Diet Coke in his hand, has a reputation as a brilliant, if occasionally smug, economist. During the debate over overhauling the nation's financial regulations, liberals bristled at Summers' rejection of proposals to place limits on the size of banks. They held him partly responsible for the deregulation of banks that occurred in 1999 while he was treasury secretary under President Bill Clinton.

When he returns to Harvard, he will be going back to his roots. At age 28 he became one of the youngest professors to receive tenure at Harvard. After leaving the Clinton Cabinet in 2001, he returned to Harvard as its new president, where he had a tense relationship with the university faculty. It erupted when he argued that gender differences explained why fewer women pursued math and science careers. He resigned in 2006.

In a statement, Summers said he will miss working with the president and the economic team but looks forward to returning to Harvard to teach and write about the economic fundamentals of job creation.

© 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Julie Pace's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: United States , Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (65)
Nadia T. Pugglesworth, III

Like rats on a sinking ship...

No one wants to go down with the USS Obama!

  • 11 votes
#1 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 6:29 PM EDT
mon glas

LOL Nadia, You beat me to it. Agree Rats on a sinking ship!

  • 8 votes
#1.1 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 6:45 PM EDT
Fred G. from N.C.

The rats are heading down the mooring lines as the goo"D" ship Titanic heads for out for her Nov. 2nd date with destiny !! Watch out for those I-C-E-bergs !!!

  • 6 votes
#1.2 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 7:05 PM EDT
tojo1968

Fred,
I wonder if anyone will stay behind to play "Nearer my God to thee"?

  • 3 votes
#1.3 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 8:19 PM EDT
Marshall James

obama would be smart to get someone who is knowledgable in austrian economics.

but then I did say he would be smart.

we know that is not the case.

  • 6 votes
#1.4 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 8:40 PM EDT
Roxanne2Sweet

Nadia T. Pugglesworth, III

The USS AmericanEconomy had already got thoroughly torpedoed at the end of the Cheney/Bush presidency's Reaganomics: you know? = Deregulation is King, Deficits don't matter, let's add trillions to the deficit with tax cuts; multi-trillion dollar "Mission Accomplished in Iraq" despite Intelligence showing no conclusive WMDs; etc etc

If it wasn't for Obama's economic team, we would've been in a full blown Depression, especially with the GOBP & the Koch-funded Teabaggers up to this very day clamouring for the exact same policies that had destroyed the American & global econmy.

  • 8 votes
#1.5 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 9:59 PM EDT
Nadia T. Pugglesworth, III

How do you know? Do you have some kind of superpower that enables you to delve into hypothetical alternative outcome universes?

  • 4 votes
#1.6 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 10:54 PM EDT
Sailcat-2064101

Actually, you don't need any superpowers to see the GOP's headlong dive into deregulation was criminally irresponsible and severely damaged the US economy. Policies drawn up during the Bush administration by rich Republicans that benefited only rich Republicans sank the USA into a recession/depression with which we will be battling for years to come. This is not hypothetical, either, it's a sad reality.

You don't need superpowers to see this: you merely need to use hindsight! It's 20/20, you know!

  • 6 votes
#1.7 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 11:47 PM EDT
Roxanne2Sweet

Nadia T. Pugglesworth, III

The greatest Hero of the GOP, President Ronald Reagan; Ronnie's very own OMB Director says that I'm correct & you're Wrong:

David Stockman, a director of the Office of Management and Budget under President Ronald Reagan, is working on a book about the financial crisis.

Four Deformations of the Apocalypse

By DAVID STOCKMAN
Published: July 31, 2010
    IF there were such a thing as Chapter 11 for politicians, the Republican push to extend the unaffordable Bush tax cuts would amount to a bankruptcy filing. The nation’s public debt — if honestly reckoned to include municipal bonds and the $7 trillion of new deficits baked into the cake through 2015 — will soon reach $18 trillion. That’s a Greece-scale 120 percent of gross domestic product, and fairly screams out for austerity and sacrifice. It is therefore unseemly for the Senate minority leader, Mitch McConnell, to insist that the nation’s wealthiest taxpayers be spared even a three-percentage-point rate increase...

This approach has not simply made a mockery of traditional party ideals. It has also led to the serial financial bubbles and Wall Street depredations that have crippled our economy. More specifically, the new policy doctrines have caused four great deformations of the national economy, and modern Republicans have turned a blind eye to each one...

The second unhappy change in the American economy has been the extraordinary growth of our public debt. In 1970 it was just 40 percent of gross domestic product, or about $425 billion. When it reaches $18 trillion, it will be 40 times greater than in 1970. This debt explosion has resulted not from big spending by the Democrats, but instead the Republican Party’s embrace, about three decades ago, of the insidious doctrine that deficits don’t matter if they result from tax cuts...

Etcetera, etcetera

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/01/opinion/01stockman.html?_r=2&ref=opinion

  • 4 votes
#1.8 - Wed Sep 22, 2010 12:45 AM EDT
Sailcat-2064101

Stockman is a formal student radical-turned-conservative-psuedo-economist. He'll say whatever he has to in order to justify the poor decisions made by his party during the last Bush administration. He's as believable as a shoplifter's story at your local WalMart.

And the proof you're dead wrong is the current sorry state of the economy, brought to you courtesy of your friendly, neighborhood Republican Party. You can dream for the glory days of the GOP, but the Republicans single-handedly put this great country into the line at the soup kitchen.

Read 'em and weep, sister.

  • 1 vote
#1.9 - Wed Sep 22, 2010 3:54 AM EDT
angela593

If the USA financial policies were handles by a top business person wanting to stay solvent
how would this be handled?
Walmart, Microsoft, Wall STreet they all know how to make money, and stay solvent.
Can any of those business principles help our politicians.
Hellllllllllllllllllllllllp! We are sick of this. I do not care what party wins, but I have no faith in past failed Republican stuff. DEmocrats crumble by the second. Americans are fearful.
What are we afraid of?

http://www.mainstreet.com/print/18648

Americans Fear Repeal of Bush Tax Cuts

By Matt Brownell
Bush-era tax cuts are causing a political firestorm, but a new poll shows many Americans fear an economic lull if the cuts are ended.

The Pew Research Center/National Journal poll conducted last week found that 39% of adults believe that repealing the tax cuts for households making more than $250,000 would hurt the economy. The number was highest among Republicans at 60%, but about a third of both Democrats and Independents also felt that ending the tax cuts would do damage.

The news is another blow to the Obama administration, which has sought to keep in place the Bush-era tax cuts for most Americans while letting them expire for the wealthiest segment of the population. Republicans have argued that allowing tax rates on the wealthy to return to 39% would slow economic recovery, and despite some signals of reconciliation from House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio), congressional Republicans seem unified in their opposition to the tax hike. The latest poll results indicate that their arguments have gained traction among a significant portion of the voting public.

Still, congressional math may be on the Democrats’ side even if public opinion is not. Senator Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) says he expects Congress to vote on extending the middle-class tax cuts before they adjourn in early October, and indicated that Democrats would block any attempt by Republicans to extend the upper-class tax cuts.

  • 1 vote
#1.10 - Wed Sep 22, 2010 10:33 AM EDT
ray.burchard

Yes lets appoint an American economic advisor with an overriding entrepreneurial propensity like Lawrence H. Summers, with his Wall Street allegiance and ask them to represent the public's view point. Why don't we just consolidate and have the FED chairman serve both positions, or make it official and outsource the duties to corporate America and avoid the middleman, the corporate lobbyist. That would be analogous to putting an alcoholic in charge of the liqueur cabinet and hoping their compulsive fixation wouldn't be an influence.

  • 1 vote
#1.11 - Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:17 AM EDT
Sailcat-2064101

I'm sorry to lauunch into a rant here, but...Walmart and Wall Street know how to make money?? Oh my god! Are they the standards we are supposed to look up to now? What about the days when mighty General Motors was the flagship corporation for the nation...the world, even...and Wall Street was not synonymous with Crook? When companies like US Steel made the USA the largest steel producer in the world and more the half the world's manufacturing capacity resided inside America's borders? A generation or two later and now GM is on the ropes, steel production is almost non-existent, and America buys its manufactured goods from countries that use child labor to produce them. Wal Mart has a hand in all of this by making loads of money by importing cheap crap from China for you to buy at the expense of US companies who try to pay their workers a living wage.

See how far we have come? Thank you Republican Party for making this country what it is today!

  • 1 vote
#1.12 - Wed Sep 22, 2010 12:51 PM EDT
Fred G. from N.C.

BOTH parties have driven the country into the ditch we're in. Look up any of the "free trade" agreements that have shipped so many jobs overseas and you'll see "D" and "R" fingerprints at the scene of the crime. That doesn't mean we should adapt an isolationist stance, but U.S. economic interests OTHER THAN WALL STREET should start being treated with importance. I always hear about how much each class pays in taxes but the bottom line is an unemployed man (or woman) pays nothing !!!

    #1.13 - Wed Sep 22, 2010 1:30 PM EDT
    Sailcat-2064101

    I firmly agree with you that the future of America's economy does not coincide with Wall Street's narrow interests. I do, however, lay most of the blame for our current predicament with the R party because of the huge deficits that ballooned in the Reagan administration, continued through the first Bush administration, and picked up again in the administration of the second Bush (never mind that, during the Clinton administration, there were actually budget surpluses). Now, faced with a crippled economy, Obama is picking up the pieces of our shattered deregulated banking system and spending to restart the economic engine. It is at exactly this point in time that the Republican lap dogs posting on this site have started yapping about his spending policies and have chosen to ignore the events that have brought this country to this historic low point.

    Shame!

    • 2 votes
    #1.14 - Wed Sep 22, 2010 4:57 PM EDT
    Doug-375144

    May 0' can pick better next time he found a bunch of real losers the first time, Hope tax cheat Geitner goes next

      #1.15 - Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:37 PM EDT
      ray.burchard

      Doug, .. Agreed Obama's administration employs a number of Academia's professorial theorist in his effort to correct the republican created economic disparity and curb America's unemployment issue. As a matter of fact in 2009 his administration employed Reagan's FED chairman Paul Volcker to help. It took the republican's 8 years to create this economic mess and the public wants Obama to wave his magic wand and correct it now, who's being a little unrealistic and blinded by emotions?

      • 2 votes
      #1.16 - Thu Sep 23, 2010 4:52 AM EDT
      Sailcat-2064101

      Well said!

      • 1 vote
      #1.17 - Thu Sep 23, 2010 12:44 PM EDT
      Marshall James

      ray

      by your own reasoning it wasnt 8 years of repubs it was only 6 as the first two years are not your fault remember??? also the last two years of bush democrats had the majority..

      also if the bad cant be attributed to obama then neither can the good.

      its hilarious that anyone would even have such a hypocritcal thought process. not saying you do just asking you if you hold that thought process.

        #1.18 - Thu Sep 23, 2010 12:50 PM EDT
        Sailcat-2064101

        Ol' James sounds a little bitter, doesn't he? Must be the fact that eight years of corruption during the Bush administration is a pill no R-Party apologist wants to swallow whole! Never fear, Jimmy! This time, the entire country is going to have to take that bitter pill with you, so long as this Republican-sponsored recession has us by the throat!

        We're all in this together! Hack! Gag!

        • 2 votes
        #1.19 - Thu Sep 23, 2010 4:11 PM EDT
        Reply
        Bubba-939441

        Now if we could just get Mr Obama to resign and go back to Harvard. Academia doesn't understand real problems.

        • 7 votes
        Reply#2 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 6:30 PM EDT
        Nadia T. Pugglesworth, III

        Just wait till Elizabeth Warren gets going...hoo boy!

        • 5 votes
        #2.1 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 6:34 PM EDT
        Sailcat-2064101

        Elizabeth Warren makes more sense than anyone I've seen involved in DC economics in a long time. I sincerely hope she becomes a real force on the hill.

        On the other hand, it's interesting to see that someone using the handle Bubba thinks he can understand complex economic systems better than some fusty old Harvard professor! Talk about real problems!

        • 3 votes
        #2.2 - Wed Sep 22, 2010 12:21 AM EDT
        Reply
        Poorworkingman

        I hope President Obama doesn't run for second term. I couldn't wait to see the hot, new President Sarah Palin. I better start looking for a pair of turbo nike shoes, a very strong belt and a best floating device.

          Reply#3 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 6:37 PM EDT
          Fred G. from N.C.

          You'll need those a lot sooner than 2012 if Harry and Nancy manage to survive mid-terms !!

          • 4 votes
          #3.1 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 7:07 PM EDT
          mon glas

          Fred, I think we all can agree. Reid and Pelosi are done!

          • 2 votes
          #3.2 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 9:22 PM EDT
          Reply
          bestquest

          Lawrence, please take Rahm and Axlerod out the door with you tomorrow. The, go back in and take out about 80 more non performers.

          Allow president to bring in genuine, experienced, educated talent. Preferably people who have worked for a living, know how to read a report or a book, and care about our entire nation and not their puny little career.

          I do know that the last two years have been hectic, unprecedented theft by banks and wall street, but the solutions being tried and proposed by either party really do not fit our difficulties. We needed more imagination and got samo-samo.

          • 8 votes
          Reply#4 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 6:41 PM EDT
          R. Donald Snyder

          Absolutely 100% correct.

          • 3 votes
          #4.1 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 6:55 PM EDT
          mavrick03

          Allow president to bring in genuine, experienced, educated talent. Preferably people who have worked for a living, know how to read a report or a book, and care about our entire nation and not their puny little career.

          That's all well and good but considering those where the people he brought in. What makes you think he knows what genuine, experienced,educated talent is?

          What say you about that bestquest?

          • 1 vote
          #4.2 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 7:11 PM EDT
          Repoman-1208817

          The media and administration kept telling us all of the Presidents advisors are the smartest people in their fields so I can't imagine how anyone would doubt this guys intelligence...maybe the people just aren't smart enough to realize how smart he is...

          *no under a buck...the sandwich lady needs to get paid*...sorry I love that line.

            #4.3 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 7:23 PM EDT
            Nadia T. Pugglesworth, III

            Obama's living proof of the Peter Principle.

            • 2 votes
            #4.4 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 7:32 PM EDT
            bestquest

            Mav,

            The group is inbred east coast, shared opinions and teachers, lightweight minds.

            Suggest searching from Western Pa to Iowa, Kentucky up to Ontario for solid performers. Enough of east coasters.

            50 years ago Rusk and McNamara were paraded as the very best. Turns out both are total failures - and Rusk was a known risk during Korea. McNamara so arrogant that only when facing hell did he fess up for forgiveness.

            I know at least three persons in central Illinois and one in Ohio better than what he has at hand. If you look around your neighborhood, you may identify a few really terrific talents.

            I really want USA to get back on track fast, not wait for Fed, treasury or London to let a long time period heal mortal wounds here. Our county suicide rate has doubled, our daily supper at various churches has doubled in five months Families cannot even afford fees for extra curricular activities like band sports. I witness people living in their cars. Time for president to have good solid advice that helps all.

            • 2 votes
            #4.5 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 7:57 PM EDT
            mavrick03

            east coasters are you serious? inbred east coasters? you do realize Pa is on the east coast side of the us only separated by nj? so stop at Kentucky so latter you can call them inbred hillbillies?

            Problem is its time for the President to put on his big boy pants and lead, stop crying and whining stop bitching like a two year old get off the campaign trail and lead he has absolutely no leadership skills what soever, as it clearly shows everyday, he could not lead his ass out of a paper bag with a hole cut in it.

              #4.6 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 10:33 PM EDT
              bestquest

              I forgot for the moment that Philly is a tory town. Soooo, I move the line west a bit, say to the crests of the Alleghenies. I really need western PA in all its beauty, brainpower, work ethic, good food, forests, hills, trails and people.

              yea, ivy leaugers are inbred, even west point graduates really suck now. Too many are not even serving their minimum enlistment! Putting their soldiers at the bottom of a ravine as bait to draw fire from taliban - then radio for air power.

              Except Cornell, which is better and getting better.

                #4.7 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 11:27 PM EDT
                Reply
                R. Donald Snyder

                Anyone going to miss him? Anyone? Anyone at all? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?

                • 5 votes
                Reply#5 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 6:48 PM EDT
                Smokie-788412

                NO!

                • 3 votes
                #5.1 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 7:47 PM EDT
                tojo1968

                Sad, really never heard of him before this article.

                • 3 votes
                #5.2 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 8:31 PM EDT
                Reply
                mon glas

                There won't be any politicans worth electing into office until they all get the message we are all tired of the usual Washington games of them doing what is best for themselves and their agenda, instead of what is best for all Americans and our own National Security.

                • 1 vote
                Reply#6 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 6:50 PM EDT
                Miguel Angel Tinoco Rodriguez

                When the rats begin to lave the mother ship it is either because the Captain has left or the mother ship has begun to sink.

                http://miguel-angel-tinoco-rodriguez.newsvine.com/_news/2010/09/21/5152244-beware-of-the-rat-race

                • 1 vote
                Reply#7 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 6:59 PM EDT
                Rob-2200828

                you got that right!!!!!!!!!

                  #7.1 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 7:19 PM EDT
                  Reply
                  Rob-2200828

                  He's leaving because he knows what's coming down the pike.....and it ain't good.....that's why he's leaving........plus he's as corrupt as any of them.....he was one of gents that helped dismantle the GLASS STEAGALL ACT........

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#8 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 7:18 PM EDT
                  Rob-2200828

                  Isn't it interesting that the guys that helped induce this collapse and or have been complicit in it are getting paid to figure out how to fix it with our tax money??.....lol

                  • 2 votes
                  Reply#9 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 7:24 PM EDT
                  determined0a1

                  LS did the damage already and now he goes back to pass the bucket to our kids in how a great experience he got in his job in the WH.

                  • 2 votes
                  #9.1 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 7:54 PM EDT
                  Bob-2105772

                  Rob-2200828 it is always a pleasure to read someone's blog who has actually done his/her homework!

                    #9.2 - Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:47 AM EDT
                    Reply
                    Candide and Me

                    I think this is a further indicator of the dire situation of our "governments" economy. It has been "talked out". People want results. Sadly, there is no foreseeable fix, the canary is dead.

                      Reply#10 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 8:01 PM EDT
                      Time will tell

                      I have one question, if it was always his plan to leave why in the hell did Dumbo appoint him? Common sense tells me you want to appoint someone who is fully committed to the task.

                        Reply#11 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 8:05 PM EDT
                        caltha-palustris

                        I hope Brad Setser is in the running for the position, by accounts from his last blog post at CFR he already serves on the NEC.

                        Good riddence to Summers.

                        • 3 votes
                        Reply#12 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 8:12 PM EDT
                        determined0a1

                        Hello Calth, good to read you always.

                        • 2 votes
                        #12.1 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 8:16 PM EDT
                        Reply
                        ray.burchard

                        Lawrence H. Summers, with his Wall Street allegiance, served as the 27th President of Harvard University, until he was encouraged to resign after publicly stating, that the under-representation of women in science and engineering could be due to a "different availability of aptitude at the high end. He also is a member on leave from The National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER.

                        The NBER has declared that America's recession ended in June 2009.

                        NBER with an allegiance to Milton Friedman's ideology where researchers at NBER have become six of the past Chairmen of the President's Council of Economic Advisers. How what segment of the American society do you think this organization represents? Just a guess, could it first be corporate prosperity? The very same prosperity that Wall Street was celebrating and the banker's gave bonuses for, right after congress secretly passed a taxpayer financed bailout, and coincidentally, while the public languished in economic disparity. This is also the reason NBER has an official "Conflict of Interest Policy", to avoid the obvious conclusion of consortium collusion.

                        Now implying republican guidance by proclaiming an unassisted end to the recession, again NBER demonstrates a dual reality disconnect in effect supporting the republican's sponsored agenda, prosperity for a select corporate few. And here is another coincidence, the declaration comes just before midterm elections.

                        • 2 votes
                        Reply#13 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 8:22 PM EDT
                        Bob-2105772

                        You have to be smokin dope to have us believe that NBER is in any way affiliated with ANY form of conservative doctrine! I challenge anyone to do their homework on NBER to discover for themselves who makes up this are of the Socialists, their bios, to whom they offer political support and donations, and determine for yourselve what NBER is all about! Start with the current Chairman and work your way down the list. BTW, Larry Summers was an appointee of the Clinton and Obama Administrations. This idiot advised that AIG and the like was perfectly cabable of policing themselves and defended these thieves from regulation.

                          #13.1 - Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:38 AM EDT
                          ray.burchard

                          Bob, … The point is that even though NBER's current direction is guided by (MIT) and it's membership is comprised by both political parties. NBER's whole premise is designed to support their consensus belief that America is defined, first and foremost. by how prosperous corporate America is. Now you tell me, wasn't this sequenced, consensus belief purchased and further developed by corporate America's deep pockets, or would you have the public believe that this theoretical ideology is America's natural, moral compass?

                          Come on this is uniting the public direction under one banner, corporate greed first then the public good as an afterthought. It doesn't require an advanced degree in economics to recognize that conclusion. What purpose does "trickle down" and "the market will police itself" serve and promote? As if a compulsive fixation like greed, alcoholism, drug addiction could ever, without intervention, control itself.

                          • 1 vote
                          #13.2 - Wed Sep 22, 2010 5:20 AM EDT
                          Reply
                          Texasguy01

                          Bye Bye

                          Go back to Harvard where economic theory's do not get tested in the real world.

                          Teach more fantasy economics to gulable students.

                          Remember Marxist economics always fails under load in the real world.

                          Try running a small business.

                          Get a real lesson in economics.

                          • 1 vote
                          Reply#14 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 8:28 PM EDT
                          jawill11

                          If only he would take Geitner with him. He's the worst choice of adviser by Obama since Rahm Emmanuel.

                          He made his millions with Geitner on Wall Street after convincing Clinton to weaken financial regulations, and now he can go back to making more millions after convincing Obama not to reinstate them.

                          The criticisms of him and Geitner by the GOP are laughable. He has followed the GOP banker-friendly playbook chapter and verse for the last two decades.

                          • 3 votes
                          Reply#15 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 9:38 PM EDT
                          Waylan Jones

                              I think you are all missing the point. This man got himself elected for the purpose of dismantling American society. Why? So he could reshape it into one that he feels is more racially equitable and balanced. We are all (regardless of race) mostly just collateral damage,cannon fodder for his grande, warped vision of what America should be.  We are children who didn't benefit from genius such as his or a Harvard education.  As far as he is concerned it's all for our own good and you can't make a good omelet with cracking a few hundred million eggs.

                          • 1 vote
                          Reply#16 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 9:54 PM EDT
                          Patriot 8888

                          These "eggs" will be all over his face come November!

                            #16.1 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 11:31 PM EDT
                            Reply
                            ziminDeleted
                            Teresa-416352

                            Hmmmm, the Republicans blocked this? Who is in the majority in the Senate? Who passed the health care bill that so many were against? So funny, so childish, such weakness....

                            • 1 vote
                            Reply#18 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 10:40 PM EDT
                            DLMaston

                            Pres. Obama started his tenure in office by surrounding himself with 3 economic theorists with ZERO real world experience, and picked one of the former "bad guys" from Goldman Sachs to lead them in the form of Timothy Geithner. Well....19 months later, it's 3 down and one to go!

                            All 3 theorists figured out that they'd actually been a part of an epic fail situation, and they ran back to the safety and theoretically-protected bubble called academia.....where they can fill thousands of other college kids with theories and ideals that do NOT work in the real world.

                            If our beloved President wants even the most remote chance of maintaining enough credibility to run for re-election, he will now give "Big Tim" the boot and surround himself with real-world economists......might I suggest the economists from Clinton's administration perhaps?.....and right the ship. It is his last best hope......and did I mention that he's only in the 19th month of his administration?

                            He's got to drop this whole plan to redistribute the wealth of our great nation to the 3rd world nations and focus on righting the wrongs.....not only from the last administration, but the damage HIS administration has done as well.

                              Reply#19 - Tue Sep 21, 2010 11:12 PM EDT
                              Bob-2105772

                              Talk about the "fox guarding the hen house"! This guy who helped "create" our financial crisis, is put in charge by the Obama administration to "turn it around"??? You have got to me kidding me!

                              Read this from Wikapedia: (You can't make up stuff this good!)

                              Summers' role in the deregulation of derivatives contracts

                              On May 7, 1998, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) issued a Concept Release soliciting input from regulators, academics, and practitioners to determine "how best to maintain adequate regulatory safeguards without impairing the ability of the OTC (Over-the-counter) derivatives market to grow and the ability of U.S. entities to remain competitive in the global financial marketplace." [18] On July 30, 1998, then-Deputy Secretary of the Treasury Summers testified before congress that "the parties to these kinds of contract are largely sophisticated financial institutions that would appear to be eminently capable of protecting themselves from fraud and counterparty insolvencies." Summers, like Greenspan and Rubin who also opposed the concept release, offered no proof that the contracts would not be misused by financial institutions. Instead, Summers stated that "to date there has been no clear evidence of a need for additional regulation of the institutional OTC derivatives market, and we would submit that proponents of such regulation must bear the burden of demonstrating that need." [19] This argument suggests that the default position in the disagreement was that Summers, Greenspan, and Rubin were right, and that anyone (i.e., Brooksley Born) who disagreed with them bore the burden of proving their position. In fact, subsequent events have proven that Summers, Rubin, and Greenspan misjudged the dangers posed by derivatives contracts.

                              The lack of regulation that allowed A.I.G. to sell hundreds of billions of dollars in credit default swaps on mortgage-backed securities was a direct result of efforts by the Treasury (first under Rubin and then under Summers), the Federal Reserve (under Greenspan), and the Securities and Exchange Commission (under Arthur Levitt) to deregulate the derivatives markets. The first response to the CFTC Concept Release was issued as a joint statement from Rubin, Greenspan, and Levitt who stated that they "have grave concerns about this action and its possible consequences." [20] Levitt and Greenspan have admitted that their views on this issue were mistaken. Levitt told WGBH in Boston that "I could have done much better. I could have made a difference." Greenspan told a congressional hearing that "I found a flaw ... in the model that I perceived is the critical functioning structure that defines how the world works." [21] [22] When George Stephanopoulos asked Summers about the financial crisis in an ABC interview on March 15, 2009, Summers replied that "there are a lot of terrible things that have happened in the last eighteen months, but what’s happened at A.I.G. ... the way it was not regulated, the way no one was watching ... is outrageous."

                              At the 2005 Federal Reserve conference in Jackson Hole, Raghuram Rajan presented a paper called "Has Financial Development Made the World Riskier?" Rajan pointed to a number of potential problems with the financial developments of the past thirty years. [23] The problems that Rajan considers include skewed incentives of managers, herding behavior among traders, investment bankers, and hedge fund operators who suffer withdrawals if they under-perform the market. Rajan also discusses (on pp. 337–40) the problems associated with firms that "goose up returns" by taking risky positions that yield a "positive carry." This is how the infamous Joseph J. Cassano impressed his superiors at A.I.G. for a decade while sowing the destruction of the firm. [24] During the boom years of the housing market, the credit default swap contracts that A.I.G. Financial Products sold provided a stream of premium payments to the company with no expense stream. That's an example of what Rajan calls "goosing up returns" with latent risk. Rajan asks (on page 388) "If firms today implicitly are selling various kinds of default insurance to goose up returns, what happens if catastrophe strikes?" This is a fair question.

                              The flip side of the trade is equally problematic. Gregory Zuckerman in his book The Greatest Trade Ever about John Paulson's hedge fund recounts the difficulties that Paulson and others had holding on to their bets against the housing market. Even Paulson, whose timing couldn't have been better, spent a great deal of his time persuading investors to persist with the bet against the market. But month after month, millions of dollars were paid out on the credit default swap premia. The investors saw money spent and gone that could have been used to buy assets with rising prices, or at least held safely with a positive yield. As Rajan puts it (p. 338), "it takes a very brave investment manager with infinitely patient investors to fight the trend, even if the trend is a deviation from fundamental value."

                              Justin Lahart, writing in the Wall Street Journal in January 2009 about the response to Rajan's paper at the conference recounts that "former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers, famous among economists for his blistering attacks, told the audience he found 'the basic, slightly lead-eyed premise of [Mr. Rajan's] paper to be largely misguided.'"[25]

                              In a recent paper (on pages 285-87), Steven Gjerstad and Nobel laureate Vernon L. Smith describe more fully (1) the contribution of derivatives to the flow of mortgage funds that supported the housing bubble, (2) the concerns that Brooksley Born had raised about the dangers inherent in these contracts, (3) Summers' contribution to their deregulation, and (4) how these contracts precipitated the collapse of the financial system in 2007 and 2008. [26]

                              On April 18, 2010, in an interview on ABC’s “This Week” program, Clinton said Summers was wrong in the advice he gave him not to regulate derivatives.[27]

                              President of Harvard

                              In 2001, when George W. Bush became President, Summers left the Treasury Department and returned to Harvard as its 27th President, serving from July 2001 until June 2006. He was Harvard's first Jewish president, and received praise from Harvard's Jewish community for his support.[28] However, a number of his decisions at Harvard attracted public controversy.

                                Reply#20 - Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:04 AM EDT
                                Bob-2105772

                                Bottom line, Obama was bought and paid for by George Soros and other wealthy and powerful Socialist Elites to "fundamentally change America" and that is exactly what they are doing by collapsing our economy and redistributing wealth from the free market to selected socialist and their minions! It is a simple as that. You very freedom and mine are what is at stake here. We have only one more chance to save our Republic and that this November.

                                  Reply#21 - Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:24 AM EDT
                                  Bob-2105772

                                  (Sorry, it is too early to be writing!) Correct below:

                                  Bottom line, Obama was bought and paid for by George Soros and other wealthy and powerful Socialist Elites to "fundamentally change America" and that is exactly what they are doing by collapsing our economy and redistributing wealth from the free market to selected socialist and their minions! It is as simple as that. Your very freedom and mine are what is at stake here. We have only one more chance to save our Republic and that is this November.

                                    Reply#22 - Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:27 AM EDT
                                    MS in VA

                                    Don't let the door hit you on the way out, Larry.

                                    I know you probably believe the 'little people' could not possibly discern your 'big thoughts,' but all that came across was sneering disdain for us.

                                    Buh-Bye.

                                      Reply#23 - Wed Sep 22, 2010 7:45 AM EDT
                                      conservative10

                                      Looks to me like Oblamer is starting to get concerned, and he should be. The public outcry is starting to be heard, even in the sound deadened white house. More and more mainstream Americans are starting to question Oblamers policies, judgments amongst other things. Say what you want, lefty viners, that’s what’s helping to fuel the tea party and general political feelings in this Country. Too many people are starting to question or feel betrayed by Oblamer and his policies. Looks like Oblamer is cleaning house, conveniently right before the November mid-terms, to make it look like he really does care and is trying to help. Well, it may be too little too late for his Admin. If the Repubs make some ground in the Senate and House, that will essentially turn Oblamer into a lame duck Pres. He will not have the rubber stamp majority he enjoyed to unquestionably push his agenda through Congress. He will have to fight for and earn everything he gets pushed through Congress. The American people will speak their displeasure by voting out some Dems considered to be Oblamers biggest co-conspirators. Then I’m sure all you lefty viners will whine about Palin, Beck, Fox News and everybody associated with the right ruining your utopian society you Dems enjoyed these last 2 years. Well “it’s the unhappy American Public, not Palin, Beck or Fox News stupid!” That’s what’s costing you politically.

                                        Reply#24 - Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:41 AM EDT
                                        Nadia T. Pugglesworth, III

                                        It'll be interesting to see who replaces him. No economist worth anything would want anything to do with this disaster of an administration. I see more ideological academia types such as Elizabeth Warren gaining more and more control over Obama's economic council which will do nothing for the overall economy since it would reinforce the existing anti-business ideology and environment in the Obama administration. Thankfully the Office of the President doesn't have that much control over the short term economy provided it doesn't issue executive orders establishing wage and price controls and the like; however, setting bad policy can have long lasting damaging effects.

                                          Reply#25 - Wed Sep 22, 2010 12:22 PM EDT
                                          Will_4_Freedom

                                          "While we have much work ahead to repair the damage done by the recession...," Obama said.

                                          A recession is the market attempting to repair the damage done by a bubble. There have been many, but I will give an example using the housing bubble, since that was the cause of the current (not over) recession.

                                          Due to government influence and banker's greed, there were more home buyers than there would have been (CRA, ARMs, etc.). This drove house prices up. Steadily increasing home prices gave a false impression that a home's equity would always go up. Normally prudent people took out second mortgages for a variety of things, not just home improvements. Borrowing from their future windfall when they sold their homes.

                                          But when those adjustable mortgages rates increased, some buyers could no longer afford the payments. Many tried to sell. Some went into foreclosure. This brought about two things. First, people became aware of the dangers of these ARMs. Secondly, more homes were on the market than there were buyers.

                                          Under Free Market principles, those that extended their reach would get burned. For the rest, home prices would drop to "normal" levels... normal being where they would have been had the government not been involved.

                                          The recession would have brought homes down to a price that the market could handle. Another way to look at it is repairing the damage done by Government.

                                            Reply#26 - Wed Sep 22, 2010 12:28 PM EDT
                                            Nadia T. Pugglesworth, III

                                            Well, the recession officially ended in June 2009. Usually at this stage of a recovery GDP and employment is rising fast and it's usually been the case that the deeper the recession the stronger the recovery.

                                            What's happening that most economists and the Obama administration aren't acknowledging is that the U.S. economy and job market is and has been undergoing a radical structural change brought about by productivity gains from the use of automated computer systems and the globalization effects brought about by the internet. Low wage unskilled jobs are still in demand since you can't get robots to clean toilets yet and high wage skilled jobs are still in demand since you need someone to engineer all those high end things. The middle has been hollowed out and will continue to be hollowed out. Until governments and the private sector somehow address that situation, the economy will suffer and the unemployment rate will remain high. All this recession did was help accelerate the structural paradigm shift underway by cutting jobs that would have eventually been cut anyhow.

                                              #26.1 - Wed Sep 22, 2010 12:44 PM EDT
                                              Reply
                                              Leave a Comment:
                                              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                              You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                                              (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                                              Newsvine Privacy Statement
                                              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                              FUN STUFF:
                                              • Leaderboard |
                                              • E-Mail Alerts |
                                              • Top of the Vine |
                                              • Newsvine Live |
                                              • Newsvine Archives |
                                              • The Greenhouse
                                              COMPANY STUFF:
                                              • Code of Honor |
                                              • Company Info |
                                              • Contact Us |
                                              • Jobs |
                                              • User Agreement |
                                              • Privacy Policy |
                                              • About our ads
                                              LEGAL STUFF:
                                              • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                                              • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                                              • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com