Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

$93,000 cancer drug: How much is a life worth?

Sun Sep 26, 2010 11:50 AM EDT
business, health, us, drugs, med, costly, cancer-drugs
Marilynn Marchione, AP Chief Medical Writer
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 4 photos
<p>In this Aug. 16, 2010 photo, patient Bob Svensson is hooked up to a blood infusion machine at the American Red Cross in Dedham, Mass., as he undergoes a $93,000 prostate cancer treatment. The Provenge therapy, approved in April, adds four months' survival, on average, for men with incurable prostate tumors. Bob Svensson is honest about why he got it: insurance paid. "I would not spend that money," because the benefit doesn't seem worth it, says Svensson, 80, a former corporate finance officer from Bedford, Mass. (AP Photo/Elise Amendola)</p>

In this Aug. 16, 2010 photo, patient Bob Svensson is hooked up to a blood infusion machine at the American Red Cross in Dedham, Mass., as he undergoes a $93,000 prostate cancer treatment. The Provenge therapy, approved in April, adds four months' survival, on average, for men with incurable prostate tumors. Bob Svensson is honest about why he got it: insurance paid. "I would not spend that money," because the benefit doesn't seem worth it, says Svensson, 80, a former corporate finance officer from Bedford, Mass. (AP Photo/Elise Amendola)

Advertise | AdChoices

BOSTON — Cancer patients, brace yourselves. Many new drug treatments cost nearly $100,000 a year, sparking fresh debate about how much a few months more of life is worth.

The latest is Provenge, a first-of-a-kind therapy approved in April. It costs $93,000 and adds four months' survival, on average, for men with incurable prostate tumors. Bob Svensson is honest about why he got it: insurance paid.

"I would not spend that money," because the benefit doesn't seem worth it, says Svensson, 80, a former corporate finance officer from Bedford, Mass.

His supplemental Medicare plan is paying while the government decides whether basic Medicare will cover Provenge and for whom. The tab for taxpayers could be huge — prostate is the most common cancer in American men. Most of those who have it will be eligible for Medicare, and Provenge will be an option for many late-stage cases. A meeting to consider Medicare coverage is set for Nov. 17.

"I don't know how they're going to deal with that kind of issue," said Svensson, who was treated at the Lahey Clinic Medical Center in suburban Boston. "I feel very lucky."

For the last decade, new cancer-fighting drugs have been topping $5,000 a month. Only a few of these keep cancer in remission so long that they are, in effect, cures. For most people, the drugs may buy a few months or years. Insurers usually pay if Medicare pays. But some people have lifetime caps and more people are uninsured because of job layoffs in the recession. The nation's new health care law eliminates these lifetime limits for plans that were issued or renewed on Sept. 23 or later.

Celgene Corp.'s Revlimid pill for multiple myeloma, a type of blood cancer, can run as much as $10,000 a month; so can Genentech's Avastin for certain cancers. Now Dendreon Corp.'s Provenge rockets price into a new orbit.

Unlike drugs that people can try for a month or two and keep using only if they keep responding, Provenge is an all-or-nothing $93,000 gamble. It's a one-time treatment to train the immune system to fight prostate tumors, the first so-called "cancer vaccine." Part of why it costs so much is that it's not a pill cranked out in a lab, but a treatment that is individually prepared, using each patient's cells and a protein found on most prostate cancer cells. It is expensive and time-consuming to make.

It's also in short supply, forcing the first rationing of a cancer drug since Taxol and Taxotere were approved 15 years ago. At the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, doctors plan a modified lottery to decide which of its 150 or so eligible patients will be among the two a month it can treat with Provenge. An insurance pre-check is part of the process to ensure they financially qualify for treatment.

"I'm fearful that this will become a drug for people with more resources and less available for people with less resources," said M.D. Anderson's prostate cancer research chief, Dr. Christopher Logothetis.

For other patients on other drugs, money already is affecting care:

_Job losses have led some people to stop taking Gleevec, a $4,500-a-month drug by Novartis AG that keeps certain leukemias and stomach cancers in remission. Three such cases were recently described in the New England Journal of Medicine, and all those patients suffered relapses.

_Retirements are being delayed to preserve insurance coverage of cancer drugs. Holly Reid, 58, an accountant in Novato, Calif., hoped to retire early until she tried cutting back on Gleevec and her cancer recurred. "I'm convinced now I have to take this drug for the rest of my life" and will have to work until eligible for Medicare, she said.

_Lifetime caps on insurance benefits are hitting many patients, and laws are being pushed in dozens of states to get wider coverage of cancer drugs. In Quincy, Mass., 30-year-old grad student Thea Showstack testified for one such law after pharmacists said her first cancer prescription exceeded her student insurance limit. "They said 'OK, that will be $1,900,'" she said. "I was absolutely panicked." The federal health care law forbids such caps on plans issued or renewed Sept. 23 or later.

_Tens of thousands of people are seeking help from drug companies and charities that provide free medicines or cover copays for low-income patients. Genentech's aid to patients has risen in each of the last three years and the company says nearly 85 percent of Americans earn less than $100,000, making them potentially eligible for help if no other programs like Medicaid will pay.

_Doctors and insurers increasingly are doing the cruel math that many cancer patients want to avoid, and questioning how much small improvements in survival are worth. A recent editorial in a medical journal asked whether the extra 11 weeks that Genentech's Herceptin buys for stomach cancer patients justified the $21,500 cost.

Doctors also have questioned the value of Genentech's Tarceva for pancreatic cancer. The $4,000-a-month drug won approval by boosting median survival by a mere 12 days. Here's how to think about this cost: People who added Tarceva to standard chemotherapy lived nearly 6 1/2 months, versus 6 months for those on chemo alone. So the Tarceva folks spent more than $24,000 to get those extra 12 days.

When is a drug considered cost-effective?

The most widely quoted figure is $50,000 for a year of life, "though it has been that for decades — never really adjusted — and not written in stone," said Dr. Harlan Krumholz, a Yale University expert on health care costs.

Many cancer drugs are way over that mark. Estimates of the cost of a year of life gained for lung cancer patients on Erbitux range from $300,000 to as much as $800,000, said Dr. Len Lichtenfeld, the American Cancer Society's deputy chief medical officer.

Higher costs seem to be more accepted for cancer treatment than for other illnesses, but there's no rule on how much is too much, he said.

Insurers usually are the ones to decide, and they typically pay if Medicare pays. Medicare usually pays if the federal Food and Drug Administration has approved the use.

"Insurance sort of isolates you from the cost of health care," and if people lose coverage, they often discover they can't afford their medicines, said Dr. Alan Venook, a cancer specialist at the University of California, San Francisco. He wrote in the New England Journal in August about three of his patients who stopped taking or cut back on Gleevec because of economic hardship.

Two of the three now are getting the drug from its maker, Novartis AG, which like most pharmaceutical companies has a program for low-income patients. About 5,000 patients got help for Gleevec last year, said Novartis spokesman Geoffrey Cook.

"We have seen a steady increase in requests over the past few years" as the economy worsened, he said.

Showstack, whose leukemia was diagnosed last year, gets Gleevec from Novartis. The dose she's on now would cost $50,000 a year.

"I'm not actually sure that I know anyone who could afford it," she said.

Gleevec's cost is easier to justify, many say, because it keeps people alive indefinitely — a virtual cure. About 2,300 Americans died each year of Showstack's form of leukemia before Gleevec came on the market; only 470 did last year.

"I don't think we quibble with a drug that buys people magical quality of life for years," Venook said.

It's unclear whether Provenge will ever do that — it needs to be tested in men with earlier stages of prostate cancer, doctors say. So far, it has only been tried and approved for men with incurable disease who have stopped responding to hormone therapy. On average, it gave them four months more, though for some it extended survival by a year or more.

Until it shows wider promise, enthusiasm will be tepid, said Dr. Elizabeth Plimack a prostate specialist at the Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia.

"I've not had any patient ask for it," she said. "They ask about it. Based on the information, they think the cost is tremendous, and they think the benefit is very small."

Logothetis, at M.D. Anderson, said Provenge and other experimental cancer vaccines in development need "a national investment" to sort out their potential, starting with Medicare coverage.

"It's no longer a fringe science. This is working," he said. "We need to get it in the door so we can evolve it."

___

Online:

Where to get help:

_Genentech: http://www.GenentechAccessSolutions.com

_Novartis: http://www.patientassistancenow.com

_Patient Advocate Foundation, 800-532-5274 http://www.patientadvocate.org

_CancerCare, 866-552-6729 http://www.cancercarecopay.org

_Chronic Disease Fund, 877-968-7233 http://www.cdfund.org

_Healthwell Foundation, 800-675-8416 http://www.healthwellfoundation.org

_Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, 877-557-2672 http://www.LLS.org/copay

_National Organization for Rare Disorders 800-999-6673 http://www.rarediseases.org

_Patient Access Network Foundation, 866-316-7263 http://www.panfoundation.org

_Patient Advocate Foundation, 866-512-3861 http://www.copays.org

_Patient Services, Inc., 800-366-7741 http://www.patientservicesinc.org

© 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Marilynn Marchione's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: United States , Boston
  • Public Discussion (13)
Slinger-958418

Western Medicine is not modern medicine. Sometimes, you have to get back to the basics, and learn again about nutrition and health. Before I would ever take any of these medications I would look to what I am putting into my mouth as food, and not take that pill as a fix all.

Educate yourself and learn about the connection of cancer, and the food you eat. Processed food, and high animal fat, are not good for the body, especially when it is already trying to recover from an illness. People could do themselves a big favor by researching and educating themselves on many of the alternative treatments out there. Start by looking a The Gerson Diet. Organic food, no animal meat, juicing and NO processed ANYTHING. If I was this sick it would benefit me to get back to the basics, and re-learn how to eat foods that have nutrients and not sugar, animal fat.

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Sun Sep 26, 2010 1:12 PM EDT
Matti Viikate

It is expensive to use drugs, it would be different thing for many, if people could actually get well with them permanently. But that is not so common thing to happen.

  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Sun Sep 26, 2010 1:19 PM EDT
take2la

This drug maker PROVES-there isn't ANY money in curing people.

Furious Styles: Why is it that there is a gun shop on almost every corner in this community?
The Old Man: Why?
Furious Styles: I'll tell you why. For the same reason that there is a liquor store on almost every corner in the black community. Why? They want us to kill ourselves.

Boyz n the Hood (1991)

#CORPORTUNISTIC

  • 1 vote
#2.1 - Sun Sep 26, 2010 4:41 PM EDT
Reply
oneforall

I don't want to say what I think should happen to a company that would charge someone $93,000 for a life saving drug. No matter how you roll the dice, health care will always be rationed, restricted, and limited even if it were free for everyone. It is restricted by accessibility to medical facilities. It is limited by the training, expertise, and competency of the health care providers. It is rationed by lack of knowledge, lack of resources, and lack of research. We are mortal beings with a limited existence on this planet. We all want more time to be with loved ones and to enjoy the pleasures of life. Fate is always unkind. Some will survive its throes of torment while others succumb. Policy can only alter the circumstances of life in the way it affects those around us. The value of any life is only as great, as those who support us, deem it to be. Few would object to spending millions to save the life of our President, if necessary, but how much is the life of the man, who sleeps under the bridge, worth?

  • 1 vote
Reply#3 - Sun Sep 26, 2010 3:18 PM EDT
Bdobb

oneforall,

You are so correct. Supporters of these exorbitant drug costs will attempt to rationalize by claiming enormous research and development costs involved. But have you noticed that the standard law of economics hold true with medicine in that supply and demand (moreover demand in this case) dictates cost. Our drug manufacturers run their business very similar to a criminal enterprise...medical STRONG-ARMING or dealing with a health HOSTAGE-RANSOM situation.

  • 4 votes
#3.1 - Sun Sep 26, 2010 6:07 PM EDT
oneforall

If we rely upon the pharmaceutical industry to conduct the research and to determine the best drugs for every ailment, we will always be spoon fed the most expensive medicine. They produce a pill for everything, including a pill to relieve depression when the meds we take for depression leave us feeling depressed. There are natural remedies for some ailments, which work better than any pharmaceuticals, without the dangerous side effects. We are limited to those products sold by Phrma, even if they don't work or happen to cause death - because the government awarded them a contract which runs through perpetuity. They are guaranteed all of our business, which allows them to charge whatever they want. It's just as Congressman Alan Grayson declared on the House Floor, referencing the Republican Health care plan. "Don't get sick, and if you get sick" and you can't afford the medicine, "die, die quickly".

  • 4 votes
#3.2 - Sun Sep 26, 2010 11:58 PM EDT
Reply
W Pearson

Excellent presentation. Compare the costs to other countries. A Canadian Pharmacy on the web

http://www.globalpharmacycanada.com/I/Gleevec-Imatinib-Mesylate-400mg-30-Caps?keyword=Imatinib

Quantity: 30 Caps, Strength: 400mg Our Generic Price: $680.00 (or $23 a capsule)

Is the rapid increase in costs related to PHARMA accepting Obamacare?

    Reply#4 - Sun Sep 26, 2010 10:25 PM EDT
    Tyler Gaetano

    that's pretty expensive, but i think that when you're given a diagnosis of incurable cancer, you're willing to pay whatever it costs to keep yourself alive for a few more months. I know that I would certainly do anything possible to prolong my life, no matter the cost, because once you're dead, your liabilities for payments are gone. glad to see that treatments are improving.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#5 - Sun Sep 26, 2010 10:44 PM EDT
    Gaynel

    Even though it seems treatment is improving, it is slanted and biased. There are things out there that are so much better for you than pharmaceuticals but have effectively been silenced. Did you know that they have found a naturally occurring substance that KILLS some forms of cancer? It's true. There are articles published here, on the Vine, that will tell you the story. We, as a people, need to stand up and scream for change. We are the only ones in charge of us but we seem to have forgotten that. If we could just stop the bickering long enough to figure out that if we banded together instead of picking each other apart and/or allowing "big pharma" to tell us what we "need", we could have some effective changes in our healthcare system.

    If you're interested in a cure for cancer, read some of my posts. (I'm not that good on the computer or I would list them here for you)

    • 1 vote
    #5.1 - Mon Sep 27, 2010 9:37 AM EDT
    Reply
    jdl-28

    Drug companies are over charging and will cause people to die, but isn't that what our government want also. Less people to pay if we all die before social security needs to kick in.

      Reply#6 - Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:41 AM EDT
      Jackie-355788

      Do they have to meet their bonuses for their CEO's? Ridiculous! What's it made out of ? Gold?

        Reply#7 - Mon Sep 27, 2010 9:14 PM EDT
        DEATHNELL J.

        I guess that everyone here can agree that "Death panels" have been around since the beginning's of medicine....I don't see this changing anytime soon. The only thing I see changing is, who gets the blame.....

        • 1 vote
        Reply#8 - Tue Sep 28, 2010 3:42 AM EDT
        TDK227

        I am never taking ANY drug with will only give me a few more months of suffering before I die, no matter who pays for it.

        • 1 vote
        Reply#9 - Tue Sep 28, 2010 3:10 PM EDT
        Leave a Comment:
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
        (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
        Newsvine Privacy Statement
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
        FUN STUFF:
        • Leaderboard |
        • E-Mail Alerts |
        • Top of the Vine |
        • Newsvine Live |
        • Newsvine Archives |
        • The Greenhouse
        COMPANY STUFF:
        • Code of Honor |
        • Company Info |
        • Contact Us |
        • Jobs |
        • User Agreement |
        • Privacy Policy |
        • About our ads
        LEGAL STUFF:
        • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
        • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
        • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com