Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

HPV shot dilemma: Should gay boys be targeted?

Fri Nov 12, 2010 8:13 AM EST
health, kids-and-parenting, only-on-msnbc-com, cancer, men, anal, vaccine, boys, hpv, bisexual
msnbc.com News — By JoNel Aleccia
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 2 photos
<p>ARCHIV - Ein Arzt haelt am 28. August 2006 in seiner Praxis in Chicago, USA, Gardiasil, einen Impfstoff gegen die so genannten Humanen Papilloma Viren (HPV) in seiner Hand.  Impfen kann nach Erkenntnissen der Bundesregierung zuverlaessig gegen Gebaermutterhalskrebs schuetzen. Die Impfung biete einen "beinahe 100-prozentigen Schutz" vor den gefaehrlichsten Typen des Humanen Papillom Virus, heisst es in einer am Montag, 10. Aug. 2009, veroeffentlichten Antwort auf eine Gruenen-Anfrage.  (AP Photo/Charles Rex Arbogast) ** zu APD8266 **  --  FILE -  Dr. Donald Brown holds the human papillomavirus vaccine Gardiasil in his hand at his Chicago office Monday, Aug. 28, 2006. Hailed by many doctors as a breakthrough in cancer prevention, the vaccine prevents infections from four strains of the sexually transmitted human papillomavirus, or HPV, which can cause cervical cancer, other genital lesions and genital warts. (AP Photo/Charles Rex Arbogast)</p>

ARCHIV - Ein Arzt haelt am 28. August 2006 in seiner Praxis in Chicago, USA, Gardiasil, einen Impfstoff gegen die so genannten Humanen Papilloma Viren (HPV) in seiner Hand. Impfen kann nach Erkenntnissen der Bundesregierung zuverlaessig gegen Gebaermutterhalskrebs schuetzen. Die Impfung biete einen "beinahe 100-prozentigen Schutz" vor den gefaehrlichsten Typen des Humanen Papillom Virus, heisst es in einer am Montag, 10. Aug. 2009, veroeffentlichten Antwort auf eine Gruenen-Anfrage. (AP Photo/Charles Rex Arbogast) ** zu APD8266 ** -- FILE - Dr. Donald Brown holds the human papillomavirus vaccine Gardiasil in his hand at his Chicago office Monday, Aug. 28, 2006. Hailed by many doctors as a breakthrough in cancer prevention, the vaccine prevents infections from four strains of the sexually transmitted human papillomavirus, or HPV, which can cause cervical cancer, other genital lesions and genital warts. (AP Photo/Charles Rex Arbogast)

Advertise | AdChoices

— If you thought the controversy over giving the HPV vaccine to girls was heated, just wait for the fight about the boys.

A government health panel is expected to vote soon on whether to recommend vaccinating boys and young men against the human papillomavirus. Since 2006, the vaccine has been advised in girls and young women ages 9 to 26 to prevent cervical cancer and genital warts — though only about a third of those eligible actually have received it.

From the start, arguments about whether to inoculate males against HPV have centered mainly on the benefits for women — and the desire to stop men from transmitting the most common sexually spread infection. The vaccine is approved, but not recommended, to prevent genital warts in males. 

But now, growing evidence shows that the vaccine also may prevent anal cancer, particularly in the high-risk groups of homosexual and bisexual men, who are about 20 times more likely than heterosexuals to develop the disease.

Next week, an advisory panel to the federal Food and Drug Administration will consider whether to recommend expanding use of the vaccine based on clinical data that show it could be up to 78 percent effective in preventing anal lesions and anal cancer in men who have sex with men.

Dilemma: targeted vs. universal vaccine?
If it's approved, it creates a dilemma, say panelists charged with the new decision. Do they opt for a targeted vaccine aimed only at gay and bisexual males? Do they support a universal vaccine for men and boys, perhaps as young as age 9? Or do they continue to exempt males from vaccination altogether?

“It’s a conundrum,” said Dr. James Turner, immediate past president of the American College Health Association and a liaison to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). “The conundrum is many times boys or teenagers don’t really fully understand or clarify their sexual orientation for years.”

That means a vaccine targeted to young men who know they’re gay or bisexual likely wouldn’t reach many of the males who may need it, or reach them early enough. With boys, as with girls, the HPV vaccine is most effective when it’s given before sexual activity exposes people to the virus, health experts say. 

“In general, targeted vaccine programs based on risk factors tend not to be nearly as effective at reaching that population as universal vaccination in that group,” said Turner.

In addition, there’s the danger that the stigma of a vaccine aimed only at young gay and bisexual boys and men would hinder use.

“I’m advocating it for all boys,” said Turner.

But HPV vaccine critics contend that it’s overkill to recommend vaccinating all boys and men in order to protect a small group from what’s estimated at about 5,000 cases of HPV-related invasive cancers each year.

“It’s hard to imagine why they want to vaccinate all these boys,” said Sheila Rothman, a professor of public health at Columbia University who was an early critic of drugmakers’ eagerness to vaccinate girls against HPV.

“There’s this whole question of vaccinating a whole population with a small risk."

Overall, about 5,260 new cases of anal cancer are diagnosed each year, with about 720 deaths reported, according to the National Cancer Institute. In the general population, about 1.6 people per 100,000 develop anal cancer, with a slightly higher proportion of women to men.

Far higher rates of anal cancer in gay, bisexual males
Among men who have sex with men, however, the rate jumps to about 40 cases per 100,000 men. If those men have HIV, the rate spikes to 80 cases per 100,000 men, research shows.

There are more than 100 strains of HPV, but only a few strains are known to cause most cervical and anal cancers, some head and throat cancers and genital warts. The virus is spread by sexual contact, including intercourse and oral sex, but can also be spread by mere skin-to-skin contact.

About 6 million new HPV infections occur in the United States each year, according to the National Cancer Institute. Most are cleared by the body naturally within a few years, although the most dangerous types persist.

Two vaccines are approved to prevent HPV infection. Merck’s Gardasil, which targets four strains of HPV responsible for most cervical cancer and genital warts, was approved in 2006 for use in girls and women. Last year, the FDA expanded approval of the vaccine to prevent genital warts in boys and men. On Nov. 17, an FDA advisory panel is set to consider expanding the use again to protect against anal lesions and anal cancer in both sexes.

GlaxoSmithKline's Cervarix, which targets two strains of HPV responsible for 70 percent of cervical cancer cases, was approved last year to prevent disease in girls and women.

New data from a Merck clinical trial of 602 men who have sex with men showed that the vaccine was 78 percent effective in preventing certain anal lesions and cancers in the high-risk group.

Merck scientists are urging the FDA to extrapolate efficacy in gay and bisexual men to the larger population of all men — and women.

"The key concept is that the disease is same in everybody," explained Dr. Elizabeth Garner, director of clinical research for Merck Research Labs. "They happen to be men who have sex with men, but the disease is the same in everybody and it should work in the same way."

But critics like Columbia's Rothman argue that while vaccine use in gay and bisexual men may be important, that doesn't argue in favor of wider vaccination.

The three-dose series of the vaccine is expensive, about $100 for each shot, and, despite government analyses and assurances of safety, Rothman and others are concerned that the vaccine hasn’t been used long enough to be certain.

“I can imagine an educational campaign targeted at a small group,” Rothman said. “Of course, that would mean Merck and GlaxoSmithKline would get less sales.”

Together, the HPV vaccine makers posted sales of nearly $111 million last year, based on wholesale acquisition costs. So far this year, sales have totaled nearly $74 million, according to data from research firm Wolters Kluwer Pharma Solutions.

Is benefit worth the cost?
The main arguments against vaccinating boys have been that the vaccine is expensive, and that it’s not cost-effective to do so, said Dr. Lauri Markowitz, a expert in sexually transmitted diseases with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention who is heading the ACIP HPV workgroup. She said panel members who support recommending the vaccine for males won't be swayed solely by the benefit to gay and bisexual men.

But that argument may be tempered by a new study by a Harvard University researcher that showed a targeted HPV vaccination of men who have sex with men is likely to be a cost-effective way to prevent deadly disease specifically in that population.

So far, use of the HPV vaccine in girls has been limited. About 44 percent of eligible girls get the first dose of the vaccine, but only about 27 percent get all three doses, according to latest data from the CDC.

That’s mostly spurred by parents’ worries over potential safety risks — and by their reluctance to immunize their young daughters against sexually transmitted disease, said Shannon Stokley, a researcher from the CDC's National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases.

More than half of parents in a recent survey said they were not likely to vaccinate their daughters against HPV, and the top reason was that the girls were not yet sexually active, Stokley told the ACIP panel.

For comparison, less than 1 percent of boys have been vaccinated at HPV so far, ACIP presenters said.

Vaccine for boys ‘a tough sell’
If parents feel so strongly about not vaccinating girls, they’ll likely feel the same about their boys, said Amie Newman, the mother of an 11-year-old son and managing editor for the reproductive health blog RH Reality Check.

“I think it’s going to be a tough sell, personally, to get parents to vaccinate their male pre-teens before they’re sexually active,” said Newman, 41, who lives in Seattle.

Throw in the issue of homosexuality or bisexuality and receptiveness will decline even further, predicts Rothman, the Columbia University expert.

“I think parents are just going to shun it for boys,” she said.

But those parents might be doing their sons — and daughters — a disservice, said Liz Margolies, executive director of the National LGBT Cancer Network, an advocacy group. Sexuality is fluid and even people who don't expect to be exposed to HPV — such as those in a long-term relationships — might be, she noted.

"I believe all males, and all females, ought to be vaccinated without question," she said.

Discussion about whether to recommend vaccination of boys is intense and ongoing, said the CDC's Markowitz, who expects a vote early next year.

“There’s no consensus on that yet,” she said. “I don’t know myself.”

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • JoNel Aleccia's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (7)
Robert-1126350

But that argument may be tempered by a new study by a Harvard University researcher that showed a targeted HPV vaccination of men who have sex with men is likely to be a cost-effective way to prevent deadly disease specifically in that population.

An industry funded study says to use it's vaccine. How convenient.

    Reply#1 - Fri Nov 12, 2010 11:49 AM EST
    Travis E.

    If this article doesn't convince people that sodomy is against nature, then I do not know what will. I am totally for gay rights and I believe that two men or two women should be able to do what they want.But sodomy, both straight and gay, is fundamentally wrong.

    • 3 votes
    Reply#2 - Fri Nov 12, 2010 2:40 PM EST
    EdFL

    It's really a no-brainer. The vaccine protects all partners...male or female. It should be given to everyone regardless of gender or orientation. The virus does not care whether a person is male or female...gay or straight. We shouldn't either.

      Reply#3 - Fri Nov 12, 2010 2:42 PM EST
      Robert-1126350

      It should be given to everyone regardless of gender or orientation.

      The virus does not care whether a person is male or female...gay or straight. We shouldn't either.

      Nice cliche but risk factors are highly associated with the cancers from this virus. It's not killing everyone indiscriminately. These risk factors are modifiable without the use of an unproven vaccines.

      BTW the vaccine has NEVER been shown to prevent ONE single case of cancer.

        #3.1 - Fri Nov 12, 2010 2:51 PM EST
        EdFL

        The vaccine has not been out long enough for long term epidemiological studies (obviously) on it's effect on cancer. The vaccine HAS been shown to reduce infection rates. If we can boost people's immunity against a virus known to cause warts and cancers, then we should do it. We protect people and their partners. Targeting people based on "risk factors" leave many people exposed. One person may have a risk factor, but their partner may not, and vice versa. So just protect everyone...everyone benefits, and so do their partners.

          #3.2 - Sat Nov 13, 2010 2:25 PM EST
          Robert-1126350

          So just protect everyone...everyone benefits, and so do their partners

          But, everyone doesn't benefit. People who would have never contracted papilloma related virus could not benefit and the people who are killed or permanently injured by this vaccine do not benefit. This together is a very large group.

          • 1 vote
          #3.3 - Sat Nov 13, 2010 4:41 PM EST
          Reply
          ithinkformyself

          My best friend got it and she didn't get it from a gay man. If we had a vaccine for herpes would we get it? It doesn't kill us but it's been known to make people miserable, let alone being a humiliation. We get many vaccinations for viruses that do not usually kill us. I don't understand what the problem is?

            Reply#4 - Tue Nov 16, 2010 10:37 AM EST
            Leave a Comment:
            You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
            You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
            (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
            Newsvine Privacy Statement
            As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
            FUN STUFF:
            • Leaderboard |
            • E-Mail Alerts |
            • Top of the Vine |
            • Newsvine Live |
            • Newsvine Archives |
            • The Greenhouse
            COMPANY STUFF:
            • Code of Honor |
            • Company Info |
            • Contact Us |
            • Jobs |
            • User Agreement |
            • Privacy Policy |
            • About our ads
            LEGAL STUFF:
            • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
            • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
            • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com