Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Study suggests mammograms under 50 if family risk

Wed Nov 17, 2010 7:01 PM EST
health, eu, cancer, med, breast-cancer, testing
Maria Cheng, Associated Press
Advertise | AdChoices

LONDON — Women in their 40s with a moderately high family risk of breast cancer should get yearly mammograms, a new British study suggests.

Though such testing is standard in the U.S. for that age group with a family history, women in Europe who have an intermediate family risk are not always offered screening if they are under 50.

British researchers followed 6,710 women under 50 who had a moderate breast cancer risk — meaning women who meet criteria such as having one close female relative who had breast cancer in her 40s or younger. Such woman have double to triple the risk of having breast cancer as the average woman.

The women were monitored for about five years and given a yearly mammogram for about four years. A total of 136 women from the group were diagnosed with breast cancer during the course of the study.

Doctors thought it would be unethical to have a comparison group that was not offered screening. So they used two previous studies: of women who were not screened and of breast cancer patients with a family history.

The study was too short to show whether the screening saved lives, but using tumor size and severity, Duffy and colleagues estimated annual mammograms reduced the death rate by 20 percent in women with a moderate family breast cancer risk.

The tumors they found were also smaller and less likely to have spread when compared to women who hadn't been screened and later had cancer. The scientists calculated two women would be saved for every 1,000 women screened over a decade.

The research was published online Thursday in the medical journal Lancet Oncology. It was paid for by the U.K. National Health Service Technology Assessment.

In Britain and elsewhere in Europe, women can get mammograms every two years from age 50 to 70 unless they have a high risk of breast cancer, in which case they may be tested earlier.

"At the moment, whether or not women with a moderate family risk get tested varies considerably," said Stephen Duffy, professor of cancer screening at Queen Mary University of London and one of the study authors.

"We hope our findings will push governments to make this kind of mammography universal for these women."

Policies and opinions vary on whether women at average risk should be screened before 50. A U.S. health task force last year concluded that women at average risk for breast cancer don't need mammograms in their 40s but not all groups agreed with that decision.

"All women over 40, both those at normal risk and intermediate and high risk, should be getting mammograms on a regular basis," said Otis Brawley, chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society. He was not linked to the study.

Karsten Jorgensen of the Nordic Cochrane Centre in Copenhagen said doctors are overtreating breast cancer and many women who are screened will test positive for a cancer that would never have threatened their health.

"Any woman needs to consider the harms and benefits carefully before she decides if she wants to be screened," he said.

____

Online:

http://www.lancet.com

© 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Maria Cheng's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: United Kingdom , London
  • Public Discussion (0)
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
(XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
Newsvine Privacy Statement
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
FUN STUFF:
  • Leaderboard |
  • E-Mail Alerts |
  • Top of the Vine |
  • Newsvine Live |
  • Newsvine Archives |
  • The Greenhouse
COMPANY STUFF:
  • Code of Honor |
  • Company Info |
  • Contact Us |
  • Jobs |
  • User Agreement |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • About our ads
LEGAL STUFF:
  • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com