Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

More than 600,000 people killed by 2nd-hand smoke

Thu Nov 25, 2010 7:02 PM EST
health, eu, deaths, smoking, med, second, hand, second-hand-smoking
Maria Cheng, Associated Press
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 2 photos
<p>FILE - This is a Monday Aug. 25, 1997 file photo of a Chinese man smoking a cigarette while reading to his daughter, under an overpass in Beijing.   Second-hand smoke kills more than 600,000 people worldwide every year, according to a new study. In the first analysis of the global impact of second-hand smoking, researchers analyzed data from 2004 for 192 countries. They found 40 percent of children and more than 30 percent of non-smoking men and women regularly breathe in second-hand smoke.   (AP Photo/Greg Baker, File)</p>

FILE - This is a Monday Aug. 25, 1997 file photo of a Chinese man smoking a cigarette while reading to his daughter, under an overpass in Beijing. Second-hand smoke kills more than 600,000 people worldwide every year, according to a new study. In the first analysis of the global impact of second-hand smoking, researchers analyzed data from 2004 for 192 countries. They found 40 percent of children and more than 30 percent of non-smoking men and women regularly breathe in second-hand smoke. (AP Photo/Greg Baker, File)

Advertise | AdChoices

LONDON — Secondhand smoke kills more than 600,000 people worldwide every year, according to a new study.

In the first look at the global impact of secondhand smoking, researchers analyzed data from 2004 for 192 countries. They found 40 percent of children and more than 30 percent of non-smoking men and women regularly breathe in secondhand smoke.

Scientists then estimated that passive smoking causes about 379,000 deaths from heart disease, 165,000 deaths from lower respiratory disease, 36,900 deaths from asthma and 21,400 deaths from lung cancer a year.

Altogether, those account for about 1 percent of the world's deaths. The study was paid for by the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare and Bloomberg Philanthropies. It was published Friday in the British medical journal Lancet.

"This helps us understand the real toll of tobacco," said Armando Peruga, a program manager at the World Health Organization's Tobacco-Free Initiative, who led the study. He said the approximately 603,000 deaths from secondhand smoking should be added to the 5.1 million deaths that smoking itself causes every year.

Peruga said WHO was particularly concerned about the 165,000 children who die of smoke-related respiratory infections, mostly in Southeast Asia and Africa.

"The mix of infectious diseases and secondhand smoke is a deadly combination," Peruga said. Children whose parents smoke have a higher risk of sudden infant death syndrome, ear infections, pneumonia, bronchitis and asthma. Their lungs may also grow more slowly than kids whose parents don't smoke.

Peruga and colleagues found the highest numbers of people exposed to secondhand smoke are in Europe and Asia. The lowest rates of exposure were in the Americas, the Eastern Mediterranean and Africa.

secondhand smoke had its biggest impact on women, killing about 281,000. In many parts of the world, women are at least 50 percent more likely to be exposed to secondhand smoke than men.

While many Western countries have introduced smoking bans in public places, experts said it would be difficult to legislate further.

"I don't think it is likely we will see strong regulations reaching into homes," said Heather Wipfli of the Institute for Global Health at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles, who was not connected to the study. She said more public smoking bans and education might persuade people to quit smoking at home.

In the U.K., the British Lung Foundation is petitioning the government to outlaw smoking in cars.

Helena Shovelton, the foundation's chief executive, said smoking parents frequently underestimate the danger their habit is doing to their children.

"It's almost as if people are in denial," she said. "They absolutely would not do something dangerous like leaving their child in the middle of the road but somehow, smoking in front of them is fine."

____

Online:

http://www.lancet.com

http://www.who.int/tobacco/en

http://www.lunguk.org

© 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Maria Cheng's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: London
  • Public Discussion (24)
lee_atwater

Propaganda. People die from the diseases mentioned that have never been exposed to second hand smoke. Diet probably killed most of these people.

  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Thu Nov 25, 2010 8:12 PM EST
Marshall James

it is propoganda and the government will use whatever it can to scare people into making the government larger and taking away the masses control of their lives.

and the left wing and the religous right are the nands fo the government doing thisl.

  • 4 votes
#1.1 - Thu Nov 25, 2010 10:38 PM EST
kayci

I think rather, that nothing killed any of these people. They are not actual deaths being reported, but estimated GIGO computer printouts. GIGO: Garbage in, gospel out.

  • 3 votes
#1.2 - Thu Nov 25, 2010 10:42 PM EST
Reply
beibDeleted
harleyrider1989

For starters theres never ever been any deaths to second hand smoke.........

These folks like SAMET are tobacco control,this isnt a study its a propaganda piece from the very beginning. All the second hand smoke trash science is junk,They have wasted billions of dollars to instill prohibition on the entire world......this junk media story seems like there last chance to push there agenda as it dies on the vine and tobacco control goes bankrupt and on life support. W e the free peoples of the world stand up against the tyrrany of the new world order of public health nazism....

I dont use nazi loosely either,Whats going on world wide is nearly a carbon copy of hitlers anti-tobacco program of the 1930s and 40s......all this comming down thru the united nations and their socialist health arm the WHO........

I can debunk every claim they make........every single one of them.....just as any of us fighting the prohibition movement across the world can......

second hand smoke is a joke and odor annoyance maybe to some but a health threat only in the minds of anti-tobacco prohibitionists,even they know they lie.........and whats worse is even our own governments know it. Why would they back bans,becuase the WHO anti-tobacco treaty told all of those who didnt sign the treaty theyd lose world bank loans to shore up their own economies if they didnt!

  • 4 votes
Reply#3 - Thu Nov 25, 2010 10:30 PM EST
kayci

There are many benefits associated with smoking. All of them are being suppressed by tobacco control (TC).

One benefit recognized by the Michael J. Fox Foundation, is "a possible link between cigarette smoking and a lowered risk of PD: the disease is far less prevalent among smokers compared to never-smokers."

http://www.michaeljfox.org/newsEvents_mjffInTheNews_pressReleases_article.cfm?ID=400

  • 2 votes
#3.1 - Thu Nov 25, 2010 11:03 PM EST
Reply
MattInTX

I see the 'tobacco is great' crowd are here in force.

  • 2 votes
Reply#4 - Thu Nov 25, 2010 11:00 PM EST
Dennis Kemmerer

MattInTX wrote:

I see the 'tobacco is great' crowd are here in force.

The posts aren't surprising. As a former long-term nicotine addict, I have first-hand experience with the denial, and I understand where they're coming from.

  • 2 votes
#4.1 - Thu Nov 25, 2010 11:28 PM EST
Bonnie-1034943

I smoked for many years, and was so addicted I thought I would never be able to quit. Luckily, Nicorette came out! I was so short of breath, it scared me. My father died of emphysema, my mother, also a smoker, now has it. My sisters and brother all smoke, and are very unhealthy because of it. They are short of breath, and when they get sick, it takes a long time for them to recover.

I was able to quit smoking, start working out, and became an aerobic instructor, personal trainer, and runner...all of which would not have been possible if I were still smoking. I also had my third child, and not a single problem during my pregnancy...my second child almost died when I was pregnant with him, due to the fact that cigarette smoking can cause the placenta to rip away, which is what happened when I was pregnant with him. We both came within a hair of dying because of it.

I grew up without my father, whom I loved very much, all because he was unable to give up his addiction to cigarettes...

I know it is a difficult thing to give up. I struggled for many years. But when I saw how much damage it was causing me, I knew something had to be done, and thankfully that was when Nicorette came out.

Riding in a car with a smoker, being in a house with a smoker, is miserable to me. I hate it.

  • 1 vote
#4.2 - Sun Nov 28, 2010 12:04 PM EST
Charles Drumm

Freedom of Personal Choice is Great. I don't believe Prohibition is Great. I don't believe Big Government intrusion is great. We are heading more and more to allowing Government make dicisions for us. Let's remove Government from our personal lives.

    #4.3 - Wed Dec 1, 2010 12:17 AM EST
    Reply
    harleyrider1989

    More ill informed smoker bashing. I do not think the authors would argue with me that smoking over the last 60 years smoking has more than halved (UK 1948 66% of the population, 2009 22.5%) but asthma has risen by 300% (again in the UK). So smoking is not the primary cause of asthma and atopy, I assume the doctor’s cars and industrial pollution. The inconvenient truth is that the only studies of children of smokers suggest it is PROTECTIVE in contracting atopy in the first place. The New Zealand study says by a staggering factor of 82%.

    “Participants with atopic parents were also less likely to have positive SPTs between ages 13 and 32 years if they smoked themselves (OR=0.18), and this reduction in risk remained significant after adjusting for confounders.

    The authors write: “We found that children who were exposed to parental smoking and those who took up cigarette smoking themselves had a lower incidence of atopy to a range of common inhaled allergens.
    “These associations were found only in those with a parental history of asthma or hay fever.”

    They conclude: Our findings suggest that preventing allergic sensitization is not one of them.”

    http://www.medwire-news.md/…/…gic_sensitization...

    This is a Swedish study.

    “Children of mothers who smoked at least 15 cigarettes a day tended to have lower odds for suffering from allergic rhino-conjunctivitis, allergic asthma, atopic eczema and food allergy, compared to children of mothers who had never smoked (ORs 0.6-0.7)

    CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates an association between current exposure to tobacco smoke and a low risk for atopic disorders in smokers themselves and a similar tendency in their children.”

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubm…pubmed/ 11422156

    In conclusion let’s have a balanced debate and not characterise smokers as race akin to the devil.

    There have been 34 studies into lung cancer and exposure to cigarette smoke as a child. 3 suggest a raised risk, nearly four times as many 11 suggest PROTECTION with 20 suggesting no raised or reduced risk. The most famous is the World Health Organization 1998 study which concluded:

    "Results: ETS exposure during childhood was not associated with an increased risk of lung cancer (odds ratio [OR] for ever exposure = 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.64–0.96)."

    "Conclusions: Our results indicate no association between childhood exposure to ETS and lung cancer risk."

    This actually suggests as the upper limit is <_1.0 it="it" is="is" a="a" protection="protection" against="against" lung="lung" cancer.="cancer." p="p"></_1.0>

    In 2008 this paper was produced in America and concludes that nictotine and hence active smoking and passive smoking leads to less asthma. It also gives the aetiology (causation) why nicotine and the biologial process that reduces asthma in recipients.

    The results unequivocally show that, even after multiple allergen sensitizations, nicotine dramatically suppresses inflammatory/allergic parameters in the lung including the following: eosinophilic/lymphocytic emigration; mRNA and/or protein expression of the Th2 cytokines/chemokines IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, IL-25, and eotaxin; leukotriene C4; and total as well as allergen-specific IgE. unequivocally show that, even after multiple allergen sensitizations, nicotine dramatically suppresses inflammatory/allergic parameters in the lung including the following: eosinophilic/lymphocytic emigration; mRNA and/or protein expression of the Th2 cytokines/chemokines IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, IL-25, and eotaxin; leukotriene C4; and total as well as allergen-specific IgE. ”

    http://www.jimmunol.org/cgi/content/abstract/180/11/7655

    • 2 votes
    Reply#5 - Thu Nov 25, 2010 11:44 PM EST
    fstwarrior

    Hmmmm - .013148% - yup, I'm worried.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#6 - Thu Nov 25, 2010 11:46 PM EST
    Aminal

    Ah!, That explains Overcrowding, 600.000 EACH year?,, Who the Hell is doing the Math?, There is only 6 to 8 Billion People in the World, OMG! WE'RE GONNA DIE!,,,,,LMAO

    • 2 votes
    Reply#7 - Fri Nov 26, 2010 1:41 AM EST
    randyr1

    I wrote an article about how unfair the worldis treating cigarette smokers. If anyone really be livesthis stat about second hand smoke the health groups that do these studies have finally made you believe what they have been lying about for years. I have smoked for over 40 years, app 2 packs a day. If all of these studies are "true" I should have been dead years ago. One thing that these groups fail to tell you is that they make millions of dollars every year in sales of drugs to help people to quit smoking and by getting them into groups that they have to pay for to help them quit smoking. When are people going to learn that these people are lying to them. We have another 1,000 cancer causing toxins in the air that we all breathe in every day of our lives. Do you really think that a reputable Doctor is going to say that any person died only from the second hand smoke that they have breathed in and nothing else had any influenceon their cancer? Not likely.

    • 3 votes
    Reply#8 - Fri Nov 26, 2010 5:03 AM EST
    jameseg

    I do not like breathing second-hand smoke and am firmly convinced that it is very harmful.

    However, I have to agree with commenters who doubt the accuracy of the specifics of the article. Obtaining accurate data on the number of deaths and illnesses caused by second-hand smoke isn't easy.

    • 3 votes
    Reply#9 - Fri Nov 26, 2010 5:54 AM EST
    harleyrider1989

    Its real easy just enter 000000000000000000000000

    • 2 votes
    #9.1 - Fri Nov 26, 2010 8:03 AM EST
    Reply
    Big Brother Commission

    Second hand smoke is right up there with Tuberculosis and Malaria when it comes to the huge amount of deaths annually.

      Reply#10 - Sat Nov 27, 2010 1:22 PM EST
      topfive

      If my young son (who skipped a grade) is President someday, the first thing he said he will do is abolish smoking. He gets it. He has watched his mother make changes in healthcare that would seem impossible to accomplish. People are generally weak and followers...that's why they smoke to begin with. The first question a potential parent should ask themselves is if they are too selfish to quit smoking, should they be parents to begin with? In this day and age there are still women smoking through pregnancy. Why ready a new baby's room when you have already taken away it's health? VERY HYPOCRITICAL!

      • 1 vote
      Reply#11 - Sat Nov 27, 2010 7:59 PM EST
      Charles Drumm

      Abolish Smoking? Should we return to an era of Prohibition? We do have many with prohibitionist attitudes. What about if we remove Government, and allow private business owners to decide what level of accommodation, if any, they wish to offer. Consumers would decide where to eat, drink, etc. based on private preferences. If you are fiercely against smoking, indulge yourself in a smoke free environment. This would preserve the Liberty, of Freedom of personal choice. I believe in accommodation for everyone; NOT PROHIBITION.

        #11.1 - Wed Dec 1, 2010 12:04 AM EST
        Reply
        SavickConn

        Smoking causes illness and death. I know this first hand and without any kind of study. My father was a chain smoker. All during my childhood I smelled like an ashtray. My little brother has asthma, my mother suffers from COPD, and my father is now dead from emphysema. Wake up people!

          Reply#12 - Sun Nov 28, 2010 5:33 PM EST
          Jane-2733941

          There has never been one decent, well done, non-biased, study that has proven second hand smoke to cause cancer. Not a single one. It's a shame that this "so-called" medical writer would peddle this crap. Some people will do anything to make a buck

          • 1 vote
          Reply#13 - Tue Nov 30, 2010 12:14 PM EST
          Jane-2733941

          There have not been any non-biased, decent, scientific studies that have proven that second hand smoke causes cancer. Even the WHO, very anti-smoking, couldn't prove a link with their own study. It's a shame that this "so-called" medical writer would peddle this garbage. Some folks will do anything to make a buck.....very sad

          • 1 vote
          Reply#14 - Tue Nov 30, 2010 12:20 PM EST
          Charles Drumm

          The message is delivered, but will face no scrutiny, or challenge. This report is symbolic of all that we have heard about passive smoke for many years. This report is another example of how people are informed about passive smoke. It will have a great influence on the populace, and even perhaps on State Legislatures who will point to it as a reason for more smoking bans. The World Health Organization, The American Cancer Society, and others weild tremendous influence, of how the populace is informed on smoking and passive smoke. Some people like myself, believe it creates an extremely unbalanced form of Journalism. Many people will read this report and become convinced that smokers are killing innocent women and children. It is likely to further increase the already high state of hostility directed at tobacco consumers. Until the public masses demand more accountability, and accept less Carte Blanche of what is being reported, it seems inevitable of where we are going.

            Reply#15 - Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:00 PM EST
            Charles Drumm

            Freedom of personal choice is Great. Prohibition is not Great. Big Government Intrusion is not Great.

              Reply#16 - Wed Dec 1, 2010 12:48 AM EST
              Charles Drumm

              I wanted to respond to Martin TX: Freedom of Personal Choice is Great. Prohibition is not Great. Big Government intrusion is not Great.

              I wrote this in response to Martin TX who commented. I see the Smoking is Great crowd are here in Force.

                Reply#17 - Wed Dec 1, 2010 12:53 AM EST
                Leave a Comment:
                You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                Newsvine Privacy Statement
                As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                FUN STUFF:
                • Leaderboard |
                • E-Mail Alerts |
                • Top of the Vine |
                • Newsvine Live |
                • Newsvine Archives |
                • The Greenhouse
                COMPANY STUFF:
                • Code of Honor |
                • Company Info |
                • Contact Us |
                • Jobs |
                • User Agreement |
                • Privacy Policy |
                • About our ads
                LEGAL STUFF:
                • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com