Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Fast growth in service sector hints at more hiring

Thu Feb 3, 2011 8:36 AM EST
business, politics, us, economy
Christopher S. Rugaber, AP Economics Writer

FILE - In this Jan. 26, 2011 file photo, job seekers line up for a job fair at a hotel in Dallas. The number of people applying for unemployment benefits fell last week, after bad weather contributed to a spike in the number of those seeking benefits the previous week. (AP Photo/LM Otero, file)

Advertise | AdChoices

WASHINGTON — The U.S. service sector, which employs nearly 90 percent of America's work force, grew in January at the fastest pace in five years. The report capped a string of data Thursday that pointed to an expanding economy and stronger hiring.

The Institute for Supply Management, a private trade group, said Thursday its index of service sector activity rose to 59.4 last month. That was up sharply from December's reading of 57.1. It was the 14th straight month of growth and the highest reading since August 2005.

Any reading above 50 indicates expansion.

The economy's service sector includes everything from retailers and hotels to health care companies and financial services. Service industries are benefiting from a more confident consumer spending more freely.

Manufacturing and the service sectors are now growing at pre-recession rates, and economists expect that will translate into more hiring in the months ahead.

The government is set to issue its January employment report Friday. Economists are predicting a net gain of 146,000 jobs last month, though some suggest it could be higher based on the latest economic data.

"Growth and employment have picked up in January," said John Ryding, an economist at RDQ Economics. "The economy is on a more robust growth path in early 2011."

Also Thursday, retailers reported solid January sales gains, defying fears that snowstorms would inhibit shopping. Costco Wholesale Corp, Victoria's Secret parent Limited Brands and Macy's Inc. all posted increases that beat Wall Street expectations.

And U.S. factory orders rose in December, the Commerce Department said. Orders were pushed up by demand from businesses for machinery and communications equipment. Orders have now risen in five of the past six months.

Earlier this week, the ISM trade group said factory activity in January expanded at the fastest pace in nearly seven years.

Another positive sign: Fewer people applied for unemployment benefits, reversing a spike from the previous week largely caused by harsh winter weather.

Applications fell to 415,000, the Labor Department said. That resumes a downward trend that took shape late last year and gave rise to hopes that employers would step up hiring.

Applications are well below their peak of 651,000, reached in March 2009, when the economy was deep in recession. Fewer than 425,000 people applying for benefits is consistent with modest job growth. But applications would need to fall consistently below 375,000 to signal a likely decline in the unemployment rate.

In a separate report, Labor said productivity — the level of output per hour worked — rose 2.6 percent in the final three months of last year. That's slightly higher than the previous quarter. Still, the trend in productivity growth has been declining. That indicates employers may need to step up hiring soon if they want to expand.

The report on the service industry bolstered the notion that companies may be ready to add workers. The services employment index rose to 54.5, the highest since May 2006. The employment indexes in the manufacturing and service sector indexes both rose in January.

Employers will likely create a net 2.2 million jobs this year, according to a survey of economists taken last month by The Associated Press. That's double the number of jobs generated in 2010.

Consumers are forecast to spend a little more freely, boosting economic growth to about 3.2 percent in 2011 from 2.9 percent in 2010. But the economy would need to grow much faster — closer to 5 percent for a year — to substantially reduce unemployment.

Analysts project that the unemployment rate will fall to 8.9 percent by the end of this year, according to the AP Economy Survey.

__

AP Writers Martin Crutsinger and Anne D'Innocenzio contributed to this report.

© 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Christopher S. Rugaber's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (33)
Phazfun

Yeah, because they are no longer eligible and aren't making the weekly claims. Ready for more home foreclosures? All from a bailout to help the wealthy. What family values does the government have in our lives messing with what they do? NONE!

  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 9:53 AM EST
Nicey-1026620

Yeah, because they are no longer eligible and aren't making the weekly claims.

The economy is constantly churning claims cause there are 138 million people working. The drop is largely due to the stabilization of the economy as opposed to the peak in early 2009 when the bottom was dropping out.

  • 2 votes
#1.1 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 10:50 AM EST
Phazfun

The economy always goes up and down and usually goes up after it crashes. Having banks make loans easier might have helped tremendously more, but some just seem to always want to hold things back or scare us into a crash.

We will never know the true number of the unemployed. Is it like the census? They say fill out your form, but still know how many didn't fill it out? What is the true way unemployment is calculated? Household surveys?

Also about the economy, why scare us with Egypt and gas prices? If gas goes up, the economy will suffer some more and what are we doing about that if at all? We will run out of the stuff so don't expect economies to get better by much. The US hit it's peak production in 1970, the world on a whole will reach its peak sooner than you think.

We need better thinkers in power and a plan for the future, not what we have today where nothing gets done.

    #1.2 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 11:19 AM EST
    valspully

    May analyst beliee that the market goes in cycles, one accountant which created the "Elliott wave principle" believes that the cycles have nothing to do with whose political party is in power.

    But with Amrica having 4 depressions, 6 panics, 35 recessions in America in it's history all the way up to Obama's great recession, you would think that Americams or at least the govt would know how to act. But we have a grasshopper governement which unlike the squirrel gathers no nuts for winter,m so when the next Depresssion or recession or panic comes around will the Govt be prepared. Probably noy. The marketplace will continue to make corrections and the further out of whack we get the bigger the correction.

    We have now spent ourselves out of any suplus to save for rainy days or deppressionwithout it hurting our financial stability. Maybe one day we will find an administration not so apt to spend, rather to save for the hard times that will surely come. Much to the Democrats chagrin FDR nor Obama could stop an econmic crisis from happening nor can governmental regulation solve the problem. FDR tried it and taxed the wealthy at 94 percent and it did not stop job losses nor did it fix the problem. In fact FDR's solutions made things worse. (see Ucla study on deppression)

    Next time you dig yourself into a whole you cant crawl out of, see what happens if you dig some more. point: you cant dig your self out...digging got you in, but you cant get yourself out that way. Just like the miners in Chile, someone dug them out and now they are indebted to those people like we to the Chinese, not the best plan . Time to think about the story of the grasshopper and the squitrrel and rather than spend save up. recessions and depressions are coming, would it be nice to have a trillion set aside just for the occasion?

      #1.3 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 12:00 PM EST
      cjcold

      The drop is due to the fact that companies have already pared down the workforce to the bare minimum. It has nothing to do with more people going back to work. The "rate" is a joke and does not reflect true unemployment, just those initially going to the unemployment office. The true rate is over 20% and climbing.

      • 2 votes
      #1.4 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 12:00 PM EST
      PAVenturer

      Phaz - if you're going to be a pessimist you need to pick an angle and stick with it. You say:

      Ready for more home foreclosures?

      Then you say:

      Having banks make loans easier might have helped tremendously more

      People are going back to work. Business is picking up. I am a Purchasing Manager for a manufacturing company. Our orders are up. We are producing more. Downstream our suppliers are producing more. Capacities are filling and lead times are extending. All signs that the wheels are beginning to turn. Employment is a trailing indicator. Just as when the economy tanked, jobs were the last thing to go, they will be the last thing to come back. We measure headcount per revenue dollar as do many companies. When companies are confident that business is picking up and will maintain then people will be hired. That optimism is starting to show. Many of my suppliers are starting to hire. We have hired a few but we have some other issues that are holding us back right now.

      Many are going to find negative angles because they don't want anything positive to happen under President Obama. By the time he finishes his second term we will be better off than we have been in decades.

        #1.5 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 12:32 PM EST
        Phazfun

        valspully

        Obama's great recession

        HAHAHAHA, Economic Stimulus of 08. Deregulation causing the only time to fog a mirror to get a home loan in history!!

        PAVenturer,

        Phaz - if you're going to be a pessimist you need to pick an angle and stick with it.

        What? I can't see from both sides of the boat? You don't know how to deal with opinions and has no label? I certainly am not holding my breath with the obstructionist party of no looking out only for the rich. There was a time when they cared about the middle class. Right now it looks way to much like the fall of Rome.

        Just as when the economy tanked, jobs were the last thing to go

        It didn't take long for jobs to go, 3 months after bush' bailout and economic checks I saw the first. I guess that's why the uninformed, like above, think it's the guy that took over's fault for the depression/recession. No need to lecture on the common sense of how an economy comes back from the depths of h.e. dbl toothpicks as the rich play their games at our expense. Some say home values won't come back till 2015, that would mean jobs won't either till then.

        Everyone I have spoke to has cut many jobs just keeping heads above water and are overworking the employees they still have. I do hope optimism will prevail in the GOP for the middle class someday soon. Otherwise we are in for a long messy road. Our politicians won't be doing much for the next 2 years because they think they need to campaign soon and it won't be doing much for the economy with more bickering, lies and propaganda that is the "norm" now I guess.

        Have a good day and tell someone else to stick with it.

          #1.6 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 2:36 PM EST
          Phazfun

          PAVenturer

          The loans I spoke of were for small business, they don't even offer those products I was told, believe me I tried. Small business helps the economy more than a Wal Mart that does nothing but think of ways to make more at our expense. Try and take the bags from me? I recycle the plastic ones...gheesh.

            #1.7 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 2:54 PM EST
            PAVenturer

            Phaz - my bad! I misunderestimated your response. I think you and I have similar views. I just misunderstood. Carry on!

              #1.8 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 3:40 PM EST
              Nicey-1026620

              The drop is due to the fact that companies have already pared down the workforce to the bare minimum.

              There are many factors. And while it may be true that many companies have cut very far, you can always cut farther if things get worse. So....

              Then you also have other converging evidence, GDP growth, industrial activity growth, survey of employers indicates more expect to hire this year, the last 4 or 5 months have had net positive job creation.

              The "rate" is a joke and does not reflect true unemployment, just those initially going to the unemployment office. The true rate is over 20% and climbing.

              The rate has nothing to do with people going to the unemployment office. That has nothing to do with how the U3 "official" unemployment rate is established by the BLS.

              • 1 vote
              #1.9 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 4:11 PM EST
              Reply
              Vote Dem Out!!

              Go Republicans!

              • 1 vote
              Reply#2 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 10:04 AM EST
              lee_atwater

              As in go away !

              • 4 votes
              #2.1 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 10:11 AM EST
              blaze1024

              I wonder how long it will be before the house republicans and teabagers try and take credit for this. I'm sure in the twisted minds of a few teabagers they might actually believe their failed repeal attempt is responsible for creating jobs. When in fact all they really accomplished was wasting scarce tax payer dollars

              • 5 votes
              #2.2 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 10:25 AM EST
              Phazfun

              Eventually the economy has to come back because the rich miss swimming in more cash they know what to do with. They need us to start whipping out our equity credit cards again.

              • 1 vote
              #2.3 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 10:34 AM EST
              huskergal

              Fewer than 425,000 people applying for benefits is consistent with modest job growth. But applications will need to fall consistently below 375,000 to signal a likely decline in the unemployment rate.

              We are making progress under Obama. Those lower numbers of those applying are consistent with the modest job growth that we are seeing and that is good news.

              The bad news is that are more disgruntled workers as well, those that fell off the unemployment rolls. It is too soon after the granting of extensions to know if any or how many have fallen off; but there had to be some whose benefits were not extended.

              There is still the option for those that are unemployed to find a demand and fill it. It may be slow going at first, but the potential is tremendous.

              • 1 vote
              #2.4 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 10:39 AM EST
              cjcold

              VDO is an obvious troll. Please don't feed.

              • 1 vote
              #2.5 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 12:13 PM EST
              Vote Dem Out!!

              Go ahead and feed me. I spit out the Dems. They taste nasty.

              • 1 vote
              #2.6 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 1:35 PM EST
              California Militia

              thats what we need. more service industry jobs. that way we dont have to worry about exporting anything for sale to the rest of the world.

              this is why a recession hurts so bad. when you have less money you go out less. those people relying on you to go out lose their jobs for lack of work.

              but if we are mostly building things, when you go out less, less people are affected.

              no wonder there is such a large gap between the rich and the poor.

                #2.7 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 2:40 PM EST
                Phazfun

                #2.5 I so agree cjcold,

                Has no care in the world for his fellow American. It seems to me the same way the GOP acts unless you have money to offer them spreading the wealth upwards. Is that vertical socialism? LOL I'm an independent anyway so I'm immune...

                  #2.8 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 3:58 PM EST
                  huskergal

                  The gap between the rich and the poor has always been there. What we are feeling now s the middle class joining the ranks of the poor. With a global economy, the elite do not need the American middle class anymore.

                  • 1 vote
                  #2.9 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 4:12 PM EST
                  Phazfun

                  Huskergal,

                  I agree, so then when the wealthy have so much money they don't need us, the middle class, to buy their stuff because most of them are bankers, energy suppliers or defense contractors etc? They are all working together so it won't be getting better anytime soon then will it?

                  The gap between the rich and the poor has always been there.

                  That is the entire reason for keeping the tax cuts to the rich so we grow further apart as to not need us even more? Then one has to wonder if this is the next real fall of another society. Once one is no longer dependent, the end is near because we can see they have taken over congress and have not enforced the constitution, only walked on it.

                  They will still need the butler, cook and chauffeur, but when oil runs out, coal runs out and water is all contaminated, acting as if they are so supreme not needing us. What will they do then not knowing how to work everything when we are useless?

                  • 1 vote
                  #2.10 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 5:04 PM EST
                  huskergal

                  Phazfun, the elite are working toward a one world government. They are working toward a one world bank. In time, they will create the middle class again but it will be a one world middle class and will be needed as a buffer between them and the poor masses. They will still use religion and fear to keep the middle class voting with them and the lower class surpressed.

                  • 1 vote
                  #2.11 - Fri Feb 4, 2011 4:58 AM EST
                  Reply
                  lee_atwater

                  According to Fox radio talk show hosts. Unemployment rates are dropping because people are to lazy to look for work. This comes from people that sit on their asses all day and do nothing to add to the countries gross national product.

                  • 4 votes
                  Reply#3 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 10:07 AM EST
                  Auto 101

                  This comes from people that sit on their asses all day and do nothing to add to the countries gross national product

                  You mean like the people that right the article?

                    #3.1 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 10:20 AM EST
                    Phazfun

                    According to Fox radio talk show hosts.

                    HAHAHAHA what a joke those people are, when was the last time they told the truth and were believable in anyway? Got more death panel lies? Lets makeup news just so the sheep will be entertained? At the expense of checks and balances to police the government as in war crimes they can care less about and journalistic ethics. No Pulitzer for that broken story! Where is Wikileaks?

                    • 1 vote
                    #3.2 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 10:28 AM EST
                    Reply
                    doug-900773

                    Blah, blah, blah, blah.........
                    Shut up and show me the money Obama. It's not 2012 yet. Just shut your trap and lets see some action on the debt, tired of you lefties and disingenuous republicans turning my kids future into a life of indentured servitude.
                    Grow a brain, learn basic math and balance the F$%#ing budget!!!!!! If you were not so worried about your political hide and focused on doing the right thing you would find that it IS NOT THAT HARD!

                    • 1 vote
                    Reply#4 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 11:31 AM EST
                    cjcold

                    Thanks to the financial deregulation abuses of Bush and Cheney, it's going to take awhile for the current president to dig us out of it.

                    • 1 vote
                    #4.1 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 12:09 PM EST
                    doug-900773

                    Better reread your recent history, the most damaging deregulation happened on Clinton's watch. Not that I want to defend traitor Bush, but he was so caught up in his pesonal war that he was not pushing much in the way of deregulation. Then there is the fact that legislation is created in congress, not the executive branch.

                    Both entrenched political parties have failed America and Obama is carrying on the tradition.

                      #4.2 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 12:18 PM EST
                      blaze1024

                      Theres an obvious double standard in your post as you absolve Bush from legislation that was created in congress yet hold Clinton responsible for legislation created in congress

                      Then there is the fact that legislation is created in congress, not the executive branch

                      Then you post this ?

                      Better reread your recent history, the most damaging deregulation happened on Clinton's watch

                      The legislation you are referring to was sponsored and cosponsored by republicans.

                      Besides If the republicans were so concerned about it they could have done something about it, after all it was their own legislation. Yet for over 10 years the republicans did nothing but get fat off their own legislation. The only time they bothered to say something was when they knew it was about to blow up in their faces. The Republicans carry just as much if not more blame for it!

                      • 3 votes
                      #4.3 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 12:45 PM EST
                      Nicey-1026620

                      Better reread your recent history, the most damaging deregulation happened on Clinton's watch.

                      Ok....then you said....

                      Then there is the fact that legislation is created in congress, not the executive branch.

                      Ummm....?

                      I assume we're talking about Glass-Steagal, which was spearheaded unilaterally by 3 Publican Senators.

                      The biggest issue I have with Publicans is the pathelogical lying. I get that Dems are corrupt as well. But you get Dems for big government, big spending on social issues and that is what they do.

                      The Publican platform is "we're for small government and fiscal responsibility" and *NOTHING* could be further from the truth.

                      The one time something got thru (Pay-Go) publicans widely thought it would hurt Clinton and the government by limiting their budget and it's the only reason they went along. It actually got government spending under control and coupled with tax raises in 1993 brought government tax revenue as a % of GDP to a peak in 2001.

                      Thank goodness there was no war from 92-2000 (no big war), otherwise I'm sure that congress would have been all too delighted to expand the military budget.

                      Other than that, in 30 years no Publican Administration or Congress has ever limited government or shown fiscal responsibility of any sort. Massive spending under Reagan, Bush I, Bush II and massive expansion of government.

                      6 FICA tax increases in the 80s, Patriot Act, Spending out the a** in the 2000s. I mean, it's not as though spending just started in 2007 or 2009. The trajectory changed in 2001 with the new admin and congress and got going like a run away train. And government spending is very hard to control once it gets started.

                      • 1 vote
                      #4.4 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 4:56 PM EST
                      Reply
                      Fifth Horseman

                      Since you are on this site does it mean that you are not working at a real job or are you one of those that do not have a job? You could be a government worker who sits at their computer and plays. I like being on the dole while my check is not much it is better then having a nasty boss telling me what to do. I have a relative that works in construction who does a little work each year then since he gets laid off, goofs off for the rest of the year until it gets warmer again. In his belief why would he want to be like the other fools and waste his time working when all of those government benfits are for the taking. He might be right since being poor in America is better than being rich when your paid to do nothing.

                        Reply#5 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 12:01 PM EST
                        doug-900773

                        So basically you are a mooch that has no problem eating your own kids to satisfy the disgusting wants of your lazy fat a@@ today. You are vile!

                          #5.1 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 12:07 PM EST
                          Reply
                          johnmcd

                          U.S. service sector, which employs nearly 90 percent of America's work force

                          This is the problem with the US economy. Government grows and grows year after year while China, Japan and Germany are producing most of the world's desirable goods. What if the rest of the world stops watching American TV , sports, and movies and stops listening to its music?

                          Mining, oil, and steel are currently doing very well but the US only wants clean energy and eco friendly wind and solar industries.

                          Perhaps it was wrong to allow services to grow to 90 percent. Get services down to half! Start by reducing government at all levels by 5 percent a year for ten years.

                            Reply#6 - Thu Feb 3, 2011 1:04 PM EST
                            Leave a Comment:
                            You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                            You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                            (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                            Newsvine Privacy Statement
                            As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                            FUN STUFF:
                            • Leaderboard |
                            • E-Mail Alerts |
                            • Top of the Vine |
                            • Newsvine Live |
                            • Newsvine Archives |
                            • The Greenhouse
                            COMPANY STUFF:
                            • Code of Honor |
                            • Company Info |
                            • Contact Us |
                            • Jobs |
                            • User Agreement |
                            • Privacy Policy |
                            • About our ads
                            LEGAL STUFF:
                            • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                            • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                            • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com