Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Obama offers deeper cuts, appeals for budget deal

Sat Mar 5, 2011 6:45 AM EST
us-news, business, politics, us, obama, barack-obama
Erica Werner, Associated Press
In his weekly address President Barack Obama says both parties have a role to play in coming up with a long-term budget that's good for the country.
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 2 photos
<p>President Barack Obama waves after arriving at Andrews Air Force Base, Md., Friday, March 4, 2011.   (AP Photo/Ann Heisenfelt)</p>

President Barack Obama waves after arriving at Andrews Air Force Base, Md., Friday, March 4, 2011. (AP Photo/Ann Heisenfelt)

Advertise | AdChoices

WASHINGTON — President Barack says he's willing to make deeper spending cuts if Congress can compromise on a budget deal that would end the threat of a government shutdown.

Obama's appeal for common ground came Saturday in his weekly radio and Internet address, but lacked specifics on how to bridge the $50 billion gulf that divides the White House and Democratic budget proposal from the deeper reductions offered by Republicans.

The competing plans are headed for test votes in the Senate in the coming week; neither is expected to survive, setting the stage for further negotiations.

The government is running on a temporary spending bill that expires March 18, so the parties have until then to come up with a plan to pay for the remainder of the budget year through September.

"We need to come together, Democrats and Republicans, around a long-term budget that sacrifices wasteful spending without sacrificing the job-creating investments in our future," Obama said.

"My administration has already put forward specific cuts that meet congressional Republicans halfway. And I'm prepared to do more," said Obama.

But the claim that Democrats are meeting Republicans halfway only stands up under the Democratic explanation of the intricate numbers game being played on Capitol Hill.

"We'll only finish the job together — by sitting at the same table, working out our differences and finding common ground," the president said.

Facing a federal deficit of $1.6 trillion, Republican leaders are under pressure from tea partiers to stick to a deep lineup of $61 billion in spending cuts for the current budget year that's been passed by the GOP-controlled House.

Obama has threatened to veto that plan, and a Democratic offer of $6.5 billion in cuts — on top of $4 billion already signed into law — restores money the House GOP cuts from education, health and other programs.

Republicans used their weekly address to reject Obama's approach on the budget.

"You may have heard President Obama say that we need to make sure 'we're living within our means,'" said freshman Rep. Diane Black, R-Tenn. "He's right about that. Unfortunately, his budget doesn't match his words.

"It continues out-of-control spending, it adds to our $14 trillion debt and it adds to the uncertainty that makes it harder to create jobs. Maintaining the status quo — and refusing to offer a credible plan to cut spending — is just unacceptable and inexcusable," she said.

"The American people want us to keep the government running while cutting its cost," Black said

© 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Erica Werner's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: United States , Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (46)
sdjsjsfjsfjsfhDeleted
George-369262

'a budget deal to avert a government shutdown' Shut it down, and be damned....our own government is the biggest threat to the prosperity and happiness of the American people that we face....

  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Sat Mar 5, 2011 7:45 AM EST
an der Lahn

How dare he ask for compromise? Doesn't he realize there was just an election.

The Republicans are too scared to shut down the government - and with the President continually coming out with immediate short term cuts in the billions - they have no footing to stand on. If they wait too long - he'll purpose all of the cuts that sensible people would accept and the Republicans will be demanding for only the unpalatable.

Republican will only vote Republican in this next election. The Democrats need something to energize the turnout and say some of that independent vote. A shut down just might help do that.

  • 1 vote
Reply#3 - Sat Mar 5, 2011 7:54 AM EST
WatchTheOtherHand

This media love-affair with this President is getting laughable. They keep calling the Republicans $61 Billion dollars DEEP cuts. That is NOT DEEP CUTS!!!! Obama wants just $6 Billion in cuts from an entire YEARS budget. Does anyone realize that is how much the government spends in just 8 HOURS!

The $61 Billion the Republicans are requesting is less than ONE WEEK worth of spending. Its less than 5% of the money that we BORROW annually.

The Republican number is a joke at how superficial it is, and the Democrats even want to counter that? People might as well face it, we are DONE as a country. We don't have any kind of responsible leadership from either party.

  • 4 votes
Reply#4 - Sat Mar 5, 2011 8:00 AM EST
an der Lahn

It is laughable. People think that they can cut teachers and federal employee benefits along with some other things like foreign aid and new weapon development and expect everything to be ok.

The Republicans in charge are scared - the Democrats in charge are watching to see anything significant be cut. For the Democrats they'll be quick to point out how much cutting would have to be done to simply cover the Bush tax cut expiration for the 250K + and the cap being raised on contributions to SS and Medicare.

61Billion is significant when you take into consideration the fiscal budget is already 1/2 way over.

Either way the clowns in charge haven't the spine to do anything but attempt to get reelected.

  • 2 votes
#4.1 - Sat Mar 5, 2011 8:06 AM EST
Reply
dfertyouDeleted
Rickeroo

Are we supposed to be impressed when politicians argue over whether to spend 41% or 43% more than we have this year?

  • 1 vote
Reply#6 - Sat Mar 5, 2011 8:34 AM EST
Black Kettle & Sand Creek...lest we forget

At this rate we will all come together - sooner or later, at the soup kitchen. I expect that I'll get to talk to the Oprah their (LOL)

    Reply#7 - Sat Mar 5, 2011 9:01 AM EST
    NOBAMARAMA

    I dont believe in going back. America needs more spending, allot more. Or are one of you going to tell me a nation with a GDP of almost 15 trillion is broke. Wake up and smell the bull@!$%#. 15 Trillion= 55Thousand per person(approximately) in the whole country. Yet the average salary is 19 thousand. Why is that?

    • 1 vote
    Reply#8 - Sat Mar 5, 2011 9:15 AM EST
    mardigan

    More spending, eh? Let's see if we can't help you figure this out. Let's say you make $100 a day but spend $143 a day using your credit card. In 10 days, you will be $430 in debt PLUS interest. In 100 days, you will be $4,300 in debt PLUS interest. In 1,000 days you will be 43,000 in debt PLUS interest. According to your premise, the way to erase one's debt is to increase one's spending. Here is a simple rule of thumb. Increased spending without increased income = deeper debt coupled with compounding interest = you are never going to get out of debt :P

    • 2 votes
    #8.1 - Mon Mar 7, 2011 1:34 PM EST
    NOBAMARAMA

    Your think the rules of debt for the bankers is the same for you and me? Keep believing that talk, and keep wondering why the inequality of wealth is higher here in America then almost any other nation on Earth. Keep protesting to have your rights taken away from you, like a good,loyal, American should. I for one dont feel Im living "beyond my means" as they say for wanting food and shelter.

      #8.2 - Mon Mar 7, 2011 6:17 PM EST
      Reply
      3232_32l

      I blame the whitehouse for all of this, past and present. 2 billion a week in afganistan, 3 billion in promises to Mexico and the list gets longer. Every day more is spent. Why has no one ever mention cutting salaries at the top, cut their benefits. Why is the health care bill good enough for the working class, yet not good enough for them. Why should their health care be free, they are not on the fighting line as the military. They work, half as much as the average worker at twice the pay, retire after 6-8 years with full benefits, health care etc.

      They need to lead by example...............sorry, I use the word lead.

      Cuts have to start somewhere, and as they have already said they are working on the cuts in social security, medicare and medicade.

      I have one problem with the term "entitlement" use by our "guides", (no leadership here) I have been paying since I was 16, how can you call it an "entitlement" when I have paid in, and paid what our guides have told us to pay. We all know that the leaders have stolen from the social security funds for years, almost 3 trillion........and they complain it will be broke soon, makes you wonder why.

      Instead of cutting benefits, increase the taxes that we are already paying. On an average it will not decrease the check that much, but will ensure everyone will get the "benefits" we have been paying for.

      I look at this as a start, and they promised "entitlment" cuts are coming soon. so i will give it time, the 14.5 trillion deficit took years to develop so it cannot be resolved in months.

        Reply#9 - Sat Mar 5, 2011 9:43 AM EST
        an der Lahn

        I suspect if your under the age of 49 then you'll be getting some cuts to your Social Security and if your under the age of 54 you'll be getting cuts to your Medicare.

        That is if the President gets reelected. If he doesn't - the problem will get pushed down the road until after the 2016 election.

        A president can only serve 2 terms so obviously he won't be bold until he is assured a 2nd term. I just wish it was the same with all of these other so call career elected officials that call themselves "public servants". They only serve the public enough to get re-elected.

        • 1 vote
        #9.1 - Sat Mar 5, 2011 10:16 AM EST
        Reply
        Robert in Ohio

        He talks a good game, but a total of $10 Billion is not going to make it

        I would hope that VP BIden is prepared to get the Democrats to the area of $45 Billion at least if he is looking for an agreement.

        The cuts are not going to be from the not approved budget either

        Republicans have made it clear that they want spending back to the 2008 levels and not the bloated levels of 2009 and 2010 and the President is going to have to deal with those facts as well

        He should move hard to sacrifice all the duplicate programs and projects that the GAO discovered, which would quickly yield over $100 Billion

        These cuts will cost some government jobs, but they are jobs that are not needed and wasteful

        I hope the two sides get together quickly

        • 2 votes
        Reply#10 - Sat Mar 5, 2011 10:04 AM EST
        WatchTheOtherHand

        The problem with using actual values like billions and trillions is that the average American doesn't seem to understand the amounts involved.

        Lets turn $1 Billion into a single $1 and $1 Trillion into $1000 dollars just to help people visualize what is being done right now by their government. I will just drop 9 zeros from the actual dollar amounts in this example.

        Using this method all of the money the US federal government takes in per year in actual revenue from taxes from ALL sources for 2011 will be $2,100. With JUST the spending bills that are already in place and not including all of the spending bills that might still be implemented, the government will spend $3,700 in 2011. They have an outstanding credit card bill of $14,000.

        Now to show that they are "serious" about cutting spending, the Republicans have proposed a cut of just $61 dollars from the current years spending. This is means that instead of spending the proposed $3,700 dollars, they would only spend $3,639. Remember, they only made $2100. Pretty ridiculous right.. You can't even really call that a spending cut.

        Here's the kicker. The President and Democrats come along and call that an outraegeous CUT. They only want to cut $6 bucks! Remember, the interest on that credit card alone costs $300 a year to maintain... and they are adding to the credit card $1600 dollars every year, which will only continue to skyrocket the amount of interest being charged.

        Hopefully this puts the argument in perspective for a few people.

          Reply#11 - Sat Mar 5, 2011 10:17 AM EST
          Dehlyn

          The point is People is We need to kick these crooks out. It does take a mental genious to know they are screwing with US. I do not want to live in a england type country and that is where WE are going with these crooks they want control and do you know what they will get it cause you won't stand together and fight for this country. this is the only place for Americans to live and most just want to roll over and give it to someone else while you make jokes and have your fun, what makes you think the new landlord will be better than what WE have???

            Reply#12 - Sat Mar 5, 2011 12:06 PM EST
            Mimsy BorogroveDeleted
            arkpdx

            "But we'll only finish the job together — by sitting at the same table, working out our differences and finding common ground," the president said.

            Wasn't too long ago he said things like

            “We don’t mind the Republicans joining us. They can come for the ride, but they gotta sit in back.

            Isn't this the president who didn't meet with the Republican leadership in congress for the first 18 months of his term?

            Now he's looking for cooperation and compromise?

              Reply#14 - Sat Mar 5, 2011 3:43 PM EST
              bluewildcat

              Isn't this the same president who met on live tv with elected gopers and answered their questions? Yep, i thought so. It is next to impossible to work cooperatively with a group of politicians who said their primary goal is to make sure Mr Obama is a one term president.

                #14.1 - Sat Mar 5, 2011 4:15 PM EST
                Robert in Ohio

                bluewildcat

                You folks on the left just can't let McConnell's statement go can you.

                He stated aloud the goal of every opposition party in the history of the republic, this is nothing new it is always the goal of the opposition to make the President of the other party a one term President.

                Get over it

                • 1 vote
                #14.2 - Sat Mar 5, 2011 6:33 PM EST
                Reply
                canuck-1412024

                I can't beleive how many Americans blame Obama for the nations woes..sad times. Anyone who can do a little research knows the country was already in trouble before he took over. What, does Bush and the Republicans get a free pass.. Some mis informed person on this post stated the deficit was 400 billion when Obama took over...Duh...the bank bailout alone was almost a trillion of which the bank execs immediatly paid them selves huge bonuses.. For what, screwing up the whole entire economy while everyone retirement funds went south. Make them give back that money you say!!! that would be unamerican...they have contracts ect ect. sends the wrong investment message..according to the right wing media.. Fast forward 2 years and those same people are saying its ok to renig on negotiated contracts with the teachers beacause they are so grossly overpaid. What hypocrisy..

                  Reply#15 - Sat Mar 5, 2011 9:33 PM EST
                  Robert in Ohio

                  canuck

                  Pres Bush gets anything but a free pass.

                  The first thing out of any liberal's mouth to explain why anything is wrong or bad is that Bush and Cheney did it and we inherited the problem

                  Well after two plus years it is time for Obamamania to get of their collective a$$e$ and do something. After this long it is no longer Bush's fault, because Obamamania needs to do something. Where in the hell is all that Hope and Change.

                  Do not try the obstructionist argument, if Obamaa is too stupid to govern with a majority how does anyone think he will be effective with a totally hostile Congress after 2012.

                  Hating on rich people and businesses an banks has gotten old and tired.

                  And to the union question, if it is god enough for the federal workers then it is good enough for all public sector employees. After all A democratic President and a Democratic Congress stripped the federal public sector union employees of their collective bargaining rights and they have prospered just fine. Try firing one for anything short of mass murder - good luck with that

                  Time to grow up on the left -- you wanted control -- you got it -- do something.

                  • 1 vote
                  #15.1 - Sun Mar 6, 2011 8:29 AM EST
                  an der Lahn

                  The first thing out of any liberal's mouth to explain...

                  I think Bush / Cheney milked the attack on 9-11 for 6 or 7 years. So talking about becoming the president at the beginning of the worst recession in over 60 years should float for at least 3 or 4.

                  The best chance the President has at winning reelection will come from high turn out of loud hate mongering voters in the Republican primary. If they turn out and vote with their hearts then you'll be sure to nominate the least likely candidate to win.

                  The bad thing about American politics is at the end of the day it comes down to voting for one of 2 people for the job. Most of the time it is the lesser of the two evils.

                  Case in point Bush vs. Kerry. Everyone hated baby Bush - but Kerry was a horrible candidate.

                  • 1 vote
                  #15.2 - Sun Mar 6, 2011 9:34 AM EST
                  Robert in Ohio

                  an der Lahn

                  While I do not disagree with your points, it is time to let the past go and fix the problem

                  It no longer matters who caused the mess, we just need to fix it

                  You could make the same election argument, that Obama wpn because McCain and Palin were sooooooooooo bad!

                  • 1 vote
                  #15.3 - Sun Mar 6, 2011 11:30 AM EST
                  an der Lahn

                  You could make the same election argument, that Obama wpn because McCain and Palin

                  McCain actually had a chance until he picked his VP. After that - it was an easy win.

                  • 1 vote
                  #15.4 - Sun Mar 6, 2011 12:23 PM EST
                  Robert in Ohio

                  an er lahn

                  Perhaps I never thought he was the best choice for the Republicans but you may be right

                  • 1 vote
                  #15.5 - Sun Mar 6, 2011 1:49 PM EST
                  Reply
                  an der Lahn

                  Time to grow up on the left -- you wanted control -- you got it -- do something.

                  No matter that the Republicans had that exact same control for 6 years. They did exactly what they wanted. Ran up the deficit, started two wars they weren't prepared to finish, cut taxes, and give out the largest increase in Medicare benefits seen since the 1970's (without paying for it).

                  Lets get back to those days!

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#16 - Sun Mar 6, 2011 9:40 AM EST
                  Robert in Ohio

                  an der Lahn

                  Again I agree with the points you make, but no longer care who caused the mess, I want the mess to be fixed and sitting around blaming those in power in the past is not contributing to a solution

                  • 1 vote
                  #16.1 - Sun Mar 6, 2011 11:32 AM EST
                  an der Lahn

                  If you can find someone who first - have the will power to fix the problem and second - have the ability to do so . . . then I'd be willing to quite down.

                  As of right now - I only see this President in a second term coupled with a republican house and senate is the only hope for financial responsibility.

                  I suspect the senate will flip over the to (R) - so if there is a Republican in the white house I fear only the minimum amount to get the deficit will be put into place and the debt will continue to rise and rise and rise as government investment in important things is encouraged to be taken up by the private sector with speeches.

                  • 1 vote
                  #16.2 - Sun Mar 6, 2011 12:27 PM EST
                  Robert in Ohio

                  I agree that control of the Senate goes to the Republicans, but as of now I think BHO gets re-elected to a 2nd term

                  If he is unable to work the the Rep House to get the spending cuts agreed to for the CR, the budget and the debt ceiling bill I will have no high hopes for anything getting done between 2012 and 2016

                  • 1 vote
                  #16.3 - Sun Mar 6, 2011 1:52 PM EST
                  an der Lahn

                  If he is unable to work the the Rep House to get the spending cuts agreed to for the CR,

                  That problem isn't between him and house ... the problem is between the house and the house first off - then the house and the senate.

                  The house can't come to an agreement amongst themselves. The experienced members love the rhetoric, but have a realization. The house members are demanding all or nothing.

                  So the bottle neck is between what the house leadership will accept and what the senate will actually pass. The president isn't even in the picture at this point and time. He has already presented a lot of suggestions as a starting point that the Senate would easily agree to or even move slightly to the left.

                  • 1 vote
                  #16.4 - Sun Mar 6, 2011 2:23 PM EST
                  Robert in Ohio

                  The Senate has no back bone (e.g. Reid) and will do as much or as little to cooperate with or oppose the House as they are instructed to do by the White House

                  Make no mistake Obama is in charge of the Democratic Party in Washington

                  The House has proposed $61B in cuts and the Biden says they have met the House halfway when they propose total of $10B in cuts. That does not bode well for compromise.

                  The WH is going to have to come above $32B on the CR and much higher on the budget and debt ceiling bill to get them passed.

                  • 1 vote
                  #16.5 - Sun Mar 6, 2011 3:11 PM EST
                  an der Lahn

                  Make no mistake Obama is in charge of the Democratic Party in Washington

                  Have you seen Washington DC in the last 2 years - that is really not an intelligent thing to say.

                  Democrats won't vote straight up and down party lines - seemingly ever.

                  • 1 vote
                  #16.6 - Sun Mar 6, 2011 3:22 PM EST
                  Robert in Ohio

                  an der Lahn

                  At least you politely called me stupid

                  They vote together on the big stuff and this is the big stuff and they will do what Obama and Billy C (if needed) tell them to

                  • 1 vote
                  #16.7 - Sun Mar 6, 2011 3:50 PM EST
                  an der Lahn

                  I didn't mean to say that.

                  But if the democrats voted as a block then there would have been a single payer health care system set to take place in about 3 years.

                  Also there would have been a revised tax code that had high earners paying significantly more.

                  Neither of those happened and they were both major issues that Billy C supported.

                  If you can't tell I'm a center right person who loves people that thing about issues.

                  • 1 vote
                  #16.8 - Sun Mar 6, 2011 4:02 PM EST
                  Reply
                  an der Lahn

                  The WH is going to have to come above $32B on the CR and much higher on the budget and debt ceiling bill to get them passed.

                  You don't seem to see how things are working. Whatever Biden and the White House propose is the starting point for the party in the house or senate. It only works up from there.

                  Politics are nasty - and when you take into fact the Democrats believe they benefit from a shutdown coupled with teaparty folks who think compromise is giving in... then it only gets worse.

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#17 - Sun Mar 6, 2011 3:27 PM EST
                  Robert in Ohio

                  an der Lahn

                  They will not benefit as much from this one as the did in the 90's as many Americans think they are the problem in getting the spending cuts that are needed

                  And the starting point is the $61B House bill that has already been sent to the Senate

                  You notice the two week extension had $4B in cuts if you multiply by 26 that is $$104B for 52 weeks of government funding)

                  • 1 vote
                  #17.1 - Sun Mar 6, 2011 3:53 PM EST
                  an der Lahn

                  You notice the two week extension had $4B in cuts if you multiply by 26 that is $$104B for 52 weeks of government funding)

                  I did and was excited about it - but then I started reading.

                  This year only has 6.5 months left in the fiscal budget. Although they are moving toward the 100B per year mark - it isn't going to be enough.

                  It is really too much politics and if they don't at least act like everything is moving along at a snail pass (i.e. a shutdown for more than a week or two) the bond market will begin to up the rates on the US.

                  Although I don't think the US could turn into Greece - simply upping the rate by 0.5% could end up in Medicare and SS cuts that not only were being put off - but may start to hurt people in benefits now. Not to mention education, research, and infrastructure.

                    #17.2 - Sun Mar 6, 2011 4:09 PM EST
                    Reply
                    mrsrachelm

                    Where was his desire and pretty words asking people to work together from Obama BEFORE the midterm elections? Hmmm?

                    Naw...ain't buying it.

                    • 2 votes
                    Reply#18 - Sun Mar 6, 2011 4:13 PM EST
                    an der Lahn

                    the same place the Republican representation was.... there but nothing to look at.

                    • 1 vote
                    #18.1 - Sun Mar 6, 2011 4:14 PM EST
                    mrsrachelm

                    Snappy comeback but essentially useless as an intelligent answer dealing with the question posed which was entirely serious.

                    • 1 vote
                    #18.2 - Sun Mar 6, 2011 4:36 PM EST
                    an der Lahn

                    Well you changed your question as I answered so not really applicable. Let me take a new shot....

                    BEFORE the midterm elections - the republicans were non-resistant really. He only had to compromise with the conservative Democrats - which may I point out no longer exist for the most part.

                    You could ask why didn't baby Bush compromise on a lot of things - the answer is he didn't have to.

                    POLITICS - learn to talk about them or your just going to be one of those people that whine on the sidelines for one team or the other.

                    Not that there is anything wrong with that. :)

                    • 1 vote
                    #18.3 - Sun Mar 6, 2011 4:44 PM EST
                    mrsrachelm

                    LOL, nice backhanded insult.

                    • 1 vote
                    #18.4 - Sun Mar 6, 2011 4:59 PM EST
                    Robert in Ohio

                    mrsrachelm

                    You are correct

                    He very politely called me stupid a little earlier

                    Almost made me feel food about it

                    Take care

                    • 1 vote
                    #18.5 - Sun Mar 6, 2011 5:32 PM EST
                    an der Lahn

                    I really admire how both of you can interpret an insult from something that is merely a contra to your position.

                    If you want to play in Politics your really going to need to suit up. Other wise grab some pom poms and continue to watch your fox news outlet.

                    • 1 vote
                    #18.6 - Sun Mar 6, 2011 5:39 PM EST
                    Robert in Ohio

                    an der Lahn

                    You said " that is really not an intelligent thing to say" kind of sounds like you were calling me stupid.

                    But no worries mate you are not the first to do it

                    Andyou sports metaphor is just so cute and manly, I would tell you where to put your pom poms, but I would be collapsed or fined or banned or whatever it is that happens when a conservative gets to uppity on the NV

                    I am an MSNBC watcher, when I watch news on TV which is seldom that little part of your psychoanalysis is a failure as well

                    Your need to be feel and act superior is refreshing though.

                    Take care

                    • 1 vote
                    #18.7 - Sun Mar 6, 2011 6:35 PM EST
                    Reply
                    obama mommaDeleted
                    Leave a Comment:
                    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                    You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                    (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                    Newsvine Privacy Statement
                    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                    FUN STUFF:
                    • Leaderboard |
                    • E-Mail Alerts |
                    • Top of the Vine |
                    • Newsvine Live |
                    • Newsvine Archives |
                    • The Greenhouse
                    COMPANY STUFF:
                    • Code of Honor |
                    • Company Info |
                    • Contact Us |
                    • Jobs |
                    • User Agreement |
                    • Privacy Policy |
                    • About our ads
                    LEGAL STUFF:
                    • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                    • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                    • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com