Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Poor households take lead in abandoning landlines

Wed Apr 20, 2011 11:33 AM EDT
us-news, business, politics, technology, us, new-jersey, rhode-island, only, cellphones
Nomaan Merchant, Associated Press
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 2 photos
<p>Commercial pilot Bill Phillips uses his cellphone on the tarmac at North Little Rock municipal Airport in North Little Rock, Ark., Wednesday, April 20, 2011. Phillips is representative of a trend of abandoning landline phones in favor of cellphones. (AP Photo/Danny Johnston)</p>

Commercial pilot Bill Phillips uses his cellphone on the tarmac at North Little Rock municipal Airport in North Little Rock, Ark., Wednesday, April 20, 2011. Phillips is representative of a trend of abandoning landline phones in favor of cellphones. (AP Photo/Danny Johnston)

Advertise | AdChoices

NORTH LITTLE ROCK — In a financial and technological role reversal, a growing number of Americans are getting rid of their old telephones and using only cellphones, a trend being led not by the high-tech elite but by people in poorer states as a way to save money.

Government estimates released Wednesday show at least 30 percent of adults in 10 states rely entirely on cellphones, with the highest percentage in Arkansas and Mississippi, where many cannot afford to pay for two separate lines.

Wealthier households have been slower to use wireless technology as their sole means of making calls.

"The answer's obvious: No one has money here," said John N. Daigle, a professor of electrical engineering at the University of Mississippi with broad experience in the telecommunications industry. "If they can do without a landline, they'll do it to save money."

William Phillips of North Little Rock says he grew tired of paying for a landline his family rarely used. So he and his wife dumped their old phone and now have prepaid cellphones that cost a total of $75 a month.

Phillips, a 39-year-old commercial pilot, taught his 12-year-old son, who doesn't have a phone, how to email him rather than call when the boy is at home.

"I've heard people talk about it, that they ought to do it," Phillips said. "They're just hanging onto that phone number."

About 35 percent of adults in Arkansas and Mississippi have only cellphones, according to figures from the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

In New Jersey and Rhode Island, the states where the smallest proportion of people depend strictly on wireless phones, that figure is only 13 percent.

Mississippi has the highest poverty rate in the nation — 21.9 percent in 2009, according to the Census Bureau. The Arkansas figure was 18.8 percent. The nationwide rate is 14.3 percent.

In 2009, the Census Bureau defined poverty as a single person making less than $11,000 a year or a family of four making less than $22,000 a year.

"I think people decide, 'I can afford one but not the other,'" said Ellen Reddy, who works for a nonprofit community center that helps low-income residents in Holmes County, Miss. She said poor people in her area often have cellphones with a limited number of minutes.

"When the minutes are gone, oftentimes we can't reach our families," Reddy said. "I think people are making choices."

The number of American households that rely exclusively on cellphones has been growing steadily nationwide, hitting 27 percent in the first half of 2010, an eightfold increase in just six years. Arkansas has had the greatest increase, with 15 percentage points. New Jersey's 7 percentage-point growth was the lowest.

Donielle Flowers of Little Rock doesn't remember the last time she had a landline. She's chosen to carry one of two cellphones — a free, government-subsidized phone with 250 minutes a month, and a prepaid phone that costs $60 a month.

"It's an extra bill," Flowers, 34, said of landlines. "I'm rarely at home, so I just need a cellphone. I'd be lost without it."

That matches the conclusion of Stephen Blumberg, a senior CDC scientist and an author of the survey. Over the years, Blumberg has found that lower-income people are more likely than higher-earning Americans to have only wireless phones. Younger people and renters are also quicker to shed traditional landlines.

New Jersey is neither young nor poor, and that's keeping it at the bottom of the list, Blumberg said.

On Wednesday, many people walking around the capital city of Trenton were talking on cellphones or texting family, friends and colleagues. Among them was Harry Weaver, a 46-year-old insurance agent who said he loves the freedom and convenience his smartphone provides.

Weaver acknowledged that he "pretty much lives" on his smartphone but said he has no plans to pull the plug on his home landline. As the father of three teenage daughters, Weaver says he wants a "dependable" phone line in case his girls need to reach their parents in an emergency.

"We could probably end our landline service and save some money, but it gives me peace of mind to know there's another way they can reach us if needed," Weaver said.

Some customers feel landlines offer more security, especially if they ever need to call 911. Since wireless phones are not linked to a fixed address, the caller's location can be more difficult for dispatchers to pinpoint.

The latest state-by-state figures, which cover the 12 months through June 2010, may indicate changes are needed in the way some public opinion polls are conducted, Blumberg said.

As the use of cellphones has grown, major pollsters have routinely included cellphone users in the people they call randomly. The number of cellphone users they call reflects national cellphone use, but Wednesday's findings suggest those numbers may need adjustment in states with especially high or low cellphone dependence, he said.

In addition to those in Arkansas and Mississippi, at least 30 percent of adults in eight other states — mostly in the West — rely strictly on cellphones. Those states were Colorado, Idaho, Kentucky, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon and Texas.

At the other end, only six states — mostly in the East — joined New Jersey and Rhode Island in having fewer than 17 percent of adults using only cellphones. They were Connecticut, Delaware, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and South Dakota.

The CDC estimates were based largely on data from the agency's National Health Interview Survey, for which it has interviewed 109,187 households over the past 3 1/2 years.

The government also uses statistics from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey taken between 2006 and 2009, plus information from listed telephone directories. The figures are then blended to produce a single estimate.

The report is available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr039.pdf.

But even in Arkansas, some people are holding tight to their landlines.

"I was taught to have a house phone at home, whether you use it or not," said Dale West, 40, who carries a $60-a-month cellphone and pays about $35 a month for his landline. "Even though you got a cellphone, you never know."

___

Fram reported from Washington. Associated Press writers Emily Wagster Pettus in Jackson, Miss., and Bruce Shipkowski in Trenton, N.J., contributed to this report.

© 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Nomaan Merchant's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: United States , Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (10)
Division by Zero

It's a lot easier to get a prepaid cellphone that you can carry anywhere than to deal with the monthly expense of a landline that you can only use from home. Several of my coworkers are cellphone-only at this point.

  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Wed Apr 20, 2011 12:40 PM EDT
Nick46

I would give up the cell phone first. There is no need to have one. I never missed one until I had one like most other convenience items. I am sure we could all adapt to life without a cell. I cannot belive all the people driving that have to be on the phone. Women especially.

  • 2 votes
Reply#2 - Wed Apr 20, 2011 2:03 PM EDT
MattInTX

Driving while on a cell phone is ridiculous and unnecessary.

While some people might be able to get by just fine without a cell phone, others will have problems. I'm rarely at home (I have a very busy lifestyle), so without a cell phone, people would basically only be able to communicate with my answering machine.

  • 4 votes
#2.1 - Wed Apr 20, 2011 2:05 PM EDT
aqua surf-1123675

Nick: Blondes especially, LOL.

  • 1 vote
#2.2 - Wed Apr 20, 2011 5:26 PM EDT
Nick46

I'm rarely at home (I have a very busy lifestyle), so without a cell phone, people would basically only be able to communicate with my answering machine.

There was life before cell phones and it worked well. Nothing is so important that a call needs to be answered right now. Try it you might like it. I rarely answer a call when I am in public unless I know someone is on their death bed.

  • 1 vote
#2.3 - Thu Apr 21, 2011 8:58 AM EDT
Reply
MattInTX

I've been cell phone only for about 7 years. The cell coverage in Austin is top notch (at least for AT&T) and having a land line is too expensive and restrictive.

While something can be said for not putting all your eggs in one basket, I prefer having only one device and bill for phones, e-mail, texts and Skype.

  • 2 votes
Reply#3 - Wed Apr 20, 2011 2:03 PM EDT
Division by Zero

I still have a landline but it is rarely used. Living in hurricane country taught me the value of keeping a landline. When Katrina struck cell phone service in my area was out for over a month. Landline service was restored in 2 1/2 days. Even after cell service was restored I couldn't get a signal inside my house, so I had to step outside to send or receive any call or text message. Full cell service wasn't restored for about 3 months. In the meantime landline service was solid as a rock.

  • 3 votes
#3.1 - Wed Apr 20, 2011 2:48 PM EDT
Reply
aqua surf-1123675

I just went totally cell last month because my landline phone broke. Again. I got tired of replacing them every year. The only bother was having to go from a wet to dry line for my computer; or was it the other way around?

  • 1 vote
Reply#4 - Wed Apr 20, 2011 5:24 PM EDT
menmy2

When I became unemployed, I let the cell phone go and kept the land line because it is cheaper - about $30/month.

There is this kid who lives in my building who uses my phone everyday to call him mom after school as mom takes her cell with her (no land line). I would hate for my kids to be home alone with no phone. Sure, they could probably use the neighbor's phone, but that would make me uneasy.

  • 2 votes
Reply#5 - Wed Apr 20, 2011 10:27 PM EDT
NC Slim

Landline worked during 9/11, cellphone didn't.

Internet, cable, digital landline and AT&T cellphone went down again last week for hours. In addition, AT&T cell drops the signal all the time. Getting rid of AT&T. Can't function without a reliable phone.

  • 1 vote
Reply#6 - Thu Apr 21, 2011 1:45 AM EDT
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
(XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
Newsvine Privacy Statement
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
FUN STUFF:
  • Leaderboard |
  • E-Mail Alerts |
  • Top of the Vine |
  • Newsvine Live |
  • Newsvine Archives |
  • The Greenhouse
COMPANY STUFF:
  • Code of Honor |
  • Company Info |
  • Contact Us |
  • Jobs |
  • User Agreement |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • About our ads
LEGAL STUFF:
  • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com