Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Geithner says he will stay at Treasury

Sun Aug 7, 2011 2:33 PM EDT
business, politics, us, barack-obama, treasury, geithner, timothy-geithner
Martin Crutsinger, AP Economics Writer
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 3 photos
<p>FILE - In this July 18, 2011 file photo, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner speaks at the Treasury Department in Washington. The struggle to head off a national debt default played out on two tracks, as do most big things in the capital. One was for show. The other was for real. The two tracks finally came together, in the knick of time, on Tuesday, when the Senate granted final passage to legislation raising the debt ceiling, trimming spending and punting the most painful decisions on deficits down the road. President Barack Obama's pen sealed the deal.  (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File)</p>

FILE - In this July 18, 2011 file photo, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner speaks at the Treasury Department in Washington. The struggle to head off a national debt default played out on two tracks, as do most big things in the capital. One was for show. The other was for real. The two tracks finally came together, in the knick of time, on Tuesday, when the Senate granted final passage to legislation raising the debt ceiling, trimming spending and punting the most painful decisions on deficits down the road. President Barack Obama's pen sealed the deal. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File)

Advertise | AdChoices

WASHINGTON — Timothy Geithner has told President Barack Obama that he will remain on the job as Treasury secretary, ending speculation he would leave the administration.

The Treasury Department released a statement Sunday saying Geithner had informed the president of his decision to remain in the administration.

Geithner is the only remaining top official on Obama's original economics team.

In late June, people close to Geithner said he was considering leaving after the debt limit was raised in August. They said he was tired of commuting to New York, where his son will be finishing up his last year in high school.

However, various administration officials including White House chief of staff William Daley had been lobbying Geithner to stay. Geithner has enjoyed a close working relationship with Obama.

"The president asked Secretary Geithner to stay on at Treasury and welcomes his decision," White House spokeman Jay Carney said in a statement.

Geithner informed the president Friday morning that he had decided to remain in the Cabinet.

That discussion took place before credit rating agency Standard & Poor's informed Treasury officials Friday afternoon that they planned to downgrade the government's credit rating from AAA to AA-plus.

Investors are watching nervously to see how financial markets react to that announcement which came late Friday after markets had closed.

In addition, Geithner and other finance ministers from the world's largest economies have been discussing what actions need to be taken to stabilize markets following renewed worries about Europe's debt problems.

A series of Obama's economic advisors have departed including Lawrence Summers, the first head of the president's National Economic Council, and two of the president's chief economic advisers, first Christina Romer and then Austan Goolsbee, who left this past week.

Obama has also had to replace his first budget director, Peter Orszag.

Before joining Obama's administration, Geithner served as president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, a job that put him on the front lines of the central bank's efforts to battle the financial crisis and to get credit flowing more freely. He has a close working relationship with Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke.

During the Clinton administration, Geithner held top positions at the Treasury Department dealing with international financial crises that occurred during that administration.

© 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Martin Crutsinger's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: United States , Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (52)
mensaiq156-3963

Obama is a skillful politician if nothing else. He is keeping Geithner for no other reason than to have him to dump the blame on for failure of the "Stimulus" plan and the downgrading of U. S. Debt.

Geithner will probably fall on his sword for Obama in the election of 2012 and Obama will walk away with very little tar sticking to him for the "Geithner" mistakes.

Anyone want to bet?

  • 6 votes
Reply#1 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 3:05 PM EDT
A radicial ideaExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Why would Obama do that? The problem is the teabaggers not the administration.

  • 6 votes
#1.1 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 3:29 PM EDT
Slinger-958418

All of these banking crooks need to go.......including Bernanke. The only thing they are good at, is making sure the profits of banks land in their accounts......

  • 7 votes
#1.2 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 3:39 PM EDT
GIL-2076580

The QEI and QEII have accomplished only two major things:

They provided the funds to indirectly bail out Greece and help the EU. They provided the liquidity for the largest U.S. banks to, in turn, have quarterly profits in the tens of $billions. It was a sham that the Fed reserve and treasury funded under false pretenses. The results are that Greece is truly in default and the immense wall street bubble is nothing but that--hot air. Greece et al, are still in need of bailouts and the EU is again waiting for the U.S. to do another QE to fund them. Now, the Federal Reserve chair Bernanke and Geitner are considering another QE(III). THIS IS INSANITY.

It is time for the Wall Street rich to join the rest of us in our suffering and for the EU to handle its own problems.

My source for the QE comment: This is a very enlightening read . Well worth your time.

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/exclusive-feds-600-billion-stealth-bailout-foreign-banks-continues-expense-domestic-economy-?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+zerohedge/feed+(zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline,+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero)

  • 2 votes
#1.3 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 4:14 PM EDT
dEd Grimley

Please, please go Timmy. Obama brought in Geitner to get an insider's perspective, to get someone who, if you're to believe all of the hype about Obama's liberalism, is against everything he's supposed to stand for. And instead, he got a typical bullish "Independent" (read: Republican) who's dragged the debate so far to the right that the happy medium that should work best for the country is still the same old crap that got us into trouble in the first place. Geitner's a disaster. And the people Obama's looked at to replace him are as bad or worse. Obama's failure to be a strong Democrat has made him almost worse than a Republican.

  • 2 votes
#1.4 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 4:32 PM EDT
DUDE-875416

Pssst Mr. President, the majority want Geithner to leave!

  • 8 votes
#1.5 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 5:08 PM EDT
MJMullinII

"The majority" of what?

  • 1 vote
#1.6 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 8:51 PM EDT
Reply
Jeannine-2751956

 Well, he's done such a great job!!!! Who would ask him to leave??

 He's as useless as-well you know the rest!

  • 3 votes
Reply#2 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 3:10 PM EDT
Don-3873477

He has done a great job of destroying our economy which is exactly why Obama wants him to stay. Obama has surrounded himself with far left extremist (czars-check each of them out for yourself) and the first thing that has to be done to transform America into a socialist state is to collapse the economy and that is Obama's meaning of transforming America.

  • 6 votes
#2.1 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 4:26 PM EDT
Marine1986

This statement from Secretary Geithner must be why the markets are tumbling today. I know I am scared that he is staying on. He has been a failure at his post.

That's my take, not yours.

  • 2 votes
#2.2 - Mon Aug 8, 2011 11:03 AM EDT
MJMullinII

Timothy Geithner has done exactly what he was told -- the only failure has been a Congress that consistently ignored him simply because they didn't like his boss.

  • 2 votes
#2.3 - Mon Aug 8, 2011 11:46 AM EDT
Reply
mountainmike-1199289

People wanting Geithner to resign while Allan Greenspan at the Fed was printing out trillions of paper dollars to fuel the Wall Street white collar crime wave we are calling a recession then Ben Bernanke was printing out trillions of paper dollars to bail them out?

We need to drastically cut back the Fed's role in our country to that of the central banks of all other major industrialized countries. The Fed will never protect America from recessions because that means protecting America from Wall Street. What they are actually doing is protecting Wall Street. Alan Greenspan's "the market takes care of itself" really means the Fed takes care of Wall Street giants.

  • 9 votes
Reply#3 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 3:11 PM EDT
DUDE-875416

Oh, you're right, justify inadequacy with prior inadequacy and call it a day. Sounds like a "have not" ideology to me. Accept it, Geithner is a bad choice.

  • 5 votes
#3.1 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 7:56 PM EDT
dEd Grimley

... So you're OK with Geitner?

  • 1 vote
#3.2 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 8:26 PM EDT
Reply
Arlene Tognetti

Good, Mr Geithner stay with the Feds

Good, kudos to you

  • 1 vote
Reply#4 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 3:25 PM EDT
DUDE-875416

Wow, I hear crickets around your post.

  • 2 votes
#4.1 - Mon Aug 8, 2011 3:26 PM EDT
Reply
outthere

We began to sink AFTER the Nov 2010 elections!!! Now it's Geithner's fault? The trouble is CONGRESS. Keep the blame where it belongs.

  • 5 votes
Reply#5 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 3:43 PM EDT
Marine1986

Agreed, the Democrats in the House and the Senate are to blame for the mess. They held the house at that time and leading up to it. They really have hurt this economy.

Wait, what about the lead up to the mess? As I recall, the Democrats owned the Congress from 2006 until 2010. Up until that point, everything was OK. Hmmmm.

That's my take, not yours.

  • 1 vote
#5.1 - Mon Aug 8, 2011 11:08 AM EDT
MJMullinII

And the actions of the Democrats cost them the House in 2010 -- THAT was their punishment.

As I recall Republicans took control of the House of Representatives in January 2011 -- that makes everything that's happened since then THEIR responsibility.

  • 1 vote
#5.2 - Mon Aug 8, 2011 11:48 AM EDT
Carol-500283

During this admin. there's never been a clear path to legislation, too many Blue Dogs and always a filibuster around the corner in the Senate, so let's not go blameless there right wing.

  • 2 votes
#5.3 - Mon Aug 8, 2011 2:22 PM EDT
Marine1986

MJ - Then based on your statement, everything that's happened since January 2009 is President Obama's responsibility? Please don't mention inheritance, I could use the same argument.

Stimulus failure, Oil Spill, Afghanistan Surge, Libya, Economy, Massive Unemployment, Gasoline Prices, Iraq, Russian relations, Chinese Relations, Loss of Dollar Value, Bush Tax Cuts, Guantanamo Bay still open, etc.

I was bashed a week ago for quoting Disney's customer service mantra: It may not be his fault, but it is is problem.

Carol - You are right, the rightwing is not without blame. However, it was the same under then President Bush. The Democrats perfected the idea/use of the filibuster, now the Republicans are using it like there's no tomorrow. Then the Democrats cry foul? Let's not forget how the Health Care bill was passed into law? The lefties eliminated the debate in the Senate to pass the law.

That's my take, not yours.

  • 1 vote
#5.4 - Mon Aug 8, 2011 2:40 PM EDT
Reply
Arlene-3873398

I agree with Slinger, they all need to go. including the person in the whitehouse. And NO MORE UNEMPLOYMENT. GO GET A JOB. Do anything, deliver pizzas, scrub toliets, sweep sidewalks, take responsiblity for yourself.

  • 3 votes
Reply#6 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 3:56 PM EDT
GendoIkari

And when you finally lose your cushy job, I expect to see you out there scrubbing toilets, and sweeping sidewalks for minimum wage (if not under the table for 3 bucks an hour) with NO benefits whatsoever.

We'll see just how long the Babylon monkey can do that, and still make it's mortgage payments and other bills.

  • 2 votes
#6.1 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 6:07 PM EDT
Carol-500283

There are places even those jobs don't exist, where do some of you people come from anyway!! In our two county rural area there are about 25-30 jobs listed in the paper at any given time, so about 12-15 of those and sometimes even more are specialized. So now, if you don't have those qualifications, I guess you move. You don't have money for gas, running around finding somewhere that has these pizza jobs, nor do you have a place to stay while looking. It isn't as easy as getting a pizza job, WHEN you lose your job, you'll know. And no I'm not looking I'm good with what I do, but there are those that do, until you are one of them, count your blessings and ask for some for your fellowman.

  • 1 vote
#6.2 - Mon Aug 8, 2011 2:30 PM EDT
Reply
magnoliaave

Well, big whoopee! The only reasons I can think of is that he is not tenured in his job which will would not afford permanent health insurance and pension for the rest of his life! Show me the money and the power!

  • 2 votes
Reply#7 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 4:04 PM EDT
MJL-3

Good that he is staying.

  • 4 votes
Reply#8 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 4:15 PM EDT
Shelly6

I agree, the economy was growing until the tea partiers took office. The stimulus was getting people back to work in the form of the auto workers and construction workers plus the engineers accounting etc. We need people working to bring in revenue to the federal government in the form of taxes. That is why we are not recovering because they want to tax the very people that purchase everything from cars to a sack of potatoes. The people making over $250,000 a year can only consume so much and they definitely need to pay their share of taxes to keep the american dream alive. Otherwise it is going to die.

  • 3 votes
Reply#9 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 4:35 PM EDT
magnoliaave

There are handful of Tea Partiers! And, the economy was growing until Nov. 2010? Give me a break!

  • 3 votes
#9.1 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 5:04 PM EDT
JayTee-3231157

"The economy was growing until the tea Part took office"

Now I don't care who you are, that is FUNNY ! ROTFLMAO.....LOL. I'm sorry, I just can't take that as a serious in depth analysis of why we're in this economic Keynesian nightmare. LOL

  • 5 votes
#9.2 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 5:06 PM EDT
Hannah-3873913

Shelly - You must be one of the 50% that doesn't pay taxes. We need to cut spending and do something to provide an incentive for people to invest in the private sector. This whole issue proves that Big Government does not work. It's not a good thing to be so dependent on the government - we need to rely on ourselves.

  • 4 votes
#9.3 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 6:10 PM EDT
Marine1986

Shelly - Your statement could be construed as blaming those not responsible for the economic crisis. Let's not forget that the "Tea Party" only came about because of the economic crisis. They have a few candidates in Washington, and they are to blame? Seems a little weak. The lefties are yelling, it was the Tea Party, yea, that's it. They never accept the blame, when they are due for it.

Leadership, someone needs to lead in this country for the benefit of the country, not what will get them re-elected.

Just my take, not yours.

  • 1 vote
#9.4 - Mon Aug 8, 2011 11:52 AM EDT
Reply
JayTee-3231157

Anyone wanna Bet ?

The guy on the front row, who said there is not a chance for a downgrade ? C'mon, I was born, but it wasn't yesterday, Obama needs some credibility and Geithner brings none to the Financial table.

On the other hand, I like it because of the 2012 election and Obama's soon to be Approval ratings in the 30 percentiles. So, I'm good with Geithner sticking around....please. WTF.

  • 3 votes
Reply#10 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 5:02 PM EDT
MJMullinII

Why should Geithner walk the plank for Congressional dithering?

He told them SIX months before, he told them FOUR months before, he told them in MAY when he was having to -- essentially -- pay one credit card with another just to stay afloat, and NOW we all receive the consequences of said Congressional dithering (the downgrade), suddenly it's Tim Geightner/Obama's fault?

If Republicans didn't want to do the "hard work" of actually running the House of Representatives -- which Constitutionally is where ANYTHING RELATING TO THE BUDGET/SPENDING begins -- then I guess they shouldn't have spent themselves into bankruptcy last year chasing it like a dog after a car.

Nope, they caught it NOW they get to sit in it up to their necks just like everyone else.

  • 5 votes
#10.1 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 5:21 PM EDT
JayTee-3231157

MJMullin

wanna talk about the 4 trillion in cuts Budget the GOP Congress passed earlier this year ? Does the Ryan budget ring a bell ?

I think it had everything that the S&P wanted.....yep, I'm sure it did.

  • 3 votes
#10.2 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 6:00 PM EDT
MJMullinII

Then you'd be wrong -- The President's plan, however, DID have everything they wanted, INCLUDING $4 Trillion in Deficit reduction using $3 Trillion in cuts and $1 Trillion in Tax Increases.

You balance the budget simply by getting rid of the low-hanging fruit, sooner or later something you DON'T want to give has to be given. For Democrats it was reforming Social Security and Medicare, for the Republicans it's tax increases.

You can't just sit in the corner with your arms crossed screaming "my way or the highway" and then get self-righteous when everyone says "highway" -- doesn't work that way (unless you in Kindergarten, anyway).

  • 4 votes
#10.3 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 7:41 PM EDT
BostonMan-3128434

And Obam's plan was voted down 97- in the Senate- It was a tertible plan -Dems and Reps voted against it

  • 1 vote
#10.4 - Mon Aug 8, 2011 9:46 AM EDT
Marine1986

MJ - Boston is right, the Obama Budget plan was voted down unanimously. Not one person voted for it. Everyone hated it. It's all just politics.

Just my take....

  • 1 vote
#10.5 - Mon Aug 8, 2011 11:54 AM EDT
Reply
MJMullinII

So! -- just to recap -- the Treasury Secretary tells Congress in JANUARY that the debt limit needs to be raised. He tells Congress in APRIL the debt limit needs to be raised. In MAY, he has to do the equivalent of paying for one credit card with another just to keep Socialist Security recipients in their checks.

And now -- after sitting on their asses for SIX MONTHS doing nothing -- suddenly Republicans in Congress want Timothy Geithner to walk the plank?

Absolutely incredible.

P.S. -- I don't call it "Socialist Security" as some kind of insult to those who receive it, I'm happy to live in a country where we don't throw people to curb simply because they get old -- HOWEVER "Social Security" is in fact a Socialistic enterprise and I simply want it NOT to be swept under the rug as though we should somehow be embarrassed because of it.

  • 5 votes
Reply#11 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 5:16 PM EDT
BostonMan-3128434

Guess you missed the Cut,Cap and Balance bill?

  • 1 vote
#11.1 - Mon Aug 8, 2011 10:07 AM EDT
bond15redDeleted
Marine1986

To recap again, the Treasury goes to Congress, tells them about the pending housing crisis if there is no regulation around Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Barney Frank, Maxine Waters and a few other Democrats blame the Bush Administration for inciting fear and choose to do nothing. To them there is no problem at all.

Then, the housing market crashes and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac cost the American taxpayers BILLIONS. They then blame President Bush?

Absolutely incredible.

Just my take.

  • 1 vote
#11.3 - Tue Aug 9, 2011 1:09 PM EDT
Reply
dougjmiller

When the team fails, the coach usually loses his job. Tim Geithner doesn't have the integrity to resign, so his boss should fire him. Apparently his boss, President Obama, doesn't care enough about the team to let him go and hire someone who might help us out of this mess. Shame on Mr Obama.

  • 8 votes
Reply#12 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 5:54 PM EDT
DCShopperDeleted
MJMullinII

Conspiracy theories involving "they" or "them" are simply ways for the poor and powerless to try and explain to themselves why they are poor and powerless.

No different than people who see lights in the sky and say their aliens simply because they don't know what they really are.

We -- at this moment -- have the exact same government we had ten years, twenty years, thirty years, etc., all the way back to the founding of the Country over 200 years ago. All that changes are the faces on those in it and what they call themselves (Democrat, Republican, Whig, etc.), not what it is.

  • 1 vote
#12.2 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 7:48 PM EDT
DCShopperDeleted
MJMullinII

No one is "holding you back".

The black man isn't holding you down -- the white man isn't holding you down -- the government isn't holding you down.

Again, blaming generic targets (as you have consistently) is simply what people who know nothing do to explain why they are poor/powerless.

YOU are responsible for your successes AND your woes.

  • 3 votes
#12.4 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 8:56 PM EDT
DCShopperDeleted
MJMullinII

I have a job -- a job I like -- thank you.

  • 2 votes
#12.6 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 10:14 PM EDT
Reply
Rise of the PHOENIX

Barack Obama Downgrade !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • 7 votes
Reply#13 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 6:47 PM EDT
ray.burchard

Excellent, for a while I thought the unconscionable, that America wasn't going to get the economic policy making guidance that a previous president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York like Timothy Geithner would provide.

Geithner's economic guidance included directing the Federal Government's spending an allocation of $350 billion of TARP funds and also the second tranche of $350 billion from the secret congressional Oct. 2008, $700 billion banking bailout bill. That was when American International Group, AIG paid bonuses to its executives after receiving more than $170 billion in federal bailout aid. Geithner defended the bailout of AIG and the payments to the banks, while reiterating previous denials of any involvement in efforts to withhold details of the transactions.

If AIG had failed through bankruptcy, the bondholder investors and derivative counterparties (major banks) would have suffered significant losses, but would have limited the taxpayer funds directly used. That resolution would have been preferable to the situation that the claims of bondholders (investors) and derivative counterparties (major banks) were paid at 100 cents on the dollar by taxpayers, without giving taxpayers the rights to the future profits of these institutions. In other words, the benefits went to the banks while the taxpayers suffered the costs.

As political consequence who do you think Timothy Geithner actually represents the American public or Wall Street's corporate interests.

  • 3 votes
Reply#14 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 6:56 PM EDT
Menander

Alas, some one who gets it.

  • 2 votes
#14.1 - Mon Aug 8, 2011 11:35 AM EDT
Reply
CreepingJesus

There's no reason for Geithner to resign. I DO want Teabaggers to resign.

NOW, please.

  • 1 vote
Reply#15 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 10:11 PM EDT
Cheryl-2837740

Geithner needs to go I think his comments about S&P are way off base

  • 2 votes
Reply#16 - Mon Aug 8, 2011 12:56 AM EDT
bond15redDeleted
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
(XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
Newsvine Privacy Statement
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
FUN STUFF:
  • Leaderboard |
  • E-Mail Alerts |
  • Top of the Vine |
  • Newsvine Live |
  • Newsvine Archives |
  • The Greenhouse
COMPANY STUFF:
  • Code of Honor |
  • Company Info |
  • Contact Us |
  • Jobs |
  • User Agreement |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • About our ads
LEGAL STUFF:
  • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com