Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Study: Only 1 in 5 medical malpractice cases pay

Wed Aug 17, 2011 5:01 PM EDT
health, us, medical, malpractice
Mike Stobbe, AP Medical Writer
Advertise | AdChoices

ATLANTA — Only 1 in 5 malpractice claims against doctors leads to a settlement or other payout, according to the most comprehensive study of these claims in two decades.

But while doctors and their insurers may be winning most of these challenges, that's still a lot of fighting. Each year about 1 in 14 doctors is the target of a claim, and most physicians and virtually every surgeon will face at least one in their careers, the study found.

Malpractice cases carry a significant emotional cost for doctors, said study co-author Amitabh Chandra, an economist and professor of public policy at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government

"They hate having their name dragged through the local newspaper and having to go to court," he said.

The study might seem to support a common opinion among doctors that most malpractice lawsuits are baseless, but the authors said the truth is more complicated than that.

They noted influential earlier research in New York state concluding that just a tiny fraction of the patients harmed by medical mistakes actually file claims.

Trial lawyers say cost is a barrier to bringing a claim to court. There are very high up-front costs for hiring expert witnesses and preparing a case. Doctors, hospitals and their insurers often have significant money and legal firepower. Some states also have caps on malpractice awards. So, usually, only very strong cases with high expected payouts are pursued.

Given the expense and other difficulties involved in winning, it's doubtful most claims are filed on a greedy whim, the researchers said.

"A lawyer would have to be an idiot to take a frivolous case to court," Chandra said.

The study was published online Wednesday by the New England Journal of Medicine.

The research team turned to one of the nation's largest national malpractice insurers, analyzing data for about 41,000 physicians who bought coverage from 1991-2005. The researchers could only get the data by signing an agreement not to identify the insurer, so they wouldn't disclose the name of the company.

The insurer represents only about 3 percent of the nation's doctors, but it operates in all 50 states. The average payouts were about the same as seen in the government-created National Practitioner Data Bank, which records payouts but doesn't record all claims filed.

The study found:

_About 7.5 percent of doctors have a claim filed against them each year. That finding is a little higher than a recent American Medical Association survey, in which 5 percent of doctors said they had dealt with a malpractice claim in the previous year.

_Fewer than 2 percent of doctors each year were the subject of a successful claim, in which the insurer had to pay a settlement or court judgment.

_Some types of doctors were sued more than others. About 19 percent of neurosurgeons and heart surgeons were sued every year, making them the most targeted specialties. Pediatricians and psychiatrists were sued the least, with only about 3 percent of them facing a claim each year.

_When pediatricians did pay a claim, it was much more than other doctors. The average pediatric claim was more than $520,000, while the average was about $275,000.

"Jurors' hearts cry out for injured patients, especially when kids are involved," Chandra said. The amount attached to a pediatric case also rises because many more years of suffering are involved than if the victim is middle-aged or elderly, experts said.

The study was funded by the RAND Institute for Civil Justice. Chandra also received funding from the National Institute on Aging, which has been interested in malpractice as a possible driver of health-care costs.

The study echoes earlier research on which specialists get sued most often, said Dr. Sidney Wolfe, director of Public Citizen's Health Research Group, a Washington, D.C.-based consumer advocacy group.

"The thing that's disappointing about their study is they don't focus on what can be done to prevent people from being injured," said Wolfe, who has pushed for more aggressive policing of doctors by state medical licensing boards.

___

Online:

New England Journal: http://www.nejm.org

© 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Mike Stobbe's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: Atlanta
  • Public Discussion (1)
Tom -3934629

What most people who are commenting here do not seem to understand is that the malpractice insurance business is different from auto or home insurance. If you are convicted of drunk driving or having a bunch of speeding tickets or accidents you pay more in premiums than a person with a clean record. This makes sense.

However, in malpractice insurance a doctor could have 10 findings of malpractice and another doctor could have a perfectly clean record and yet they pay the same premium based only on their medical specialty. This makes no sense at all. Essentially, the good doctors subsidize the bad ones. This is a major problem regarding costs to individual doctors. If the bad doctors paid their fair share like the bad drivers, the good doctors insurance costs would be drastically reduced. But this makes too much sense and does not support the arguments that big business and the medical industry use to justify taking away your constitutional rights.

If any of the people who are bad mouthing malpractice cases had a child damaged, were personally injured or had a loved one die because of a doctor's screw up, they would be racing to the lawyer's office to get some form of help. It is easy to say malpractice is "bad" when you are not the one left raising a brain damaged child or dying from cancer because a doctor did not read your test results properly.

I will mention few doctors in New York who are interesting "victims" of "litigious Americans." One is Dr. Brian Goldwebber, an anesthesiologist who has infected a bunch of people with Hepatitis because he was using the same needles and bottle of anesthetic on different patients. There is another guy named Dr. Michael Hall who infected at least three people with Hepatitis and is still operating today. Do you think the people he is operating on today are being told that the surgeon opening their chest up is infected with Hepatitis? I doubt it. The stories about these two are all over the web so please feel free to fact check me.

Based on the comments above, they should be protected and their victims should not be compensated or be limited to recovering $250,000. Would any of the people who feel that malpractice is out of control believe that this is a fair amount for being infected by and having to live with a disease which can destroys your liver and can ultimately kill you? That is what many of the people posting comments here are arguing and that is just dumb.

Who do you think pays for people who are injured by doctors if they cannot get compensated in court when they can't work or need medical attention? Society does, not the people who are responsible! People talk about taking personal responsibility for their actions. But the doctors and medical insurance industry are attempting to avoid being accountable to the people who are hurt by them and sticking society with the bill for taking care of them.

I feel comfortable with the idea that a jury from my community should decide whether or not a doctor committed malpractice or not and if so what the fair amount of damages are. The medical industry wants to take away that right and protect itself. My advice is not to fall for the dopey rhetoric. Before buying the myth, put yourself in the position if you or someone you love were injured or killed by a doctor's mistake. That always changes things. If it was up to the medical community and its insurance industry, your family would get chump change.

Nobody appreciates lawyers until they need one LOL!

    Reply#1 - Thu Aug 18, 2011 8:34 PM EDT
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
    (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
    Newsvine Privacy Statement
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    FUN STUFF:
    • Leaderboard |
    • E-Mail Alerts |
    • Top of the Vine |
    • Newsvine Live |
    • Newsvine Archives |
    • The Greenhouse
    COMPANY STUFF:
    • Code of Honor |
    • Company Info |
    • Contact Us |
    • Jobs |
    • User Agreement |
    • Privacy Policy |
    • About our ads
    LEGAL STUFF:
    • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com