Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Campaign gets companies to make safer cosmetics

Wed Nov 30, 2011 12:36 PM EST
business, us, safety, cosmetics, ingredient
Linda A. Johnson, AP Business Writer
Advertise | AdChoices

TRENTON — More than 400 companies selling cosmetic and other personal care products have removed potentially hazardous chemicals from them, after a seven-year campaign by a large coalition of consumer, health and environmental groups.

The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics said Wednesday that those companies — all fairly small and in the industry's "natural products" niche — have met all or nearly all of its goals to make items from soaps and shampoos to cosmetics and aromatherapy safer for U.S. consumers.

The coalition of about 150 groups worked with the companies to get them to remove substances banned by health authorities in other countries, particularly chemicals linked to cancer and birth defects and preservatives that release formaldehyde, which can cause cancer as well as burn the eyes, nose and throat. The coalition also pushed for companies to list all ingredients in their products, which many companies don't do.

"We asked the big companies repeatedly, but none of them signed on," Stacy Malkan, co-founder of the campaign, told The Associated Press.

The campaign has been pushing Johnson & Johnson for 2 1/2 years to remove harsh and potentially dangerous chemicals from all its personal care products. The health giant is now steadily removing those chemicals from its baby products worldwide but has not committed to do so for products for adults.

More than 1,500 companies initially pledged to meet the campaign's goals for personal care products, but most didn't follow through for various reasons. Malkan said the campaign has checked product ingredients and otherwise verified that 321 companies have met all its goals and another 111 have met many of them.

In the latter group, some were unable to fully list ingredients in a product's fragrance because the fragrance was made by a third party that would not disclose components, she noted. The fragrance industry traditionally is very secretive.

The coalition, which includes organizations from the Environmental Working Group to the Breast Cancer Fund, on Wednesday issued a detailed report on its seven-year project, which wrapped up recently, and posted a list of companies that have complied with its goals, with links to their own websites. Participants include shampoo and lotion maker Avalon Organics, Dr. Bronner's Magic Soaps, Glimpse skin care products and California Baby products.

According to the coalition, natural and safe cosmetics have become the fastest-growing part of the $50 billion cosmetics industry, accounting for roughly 10 percent of sales.

With the project now concluded, the campaign is pushing for the Safe Cosmetics Act, federal legislation introduced in July to update cosmetics regulations dating to 1938 that it says fail to protect health.

"It would ban chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive harm. That's basically what Europe has done," Malkan said.

The legislation also would set up a system for the Food and Drug Administration to do product safety assessments. So far, it has not had a hearing.

The FDA has far less authority over cosmetics than medicines. It does not review and approve personal care products before they go on sale and cannot order recalls of ones considered hazardous.

___

Link to campaign website: http://safecosmetics.org

© 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Linda A. Johnson's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: San Francisco/Oakland/San Jose
  • Public Discussion (0)
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
(XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
Newsvine Privacy Statement
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
FUN STUFF:
  • Leaderboard |
  • E-Mail Alerts |
  • Top of the Vine |
  • Newsvine Live |
  • Newsvine Archives |
  • The Greenhouse
COMPANY STUFF:
  • Code of Honor |
  • Company Info |
  • Contact Us |
  • Jobs |
  • User Agreement |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • About our ads
LEGAL STUFF:
  • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com