Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

BP settles with maker of failed blowout preventer

Fri Dec 16, 2011 6:45 AM EST
us-news, business, us, oil-spill, gulf, spill, deepwater-horizon, gulf-oil-spill, settlement
Cain Burdeau, Associated Press

FILE - In a Sept. 13, 2010 file photo, the bottom of the blowout preventer stack, from the Deepwater Horizon explosion and oil spill, which is being examined as evidence for federal investigations, is seen at the NASA Michaud Assembly facility in New Orleans. BP PLC said Friday, Dec. 16, 2011, it will be paid $250 million by the maker of the blowout preventer that failed to halt oil spewing from BP's busted well in the Gulf of Mexico. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert, File)

Advertise | AdChoices

NEW ORLEANS — Cameron International, maker of the Deepwater Horizon blowout preventer that failed to stop last year's massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, has agreed to pay $250 million to BP under a legal settlement, BP said Friday.

BP said it was "in their mutual best interests, and the agreement is not an admission of liability by either party." The companies are dropping all claims against one another, they said.

The settlement comes in advance of a federal trial over the catastrophic Gulf oil spill. The non-jury trial is slated to begin in February and determine fault in the April 20, 2010, explosion and subsequent oil spill off the Louisiana coast of more than 200 million gallons of oil.

Oil and gas analysts said they saw Friday's settlement as setting the stage for more out-of-court agreements. At this point, Halliburton Corp., which supplied the cement to seal the blown-out well, and Transocean Ltd., the drilling company, have not settled with BP. The federal government, individual Gulf states and many other plaintiffs also have not settled.

For the companies involved, and government entities, "it's better to make peace than make war," said Fadel Gheit, managing director of Oppenheimer & Co., a Wall Street investment bank. He studies the oil and gas markets and follows BP closely.

He said he would expect all the parties — including the federal government — to seek to settle the Deepwater Horizon case before it goes to trial. He called court "the last resort."

"The strategy right now is settle, settle, settle," he said. "I would say that once the companies settle, the government will be under increasing pressure to settle."

Phil Weiss, a senior oil and gas analyst with the Argus Research Co. in New York, agreed and said he expected more settlement announcements. "I think it's in the interest of all these parties to settle."

For now, the settlement with Cameron does not end the legal fighting over the blowout of the Macondo well, which was owned by London-based BP and two partners, MOEX and Anadarko. BP has already settled claims with those two companies and a third company, Weatherford, the maker of a part used in the well.

"Today's settlement allows BP and Cameron to put our legal issues behind us and move forward to improve safety in the drilling industry," said Bob Dudley, BP group chief executive. "Unfortunately, other companies persist in refusing to accept responsibility for their roles in the accident and for contributing to restoration efforts," Dudley said in a swipe at Halliburton and Transocean.

The blowout preventer is the last line of defense in an oil well and is supposed to shear the well and cap it. But the device placed over the Macondo well failed to work properly and choke off the out-of-control spill. Government investigators have charged that the device had a design flaw and was not maintained properly. A bent pipe also prevented it from working, investigators found.

After the spill, the large contraption was lifted from the sea floor of the Gulf and transported to a NASA facility in New Orleans where engineers pored over it and conducted tests to determine what went wrong with it.

Probes of the Deepwater Horizon explosion by the federal government and independent scientists and engineers have found all three companies were at fault for a series of decisions and actions that led to the Macondo well blowout, the nation's largest offshore oil spill.

BP is engaged in an intense legal fight with Halliburton and Transocean. Earlier this month, BP went so far as to accuse Halliburton employees of covering up damaging evidence about a cement mixture Halliburton used in drilling the well.

BP said it would use the $250 million from Cameron to pay for the cost of cleaning up from the spill and paying individual damage claims by people, businesses and government entities hurt by the spill. BP said it has spent about $7.5 billion so far of those claims. But the British company faces billions of dollars in additional damages and fines.

Under the agreement, BP said Houston-based Cameron is no longer responsible for any additional cleanup costs related to the spill. But BP said the agreement does not cover civil, criminal and administrative fines and other penalties that might arise out of the court proceedings.

Jack Moore, chairman and CEO Cameron, said the agreement with BP "removes uncertainty facing Cameron" as litigation intensifies over the Deepwater Horizon explosion.

"This eliminates all significant exposure to historical and future claims related to this incident," Moore said.

Moore said Cameron does not expect to have to pay much for possible court fines and penalties. "We do not consider these items to represent a significant risk to Cameron," he said.

Cameron said its insurers were expected to fund at least $170 million of the $250 million payment the company agreed to make to BP.

BP and Cameron also pledged to "improve safety in the drilling industry" and do more to improve blowout preventers.

So far, BP has spent about $25 billion on the Deepwater Horizon disaster and has said it expects the final bill to be about $40 billion, Gheit said. BP has received about $5 billion from the companies it has settled with, he said.

© 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Cain Burdeau's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: New Orleans
  • Public Discussion (9)
Man of Knowledge

Forensic examination of the BOP revealed that a design flaw in the Cameron shear ram contributed to the failure of the BOP to shut in the well. At that point, many mistakes had already been made by BP, the Transocean drill crew and Haliburton. The well was already out of control.

  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 8:11 AM EST
tbart

They are paying BP?!??!! They should be paying the U.S. govt that is responsible for dealing with this hideous mess. There is no way that BP or any of the other geniuses involved with that well should have their financial liability reduced by one single dollar.

    #1.1 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 9:06 AM EST
    Rich-365548

    And what are they paying the families of the workers who died in the explosion?

    • 1 vote
    #1.2 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 9:13 AM EST
    Smith Cassidy

    Yeah, poor BP deserves $250 million for helping destroy the Gulf of Mexico and killing untold numbers of wildlife.

    This is a WTF story.

    • 1 vote
    #1.3 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 9:40 AM EST
    Man of Knowledge

    This is only one lawsuit. There are dozens, and there may be criminal charges as well. This process will take years to resolve.

      #1.4 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 10:50 AM EST
      Reply
      JB-1123320

      Payoffs and no one has been sent to prison... Figures, eh?

      • 2 votes
      Reply#2 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 9:08 AM EST
      Buono Cane

      How will the settlement be paid for? Insurance money. BFD, their premiums go up and the cost gets passed along to all of us.

      This is why, as the military model of management thrives, there is no accountability. This is also why nobody goes to jail. It is the layers of management that conceal accountability. Can you imagine trying to assign to one, or even a few people liability for what happened. The same goes for the financial sector.

      Another contributing factor has been the lack of tort reform, or the intentional lack of tort reform. By making settlements astronomical it allowed, once again, for insurance to benefit by charging skyrocketing premiums. Companies and sectors don't care because all the costs get passed on to consumers.

      It is the art of concealment. People in general have no concept of what they pay for or why. While our jobs were being exported, we were being placated with cheap products and cheap energy/gas. Now that the process is over and we are so thoroughly compromised they can make us dance any way they want.

      We don't have a representative democracy. We have a bunch of toadies that get paid to make laws that benefit the people that pay for them. You can include the costs of lobbying and special interest groups, and political action committees. WE all pay for our own enslavement.

      Quite a scheme huh?

        Reply#3 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 10:08 AM EST
        Man of Knowledge

        Insurance for a manufacturing company is not the same as that sold to individuals. There is no carryover in insurance cost here.

          #3.1 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 10:54 AM EST
          Buono Cane

          LOL, sure if you say so.

          Of course it is.

            #3.2 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 1:13 PM EST
            Reply
            Leave a Comment:
            You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
            You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
            (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
            Newsvine Privacy Statement
            As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
            FUN STUFF:
            • Leaderboard |
            • E-Mail Alerts |
            • Top of the Vine |
            • Newsvine Live |
            • Newsvine Archives |
            • The Greenhouse
            COMPANY STUFF:
            • Code of Honor |
            • Company Info |
            • Contact Us |
            • Jobs |
            • User Agreement |
            • Privacy Policy |
            • About our ads
            LEGAL STUFF:
            • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
            • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
            • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com