Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Mudd, facing civil charge, steps down at Fortress

Fri Dec 16, 2011 10:41 AM EST
business, politics, us, charges, fannie-mae, freddie-mac, exchange-commission, freddie, fannie, fannie-freddie, former-fannie-mae-ceo-daniel-mudd
Associated Press
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 4 photos
<p>FILE - In this Dec. 9, 2008 file photo, former Freddie Mac CEO Richard Syron, left, and former Fannie Mae CEO Daniel Mudd wait to testify on Capitol Hill in Washington.  The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has brought civil fraud charges against six former top executives at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, saying they misled the government and taxpayers about risky subprime mortgages the mortgage giants held during the housing bust. Those charged include the agencies' two former CEOs, Fannie's Daniel Mudd and Freddie's Richard Syron. They are the highest-profile individuals to be charged in connection with the 2008 financial crisis.  (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File)</p>

FILE - In this Dec. 9, 2008 file photo, former Freddie Mac CEO Richard Syron, left, and former Fannie Mae CEO Daniel Mudd wait to testify on Capitol Hill in Washington. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has brought civil fraud charges against six former top executives at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, saying they misled the government and taxpayers about risky subprime mortgages the mortgage giants held during the housing bust. Those charged include the agencies' two former CEOs, Fannie's Daniel Mudd and Freddie's Richard Syron. They are the highest-profile individuals to be charged in connection with the 2008 financial crisis. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File)

Advertise | AdChoices

NEW YORK — Former Fannie Mae CEO Daniel Mudd announced he would take a leave of absence from the hedge fund he runs Wednesday, less than a week after being charged in connection with the 2008 financial crisis.

Mudd is one of six former executives at Fannie, the Federal National Mortgage Association, and Freddie Mac, facing civil fraud charges from the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The executives are accused of understating the level of high-risk subprime mortgages that Fannie Freddie held just before the housing bubble burst.

Fannie and Freddie have cost taxpayers more than $150 billion to date — the largest bailout of the financial crisis. Regulators say that tab could hit $259 billion.

The companies have since essentially become wards of the state.

Legal experts say they don't expect the executives to face criminal charges, however, the SEC took action amid widespread criticism that no one was being held accountable for a financial crisis that reached across the globe.

The SEC has agreed not to charge Fannie and Freddie. The companies, taken over in 2008, have agreed to cooperate in the case against the former executives.

Randal Nardone, principal and co-founder of the hedge fund, Fortress Investment Group, will serve as interim CEO in Mudd's absence.

"I have requested a leave of absence from my position as chief executive officer to ensure that any time or attention I need to focus on matters outside of Fortress will not affect the business or operations of the company," Mudd said.

Mudd, 53, was leading the mortgage giant in 2007 when it became clear that the housing market began to disintegrate.

Investigators say that executives at the Fannie and Freddie mislead the public, and investors, in congressional testimony, as well as in reports and speeches.

Fannie Make was established by the government in the 1930s to encourage homeownership by buying mortgages from banks. That freed cash for the banks so they could make new loans.

© 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Associated Press's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (13)
Sean-332093

Maybe you fellows should take a close look at their highly paid 'Historian' while you're at it?

Just sayin'

  • 3 votes
Reply#1 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 11:08 AM EST
BostonMan-3128434

And don't forget Barney and Dodd - And Barney's former lover who got a nice gig at Fannie

Just sayin '

    #1.1 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 11:32 AM EST
    Sean-332093

    Gee BM, which offices are Dodd and Frank running for?

      #1.2 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 1:26 PM EST
      BostonMan-3128434

      Gee sean did i say they were running for anything? No they got out before the @!$%# hit the fan - Barney and Dood decided to all of a sudden retire - What a shock

      • 2 votes
      #1.3 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 2:07 PM EST
      nospin1

      Naturally both are not running anymore as they would be soundly defeated for their roles in Freddie and Fannie.

      • 1 vote
      #1.4 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 3:14 PM EST
      mountainmike-1199289

      Duck and cover, this article is going to get a knee jerk right wing Republican response - it was Fannie and Freddie that caused the recession, not all of those white collar criminal on Wall Street that Republicans can't stop butt kissing in exchange for huge amounts of money.

      I do not support Fannie and Freddie or government intervention into the housing market. However, they are secondary agencies that purchase bundles of mortgages from Wall Street giants. They got $crewed with the rest of the world with those bundles. Its called "derivatives fraud" and Wall Street is guilty as charged. The global economy is estimated to have lost $20 trillion due to Wall Street fraud.

      My hope here is that if they are found guilty, they are held fully accountable. I would like to see Fannie and Freddie shut down. However, the SEC has a track record of out of court settlements. When people get these settlements, all criminal charges are dropped. In short, they are free to turn around and do it all over again. That's what happened with Angelo Mozilo, the CEO of Countrywide. He was charged with predatory lending in eleven states. He got an out of court settlement, SEC fine of $63 million. His financial wealth is over ten times that. He paid the fine, and he's still rich - free to go and do it all over again.

      • 1 vote
      #1.5 - Sun Dec 18, 2011 2:45 AM EST
      Reply
      Sean-332093

      BostonMan-3128434 Barney and Dood decided to all of a sudden retire - What a shock

      Which is precisely what the GOP will wish Newt had done after the media gets done with his part in all of this.

      • 1 vote
      Reply#2 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 3:25 PM EST
      DemsRtoast2012

      Dream on. The media has already tried. It didn't work.

      Nice try !

      • 1 vote
      #2.1 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 5:16 PM EST
      Sean-332093

      Sure that's why your own party turned on him. The media and YOUR own party is why he became the only speaker in history forced to resign in disgrace and pay a 300k fine.

      You think this is over?

      You aint seen nothing yet

      • 1 vote
      #2.2 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 7:15 PM EST
      Reply
      Castor Bridge

      I wonder why the AP failed to mention which political party these guys belong to? Because of the omission, I'd guess Democratic Party.

        Reply#3 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 4:49 PM EST
        Ralph-482541

        I find it funny that the only ones that appear to be under the gun are the Fannie and Freddie folks, who remember only bought or backed loans that banks and mortgage companies made based upon info the banks said was A-OK. and to my recollection not one banker or mortgage broker has be charged with anything, add to that the only ones I recall getting jail time as of now were a couple of Indian or Pakistani brokers. Funny how no Anglo Saxon Wasps or good old boys have been caught up in the "dragnet" I guess they must be clean as a whistle.

          Reply#4 - Sat Dec 17, 2011 9:51 AM EST
          mountainmike-1199289

          I am no Chris and Barney fan but they did try to come up with an effective banking reform bill. That bill was gutted by Republicans before it passed. They had to get enough votes to pass the bill.

          Interesting none of the Republicans want to remember their predecessor Phil Gramm. He was the Senate Banking Committee Chairman and ex Enron lobbyist that was the mastermind behind the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act and Modernization of Commodities and Futures Act. Instead of playing the favorite Republican Party game"pin the tail on the donkey" we need to credit Phil as the number one enabler of the recession with those two bills. He needs to be in prison along with all of this white collar criminal buddies.

          • 1 vote
          Reply#5 - Sun Dec 18, 2011 2:53 AM EST
          Ralph-482541

          Mike - putting Glass-Steagall back in place would be one large step back to sanity. But I would not hold my breath on that now, the money men would come up with a hundred reasons why it would be a job killer, slow the economy, tighten money or whatever. Why of course they really don't want it back is because they make billions manipulating and transferring all this money a bewildering rate, are virtually unregulated and if "the you know what hits the fan" they push the losses off to the FED and blame the government or poor folks for borrowing to much, a pretty good scam.

          P.S. I'm retired now but when I was in the F&A business I clearly remember thinking that the repeal of Glass-Steagall did not seem to make sense to me and then some years later changes to bankruptcy laws that made it hard for low and middle class folks to abandon loans and a number of other Congressional actions made me think they where all linked together to squeeze as much $$$$ out of they system as could be done before the reckoning.

            #5.1 - Sun Dec 18, 2011 10:01 AM EST
            Reply
            Leave a Comment:
            You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
            You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
            (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
            Newsvine Privacy Statement
            As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
            FUN STUFF:
            • Leaderboard |
            • E-Mail Alerts |
            • Top of the Vine |
            • Newsvine Live |
            • Newsvine Archives |
            • The Greenhouse
            COMPANY STUFF:
            • Code of Honor |
            • Company Info |
            • Contact Us |
            • Jobs |
            • User Agreement |
            • Privacy Policy |
            • About our ads
            LEGAL STUFF:
            • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
            • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
            • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com