Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

South Carolina TV already awash in GOP attack ads

Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:56 AM EST
us-news, us, mitt-romney, newt-gingrich, south-carolina, rick-santorum, ad, crush, nancy-pelosi"
Brian Bakst, Associated Press
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 5 photos
<p>Republican presidential candidate, Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas speaks during a campaign stop, Wednesday, Jan. 11, 2012, in West Columbia, S.C. (AP Photo/David Goldman)</p>

Republican presidential candidate, Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas speaks during a campaign stop, Wednesday, Jan. 11, 2012, in West Columbia, S.C. (AP Photo/David Goldman)

Advertise | AdChoices

COLUMBIA — Mitt Romney is "a Massachusetts moderate" who "can't be trusted" on abortion and other core Republican values. Newt Gingrich has questionable judgment for "teaming up with Nancy Pelosi," the Democratic lawmaker the GOP loves to malign. Rick Santorum is a "serial hypocrite" with "a record of betrayal."

That is, if you believe the crush of TV commercials on steady rotation in South Carolina.

It's where Republican presidential candidates and their deep-pocketed allies are spending millions on attack ads ahead of the state's pivotal primary on Jan. 21. And in a state known for brutal campaign tactics, the savaging has only just begun. That's because Romney's wins in the first two contests — Iowa and New Hampshire — have set up a now-or-never situation in South Carolina for opponents desperate to deny him the nomination.

"People are going to stoop to new, interesting ad tactics that we haven't seen in the past," says DeWitt Zemp, a GOP strategist who was an aide to both Bush presidents and is unaligned in this race. "They're going to go even more negative than they have in the past as a result of where we are in the election process. It's all hands on deck against Romney."

Even before the race turned south, roughly $3 million had been spent in South Carolina, with more than half of it coming from a pro-Rick Perry super PAC called Make Us Great Again. Then, a similar group supporting Gingrich, named Winning Our Future, said it planned to spend $3.4 million to run an ad attacking Romney for jobs lost during his time as an executive at equity firm Bain Capital. But so far, only roughly $1.5 million has been bought.

Not to be outdone, a pro-Romney group called Restore Our Future has reserved $2.3 million in time. It's the group behind the ad linking Gingrich to Pelosi and ribbing him for other "mistakes" or flips on immigration, health care and Iraq policy. The group spent nearly $3 million on ads attacking Gingrich in Iowa before the leadoff caucuses, contributing to his precipitous fall from the top of polls there.

As he looks to revive his struggling campaign, Gingrich ditched his pledge to stay positive and unleashed a TV commercial assailing Romney on his long-ago evolution from a supporter of abortion rights to a firm stance against them. The 30-second spot says the former Massachusetts governor can't be trusted to stand by sacred anti-abortion positions.

The former House speaker is getting even more personal with his snipes in online videos, which sometimes end up making their way to TV.

One video that Gingrich's campaign released Wednesday targeted Romney's verbal gaffes, including his misconstrued statement that he liked "being able to fire people" and his argument that "corporations are people, too." The ad also revived a decades-old story about Romney strapping a dog carrier — with family dog Seamus inside — to the roof of his car for a lengthy road trip.

Romney himself has two TV ads up: One in which he characterizes the need to bring federal spending under control as a "moral responsibility" and another in which he rips the Obama administration's National Labor Relations Board for blocking Boeing's effort to build a jet production plant in Charleston.

Texas Rep. Ron Paul, a top three finisher in Iowa and New Hampshire, is doing his own dirty work.

He's going hard at Gingrich and Santorum in a double-barreled attack. His minute-long ad calls out both for cashing in once leaving office. It highlights Santorum's votes to raise the debt limit, support for earmark spending and siding with "big money union bosses" on right-to-work legislation.

"Don't be fooled. Rick Santorum, a record of betrayal. Another serial hypocrite who can't be trusted," the Paul ad ends to music with a horror-movie feel.

Some South Carolina voters cringe over what they've already seen and heard — and what they know is still to come over their TV sets and radios, and in their mailboxes.

"I wish we didn't have any negative ads," said Colleen Morrow, a retired state social worker from Columbia. "Talking about somebody's record is one thing, but attacking them on a personal level, I don't think that's right."

Not everything has had a dark edge.

Lagging in the polls, Perry has two commercials touting his Christian faith, small-town values and military background.

Santorum, the Iowa runner-up, is airing one that says he's "a trusted conservative that gives us the best chance of taking back the White House." A political action committee promoting the former Pennsylvania senator is striking the same theme.

And Paul, the candidate with arguably the hardest-hitting ads, is offsetting those with a softer spot featuring testimonials from veterans describing the former Air Force officer as "a veteran's best friend."

The ad wars aren't limited to South Carolina.

Candidates and their backers are already turning to Florida, which votes Jan. 31. The pro-Romney group has bought $3.6 million in airtime for commercials there.

___

Associated Press writer Thomas Beaumont and Julie Pace in South Carolina contributed to this report.

© 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Brian Bakst's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: United States , Columbia-SC
  • Public Discussion (37)
bdjwill

It's so nice to see how wonderful the Citizens United decision is helping the politicians. /sarc

  • 7 votes
Reply#1 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:20 PM EST
1standlastword

It's so nice to see how wonderful the Citizens United decision is helping the politicians. /sarc

Agreed and voted up!

A not so wise result of our corporate friendly supreme court justices.

Wonder what they think of their legal contribution to making our democracy (/sarc) a despicable carnival!

    #1.1 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:43 PM EST
    Shuklack

    Correct me if I'm wrong,

    But didn't Newt say in this campaign that he would never, ever, in a million years, stoop to negative campaign ads after being attacked by negative ads himself not too long ago? Didn't he make some big self-righteous deal about it?

    Was that someone else?

    • 1 vote
    #1.2 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:13 PM EST
    northtosouth

    Apparently, it was a "failed experiment" by the Gingrich camp. At least that's what he said.

      #1.3 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:16 PM EST
      1standlastword

      Oops! LOL!!

        #1.4 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:19 PM EST
        Reply
        Marshall James

        lol

        I havent seen an article on the gop with a Ron Paul picture on it in months....

        now there is a picture of him.....but the article is 100% negative.

        good lord.

        wake up people........corporations are choosing who you should vote for.

        dont let them.

        Ron Paul 2012

        • 3 votes
        Reply#2 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:36 PM EST
        Reliant

        James,

        you know that is just one of a group of 5 pictures, right? If you click thought the group you will see pictures of all the candidates discussed.

        • 3 votes
        #2.1 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 3:03 PM EST
        Grey Wolf

        … and it is ironic (and funny) because Ron Paul advocates that corporations should be the ones to choose who you should vote for. (Libertarian = shrink government, let the big corporations rule!)

        • 1 vote
        #2.2 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 3:11 PM EST
        northtosouth

        Reliant, pointing out facts break up the conspiracy theory that "everyone is out to get Ron Paul" that is his rallying cry. Stop it, you might make someone cry.

          #2.3 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 3:20 PM EST
          Marshall James

          reliant

          you really do not understand PR then.

          it is the main picture...most will not scroll through them all.

          this works on another whole level.

          please read up on bernays and lippmann.

          • 1 vote
          #2.4 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 3:33 PM EST
          northtosouth

          you know that is just one of a group of 5 pictures, right? If you click thought the group you will see pictures of all the candidates discussed.

          How did that comment prompt this?

          you really do not understand PR then.

            #2.5 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 4:21 PM EST
            Marshall James

            because if you honestly think that just as many people see all 5 pictures vs the main one...then you are not aware of what PR is.

            its pretty simple.

            do you know what PR is Nts? bernays???? lippmann?

              #2.6 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 4:33 PM EST
              northtosouth

              There's no conspiracy. Nobody is "out to get" Ron Paul. People steer away from Ron Paul because of Ron Paul, not some vast corporate media conspiracy. How many negative ads have the other candidates run against Paul? Not many if any. Why? Because he will only ever garner 25% of the Republican vote....max. He's too liberal for conservatives, too conservative for liberals and too all over the place for the middle. That's why he'll never be better than 2nd place in a primary (and that was in libertarian New Hampshire!), not because people are "out to get him". I hope the campaign material you pass out while on the job doesn't say what you post here. If it does, it's no wonder people think Paul's a bit off.

                #2.7 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 4:48 PM EST
                Marshall James

                5 months ago they were saying he would break out of single digits...then 3 months ago they said never over 14%.

                they say he isnt electable....both conservative and liberal media.

                seems like cain, pawlenty and bachmann are the unelectable ones.....and soon perry and gingrich and santorum.....they are unelectable.

                but you dont hear the media blasting on them daily on how they are unelectable...and how there support has a ceiling...ignoring the fact that they keep raising that ceiling.

                  #2.8 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 5:04 PM EST
                  northtosouth

                  but you dont hear the media blasting on them daily on how they are unelectable

                  Actually, yes. It's said every day. Since you're actively working on Ron Paul's campaign you should know this.

                    #2.9 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 5:12 PM EST
                    Marshall James

                    please link me where foxnews......oreilly, hannity has ever said that gingrich or santorum is unelectable....the right wing media has never done that to them like they have done to ron paul.....yet he is the one still standing.

                    same with the left wing...sure they think santorum and gingrich are evil....but there are still far more articles on how Ron Paul is not electable.

                    and being I argue for him constantly..I hear that quite often...he isnt electable...he has a ceiling...

                    I have yet to see that argument used against gingrich or perry....or the others.

                    sorry

                      #2.10 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 5:17 PM EST
                      northtosouth

                      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/t/unelectable-rick-santorum_66717682153701377.html

                      http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Elections/Vox-News/2011/0912/Rick-Perry-unelectable-or-GOP-s-best-shot-Why-public-and-pundits-differ

                      http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2011/11/25/the-unelectable-mitt-romney/

                      http://dailycaller.com/2011/12/21/gingrich-is-as-unelectable-as-he-is-delusional/

                      Notice Red State calls Romney unelectable and Ann Coulter thinks Gingrich is unelectable. So.....yeah.

                        #2.11 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 6:21 PM EST
                        Marshall James

                        First one was left wing...they think they are all unelectable.

                        christian science??? lmao.....unless you tote the christian kill all gays and muslims and give them millions they disown you......and once perry goofed in the debates....all of them were saying that.....

                        redstate...well one article against the frontrunner who has been annointed is not a problem...when there are hundreds of ron paul articles.

                        and gingrich is a progressive...so anyone with a lick of common sense on the right will say that...although...again....the sheer number of articles for Ron Paul against gingrich??

                        come on.

                        please dont even try to compare...you use second rate publications...when cnn, fox, msnbc say nearly daily he is not electable.

                        besides...didnt Jon Stewart point out the bias quite well a few months ago???

                          #2.12 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 6:31 PM EST
                          northtosouth

                          And you work for the Paul campaign, so why am I even debating this with you? I'm not going to entertain your derail any longer. Good bye, and good luck with your campaign efforts.

                            #2.13 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 7:59 PM EST
                            Reply
                            CreepingJesus

                            I LOVE it when republicans/teabaggers start to eat each other.

                            Here's a little tip for you RWNJs: You're ALL going to loose.

                            President Obama has a second term to serve.

                            • 1 vote
                            Reply#3 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:44 PM EST
                            You Just Lost The Game

                            and by the time that term is over the definition of "terrorism" will have expanded far enough that Obama can lock up anybody who dares to criticize him.

                            Whoever wins (Except for Ron Paul) we lose

                            • 2 votes
                            #3.1 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:59 PM EST
                            Raisuli

                            Paulbots- the comedy gift that just keeps on giving.

                            • 2 votes
                            #3.2 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:35 PM EST
                            Reply
                            northtosouth

                            It seems like every election cycle the GOP attack ads are getting worse and worse. It's disheartening to see Ron Paul joining in on the "fun". He ran clean in 2008. Not so much this time. I expect it from Gingrich, it's been his way since the beginning of his political career. It seems like GOP candidates can't get elected on their own merit, so instead they need to tear down the other guy.

                            • 2 votes
                            Reply#4 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:50 PM EST
                            Marshall James

                            nts

                            in all fairness...when you are going up against candidates who are backed by corporations and a biased media(more corporations)...you have to point out their records.

                            republicans are supposed to be limited government and non interventionist people.

                            everyone with the exception of Ron Paul is big government and war...ie fascist.

                            when you are taking on the banks, corporations and the military industrial complex you have to do what you can....they are.

                            • 1 vote
                            #4.1 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:57 PM EST
                            1standlastword

                            so instead they need to tear down the other guy.

                            The problem is their super PACs can do it legal and they--the candidates--don't have to take responsiblity.

                            It' the activist supreme court that has legitimized letting corporate entities to make a mockery out of our psuedo democracy.

                            When the general election campaign comes into full swing we have a REAL FREE FOR ALL to look forward to...not look foward to.

                            Be interesting to see if Obama let's the dogs loose...I hope not

                              #4.2 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:58 PM EST
                              You Just Lost The Game

                              Positive campaigning only works when everybody does it. Pointing out their records of deceit is key for Ron Paul if he wants a chance though.

                              Note how you never see the media go after Ron's record. It's always grasping at straws with crude generalizations or some newsletters written by James B. Powell.

                              • 1 vote
                              #4.3 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:03 PM EST
                              Philboo

                              " It seems like GOP candidates can't get elected on their own merit, so instead they need to tear down the other guy."

                              Right....

                              Just wait until you see Obama's ads...

                                #4.4 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:15 PM EST
                                northtosouth

                                Note how you never see the media go after Ron's record. It's always grasping at straws with crude generalizations or some newsletters written by James B. Powell.

                                Sorry if this sounds snarky, but Ron Paul doesn't have much of a record to attack except for the legislation he has proposed.

                                Right.... Just wait until you see Obama's ads...

                                Something you know that we don't?

                                  #4.5 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:22 PM EST
                                  Philboo

                                  "If you were hoping that President Obama's reelection campaign was going to be a positive one that focused on his accomplishments and record, sorry, its not.

                                  Obama's SuperPac, Priorities USA Action, is up with their first presidential ad and ostensibly its a hit job on Mitt Romney. Although the real target is House Budget Committee Paul Ryan. Oh, and it uses Newt Gingrich's Meet the Press attack on Ryan.

                                  #ixzz1jH1XZorW"

                                  I guess he can't get elected on his own merit...

                                    #4.6 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:22 PM EST
                                    northtosouth

                                    What was your source for that quote? I'd like to read the entire article.

                                      #4.7 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:29 PM EST
                                      Reply
                                      ZmanJeff

                                      I can't figure out why they just don't declare Romney the nominee so they can all save a lot of time and money on attack ads. The corporations and establishment Republicans have spoken and Romney gets the nod.

                                      Take that Tea-Party! lol

                                      • 1 vote
                                      Reply#5 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:01 PM EST
                                      greg81082-4115372

                                      On a lighter note..Rush Limbaugh said that Romney could lock up the nomination if he just parroted him. In a way, all these candidates are parroting Blimpy.

                                        Reply#6 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:27 PM EST
                                        DSKI-1290107

                                        be careful of those that only attacks and NEVER offer any solutions.

                                          Reply#7 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:33 PM EST
                                          Neetu M.

                                          More brainwashing - the more money they have, the more they spend on airtime! Maybe they could figure out how to create more jobs with the same money and have something to show for it.

                                            Reply#8 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:36 PM EST
                                            FactOfTheMatter

                                            Santorum, the Iowa runner-up, is airing one that says he's "a trusted conservative that gives us the best chance of taking back the White House."

                                            No amount of pot smoke can make that even plausible.

                                            • 1 vote
                                            Reply#9 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 3:00 PM EST
                                            RobPlumley

                                            Frankly, I can't find one ad that made me look one way or the other.

                                            I look for content, and the ads just don't cut it.

                                            So, if rich corporations or people want to piss their money away - fine.

                                            Until any of these candidates have anything to present, they're not getting my vote in the general elections.

                                            What these clowns (as in the GOP candidates) have to understand that though I may not vote in your primaries, I do listen and take notes.

                                            So far, my tally for the nominees are:

                                            1. Romney: 0
                                            2. Santorum: 0
                                            3. Paul: 0
                                            4. Perry: -1 (yeah, that bad)
                                            5. Bachmann: -1 (that bad too)
                                            6. Gingrich: 0
                                            7. Huntsman: 1 (but that's on the bubble)
                                            8. the others: 0
                                              Reply#10 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 3:12 PM EST
                                              Neetu M.

                                              The GOP will bash one another to pulp before anyone gets to the front nationally. It is pretty ludicrous how the show is conducted - I never pay attention to the ads on TV - they speak no truth, they make impossible promises, they malign everyone involved and reveal the ugliest side of politics.

                                              Why people waste so much time on garbage like this is quite ridiculous.

                                                Reply#11 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 3:54 PM EST
                                                Leave a Comment:
                                                You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                                                (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                                                Newsvine Privacy Statement
                                                As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                                FUN STUFF:
                                                • Leaderboard |
                                                • E-Mail Alerts |
                                                • Top of the Vine |
                                                • Newsvine Live |
                                                • Newsvine Archives |
                                                • The Greenhouse
                                                COMPANY STUFF:
                                                • Code of Honor |
                                                • Company Info |
                                                • Contact Us |
                                                • Jobs |
                                                • User Agreement |
                                                • Privacy Policy |
                                                • About our ads
                                                LEGAL STUFF:
                                                • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                                                • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                                                • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com