Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

IMF seeks up to $500 billion in new funds

Wed Jan 18, 2012 9:44 AM EST
world-news, business, eu, resources, imf, international-monetary-fund
Gabriele Steinhauser, AP Business Writer

Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron, left, greets his Italian counterpart Mario Monti outside 10 Downing Street in London Wednesday, Jan. 18, 2012. (AP Photo/Alastair Grant)

Advertise | AdChoices

BRUSSELS — The International Monetary Fund said Wednesday that it's aiming to increase its financial firepower by around $500 billion so it can issue new loans to help ease a worsening financial crisis.

Responding to speculation surrounding its funding requirements, the Washington-based institution said its staff estimates that countries around the world will need about $1 trillion in loans in the coming years. Most of the concerns center on the 17 nations that use the euro and their debt crisis.

Thanks to about $200 billion that European countries have promised the IMF, it's more than one-third of the way to its fund-raising goal.

The IMF has put up about a third of the financing of the eurozone's bailouts over the past two years. But there are growing worries that non-European countries will also need more help because of the worsening economic outlook.

Earlier, its sister organization, the World Bank, urged emerging countries to be ready for a severe global downturn if the crisis in the 17-nation eurozone intensifies.

The eurozone, in particular, has been pushing countries around the globe to give more funds to the IMF. The idea is to build up a larger firewall to stop the continent's debt troubles from spreading to large economies like Spain, Italy or even France.

But so far, even countries relatively flush with cash, like China or Brazil, have been reluctant to put up more money for Europe. So has the United States.

The Obama administration said Wednesday that it had not changed its opposition to further U.S. support for the IMF to handle Europe's debt crisis.

"We continue to believe that the IMF can play an important role in Europe, but only as a supplement to Europe's own efforts," said Treasury Department spokeswoman Kara Alaimo.

Eswar Prasad, a former top IMF official who teaches economics at Cornell University, said emerging market countries may have started to see the need for such support because Europe's debt crisis has begun to cut into their exports. He said also that concern about possible European bond defaults is triggering a flight to safer bonds. That means less capital is flowing to emerging markets.

"There is a sense among many countries that the problems of Europe are beginning to wash up on their shores, so some action must be taken," Prasad said.

Prasad expects the issue to be discussed Thursday at a meeting of deputy finance ministers for Group of 20 countries in Mexico City. But he doesn't expect a decision until the G-20 finance ministers meet Feb. 24-25 in Mexico City.

"The United States is almost certainly not going to put any more money on the table," Prasad said. "Even if the administration wanted to do it, there is little chance they could get it through Congress."

British Prime Minister David Cameron said Wednesday that the government would be prepared to back an increase but that he would require approval from his Parliament.

"We believe the IMF must always lend to countries, not to currencies," Cameron said at a news conference with Italian Premier Mario Monti. "We would only act if that was with others, not just as part of a eurozone measure.

But Cameron said it's up to the eurozone itself to prove that it's "standing behind its own currency."

Monti said British taxpayers wouldn't have to pay for Italy's economic woes.

"To my knowledge, my country has not cost a penny to the U.K.," Monti said. "I don't see a reason why this should change in the future."

How the IMF's fund-raising goal will be reached is set to be discussed at a meeting of finance ministers of the Group of 20 leading economies in Mexico next month.

____

David Stringer in London and Martin Crutsinger in Washington contributed to this story.

© 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Gabriele Steinhauser's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: Brussels
  • Public Discussion (17)
mstanley2265

The ability to repay ...of the nations getting the loans plus interest....is crucial...Too many errors have been made in the past in this regard...

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:21 AM EST
mountainmike-1199289

Since it was the Wall Street giants that were directly responsible for the largest white collar crime wave in world history that put us in this mess, maybe we need to tax all of the white collar criminals that are still on Wall Street so they can be held directly responsible for THEIR mess. Tax those obscene over the top bonuses and executive salaries.

In reading this news today, I have to wonder about when we will see an end to world financial problems. What I am afraid of is that the white collar crime and reckless speculation is continuing because Wall Street assumes there will be this safety net. It seems to be a new system for privatizing profits that go into those obscene salaries and bonuses while socializing the losses. Almost all of the white collar criminals that were the primary cause of the recession are still on Wall Street, and none of them have been held fully accountable. Then we have the top ten of those huge corporations owning 77 percent of all US banking assets and controlling most investment in America.

All of the central banks in Europe, the UK, etc... failed to protect the world from a very, very, very blatant scam. Predatory lending developed hundreds of thousands of junk loans and mortgages. Then the rating agencies lied their butts off to grossly over rate them when they were grouped into bundles. Those bundles were fraudulently represented world wide by Wall Street executives. That's why we are in the current mess, which is made all the worse by Wall Street now focusing on speculation on oil and food to cause world wide inflation.

At what point due we stop them in their tracks and start handing out prison time for robbery, cheating, stealing, forgery, fraud, etc...

  • 2 votes
#1.1 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 1:22 PM EST
FlNutmegger

mountainmike-1199289 Since it was the Wall Street giants that were directly responsible for the largest white collar crime wave in world history that put us in this mess, maybe we need to tax all of the white collar criminals that are still on Wall Street so they can be held directly responsible for THEIR mess. Tax those obscene over the top bonuses and executive salaries.

Well said but, here comes that but again, :>)) the same guys who truly created this mess also bought and paid big dollars for all 3 arms of our country and are dictating to them what is to take place. We, the ones who ultimately foot the bills for this chicanery, do not even enter into their considerations because no matter whom we elect they already own them and from the top down too so there are no clean hands in the cesspool we call Washington!

  • 1 vote
#1.2 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 1:31 PM EST
skeptic-227981

Since I've said pretty much the same thing as mountainmike, I totally agree. If our companies can hoard $2 trillion off shore rather than hire people, THEY can put that money into economies and banks. Hire people. At decent wages. Everything was fine when workers had enough to pay their own bills. According to an OECD report that came out two days ago, the U.S. now ranks 27th, just over Greece, Chile, Mexico, and Turkey, in social justice. Health, education, poverty, and JOBS are accounted in that equation.

  • 1 vote
#1.3 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 2:32 PM EST
Reply
peapod

It sure takes alot of money to ruin countries.

  • 3 votes
Reply#2 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:58 AM EST
Jonathan-1917156

Why should other nations contribute if the structural changes that are needed won't be made by the recipients. That is just throwing good money after bad. It isn't just cutting the deficits, it is HOW their finances are managed. So yeah, we have one side, greece that basically lives as though nothing has changed, then we have the tea party in the united states who basically want no taxes to fund the government. Two sides of the idiocy, two sides of stupidity, two big reasons to not put more money into the pot.

  • 1 vote
Reply#3 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 12:26 PM EST
mountainmike-1199289

Structural changes? Divide up the Wall Street giants. Investment corporations then stand on their own. At the first indication of white collar crime or cooking the books, they get forced into bankruptcy with executive assets seized. That is where the money needs to come from for the next bail out.

  • 3 votes
#3.1 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 1:23 PM EST
Jonathan-1917156

whatever, if you are going to spew partisan rants, then I'm out of here.

    #3.2 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 1:39 PM EST
    mountainmike-1199289

    What's partisan about dividing up Wall Street giants? They are the ones that collapsed the economy. That's FACT not partisan fiction.

    • 1 vote
    #3.3 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:02 PM EST
    Jonathan-1917156

    and they would have done it regardless of whether they were together or not. The point is to come up with REAL solutions, not flights of fancy that make people feel good but really doesn't make a @!$%#load of a difference.

    That is REALITY.

    • 1 vote
    #3.4 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:05 PM EST
    Reply
    Fifth Horseman

    China has no interest in putting money into countries that fellow a welfare State of mind. China has had decades of people sitting around doing nothing under the old Communist system. China leaders have look at countries in Europe as having too many people on the dole. By their standards should be put into labor camps where it is "No work, No eat".

    There is that little thing that if these countries go into default on their loans then any contracts with their country unions will be worthless. The average high price salary of top government officials will come to an end. Rich Lifestyles will come to an end.

    IMF should look into the bank accounts of high government officials of the these countries. Find out who took what out of the country. Better who sold what to whom. The country of Greece have lost some of those rare antiques from the National Museum. They can now be found in the homes of Oil Rich people in the Middle East.

    As usually the USA will get stuck bailing out those other nations that is if China will loan the USA money.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#4 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 12:48 PM EST
    FlNutmegger

    Didn't I just read here Iceland stuck its thumb in the world's eye and defaulted on all of their outstanding loans as they rewrote their Constitution? I wonder how much of our taxpayer dollars went into the dirt chute with that little goody? The US continues to borrow money from the world to fund not only the World Bank but the IMF also and where do they get the money to throw into the wind? From struggling American taxpayers of course. I want to know just how much money is given to these countries as well as snuck over there through the IMF and World Market as a supporting member. If we are going to fund organizations such as there then we should not be giving money in any other many as we do with our foreign aid charades It is way past time for our leaders (?) and I use that word very advisedly, to realize that the golden goose is on life support!

    • 2 votes
    Reply#5 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 1:15 PM EST
    Jonathan-1917156

    Iceland refused to pay the english (and possibly other european) bank insurance systems for the monies that those agencies paid when the icelandic banks went belly up. The problem is that the icelandic banks (I believe) using their offshore nature to not pay into the fund, but expected its customers to be reimbursed for the default.

    It is like saying that american customers put their money into the royal bank of canada (not Centura Bank which is a wholy owned US based subsidiary) and the royal bank of canada didn't pay into the FDIC, but then went bankrupt, and still expected the FDIC to compensate the account holders.

    As for what money went into Iceland, I believe that they recovered most of their losses as a result of the AIG bailout.

    Icelandic banking was just another symptom of the bubble, a banking system that was being backed by a country that didn't have the finances to support it when @!$%# happens.

    • 1 vote
    #5.1 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 1:21 PM EST
    FlNutmegger

    Jonathan-1917156, thanks for the info. Most interesting. We had RBC buy out a local independent bank and they were the worst people in the world to do business with and I moved our accounts from there top another independent. They went belly up, in this market, simply because of their attitude and have moved on or back to Canada. Man they were so rude and never heard of Customer Service, they wanted us to do do business with them based on that. Not in this lifetime! Good stuff, thanks.

    • 1 vote
    #5.2 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 1:39 PM EST
    Jonathan-1917156

    RBC itself is a good bank, I have never had to deal with any of the US divisions, because they have to be run completely separately (that is a canadian regulatory thing relating to Basel II compliance).

    My mention of RBC was because it was the last canadian bank I worked for before I started doing work in the US banking industry, as a bank, RBC is probably the best run of all the canadian chartered banks, CIBC the worst.

      #5.3 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 1:41 PM EST
      FlNutmegger

      They sure must have left their good manners, which I might add after years of dealings in Canada are second to none none. Gotta tell you that the only people I ever met, representing Canada, that were nastier, were the Customs Agents at not only Quebec, but Montreal as well! Really bad dudes, all around.

        #5.4 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 1:52 PM EST
        Jonathan-1917156

        Well they didn't start any banks in the US, they only bought existing banks, and because of the required separation, the only thing they can really do is look at the numbers. Not sure what bank you re referring to but even if I did, I don't know enough about their operations to know what went on. All I can say is that nobody in canada left canada to run any of the US banks, so if there are customer service issues, it more than likely is internal to the US bank.

        As for the customs agents, well there are @!$%#s everywhere, including Canada.

        • 1 vote
        #5.5 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 2:03 PM EST
        Reply
        Leave a Comment:
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
        (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
        Newsvine Privacy Statement
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
        FUN STUFF:
        • Leaderboard |
        • E-Mail Alerts |
        • Top of the Vine |
        • Newsvine Live |
        • Newsvine Archives |
        • The Greenhouse
        COMPANY STUFF:
        • Code of Honor |
        • Company Info |
        • Contact Us |
        • Jobs |
        • User Agreement |
        • Privacy Policy |
        • About our ads
        LEGAL STUFF:
        • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
        • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
        • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com