Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Obama's State of the Union: Jobs, re-election time

Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:05 PM EST
business, politics, us, obama, barack-obama, of-the, state-of-the-union
Ben Feller, Associated Press
In his weekly address President Barack Obama talked about his upcoming State of the Union address.
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 3 photos
<p>President Barack Obama speaks at a campaign event, Thursday, Jan. 19, 2012, at the Apollo Theatre in the Harlem neighborhood of New York. (AP Photo/Haraz N. Ghanbari)</p>

President Barack Obama speaks at a campaign event, Thursday, Jan. 19, 2012, at the Apollo Theatre in the Harlem neighborhood of New York. (AP Photo/Haraz N. Ghanbari)

Advertise | AdChoices

WASHINGTON — Vilified by the Republicans who want his job, President Barack Obama will stand before the nation Tuesday night determined to frame the election-year debate on his terms, using his State of the Union address to outline a lasting economic recovery that will "work for everyone, not just a wealthy few."

As his most powerful chance to make a case for a second term, the prime-time speech carries enormous political stakes for the Democratic incumbent who presides over a country divided about his performance and pessimistic about the nation's direction. He will try to offer a stark contrast with his opponents by offering a vision of fairness and opportunity for everyone.

In a preview Saturday, Obama said in a video to supporters that the speech will be an economic blueprint built around manufacturing, energy, education and American values.

He is expected to announce ideas to make college more affordable and to address the housing crisis still hampering the economy three years into his term, people familiar with the speech said. Obama will also propose fresh ideas to ensure that the wealthy pay more in taxes, reiterating what he considers a matter of basic fairness, the officials said.

His policy proposals will be less important than what Obama hopes they all add up to: a narrative of renewed American security with him at the center, leading the fight.

"We can go in two directions," Obama said in the campaign video. "One is toward less opportunity and less fairness. Or we can fight for where I think we need to go: building an economy that works for everyone, not just a wealthy few."

That line of argument is intended to tap directly into concerns of voters who think America has become a nation of income inequality, with rules rigged to help the rich. The degree to which Obama or his eventual Republican opponent can better connect with millions of hurting Americans is expected to determine November's presidential election.

Obama released his video hours ahead of the South Carolina primary, where Republican candidates fought in the latest fierce contest to become his general election rival.

The White House knows Obama is about to get his own stage to outline a re-election vision, but carefully. The speech is supposed to an American moment, not a campaign event.

Obama didn't mention national security or foreign policy in his preview, and he is not expected to break ground on either one in his speech.

He will focus on the economy and is expected to promote unfinished parts of his jobs plan, including the extension of a payroll tax cut that is soon to expire.

Whatever Obama proposes is likely to face long odds in a deeply divided Congress.

More people than not disapprove of Obama's handling of the economy, and he is showing real vulnerability among the independent voters who could swing the election. Yet he will step into the moment just as the economy is showing life. The unemployment rate is still at a troubling 8.5 percent, but at its lowest rate in nearly three years. Consumer confidence is up.

By giving a sneak peek to millions of supporters on his email list, Obama played to his Democratic base and sought to generate an even larger audience for Tuesday's address. He is unlikely to getter a bigger stage all year.

More people watched last year's State of the Union than tuned in to see Obama accept the Democratic presidential nomination in Denver in 2008.

The foundation of Obama's speech is the one he gave in Kansas last month, when he declared that the middle class was at a make-or-break moment and he railed against "you're on your own" economics of the Republican Party. His theme then was about a government that ensures people get a fair shot to succeed.

The State of the Union will be the details to back that up.

But even so, the speech will still be a framework — part governing, part inspiration.

The details will be rolled out in full over the next several weeks, as part of Obama's next budget proposal and during his travels, which will allow him more media coverage.

On national security, Obama will ask the nation to reflect with him on a momentous year of change, including the end of the war in Iraq, the killing of al-Qaida terrorist leader Osama bin Laden and the Arab Spring protests, with people clamoring for freedom. He is expected to note the troubles posed by Iran and Syria without offering new positions about them.

Despite low expectations for legislation this year, Obama will offer short-term ideas that would require action from Congress. For now, the main looming to-do item is an extension of a payroll tax cut and unemployment benefits, both due to expire by March.

His travel schedule following his speech, to politically important regions, offers clues to the policies he was expected to unveil.

Both Phoenix and Las Vegas have been hard hit by foreclosures. Denver is where Obama outlined ways of helping college students deal with school loan debt. Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and Detroit are home to a number of manufacturers. And Michigan was a major beneficiary of the president's decision to intervene to rescue the American auto industry.

Republican leaders in Congress say Obama has made the chances of cooperation even dimmer just over the last several days. He enraged Republicans by installing a consumer watchdog chief by going around the Senate, which had blocked him, and then rejected a major oil pipeline project the GOP has embraced.

Obama is likely, once again, to offer ways in which a broken Washington must work together. Yet that theme seems but a dream given the gridlock he has been unable to change.

The address remains an old-fashioned moment of national attention; 43 million people watched it on TV last year. The White House website will offer a live stream of the speech, promising extra wrinkles for people who watch it there, and then invite people to send in questions to administration officials through social media such as Twitter and Facebook.

Obama's campaign is also organizing and promoting parties around the nation for people to watch the speech.

__

AP deputy director of polling Jennifer Agiesta and Associated Press writer Ken Thomas contributed to this report.

__

Online:

White House: http://www.whitehouse.gov

___

Follow Ben Feller at http://twitter.com/BenFellerDC

© 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Ben Feller's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: United States , Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (103)
Monkey99

President Obama's SOTU speech will be roundly criticized, of course, but this time, the GOP will have nothing to say about it, much as they have said, and done nothing, about this economy. Neither the GOP-controlled congress, nor any of the GOP primary candidates have said anything about how they propose to strengthen the economy for EVERYONE, without screwing the middle and working class in the process.

No, the GOP have nothing to say, this time around. It's too late. The country needs a new direction, and the GOP aren't the ones to propose it, because they don't have one that won't destroy this country in the process.

  • 14 votes
#1 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:39 PM EST
mountainmike-1199289

For Republicans to do more than cheap shot Obama on his speech, their "feet need to be held to the fire" to actually come up with a platform to run on for 2012. We need to at least hear about what they are FOR and not just what they are against.

That's the time warp zone for Republicans. They will go back to the 1980's and recommend once again voodoo trickle down Reaganomics with NO factual evidence that it works. Then they will go back to the 1920's for their non regulation dogma - which accounts for both the Great Depression of 1929 and Great Recession of 2008.

It would be refreshing for Republicans to come up with new ideas every few decades.

  • 14 votes
#1.1 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:47 PM EST
Bye

Mr. President: Please point out to all the people who haven't been paying attention just how useless and worthless the GOP has been in moving this country forward. Please point out how they threw the Keystone XL Pipeline bill together in secret, then advertised it for everybody to call you and urge you to support this "Job Creating" piece of bull. Once again the 1% trying to screw the American people and then jumping on you for not signing it. Thank you for not signing it!! Of course the Republicans are still trying....there's too much "Secret Cash" changing hands under the table to push this through for the Kochsucking brothers.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/keystone-xl-robert-redford-thanks-obama-for-rejecting-pipeline-clinton-wont-testify/

Don't worry Mr. President. Your Victory in November will be the clear sign that the Right can't see....and doesn't get.

  • 13 votes
#1.2 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:52 PM EST
MartyMoose

It's a gigantic waste of time. As interested as I am in the state of our nation, I do not see this speech as a place to learn about it. It's an hour-long political ad where the president proposes a whole bunch of pie-in-the-sky ideas he has no power at all to implement. Meanwhile, members of Congress show what a collection of douchebags they are by partisanly cheering in unison every little thing he says or staying in their seats if they are in the other party. It's embarrassing really.

  • 6 votes
#1.3 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 1:42 PM EST
flameaway

Embarassing or high political theater?

It's a judgement call.

:)

  • 4 votes
#1.4 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 1:59 PM EST
WILDWONDERFUL

Neither the GOP-controlled congress

Monkey who controls the Senate ?

  • 3 votes
#1.5 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 2:00 PM EST
Monkey99

Nah-nah.

What has the GOP DONE?? That's the pertinent issue here. What do they plan to run on?

Nothing? It's what they've done this past three years.

  • 7 votes
#1.6 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 2:15 PM EST
Arlene Tognetti

Monkey99

You are accurate, the GOP/Tea Party have nothing to offer, nothing to give to America

except talk, talk and more debates over like nothing: The Gop/Tea Party promised when

THEY got into office Nov 2010, that THEY would get jobs a going and that we can reduce t

budget.....blah,blah, blah

Now, its Jan 2012 and its still Blah, blah, blah

They have nothing, they never had anything and they won't run on something

except hot air

Obama/Biden 2012

  • 4 votes
#1.7 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 6:37 PM EST
Linda Luke

a lasting economic recovery that will "work for everyone, not just a wealthy few."

Exactly what everyone wants, sold, re-elected, who needs a campaign.

Trickery, deception, and stealth goes a long ways.

  • 1 vote
#1.8 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 7:12 PM EST
John-614398

Just some more BS from BO

  • 2 votes
#1.9 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 8:49 PM EST
Monkey99

"just some more BS from BO."

As compared to the GOP? Now you're making me laugh........

  • 2 votes
#1.10 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 9:01 PM EST
Gilf Hunter

Monkey 99-

Apparently you are still Obama drunk like I was in 2008 when I voted for him. I won't be making that mistake again. I woke up. You should take a look on how the universal health care is paid for in 2013 (after the 2012 election of course)...it's on the backs of the middle class. Do you have a house that you pay a mortgage on with interest that you could right off on your taxes? And that's just one example. Kiss it goodbye in 2013. In the last 3 years under Obama, Wall Street executives and businesses have profitted more than under Bush's 8 years...and he sucked! As for his SOTU address Tuesday, once you've sobered up from being under Obama's spell, all he sounds like is the teacher from Charlie Brown.

  • 3 votes
#1.11 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 10:00 PM EST
Linda Luke

Hang in there people the "World Bank" and the IMF are predicting all hell is going to break with every economy in the world. I'm sure that will happen after Obama is re-elected though. If not we will all know that Obama is not part of the master plan.

    #1.12 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 10:38 PM EST
    Monkey99

    gilf,

    I'm not "Obama-drunk," as you seem to think. He's just the lesser of two evils right now. Those Wall St execs profited by Glass-Steagall being removed. The lack of regulation caused all that, not Obama.

    And that healthcare is not universal. If you knew anything about real universal healthcare, you wouldn't complain, because there would be nothing to complain about. Unless you just omit the "socialist" or "communist" reference to persuade.

    It's doubtful you voted for him using Fox talking points like those. Good try, no cigar.

    • 1 vote
    #1.13 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 11:15 PM EST
    Heavy Artillery Rocker

    Obama 2012,

    Can't find a single reason to vote otherwise.

    We took out another Al Qaeda operative today. How many is that?

    Lesee...Quadafi, Osama, multiple operatives and I have no idea how many "soldiers."

    Give 'em hell Obama! Screw poliyticks lets off some evildoers, idn't that right there dubya?

    After Obama finishes cleaning up the mess from the previous administration maybe we'll consider it but, don't count on it.

    Someone said something about Repub's coming up with some new ideas?

    I can hear Palin already, "Oh. and we can see Canadia too, doncha know?"

    • 5 votes
    #1.14 - Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:06 AM EST
    FRED-1090120

    you got your facts wrong pal, it's not the GOP controled congress, it's the Democrat controled congress, the Democrats controlthe Senate and the Whitehouse, the GOP controls the house only, don't try to put Obama's failures on the party that is not in control of the Government, this is the problem with the Democrats they try to put their failures on someone else, doesn't work anymore, nobody believes the B/S coming from the liberal news any more , we the people no where the faults lie, Obama and the Democrats are the cause for this countries downfall, you liberals elected a community organizer with no government experience at all to be the President of this great nation, and now you want to blame the GOP for your failures, sorry but time is up, Obama's term is up, he is a total failure, just like the democrat party, and we the people will speak load and clear in Nov. 2012

    • 4 votes
    #1.15 - Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:27 AM EST
    TPisFORtheBATHROOM101

    Hello McFly(derrr gop)...welcome back to reality,if you can find the way. Sheesh.

    FRED!!! C'mon now. You are going to deny that 2/3 of the top can get passed through what NEEDS to pass. There is that 1/3 which won't even so much as pass gas. C'mon. Really. If we could get all 3 to agree,something would get done.

    The numbers aren't actual,but try the scenario. Please. When there are 100's of millions of people sayingone thing,and those couple million holding out,are 100's of millions wrong,or the few million?

    At the scene of an accident,3 people say the person ran the red light causing an accident,and the 1 person denies running the light. Who would you tend to believe as more accurate/reliable? Seriously,it's a fair comparison.

    • 2 votes
    #1.16 - Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:39 AM EST
    Gilf Hunter

    Monkey-

    Unfortunately, I did. I caught hell for it at work, but my wife (a liberal) was "so proud of me". I believed all his rhetoric. I thought he would pull everyone together and turn this country in the right direction. Never again will I be fooled by rhetoric from an articulate, intelligent presidential candidate. I should have done my research. Guess what, this time I have and he won't get my vote a second time...just like Bush didn't the last time. He has created more of a rift than Bush ever did. How many more years is Obama going to focus on jobs? It's not the government's job to create jobs. It's the private sector. On a side note, kudos to Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday for hammering John Boehner on the Republicans low congressional approval ratings and their lack of compromise.

    • 3 votes
    #1.17 - Sun Jan 22, 2012 9:22 AM EST
    Monkey99

    Again, you are placing blame in the wrong area. If you've paid enough attention to politics, this division is not the president's fault. Nor is the lack of jobs.

    Read up on American history during the Great Depression. What entity created the jobs to get this country back on it's feet? Then tell us where all those "Private sector" jobs are? They've got the lowest tax rates in history, we should be SWIMMING in jobs. Yet, where are they?? No one has gotten a straight answer for that one, and by now, we don't expect one, because there isn't one. That "less tax - more jobs" line is pure, unadulterated BS.

    Give Chris Wallace credit? For what? He's stating what everyone already knows, and besides what he didn't mention is that the GOP have not just refused to compromise, they haven't done anything in the last three years. How many jobs bills have passed? And don't blame the senate. If it can't pass muster there, it damn sure can't come across the president's desk.

    No, Fox talking points is all I'm still seeing. It's all to recognizable, anymore.

      #1.18 - Sun Jan 22, 2012 12:42 PM EST
      Common.Cents

      @Lisa_Lee, you want @BarackPresident Obama to lie to us? More than he already does?

      @Lisa_Lee wrote:

      Please point out how they threw the Keystone XL Pipeline bill together in secret, then advertised it for everybody to call you and urge you to support this "Job Creating" piece of bull.

      For those who want the truth, the North American-Made Energy Security Act was first proposed in May of 2011. That bill went through all the proper committee hearings and votes, and was brought to the floor of the House of Representatives for a vote on July 26, over 2 months after it was first introduced. This bill wasn't done "in secret" and it passed the House with fairly strong bipartisan support. There were 47 Democrats who voted for the bill for the Keystone XL project the first time it came up for a vote in the House.

      Obama has no commitment to jobs or economic growth. He only favors cronyism. He favors his administration having the power to pick "winners" and dole out taxpayer funds to his friends. Obama's idea of jobs and energy is Solyndra, not successful, privately funded enterprises like the ones who want to build the Keystone XL pipeline.

      --
      ¢ommon ¢ents
      AKA @CommonCentsUSA

      • 1 vote
      #1.19 - Sun Jan 22, 2012 1:10 PM EST
      FRED-1090120

      Tips,Gilf Hunter,Monkey

      did you watched Fox News Sunday, what was Boehner holding up in his hand the whole show, A jobs bill, the house passed 30 jobs bills and now are at the senate DOA, and what about the Keystone pipeline, DOA by Obama, i still don't get Obama putting a moratorium on American oil co. drilling in the gulf when it was BP (a foreign co)that caused the spill, how many US jobs did that brainless decision by Obama cost, the GOP house does it's job but when nothing gets past the senate or Obama then who's to blame, the GOP?

        #1.20 - Sun Jan 22, 2012 4:02 PM EST
        Monkey99

        Waving a stack of paper around on TV doesn't qualify as doing one's job. Since this GOP congress has the deserved label of Do-Nothing, coupled with the lowest rating since ratings began, I'd say there is no longer an argument about that.

        Maybe looking into how those supposed "bills" were going to "help" the American people should be done first, before attempting to defend them.

        And know what moratoriums are for? look that up. It matters not if the company was domestic OR foreign. A spill is a SPILL.

        And Fox? C'mon......opinions don't count as facts.

          #1.21 - Sun Jan 22, 2012 4:20 PM EST
          flameaway

          Fred,

          "who's to blame, the GOP?"

          [nods positively]

          Yes.

          Here's how. They don't want to raise taxes on the wealthy, but they want to take social services from the the poor.

          That pretty much sums it up. Right?

          • 2 votes
          #1.22 - Sun Jan 22, 2012 4:27 PM EST
          Gilf Hunter

          Fred- You're right.

          Monkey -

          For someone who bitches so much about the Republicans not comprimising and lack of progress, take a look in the mirror and ask yourself how willing you are to look at things differently. Judging by our exchange, you're just as stubborn as a right-wing conservative only in liberal form. At least I'm a moderate, Reagan Republican. All I hear in your posts sounds like the same old Pelosi-Reid talking points. Wake up.

            #1.23 - Sun Jan 22, 2012 11:15 PM EST
            Monkey99

            I used to be a republican, for your information. The party left me when it embraced extremism. I was an Eisenhower republican, but now, I'm a "leftist," "socialist," or 'f***ing liberal." Well, no more of that crap. I DID wake up. I DO see things differently.

            I also fought for this country. I see a bunch of right-wing extremists dismantling this country for the sake of the "almighty" greenback. Screw the middle and working classes, that last buck just HAS to be made.

            A reagan republican? YOU are a hair's breath from being a "leftist,": "socialist," and f***ing liberal," too. YOU wake up.

            • 1 vote
            #1.24 - Mon Jan 23, 2012 3:03 AM EST
            Gilf Hunter

            Monkey -

            I have no way to prove it, but if you did actually serve in the U.S. Military then thank you for your service.

            On the flip side, it's called Prozac, talk to your doctor about it.

              #1.25 - Mon Jan 23, 2012 1:55 PM EST
              Monkey99

              I guess you'll have to go through the process, yourself. Unless of course, you happen to be an extremist too.

              By the looks of it, seems so, if you can still accept the lousy job the GOP are doing in congress, and the danage they are doing to this country.

              Who needs prozac? I laugh at the GOP. All this talk about taking the White House and the senate? LOL! The GOP will be lucky if they can keep control of congress!

              No I take that back....They've already lost control.

              • 1 vote
              #1.26 - Mon Jan 23, 2012 2:21 PM EST
              Monkey99

              I guess you'll have to go through the process, yourself. Unless of course, you happen to be an extremist too.

              By the looks of it, seems so, if you can still accept the lousy job the GOP are doing in congress, and the danage they are doing to this country.

              Who needs prozac? I laugh at the GOP. All this talk about taking the White House and the senate? LOL! The GOP will be lucky if they can keep control of congress!

              No I take that back....They've already lost control.

                #1.27 - Mon Jan 23, 2012 2:22 PM EST
                Reply
                flameaway

                Well, I'm still making up my mind. But the political gamesmanship shown by both parties certainly doesn't sit well...

                People are homeless and hungry and the pols are maneuvering for the 2012 election cycle.

                I have an idea for all politicians of whatever stripe.

                Shut up and get to work fixing the problems you shouldn't have allowed to happen in the first place.

                • 5 votes
                #2 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:50 PM EST
                Carol-500283

                I do think the SOTU is required, but I'm not positive, it's been a long time since I've actually study that subject. For me, political science 101 was sometime ago, but I think that's right. So sorry, he has to speak, and he at least has ideas, the other side just wants him, also interupted as "us" to fail. That seems to be the last "idea" they've had in the last 3 years.

                • 5 votes
                #2.1 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 1:06 PM EST
                madvargr

                US Constitution Article II, section 3:

                [The President] shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.

                • 5 votes
                #2.2 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 1:23 PM EST
                MartyMoose

                I do think the SOTU is required, but I'm not positive

                Some kind of report is required, but a speech is not. He could just write it down and email it to Congress. It's really just about getting some free face time in front of the public.

                • 3 votes
                #2.3 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 1:38 PM EST
                WILDWONDERFUL

                It will be a campaign speech full of blame Bush

                • 5 votes
                #2.4 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 2:15 PM EST
                Skip Murray

                Actually, I do blame G. Bush. Don't you? Do we not have 2 unpaid for wars? Did the banking sysstem not break under Mr. Bush? Did our infrastructure suffer neglect under Mr. Bush? Did tax breaks for the wealthy to create jobs not happen under Mr. Bush's watch? Yes, I blame Mr. Bush and I expect it will take much longer than 4,6,8 years. Elizabeth Warren will probably still be trying to fix the muddle that Mr. Bush got us into in 2016. So, to your comment. Yes, I hold Mr. Bush responsible.

                • 8 votes
                #2.5 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 2:39 PM EST
                WILDWONDERFUL

                So the attack on us World Trade Center etc you blame on George ?

                Do you not think Barney Frank had any responsibility. Do you not find it very strange that the whole banking mess blew up right before the election and that Wall Street was the biggest contributor or Hussein Obama ?

                Elizabeth Warren talks a good game but accomplishes little.

                • 2 votes
                #2.6 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 2:45 PM EST
                Randy McMurphy

                So the attack on us World Trade Center etc you blame on George ?

                The kind of sloth and inattention he paid to terrorism may have been forgivable, if he proceeded to take out the people who did, did not go into his optional war with Iraq, and was marginally successful at rebuilding Afghanistan.

                Do you not think Barney Frank had any responsibility./blockquote>

                Barney Frank was in the minority from 1995-2006 and was in no position to stop anything Republik maority wanted to pass. Thats just how the house works. He did however work with Republican mike oxley to pass a bill to regulate lenders that would have prevented the 08 BUSH crash, and he got the majority of democrats to sign onto it.... It was shelved, Killed, by the Repblican senate majority leader Frist...there were filibuster threats , it was not offered on the floor for a vote.

                Do you not find it very strange that the whole banking mess blew up right before the election and that Wall Street was the biggest contributor or Hussein Obama ?

                OK Conspiracy corner.. they would blow up their own finances and industry just to elected Obama? Please think about that...and understand they are donating more to republiks this year and in '10 ...Most of those donations Obama got was from individual donors, the wall street Pacs owned by those firms largely donated more to Republix...

                • 2 votes
                #2.7 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 3:28 PM EST
                nospin1

                Blaming others for Obama's shortcomings is typical of the dems.

                Guess they forgot that when you point a finger at someone else 3 fingers point back at themselves.

                • 2 votes
                #2.8 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 4:55 PM EST
                Necie

                And nospin, trying to forget that there were twenty years in between Reagan and Obama is something the Right tries to forget...if the DEM did not bring up Bush, then you folks would never bring him up...what you righties really want to do is forget that your man was the one responsible for all the damage done to the economy...you want the history books to be rewritten with President Obama's TERMS in office as a back board of failures, instead of Bushes...I do not understand you people, you placed an idiot into office for two terms, he was a waste of space, and if history is written right, it will show that Bush & Criminals Inc., should have been sent off to prison, instead of his ranch in Texas...pointing fingers is something the right is good at, you elephants might think that President Obama will be leaving office, but as donkeys it is our duty to try and kick some common sense into you....

                • 4 votes
                #2.9 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 6:22 PM EST
                Arlene Tognetti

                Flameaway

                The GOP/Tea Party do not care who is homeless, who lost their jobs or who doesn't have health care

                Bernie Sanders has said it right all along: The impasse of Congress, especially the HOUSE, is the real reason we have not made headway

                the other reason: The GOP wanted to make President Obama a failure from the get go

                Bernie Sanders has had his differences with the President, but Bernie also recognises who

                is actually to blame. We the people should all write, kick our representavies in the collective ass and say GET TO WORK OR ELSE

                We can't wait til November 2012 and trust me, after Gov Walker is recalled and he will be

                Americans will fight like you have never seen before. Not against the President, but against

                special interests, lobbyists and the people who have stopped job creation in America

                • 5 votes
                #2.10 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 6:45 PM EST
                nospin1

                Necie - Repubs do not bring Bush up just as dems do not bring Clinton up. There is no point to doing either as they are not the current POTUS.

                It was the American election system that put Bush into office not idiotic voters. To even say that shows you have no respect for the American election system.

                So now you are the judge and jury about Obama. If Obama agreed with you, criminal proceeding would have happened. You are just another sheep who blindly follows dem rhetoric.

                You are correct that you are a donkey and are acting like one.

                • 1 vote
                #2.11 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 7:25 PM EST
                Monkey99

                I don't have any problem bringing up Clinton, any more than those extremist GOP idiots cheering Gingrich.

                It was the right-leaning SCOTUS that gave Bush his second term, if that escaped your attention, so so much for respect for the American election system.

                Obama won't bring criminal proceedings (though there is ample legal justification to do so, you can ignore it, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist), because it won't do anything for the country. Might want to remind the GOP of that, since they still haven't gotten the message that they are supposed to DO something FOR this country, instead of sitting on their a$$e$, doing nothing, collecting salaries they haven't earned.

                As far as sheep, The only sheep I see are republicans. Look at that clown spectacle of a primary. Crowds bleating to the lowest common denominator. From Willard all the way to Wrong-Way Ron. Jeez, talk about the donkey metaphor.

                • 1 vote
                #2.12 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 9:17 PM EST
                nospin1

                monkey - There are many who felt the same way about the dems in the last election as you feel about Gingrich in this one and we didn'tcall the dems idiots.

                Disagreeing with the SCOTUS when it doesn't fit in with your beliefs is fine but that doesn't mean the SCOTUS is wrong.

                If Obama will not bring criminal proceedings, he is derelict in his duty as POTUS.

                In the 2010 election the voters were unhappy enough with the dems since 2008 or they would not have elected the repubs.

                The 2008 dem primary is no diffferent than the repub primary this year.

                • 1 vote
                #2.13 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 10:06 PM EST
                flameaway

                Arlene,

                All this bad blood seems to have arisen out of Clinton. The whole ethics thing and how the Republicans reacted. It created a lot of deep divisions across the aisle. Throwing so much money into the mix hasn't helped. Now, neither side seems to have an ethical leg to stand on.

                We see it played out on the vine all the time. The finger pointing and cut and paste wars, each side trying to finally prove the other one worst.

                When you consider the misinformation and bias being passed by Mainstream Media it all appears intentional at some level. I personally believe most of this is being driven by the wealthy folks. They decide the message the people get and vote on. And the profit motive governs decisions.

                These folks have poured money into both sides, in my opinion, if we have gridlock is because the current situation is good for them.

                • 2 votes
                #2.14 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 10:56 PM EST
                Monkey99

                Geez. It's like talking to a wall.

                • 1 vote
                #2.15 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 11:16 PM EST
                nospin1

                A dem stone wall.

                  #2.16 - Sun Jan 22, 2012 12:22 AM EST
                  Monkey99

                  See what I mean?

                    #2.17 - Sun Jan 22, 2012 1:47 AM EST
                    flameaway

                    nospin,

                    Name one good thing about President Obama.

                      #2.18 - Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:14 AM EST
                      nospin1

                      flameaway - Hard to think of anything good but I am sure there are a few things. (just as with Bush,Clinton etc)

                        #2.19 - Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:19 PM EST
                        Recruitdad1992

                        Name one good thing about President Obama.

                        I'll play.....he views the military as something more than an instrument to deliver blunt-force trauma. What he has done is continue to support a robust special operations program, increasing our ability to strike surgically when needed. While I don't totally agree with defunding traditional combat forces, I understand it needs to be done in measured steps for economic reasons. What most people don't understand though is the spec ops community has grown considerably during this administration.

                        • 2 votes
                        #2.20 - Sun Jan 22, 2012 4:05 PM EST
                        flameaway

                        nospin1,

                        So, although you are certain there are some good things about President Obama you'll not trouble yourself to think what they are, or to name them?

                        Didn't you say this, "You are just another sheep who blindly follows dem rhetoric. You are correct that you are a donkey and are acting like one.", about three inches up?

                        So, can you name anything good about President Obama?

                          #2.21 - Sun Jan 22, 2012 4:39 PM EST
                          flameaway

                          Recruitdad,

                          Thank you for playing my game, you are a winner! :D

                          • 2 votes
                          #2.22 - Sun Jan 22, 2012 4:40 PM EST
                          Recruitdad1992

                          you are a winner! :D

                          Lol, unfortunately, when it comes to domestic policy, we are all losers no matter who we vote for in november. IMHO

                          • 1 vote
                          #2.23 - Sun Jan 22, 2012 5:21 PM EST
                          Linda Luke

                          Amen Recruitdad1992, your comment is correct.

                            #2.24 - Sun Jan 22, 2012 10:36 PM EST
                            Reply
                            Jeff-3469909

                            I am certain when we hear the criticism of the president' speech we will not hear a single new idea or a single to make things better. The GOP has thrown up no ideas except more deregulation which is exactly the reason we are in this mess to begin with. They are refusing to stray from their ideological path even though reality has shown that their path leads to ruin.

                            • 7 votes
                            Reply#3 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 1:05 PM EST
                            Monkey99

                            All the GOP will have is Mitch Daniels. The governor who is, at this moment, spiraling his state down the drain with his own example of failed GOP ideology.

                            They can't even give a rebuttal with someone who isn't a poster child of their own failures as a party.

                            • 6 votes
                            #3.1 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 1:31 PM EST
                            Reply
                            hww

                            Is this going to be another summer of recovery speech? All talk and no action. I am thinking XL Pipeline, 3-4 years of studies and it still is not enough until after the next election that is. Enough of politics, lets go to work.

                            • 4 votes
                            Reply#4 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 1:18 PM EST
                            agagnu

                            Why, have you got insider info like the GOP who have bought shares on the pipeline ?

                            Seriously why not build a needed new refinery up north, jobs notwithstanding ?

                            • 6 votes
                            #4.1 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 1:45 PM EST
                            Skip Murray

                            Let me guess.........as I come from an oil spill disaster state, how many years did it take to study on the damages of an oil spill of this magnitude require? 4 years? 8 years? 12 years? Remember, the Preident was critisized for what he did and what he didn't do. I think it'll take as long as it takes to insure that something so potentially voliatle as a pipeline and its affects on the environment concern me. Yeah, I want jobs. I do not want jobs at all costs.

                            • 5 votes
                            #4.2 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 2:42 PM EST
                            Pat P11111

                            Enough of politics, lets go to work.

                            The pipeline is not work. It will create about 6 or 7 thousand jobs for a year or so. It is about oil profits for Canada and increased oil supplies for China.

                            Oil for China, that's right. We don't get that oil unless it spills on us in transit. It comes from Canada and goes on the world market.

                            If you want work for us look at the green energy field that is the fastest growing segment of the US economy. If we want that to grow we need to stabilize the subsidies that encourage the private investments to continue.

                            Regardless what Republicans say we can compete with China we just need the government to give us a level playing field. We also need to continue green subsidies or remove the oil industry subsidies so they can compete on a level field also.

                            • 4 votes
                            #4.3 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 6:20 PM EST
                            Necie

                            Hww, you may think the XL Pipeline was a good project, but do you or any of your family stay in any of the areas where this line will travel...you folks are humorous...the President put forth an infrastructure bill/proposal that would have employed MILLIONS of Americans and all you folks did was whine...his bill would have help stabilize many of America's bridges and freeways, and would have been something millions of American could have been proud of...but your side stopped it...and now you folks are whining over a pipeline that would have only provided several thousand jobs, placed many areas in jeopardy,and been hazardous to our water and ecosystem...but the biggest bull of all is that NONE of the oil would have been available to the citizens of the United States...lol...lol..lol..lol..you guy on the right have to be on some kind of potent drug because most of you sure as heII don't make a bit of sense...patriotic your arse...

                            • 5 votes
                            #4.4 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 6:35 PM EST
                            Thinknaboutit

                            It will create about 6 or 7 thousand jobs for a year or so.

                            Environmental risk aside, there is little mentioned about the permanent jobs this pipeling will destroy. They are already shipping this sludge in trucks, each one providing a job for a driver. All those truckers will be put out of work permanently for a few thousand temporary jobs. I wonder who is paid more as well, truckers or guys digging ditches for a pipeline?

                            This seems like another play to pay the workers less and pocket more profits at the top.

                            • 1 vote
                            #4.5 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 7:24 PM EST
                            Reply
                            Shelby Davenport

                            I just want him to sing....(sigh).....

                            And I'll be waiting to see who in the audience will yell out something inappropriate.

                            • 3 votes
                            Reply#5 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 1:24 PM EST
                            Pat P11111

                            I can just imagine him bring the crowd to their feet with God Bless America

                            Now that would be a historic speech

                            • 3 votes
                            #5.1 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 6:29 PM EST
                            Reply
                            BKER1492

                            These should have been his topics three years. It'll be the lowest watched SOTU in years.

                            • 3 votes
                            Reply#6 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 1:37 PM EST
                            Geek_on_the_wing

                            I started to lose interest in the article at the point where it mentioned manufacturing being part of his plan, and stopped reading when it mentioned education. In fact, I rather doubt I'll bother watching the speech at all, quite frankly.

                            Manufacturing in this country is dead. It was killed by a combination of factors, but the two main ones were excessive and unreasonable federal regulations, and unfair trade practices on the part of the Chinese government.

                            How are American companies supposed to compete with a nation that tolerates the employment of children and prisoners? There was a documentary a few years back that revealed children as young as 6 employed in a factory making some sort of clothing, chained to their sewing machines, with buckets next to them to pee and poop in so they wouldn't have to leave their workstations to use the toilet. How do we compete with that?

                            And then there are the regulations that seek to micro-manage every aspect of your business, and demand that business owners document same. In many cases, the regulations themselves aren't such a big problem as are the costs of documenting compliance.

                            Reviving manufacturing in this country is politically impossible because it would require serious lightening of the regulatory burden on manufacturers, which Obama and his Liberal base will never allow. It also would require creative thinking with regard to Labor / Management relations, which might just work if the government would keep its nose out of the process. But that's very unlikely.

                            Reviving manufacturing would also require massive tariffs -- if not an outright embargo -- on goods imported from China. Either of these measures would be opposed by people across the political spectrum, ranging from the wacked-out pinkos on the extreme Left who hold China up as an example to be emulated, to the powerful Conservatives in the retail sector, like the Walton family, whose businesses would nosedive without the cheap @!$%# they import from China.

                            Since neither regulatory reform nor a tough stance on China are political possibilities, you can write manufacturing off; and nothing Obama says about it during the SOTU will make a bit of difference.

                            As for education, it's been going downhill ever since the creation of the Department of Education -- quite possibly the most useless and wasteful government agency in all of human history. I was educated (and quite well, thank you) before there was such a thing as a federal Department of Education, by the way, for which I remain very grateful.

                            When I suggest to people (and by no means only Liberals) that the DOE is as about useless as the tits on a bull and should be abolished, their response is usually something along the lines of, "Education is too important not to have its own federal government department." While I agree with the first part, about education being important, that is precisely the reason that I oppose the federal government's involvement in it. Education is far too important to allow the feds to touch it.

                            Do I need more evidence than the "No Child Left Behind" law to prove my case?

                            So two of Obama'a four areas of emphasis in the SOTU draft -- manufacturing and education -- are lost causes, in the former case because there is an absolutely zero political possibility that the government will do what actually needs to be done to fix the problem; and in the latter case, because the federal government's involvement with education thus far has yielded less-than-stunning results, and there is no reason to expect that to change.

                            So why bother watching it? It promises to be nothing but a crock of bull@!$%# from an accomplished bull@!$%# artist.

                            • 2 votes
                            #6.1 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 3:01 PM EST
                            Pat P11111

                            Geek

                            Reviving manufacturing in this country is politically impossible because it would require serious lightening of the regulatory burden on manufacturers,

                            I don't think you have been paying attention to the news. There are quite a few new manufacturing plants breaking ground. Air Bus announced it is looking for a possible site for it's smaller aircraft.

                            The US once again is in the running for manufacturing. China is facing rising wage pressures. Last week because of citizen based pressure China started releasing smog information.

                            The American worker is the most productive in the world. We don't need to race to the bottom and destroy our environment to compete. Even China is realizing that the health of its citizens and the environment needs to be part of the equation.

                            The GOP talking points of the last few decades have not born fruit. Trickle down economics only produces a warm yellow fluid. Regulations are needed to curb excess, unless we want another Wall Street fiasco or another Gulf Spill.

                            The standard GOP talking points are great bumper stickers but disastrous public policy.

                            "The problem isn't that conservatives are wrong about the efficiency of markets or the creativity of enterprise. It's that they have made false idols of both, usually without acknowledging that markets work best when well regulated, that private enterprise cannot meet every human need, that government has always played a critical role in our economy, and that the profit motive can be socially and environmentally destructive as well as dynamic." Joe Conason

                            • 2 votes
                            #6.2 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 6:41 PM EST
                            Geek_on_the_wing

                            Pat,

                            The American worker is the most productive in the world. We don't need to race to the bottom and destroy our environment to compete. Even China is realizing that the health of its citizens and the environment needs to be part of the equation.

                            I'm really not talking about environmental regulations so much as the endless stream of paperwork requirements, such as the 1099 tax-reporting provision that was slipped into the health-care legislation (which said provision was, thankfully, repealed).

                            Unless you've run a small business, you have no idea how much money it costs to prove compliance with the endless stream of idiocy that comes from Congress, most of whose members have zero experience running any business except, possibly, their law practices -- in which said profession pushing pencils over pointless paperwork is their stock in trade.

                            As for China, I make no secret of my feelings about the Chinese government and the utter lack of principles that pervade that country's emerging capitalist class. Child labor. Prison labor. Poisoned toothpaste and baby formula. Lead-painted toys. Phony pills. Total disregard for environmental concerns. The list of reasons why we should embargo Chinese imports is endless, and the list of reasons not to very short.

                            • 2 votes
                            #6.3 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 9:03 PM EST
                            Heavy Artillery Rocker

                            Whinenenenene,Whinenenene, you sound like a Chrysler trying to start on a cold morning, look you said you weren't going to watch, so be it.

                            I understand what you're saying, I agree with a lot of it, what I don't understand is why you don't wish to do anything about it.

                            For or against Obama it is our nations congress who are clearly holding up progress. If we can't pressure them to stop suckling the teat of the 1%'ers and do what's right for this country well, we all might as well pack it in.

                            It sounds as if you've given up.

                            Don't!

                            I don't care if you're a Republican or Democrat, it's clear they can't work together at their current jobs. Lets give them a clear message that as American people we can.

                            Keep your chin up, we're all in this together.

                            Obama said at the beginning it would be a long slow recovery. I grow a little impatient too but when I see congress stale mate and refuse to budge on important issues. It breaks my heart and pisses me off at the same time.

                            Just want you to know, I can't vote for anyone who claims to have moral values or "knows where I'm coming from," when its clear they do not.

                            Let's work toward fixing the issues, we already know the politicians are broken.

                            One step my family has taken is that we don't shop Wal-Mart for 2 years now we only use the small retail shops in town or a trip to the city.

                            Wish others would do the same.

                            • 2 votes
                            #6.4 - Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:40 AM EST
                            Reply
                            agagnu

                            As for me, I am sick of watching the GOP primaries and all the money changing hand to the benefits of the media machine.
                            Since Obama will win,
                            I appeal to Obama to give up all his campaign funds to the needy and the same on the other side. let the President do his job with another 4years to make good all the obstructions/lost time and clean up congress dems. and GOP alike who are in bed with lobbyists and ban pledges (think norquist ) against the interest of the People as a whole

                            • 3 votes
                            Reply#7 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 1:43 PM EST
                            magnoliaave

                            It isn't important to listen to Obama's speech. Just look around for starters! As far as that part relating to the "wealthy" goes, I am certain he knows about that with his $35,800 a seat fundraiser!

                            After receiving so many emails from him regarding sending my $3.00 donation to him, I requested that I be deleted from his list, but no, he still wants it. He doesn't realize that buys a loaf of bread!

                            • 2 votes
                            Reply#8 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 2:14 PM EST
                            agagnu

                            I have not responded either and have asked him to go about taking money out of politics. he criticized the SCOTUS decision but still goes round getting super pac. !!!!!!

                            • 1 vote
                            #8.1 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 3:54 PM EST
                            Necie

                            And what may I ask you would you whiners have him do...just sit back while the righties raise their money and wage and out-right assault on him through the right wing media...you folks are something,especially since everyone knows that negative ads turn the American electorate on, they work well....WHAT WOULD YOU HAVE HIM DO???? Oh, I know, you want him to just sit back and take whatever they throw at him and smile...yes,um,sir,Iey do that, massa...it only took Newt one debate to have the whole State of South Carolina show how nasty and racist they are...what do you think the Kocheroaches and Citizens United will be doing to Obama?? get a grip, Bush, McCain and all President's fund raise, why should this President be any different??? My Lord, you folks are simple minded...

                            • 4 votes
                            #8.2 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 6:48 PM EST
                            agagnu

                            Nucle,
                            I would advise that the campaign system brought up to date using the media/TV. Why bother with the tedious primaries etc to benefit ads profits for the media. look at the farce in Iowa and now SC. Take money out of politics and you will be rid of super pac, kowtowing to big donors etc. Simple minded? No, just KISS.

                            • 1 vote
                            #8.3 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 7:24 PM EST
                            magnoliaave

                            Whiners, Nicie? Why does he need my $3.00? Geez! Guess what the deal was? I would be given the opportunity to having lunch with him. And, guess what else? Michelle would even join us! Whippety wee, a great adventure waits for me!!!!!

                            • 1 vote
                            #8.4 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 9:00 PM EST
                            Reply
                            expatdownunda

                            A continuation of the class warfare rhetoric will not solve our problems.

                            Equality of income is not the issue. An individuals freedom to choose is the issue.

                            Individual freedom will lead to prosperity.

                            • 1 vote
                            Reply#9 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 3:59 PM EST
                            Randy McMurphy

                            Platitudes and a token.... That meme has been said for the the pst 30 years, and income disparity has grown at a record clip... Incredible wealth accumulation is good , so long as , as Adam Smith advocated pay proporatioanl taxes and workers get the benefits of their productivity increases, and their incomes rises at the same pace the rich does, that btw is not income equality, that is income growth parity

                            • 4 votes
                            #9.1 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 4:21 PM EST
                            Reply
                            ray-2211901

                            Unless he sings Al Green, I don't want to hear what he has to say.

                            • 1 vote
                            Reply#10 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 4:03 PM EST
                            Arlene Tognetti

                            then plug your ears

                            President Obama may sing Al Green and also give a great, poignant speech

                            • 2 votes
                            #10.1 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 7:37 PM EST
                            Reply
                            Americanpatriot12

                            Doesn't matter WHAT Obama will say. The Nation is still in dismal shape. We are still losing lives needlessly in Afghanistan. We are still hated by the Muslim world. We still are in hock to our eyebrows to China and other nations. Our employment picture, regardless of the positive spin put on it by the Obama Administration -- still is @!$%#ty, to say the least. As to controlling our borders and ridding our country of some 25 to 30 MILLION illegal immigrants -- nothing has been done to address that issue! Other than blathering from Obama who wants to grant them undeserved amnesty.

                            Sure, Obama, give us your sales pitch. But count on losing MY VOTE, along with the support millions of other disgruntled voters who see yours as yet another failed presidency.

                            • 2 votes
                            Reply#11 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 4:23 PM EST
                            Fifth Horseman

                            President Obama disappointed a lot of people in Chicago when he went to Washington and did not take them with him. Getting those high pay government jobs. A lot of Black folks still believe that he will get them a good job if it was not for those white rich folks in Chicago. When President Obama comes to Chicago you do not see many dark faces around him, outside of news reporters. Even when he was running the first time them white folks crowded around him. Even Rep. Davis notice that he felt uneasy with all those White folks. Know the feeling, Sir.

                            In Chicago it is them White folks who have the money, who get the good paying jobs, who are the bosses. It is them White rich folks who put him in office last time and will do it again. Most of these folks do not even get a hand shake from President Obama.

                            Two more Thank you, cards from the President Obama and I will have a full deck.

                              Reply#12 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 4:24 PM EST
                              Sees Thru Gloss

                              Obama has nothing to say.

                              • 2 votes
                              Reply#13 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 5:09 PM EST
                              Necie

                              All of you sound silly...stop whining and blaming this President for your ills...start pulling yourself up by your boot straps...where were all of you when Bush was losing jobs at a rate of 750,000 a month....WHERE WERE YOU! AND WERE YOU WHINING THEN??? Stop whining and do something for yourselves...isn't that what you tell so many others to do???Now the shoe is on your twisted foot, and all most of you can do is point at this President and whine about your conditions...lol..lol..lol..you folks are too funny...most of you know NOTHING about being broke and having no job...living through several presidents who made promises and broke them...you whiners act like Obama is the FIRST president who made promises and did not follow through on them...but he is not..the only thing that separates him from the other PROMISE BREAKERS is his COLOR...which you folks say doesn't matter..so why are you whining about what he could not get done because, at least, he has a reason for his broken promises...just open your color-blind eyes and look across the aisle...

                              • 3 votes
                              Reply#14 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 6:58 PM EST
                              David Noah

                              When a company hires a new CEO the first thing the CEO does is look at the economics and structure of the company and comes up with a plan to increase quality,profits, productivity, reduce waste and eliminate unnecessary and wasteful spending to get the company back on the right track. Isn't that what he ran on in 2008? "Hope and Change", how he was going to "fix Washington", how it wasn't go to be business as usual and he was going to change the status quo.

                              Why is it that three quarters of the way through his term as POTUS NOW he has a plan for how to build the economy and bring fairness, etc.?

                              Seems to me if he had a plan three years ago then he would be talking about its success, how to add to that plan, and the modifications that need to be made to the parts of his plan that aren't working well, not coming up with a NEW plan.

                              With almost 70% of the country believing the country is headed in the wrong direction it appears the country isn't impressed with Obama's performance.

                              Do you think they will fall for the smooth talking hype again?

                              http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/Fool+me+once,+shame+on+you%3B+fool+me+twice,+shame+on+me

                              Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.

                              Prov. After being tricked once, one should be wary, so that the person cannot trick you again. Fred: Would you like a can of peanuts? Jane: The last can of peanuts you gave me had a toy snake in it. Fred: This one really is peanuts. Jane: Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.
                              See also: fool, shame

                              • 1 vote
                              Reply#15 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 7:37 PM EST
                              Monkey99

                              First, how much do you expect to get done. when a petulant, do-nothing congress stifles every bit of that change, hmm?

                              That 70% of the country believes that is precisely BECAUSE of the do-nothing congress. The president himself can't do much on his own, if that escaped your attention. The president needs no "smooth talking hype," as you call it. He needs only outline the facts of this economy. The only thing I wonder is, if he'll attribute the slow recovery to those directly responsible, and it isn't the Democrats.

                              And this country is not a corporation. Only those dumb enough to swallow right-wing BS talking points could think it can be run like one.

                              • 2 votes
                              #15.1 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 9:29 PM EST
                              BKER1492

                              You do realize that the Do-Nothing Dem Senate and Dem House only passed ONE budget under Obama, and we have been under continuing resolutions ever since. You do know the Republican House HAS passed a budget, which the Dem Senate shelved?

                              Your Dem leadership has decided the best way to run the government is to take the most debt ridden budget ever created (under a Dem White House, Senate, and House) and just tack continuing resilutions on it (for two years and counting. That way they don't have to actually discuss the problems and come up with fixes.

                                #15.2 - Sun Jan 22, 2012 8:46 AM EST
                                Monkey99

                                You have to get out more.

                                And get some REAL news, too. That BS you've been fed just doesn't scan, anymore. Those same BS excuses were used three years ago. They didn't make sense then, and just look silly now.

                                • 1 vote
                                #15.3 - Sun Jan 22, 2012 12:48 PM EST
                                Reply
                                magnoliaave

                                I tell you what...Democrats run Ms. Clinton and I will vote for HER. In the meantime, let's buy Obama a home in Hawaii where he can go for the next 100 years.

                                • 1 vote
                                Reply#16 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 8:56 PM EST
                                Recruitdad1992

                                Obama didn't mention national security or foreign policy in his preview, and he is not expected to break ground on either one in his speech.

                                This is disappointing. We are still at war, a war that is quickly becoming even MORE futile. The training of Afghan soldiers isn't working, our allies are beginning to pull out, the Military is facing budget cutbacks, Iran is being ignorant.....and he is going to "reflect"?

                                Come on Mr. President.

                                  Reply#17 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 10:29 PM EST
                                  DW Brown

                                  Recruitdad,

                                  You are right about Afghanistan, a military action that we have been involved in since before 9/11. After the killing of Osama a full military presence is counter-productive.

                                  The State Of The Union address is an oppurtunity for a sitting President to reflect on his accomplishments of the preceding year and his intentions for the next.

                                  While I desperately want our troops withdrawn from Afghanistan, I have supported Obama's foreign and domestic policies in the past year and will probably do so in the future.

                                  • 1 vote
                                  #17.1 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 11:57 PM EST
                                  Recruitdad1992

                                  The State Of The Union address is an oppurtunity for a sitting President to reflect on his accomplishments of the preceding year and his intentions for the next.

                                  That's what I want to hear.....the intentions. The article implies there will be none. I will wait until the actual speech before being too critical.

                                  I too have supported his foreign policies in the past, but I'm more concerned about the future.

                                  • 1 vote
                                  #17.2 - Sun Jan 22, 2012 12:20 AM EST
                                  WILDWONDERFUL

                                  If you voted for Obama to prove you were not a a racist , vote him out to show you are not an idiot.

                                  • 2 votes
                                  #17.3 - Sun Jan 22, 2012 10:00 AM EST
                                  Recruitdad1992

                                  If someone voted for him to prove they are not racist, they are an idiot.

                                  I vote for the person, not skin color, not party.

                                  I tend to vote for a Commander in Chief.

                                  • 2 votes
                                  #17.4 - Sun Jan 22, 2012 12:44 PM EST
                                  Reply
                                  DesertFox-1681572

                                  Obama 2012! The gop is falling apart, doesn't matter what they say, or do or who they decide to run. They're toast.This state of the union address won't change that. DF

                                  • 2 votes
                                  Reply#18 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 11:23 PM EST
                                  ray-2211901

                                  Do you really think there will be an election

                                    Reply#19 - Sat Jan 21, 2012 11:51 PM EST
                                    Jennifer-2446215

                                    I am looking forward to Obama's speech on Tuesday. I am sick of listening to right wing bull crap pretending to have a moral conscious while we all know that they don't, in reality. Mittens is in for the 1%, Gingrich is all about whatever gets him elected and will pander to the right wing haters or whatever it takes to succeed. Santorum is willing to try to force his "now" religious dogma on women and Paul's plan would destroy the country while he trys to deny his racist past. So while the right decides which one is not too horrible and has a better chance to run against Obama, I will enjoy hearing an intelligent speech from a man who is trying to help the country, all of it, including the a-holes who are haters, on Tuesday night.

                                    • 1 vote
                                    Reply#20 - Sun Jan 22, 2012 10:41 AM EST
                                    WILDWONDERFUL

                                    How is that Change We Need working for America ?

                                      #20.1 - Sun Jan 22, 2012 10:45 AM EST
                                      Jennifer-2446215

                                      How is that fighting for the 1% while obstructing all efforts to improve the economy for the 99% working for you Wild? History, recent or otherwise is not your strong point, apparently.

                                      • 3 votes
                                      #20.2 - Sun Jan 22, 2012 11:06 AM EST
                                      WILDWONDERFUL

                                      Do you know how much the top 1% pay in taxes ?

                                        #20.3 - Sun Jan 22, 2012 11:16 AM EST
                                        flameaway

                                        "Do you know how much the top 1% pay in taxes?"

                                        A. No, because they won't release their tax returns.

                                        B. Not enough.

                                        C. Less than Walton's secretary.

                                        D. All of the above.

                                        • 4 votes
                                        #20.4 - Sun Jan 22, 2012 11:45 AM EST
                                        Reply
                                        WILDWONDERFUL

                                        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHoAuk76fT8

                                        This is change we need

                                          Reply#21 - Sun Jan 22, 2012 11:16 AM EST
                                          nospin1

                                          How many times will this make that Obama has said jobs is his priority?

                                            Reply#22 - Mon Jan 23, 2012 1:53 AM EST
                                            Mysterious Howard Anderson

                                            As the economy slowly swirls around the bowl, a President will try to reverse the laws of gravity. The opposition will try to reverse the flow from clockwise to counterclockwise. Each failing to admit that neither has a plausible solution, they will continue to point fingers at each other instead of admitting that it is hopeless... and then I awakened.

                                            • 1 vote
                                            Reply#23 - Mon Jan 23, 2012 10:33 AM EST
                                            Bill Parks

                                            Obama left out of the State of the Union - Obamacare and matters of life and death! My article spells out the problem Obama is creating. The elite media are so insensitive to what matters to the Creator! I really think the elite media has missed their calling lately - namely. reporting on what is important to the Creator. Instead they are pleasing certain public interest groups in their audience and their bosses who obviously lack an informed conscience and moral jugment. The elite media are leading America in the wrong direction - toward the spirit of the Anti-Christ - regarding abortion and similar liberal causes. In the final battle the promoters of abortion will not win!

                                              Reply#24 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 6:24 AM EST
                                              Leave a Comment:
                                              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                              You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                                              (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                                              Newsvine Privacy Statement
                                              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                              FUN STUFF:
                                              • Leaderboard |
                                              • E-Mail Alerts |
                                              • Top of the Vine |
                                              • Newsvine Live |
                                              • Newsvine Archives |
                                              • The Greenhouse
                                              COMPANY STUFF:
                                              • Code of Honor |
                                              • Company Info |
                                              • Contact Us |
                                              • Jobs |
                                              • User Agreement |
                                              • Privacy Policy |
                                              • About our ads
                                              LEGAL STUFF:
                                              • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                                              • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                                              • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com