Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Clinton: US, Europe must do more against tyrants

Sat Feb 4, 2012 4:09 AM EST
world-news, us, europe, eu, arab-world
Matthew Lee, Associated Press
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 4 photos
<p>US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton arrives at the Security Conference on Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012 in Munich, Germany. Politicians and military representatives will join for the 48. Munich Security conference from Friday, Feb. 3 until Sunday, Feb. 5, 2012.(AP Photo/Frank Augstein)</p>

US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton arrives at the Security Conference on Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012 in Munich, Germany. Politicians and military representatives will join for the 48. Munich Security conference from Friday, Feb. 3 until Sunday, Feb. 5, 2012.(AP Photo/Frank Augstein)

Advertise | AdChoices

MUNICH — The Obama administration on Saturday called for stepped up U.S.-European cooperation to isolate tyrannies like the Assad regime in Syria, promote democracy in the Arab World and beyond and repair damage from the global financial crisis.

And, as America shifts its primary strategic focus to Asia and reduces its military presence in Europe, President Barack Obama's top two national security aides — attending an international security conference here together in a demonstration of Washington's resolve — reassured the continent that it remains deeply relevant to U.S. interests as well as its partner of "first resort" in dealing with global hotspots.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said Americans and Europeans must send a clear and common message to tyrants that they must respect the rights of their people. She spoke as violence flared anew in Syria ahead of an expected vote on a U.N. Security Council resolution on the matter later Saturday.

"As a tyrant in Damascus brutalizes his own people, America and Europe stand shoulder to shoulder," she said, referring to Syrian President Bashar Assad.

"We are united, alongside the Arab League, in demanding an end to the bloodshed and a democratic future for Syria. And we are hopeful that at 10 a.m. Eastern Standard Time in New York the Security Council will express the will of the international community," she said.

President Barack Obama, in a strongly worded statement Saturday, condemned Assad's "unspeakable assault" and called for his ouster.

"Assad must halt his campaign of killing and crimes against his own people now. He must step aside and allow a democratic transition to proceed immediately," the president said.

Clinton said, "Wherever tyrants deny the legitimate demands of their own people, we need to work together to send them a clear message: You cannot hold back the future at the point of a gun."

While promoting democracy, she warned that Europe could not ignore backsliding in its own backyard, decrying limits being placed on press and religious freedoms. She did not identify trouble spots by name but was referring to Russia, Belarus and Hungary.

"It is not credible to preach democracy elsewhere unless we also protect it within our community," she said. "The trappings of democracy are not enough."

Clinton said she had no doubt that Europe would overcome its economic woes. But she said it was imperative for a common agenda and enhanced cooperation to reinforce recoveries on both sides of the Atlantic.

"We are confident that Europe has the will and the means to cut its debt, build the necessary firewalls, create growth, and restore liquidity and market confidence," she said. But, she added: "As Europe emerges from crisis, we have to work harder to reinforce each other's recoveries. As deep as our economic relationship is, it has not yet lived up to its potential."

To boost the recovery, she said the United States and Europe need to team up to fight unfair trade practices.

Meanwhile, U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said Europe is America's security partner of choice for military operations and diplomacy around the world. He said Europe will continue to be a central U.S. defense interest, even as the administration withdraws two of the four Army brigades stationed on the continent.

In his remarks to the conference, Panetta emphasized the positive. He noted that the U.S. is building a missile defense system in Europe, including a radar installation in Turkey and missiles to be stationed in Romania and Poland. He said four U.S. ships capable of shooting down missiles will be stationed at Rota, Spain.

And he said that while two Army brigades will leave Europe, that will be partly offset by a new arrangement in which smaller Army units will rotate to the continent for temporary training assignments. This was announced in January as part of a new U.S. defense strategy.

These changes, he said, amount to a U.S. "vote of confidence" in the future of NATO.

Panetta's remarks were aimed at countering a perception that the administration's added focus on security challenges in Asia and the Middle East is weakening U.S. partnerships in Europe.

"In all, the steps Europe can expect from the United States amount to a vote of confidence from Washington in the future of the alliance, especially in a period of fiscal austerity," he said.

He noted that the U.S. military will still have a larger presence in Europe than in any other region of the world.

"That's not only because the peace and prosperity of Europe is critically important to the United States, but because Europe remains our security partner of choice for military operations and diplomacy around the world," he said.

The Obama administration has sought to limit the diplomatic fallout from its decision to pull the Army brigades out of Europe — a move in line with an overall shrinking of the Army from 570,000 soldiers to 490,000. One brigade is scheduled to pull out of Europe in 2013 and another in 2014.

Missile defense will become a central feature of the U.S. military presence in Europe. Officials in recent days confirmed that the missile defense system's headquarters will be at Ramstein air base in Germany.

Panetta also spoke optimistically about the outlook for stability in Afghanistan, where the Taliban insurgency persists.

He said the U.S. hopes Afghan security forces will be ready to take the lead combat role throughout the country "sometime in 2013." At that point, U.S. and NATO forces will shift to a support role, he said, while remaining prepared to engage in combat if necessary.

At the conclusion of the NATO defense ministers meeting he attended in Brussels on Thursday and Friday, Panetta said there is a broad consensus among the allies that 2013 should be the year for such a transition out of a lead combat role. But France takes a different view, arguing that international forces should withdraw all combat forces from Afghanistan next year.

___

Associated Press National Security writer Robert Burns contributed to this report.

© 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Matthew Lee's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: United States , Syria , Fargo/Valley City
  • Public Discussion (41)
Buzz of the Orient

"As a tyrant in Damascus brutalizes his own people, America and Europe stand shoulder to shoulder," she said, referring to Syrian President Bashar Assad.

You didn't finish the sentence, Hillary. You need to add the words "doing f*ck all."

We would have to be complete imbeciles not to know that Russia and/or China will block anything meaningful in the Securtiy Council.

  • 2 votes
#1 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 4:32 AM EST
flameaway

Not only that, it's a bit disingenuous for the USA to start talking about taking a stand against tyranny in the Middle East.

We've been supporting tyrants there for decades.

What Hilary rally means is, "Oh @!$%#, now that the Arab Spring has @!$%#ed us. We need to put a different bunch of puppets in place. Thereby allowing us to steal the rest of the oil and further stoke sectarian violence. This is a GREAT business opportunity - for the West."

Think of the hospitals we can bomb and then contract to rebuild...

  • 3 votes
#1.1 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 8:51 AM EST
EvaPeron

Let's do something first about the tyrants at home. Start with Eric Holder and finish in Congress !

  • 11 votes
#1.2 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 8:54 AM EST
Marshall James

sure lets just go to war with the whole damn world...that should cover anyone we might disagree with.

damn look at the bloodlust in her eyes.......she just wants to kill

  • 4 votes
#1.3 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 9:39 AM EST
Conservative Conspirator

she just wants to kill

Kill Bill.

  • 5 votes
#1.4 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 9:41 AM EST
don-72

EvaPeron

Let's do something first about the tyrants at home. Get rid of the tea bag republicans who have not done ONE thing to help this Country..........................

    #1.5 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 9:55 AM EST
    curtiscrx25

    Should the power to attack another country be taken from the Presidency and put in the hands of the American people.? No more drone attacks and no more invasions without a popular vote from the American people! After all, it is the American people who will pay for the undeclared wars which the oil companies and military industrial complex profit from. It is the sons and daughters of the average American whose blood will be spilled and lives loss. It is the average American who will feel the resentment of people in other nations. How many rich kids lose their lives in these wars? Since the American people must bare the financial and physical burdens of attacking other countries, it is the American people who should by popular vote decide whether such incursions are justified. A handful of politicians are too easily manipulated by those who profit from war.

    • 1 vote
    #1.6 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 10:04 AM EST
    Nate8785

    Curtis,

    The constitution is supposed to keep the president from unilatirally taking america to war. The congress is supposed to declare war and is the best representation of the people we have at a federal level.

    • 1 vote
    #1.7 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 10:11 AM EST
    curtiscrx25

    Nate:

    You are right, but the reality is, when it comes to International issues especially war, the rule of thumb is to rally around the President. The Congress is bought and paid for by those who profit from war. There is too much at stake to trust the President or the Congress. There should be a popular vote for each and every time the issue of attacking another country comes up.

    • 1 vote
    #1.8 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:11 AM EST
    curtiscrx25

    Stop the Communist!

    Stop the Terrorists!

    Stop the Tyrants!

    There is always an excuse for invading other countries. What will the next excuse be?

    • 2 votes
    #1.9 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:14 AM EST
    Buzz of the Orient

    Curtis, philosophically you're right, but when the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbour, do you think there should have been a referendum (which takes TIME to complete) before going to war against Japan? You have voted in lawmakers to represent you. When there are over 300 million people in a country, sometimes decisions must be made without delay.

    • 2 votes
    #1.10 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 8:57 PM EST
    BD Styers

    And of course they've blocked it.

      #1.11 - Sun Feb 5, 2012 8:32 AM EST
      curtiscrx25

      Buzz:

      First, the U.S. initiated an embargo against Japan was an act of war. What would America do if someone tried to cut off its oil supply?
      Second, Pearl Harbor was orchestrated by President Roosevelt himself to get America into the war in Europe. The American people did not want to go to war, so they were tricked into going to war by Roosevelt. Watch this documentary: (Sacrifice at Pearl Harbor

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3uilOGzxr2c )

      If the American people had to vote before going to war, serious questions might have been raised about what really happened at Pearl Harbor.

      If there is a nation crazy enough today to formally declare war on America, then the military would have to defend the country, but short of that, there is plenty of time for the American people to rationally debate the merits of going to war. Also with computers, every American citizen could cast a vote instantly.

        #1.12 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 12:38 PM EST
        Buzz of the Orient

        Curtis, as much as I would like to watch your link, YouTube is blocked where I live. I can't help but think that your accusation about Roosevelt is just another conspiracy theory. Consider, also, that if America had not joined the allies against Nazi Germany, whether you and your children would be singing "Deutchland uber alles" every morning in school, but then, perhaps that is what you think is a good thing. I suppose you feel that had Hitler attacked the USA he would have been defeated by them. However, by that time Hitler may have succeeded in subduing the rest of the allies, and without an alliance there's a good chance he could have succeeded against the USA as well. Think that if Canada had fallen what you would have done to protect the USA from the V2 rockets launched from there.

          #1.13 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 12:59 PM EST
          curtiscrx25

          Are you saying that organizing the massacre of 2000 American sailors and lying to the American people was justified? What if one of those sailors was your son? Murder is murder. Lying is lying. A crime is a crime.

            #1.14 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 2:13 PM EST
            curtiscrx25

            Orient,

            By the way, you can do a Google search on it.

              #1.15 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 2:13 PM EST
              Reply
              BD Styers

              "Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists". President George Bush made this tough statement on the 20th of September nine days after the World Trade Centers Collapsed.

              His statement polarized people into "pro-war" and "anti-war", in raw terms that drew a line between an agressive or passive approach to solving a problem.

              Hilary stops short of quoting GB, but the same implications arise from her speech. Ultimately we need no UN support.

              • 1 vote
              Reply#2 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 5:06 AM EST
              are you crazy?-1425777

              ....and in the end we found out we had more to fear from bush

              • 4 votes
              #2.1 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 7:15 AM EST
              Conservative Conspirator

              Time to call Hillary and Obama of "Nation Building."

              • 5 votes
              #2.2 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 8:42 AM EST
              Reply
              Terry Yoder

              I'm so glad Mrs Clinton is Sec of State. Mrs Clinton IS sending a clear message to the Arab world and brutal dictatorships that the US won't put out a welcome mat when it comes to embracing human rights violating regimes in the world as with Syria's monster Assad.

              • 1 vote
              Reply#3 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 5:09 AM EST
              flameaway

              Terry,

              You do realize that it was the United States that propped up these dictators in the Arab world, right?

              I mean for decades.

              We'd do a bit of regime change and put a guy in that would let us take as much oil as we wanted, at our price. Mubarak, Assad, Quaddafi, Hussein. Those guys were our friends.

              Remember?

              • 2 votes
              #3.1 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 9:00 AM EST
              Terry Yoder

              Those guys have all bitten the dust excepting Assad for now. A lot of things have changed over the years but especially in recent days. The Arab Spring presents the perfect opportunity for the US to stand for human rights and regime change where abuses have been rampant. I'm so glad our current administration is pushing for human rights in places like Syria and elsewhere.

              • 1 vote
              #3.2 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 10:03 AM EST
              flameaway

              Okay, I'm all for that. I just don't want to forget that we've used all these words before and ended up propping up puppet dictators who we are now involved in getting rid of...

              • 2 votes
              #3.3 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 10:10 AM EST
              Reply
              Buzz of the Orient

              ...the US won't put out a welcome mat?

              It'll break Assad's heart that he won't get an invitation to the White House. I'll bet they won't even get him a date with Monica. Oh, the pain!!

              • 1 vote
              Reply#4 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 5:32 AM EST
              Terry Yoder

              There you go. No homewreckers are welcome. Speaking of homewreckers should a welcome mat be put out at the WH for that Gingrich open marriage tramp or his anything but first lady?

              • 1 vote
              Reply#5 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 6:09 AM EST
              Thomas-Jefferson

              All governments oppress their people. This is what a government is: a military force which oppresses and controls people. Clinton claims Assad is tyrannical because he is not agreeing to mob rule, as if mob rule would fly in the USA. US uses every bit as much force, and the government would take it to any extremes to remain in control. Plus we tax our people twice as much. Hillary carries no high ground, she is catering support from zionists/hawks. Vote for Obama if you want war. If you want peace register Republican and vote Ron Paul.

              • 1 vote
              Reply#6 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 7:34 AM EST
              flameaway

              Yeah, voting for a Republican Ron Paul would fix things.

              We'd wouldn't have Social Security...

              Wait didn't we let the Teapublicans take a swing at fixing things, in 2010? How did that turn out again? Oh yeah, we are in the process of recalling a bunch of the bastards.

              I don't think I'll count on any more Republicans...

              • 1 vote
              #6.1 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 8:57 AM EST
              Nate8785

              We'd wouldn't have Social Security...

              Grandma will be ok...

              Ron Paul would phase out social security and give and option to the younger americans to decide how they will go about planning for retirement. I know it's crazy to let people make their own decisions.

              • 2 votes
              #6.2 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 9:30 AM EST
              Conservative Conspirator

              Yeah, Americans are too stupid to make their own decisions. Those decisions need to be made for us by corrupt politicians.

              • 2 votes
              #6.3 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 9:33 AM EST
              Marshall James

              and tyrants dont forget that conservative.

              its funny...our citizens are advocating mob rule...and oppression of the rights of the "minority"

              • 4 votes
              #6.4 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 9:42 AM EST
              flameaway

              They call it the third rail because it rather consistently zaps the @!$%# out of those who want to mess with the most successful social program ever conceived.

              We're funny that way...

              • 1 vote
              #6.5 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 10:12 AM EST
              Reply
              Conk

              What about the tyrants who run China?

              President Wilson had his war to make the world safe for democracy nearly 100 years ago. The results were a little suspect. You run into situations where a ruler is overthrown and the crowd that follows is no better.

              • 1 vote
              Reply#7 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 8:59 AM EST
              D Jahns - Choclatier

              ohhhh, i see. Hilary means the "US and Europe" must stick their collective noses in

              to other countrys business when it doesn't suit them....

              • 2 votes
              Reply#8 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 9:18 AM EST
              don-72

              For way to long the Europeans have let this County protect them and have given us little help and now when this Administration asks them to do more. We have Americans complaining about it.

              Just can't make some people happy that we are not running around the world being in charge.

              • 1 vote
              Reply#9 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 10:04 AM EST
              Buzz of the Orient

              I know it's historical, but you would be singing "God Save the Queen" in school if had not been for the French fleet.

              • 1 vote
              #9.1 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 9:00 PM EST
              Reply
              lorwongDeleted
              Dean Moriarty

              The best way to get rid of Hillary is to get rid of Obama.

              • 3 votes
              Reply#11 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 10:11 AM EST
              flameaway

              LOL

              The Right's only platform. Get Obama. Hunker down and attack Obama. In any way possible, fair or foul. He's evil and so black, too...

              Are they teaching you folks that Obama is the Anti-Christ is Sunday School or something?

              • 2 votes
              #11.1 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 10:18 AM EST
              Reply
              lorwongDeleted
              ispania-rielt.ru

              the economic problems in europe seem to continue...

              • 1 vote
              Reply#13 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:27 AM EST
              ispania-rielt.ru

              and the property market has not yet recovered

              • 1 vote
              Reply#14 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:28 AM EST
              JackPot1

              Yes, the EU has to pay up more to fund pro democracy in the world. Tyrants usually grow where the people is weak. They take power and use it for their own advantage. People in the free world have to help those people who live under tirany! For example IRAN! that is a tyrany! ahmajinedad is a tyrant who dictates over their people, he is talking about the destruction of ISRAEL from his tyrant thorne!.. How long has ahmadinejad and his thugs being in power in IRAN??? he is deeply preocupied aboud ISRAEL of its existense but that is to throw sand on someone else's eyes... He believes that showing antisemitism in his own country will help him avoid his own demons...

              Tyrants have to be fought by all democratic goverments in the world! Those people who live under a dictatorship need our help! The US is a democracy and has to be aware of it.

              • 2 votes
              Reply#15 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 1:15 PM EST
              nospin1

              The middle east has resisted democracy for a long time. Democracy is for those who want it and are willing to fight and die for it instead of having it forced on them.

              Get out of the ME.

              • 2 votes
              Reply#16 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 6:34 PM EST
              Leave a Comment:
              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
              You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
              (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
              Newsvine Privacy Statement
              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
              FUN STUFF:
              • Leaderboard |
              • E-Mail Alerts |
              • Top of the Vine |
              • Newsvine Live |
              • Newsvine Archives |
              • The Greenhouse
              COMPANY STUFF:
              • Code of Honor |
              • Company Info |
              • Contact Us |
              • Jobs |
              • User Agreement |
              • Privacy Policy |
              • About our ads
              LEGAL STUFF:
              • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
              • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
              • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com