Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Tea party: Warming or resigned to Mitt Romney?

Mon Feb 6, 2012 4:22 PM EST
us-news, politics, us, mitt-romney, tea
Kristen Wyatt, Associated Press
GOP presidential hopeful Mitt Romney - campaigning in Colorado ahead of tomorrow's caucuses - says federal deficits are unfairly being inherited by today's youngsters.
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 3 photos
<p>Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney greets supporters at a campaign rally in Grand Junction, Colo., Monday, Feb. 6, 2012. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)</p>

Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney greets supporters at a campaign rally in Grand Junction, Colo., Monday, Feb. 6, 2012. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)

Advertise | AdChoices

DENVER — Long skeptical of Mitt Romney, tea party activists are either warming up to the GOP presidential front-runner or reluctantly backing him after abandoning hope of finding a nominee they like better.

Whatever the reason, the former Massachusetts governor who is coming off of back-to-back victories in Florida and Nevada now is picking up larger shares of the tea party vote than he did when the Republican nomination fight began. And that fact alone illuminates the struggles of the nearly three-year-old movement to greatly influence its first presidential race.

"We haven't gone away," insisted Amy Kremer, chairwoman of the national Tea Party Express. But, in the same breath, she acknowledged lower expectations and a shift in focus to Senate races over the White House campaign. She also pleaded for patience, saying: "Anybody that thinks we are going to change things in one cycle or two cycles is fooling themselves."

Tea party activists across the country entered their first presidential contest this year expecting to hold major sway over the Republican race following a 2010 congressional election year in which their favored candidates successfully knocked off a string of insiders in GOP primaries in Colorado and elsewhere.

The movement influenced the presidential race early on, with candidates from Romney on down parroting the movement's language and promoting its agenda of restrained spending to curry favor with its adherents.

But the coalition was greatly fractured and plagued by infighting. It also watched as one favored candidate after another lost standing or quit the race, among them Georgia businessman Herman Cain and Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann. The remaining candidates — Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum and Ron Paul — have attributes that tea party backers like but they face huge hurdles in knocking Romney off his stride.

That's left many in the tea party shifting focus to Romney, a candidate viewed by many as most likely to unseat President Barack Obama, even if he doesn't vociferously bang the drum of their top issues.

"We're warming up to Romney," said Brian Walker, a tea party member and 62-year-old sheet metal contractor in the Colorado mountain town of Florissant. He raves about Santorum but said he's leaning toward Romney because he wants to support the candidate he views as the likely nominee.

Such perceptions may be one of the reasons Romney has seen a bump in support among tea party followers even though the movement has long been irked by Romney's tentative embrace of it and evolution on several issues it holds dear.

In South Carolina last month, exit polls showed that only about 1 in 4 self-described tea party supporters backed Romney in the primary, which Gingrich ended up winning. But 10 days later, 41 percent of tea partyers in Florida's primary chose Romney as he cruised to victory there. And in Nevada, entrance polls showed that Romney won 47 percent of the tea party vote on Saturday, crushing his rivals in the state.

Romney could perform just as well in Colorado and Minnesota caucuses on Tuesday. He won both four years ago. Since then, both states have been heavily influenced by the tea party.

In 2010, tea party supporters in both states claimed credit for usurping well-funded GOP insiders and producing conservative gubernatorial nominees, Dan Maes in Colorado and Tom Emmer in Minnesota. Both lost the general election, despite big Republican successes elsewhere.

Colorado Republicans also nominated a conservative tea party favorite, Ken Buck, over a better-funded candidate, former Lt. Gov. Jane Norton. But Buck also lost the general election to the appointed Democratic senator, Michael Bennet, who had never before run for political office.

Mindful of the tea party strains in both states, Romney's rivals are playing to the movement in hopes of engineering comebacks.

"I ask you to reset this race. Create an opportunity for someone who can speak to Americans about what America is all about," Santorum, the former Pennsylvania senator, said Saturday in northern Colorado.

Some tea party activists argue that the GOP puts itself at risk if it ignores conservative critics of Romney, even if tea party influence appears diminished.

"I do not believe in this idea that you vote for the lesser of two evils. The lesser of two evils is still evil," said Erika Vadnais, 48, an engineer from Colorado Springs who attended a Paul rally last week.

Kremer, the Tea Party Express chairwoman, disagreed and predicted that tea party conservatives will recover from divisions between now and November.

"At the end of the day, the movement will come together to defeat Barack Obama," Kremer said.

___

Deputy Director of Polling Jennifer Agiesta in Washington contributed to this report.

___

Follow Kristen Wyatt on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/APkristenwyatt

© 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Kristen Wyatt's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: Denver
  • Public Discussion (56)
Michael in S J

Looking at turnout at the various Republican primary events, I would say less than excited resignation!

  • 5 votes
Reply#1 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 5:10 PM EST
Rorschach-558483

"We haven't gone away," insisted Amy Kremer, chairwoman of the national Tea Party Express. ....She also pleaded for patience, saying: "Anybody that thinks we are going to change things in one cycle or two cycles is fooling themselves."

Well, now that's a fine how d'ya do.

You mean to tell me that it takes TIME to accomplish major work?

Now, fixing the results of thirty years of trickle-down rape of the country's economy and middle class, not to mention a meltdown of the economy serious enough to invite comparison to 1929.... THAT's something Obama should have snapped his fingers and just made disappear. Is that correct?

C'mon. You were ragging Obama the day he walked in the door, calling him a failure because thirty years of Republican policy failure wasn't fixed in a day.

And now you're telling your little Teabaggers to be patient because Teabag Mania has yet to sweep the whole country.

Oh, the irony.


  • 4 votes
#1.1 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 6:51 PM EST
Tappy McWidestance

Nobody in the GOP really likes Romney just like nobody really liked McCain. But they are stuck with him. It is his turn at the top of the ticket and lemming like the base will fall in line.

  • 4 votes
#1.2 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 7:05 PM EST
Ron West-513664

I think all you need to know about Romney's appeal is the fact that 70% of those that voted for him said they did so because he has the best chance of beating Obama. In fact, he's been stumping that phrase, "I can beat Obama". That's all the GOP minions want to hear and can hear. They can't tell you Romney's proposals or if they agree with them. They don't know or care about his record as Gov. or vulture capitalist. They don't care if he has sons that won't ever have to work because of tax dodging money schemes that made millions he put away for them. The fact that those sons will never see war but he might start one hasn't occured to them. He just says that magic phrase and it is music to their ears. It won't happen, but it's all they've got to run with.

  • 2 votes
#1.3 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 8:09 PM EST
Andy Horning

Several polls showed that Ron Paul (gasp) had the best chance of beating Obama since Dr. Paul pulls from Democratic, independent and Libertarian voters as well as the Republicans who'd hold their nose and pick whoever held the GOP flag.

But when the so-called "Christian" Republican audience booed him for suggesting we invoke the Golden Rule in our foreign policy, and seeing how written constitutions/ Rule of Law creeps out the average Republican, I saw that the GOP will lose to spite it's own face.

  • 1 vote
#1.4 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 8:35 PM EST
Tappy McWidestance

Romney is concerned with only one kind of movement. Money flowing to his offshore accounts is all he cares about.

  • 2 votes
#1.5 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 10:18 PM EST
Coral Atlas

The tea party represents the T in GOTP that has been there all along. Re-skinned republicans trying to revive a dying political party.

The GOTP is going thru a death rattle right now as they gasp frantically for meaning.

In November we will administer the coup de grâce !

  • 4 votes
#1.6 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 11:42 PM EST
Monkey99

The teabags are responsible in part for the sad state of play in the GOP primary. They created the atmosphere for the bottom of the barrel to rise, and now they are stuck with it.

It matters not who is the eventual nominee. The damage to the brand has already been established, thanks in part to obstruction, intransigence, open defiance against the people's wishes, and a general propensity to do NOTHING for this country.

THAT is all the GOP candidates can run on. There are NO achievements, or even anything positive they can attribute themselves to. All they have is NOTHING.

Can't win a national election that way. Good going, teabags.

  • 2 votes
#1.7 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 12:32 AM EST
Idj

Another Stark example of the Hypocracy nesting in the Tea Parties. Devout, born again Christians, warming/resigned, to a Morman? Which in and of itself, is a Very good thing, there should be NO religious test for public office; but they hate a Christian,one with Jesus Christ as his Lord and Savior, with a passion!

Poor saps, they are truly lost in the wildeness. Dumbfounded,Confounded and twisted into knots, with a Conundrum of their own intolerable ways. Sooner or later, they will have to utter those most frightening of words; "we have found the enemy, it is us"...

  • 3 votes
#1.8 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 7:37 AM EST
Auto 101

Romney is concerned with only one kind of movement. Money flowing to his offshore accounts is all he cares about

The accounts that are in a blind trust and he paid taxes on?

The reason the tea party will have no real success is because they are only 1/3 of the country. the OWS are another 1/3 and the rest are the ones that will not be controlled by either party.

but they hate a Christian,one with Jesus Christ as his Lord and Savior, with a passion!

The republicans don't they just have one Idea on how people should raise them selves up it is the concept of "give a fish feed him for a day teach him to fish feed him for life." No safety net will raise you up out of your financial ashes. their are a lot of christan republicans that give tirelessly to help the hungry just as their are democrats that do the same.

  • 1 vote
#1.9 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 9:40 AM EST
Reply
echo82

sell outs. no reason anyone should should respect this "movement"

  • 2 votes
Reply#2 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 5:22 PM EST
Andy Horning

Sad but true. There was so much promise in its libertarian beginnings. But then they just became more totem-pole-dancing Republican tribalists.

So sad.

sigh...

  • 4 votes
#2.1 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 6:14 PM EST
Rorschach-558483

"movement"

That says it all.

  • 1 vote
#2.2 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 7:01 PM EST
Reply
BobbyG-420766

Definitely resigned... Santorum and Paul are nowhere to be found and Gingrich is in full meltdown mode...

Republicans only choice now is to dance with the devil - and Romney is his name...

  • 1 vote
Reply#3 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 5:23 PM EST
Andy Horning

Bad Choice, Bobby. Don't do it.

We already have what we've chosen by such "lesser evil" madness. It's time to change the way you vote. Look deeper. Choose better.

  • 2 votes
#3.1 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 6:15 PM EST
BobbyG-420766

@ Andy,

And we were right... think of what a disaster we would now have if McCain / Palin were in the White House...

    #3.2 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 9:36 AM EST
    Andy Horning

    I'm quite sure that we'd still be enduring the disaster that's been brewing unchecked since 1913. We'd been warned by all the brightest people and even by many Presidents about the "men behind the curtain," the "military-industrial complex" (more accurately, bankster/moneychanger-military complex), and the crony network that Jefferson called worse than standing armies.

    What part of the New Deal did even Reagan dismantle? Hmmm?

    Nope; as long as you vote for the uniparty, you'll get more of the same.

    • 1 vote
    #3.3 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 11:25 AM EST
    Reply
    Brian-497171

    If the T-Party votes for a Mass moderate who basically created the prototype to "Obamacare", I will piss myself in hysterical laughter.

    The sad part is that they'll undoubtedly fail to understand that this is a firm rebuke by the nation of their far-right anarchic positions.

    Oh well...

    • 4 votes
    Reply#4 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 5:25 PM EST
    BLOGER-486140

    They hate Obama so much they will happily vote for Obama Lite.

    • 3 votes
    Reply#5 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 5:33 PM EST
    Student of Life

    Actually on guns and abortion, he (was) further left than Obama.

    It's just proof that the TEA party is a issue voting group. That issue is the (R) after the candidate's name.

    It was funny when they were supporting Gingrich - now it's just pathetic.

    • 7 votes
    #5.1 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 5:45 PM EST
    JC-1439099

    The primary Tea Party issue is Fiscal Responsibility. Romney is, in fact, an excellent fit.

      #5.2 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 5:55 PM EST
      jmorris

      JC-1439099

      The primary Tea Party issue is Fiscal Responsibility

      ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

      • 7 votes
      #5.3 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 6:21 PM EST
      Rorschach-558483

      JC-1439099

      The primary Tea Party issue is Fiscal Responsibility. Romney is, in fact, an excellent fit.

      Whoa, stop. The whole room is spinning.

      • 5 votes
      #5.4 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 7:02 PM EST
      JC-1439099

      Believe what you will, but if you look at the issues that the Tea Party representatives in the House have stood firm on, it has been issues dealing with spending and borrowing, such as the debt ceiling, budget, etc.

      Perhaps you don't realize that the Tea Party is not just Republicans. There are independents and Democrats involved too. That's because the financial issues are not limited to one party, they affect everyone equally. If we continue to spend like we are, it will end in financial ruin.

        #5.5 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 10:52 AM EST
        jmorris

        JC-1439099

        Believe what you will, but if you look at the issues that the Tea Party representatives in the House have stood firm on, it has been issues dealing with spending and borrowing, such as the debt ceiling, budget, etc.

        Anti-abortion, anti-women's health, pro-rape, more taxpayer money to large corporations, cutting SS & Medicare, dumping on the poor etc, etc etc.

        Yep, we have been watching the issues they think are important.

        • 1 vote
        #5.6 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 1:55 PM EST
        Andy Horning

        Dear jmorris, I also think that the TP has gone off the rails. But your litany is full of partisan nonsense that's just as bad as the TP's objections to you.

        It's just silly to say that they're "anti-women's health, pro-rape..." That doesn't help anything.

        • 2 votes
        #5.7 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 2:04 PM EST
        Reply
        Student of Life

        They may get married to Romney in time, but there'll be a shotgun at that wedding. This isn't by choice.

        • 4 votes
        Reply#6 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 5:57 PM EST
        Duh-3296044

        Of course the Tea party is warming to Mitt. When he's talking to the Tea party he'll tell them what they want to hear and when he's talking to all other GNOP'ers he'll tell then what they want to hear.

        • 1 vote
        Reply#7 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 5:59 PM EST
        StevieGee

        Actually, Obama has cut their taxes, cut government spending, ended an expensive war which will go a long way toward reducing the deficit, deported more illegals in three years than Bush did in eight, and kept the government from meddling in their Medicare and Social Security. He also hasn't made it harder to get a gun or easier to get an abortion. If, as they say, they aren't a bunch of racists maybe they should give him a look.

        • 6 votes
        Reply#8 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 6:09 PM EST
        Jensen-576947

        Kind of funny, really about Mitt being a Mormon. Most Fundamentalists have "Mormon Envy." Mormons don't have a professional clergy, they have a lay clergy that is not paid. Members are required to do janitorial work, and 90% of Mormons pay a 10% Tithe on their gross income. Whilst most Churches go begging for support, the Mormons are rolling in cash. Also, Evangelicals hate Mormons for not being Christians, but a simple Wikipedia Search would tell them that Mormons is a nickname, and they know it. There is not one Christian organization, according to Wikipedia, but 38,000, and LDS are Christian Restorationists.

        • 1 vote
        Reply#9 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 6:17 PM EST
        Angry Left-532262

        that is not paid

        Then could you please explain "sustaining the brethren"????

        the Mormons are rolling in cash.

        Can you prove this?? They are super secretive about their financial records.

        ...and Mormons believe in a a prophet after Jesus. They are as much "christian" as the muslims are (who also believe in jesus).

          #9.1 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 7:57 PM EST
          Jensen-576947

          No problem: http://institute.lds.org/manuals/teachings-of-the-livings-prophets/tlp-10-4.asp

          Lay Clergy/Not Paid: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ward_(LDS_Church)

          Christian Denominations: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_denomination

          Estimated Net Worth LDS:

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finances_of_The_Church_of_Jesus_Christ_of_Latter-day_Saints

          Mormon_Christian: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mormon_Christian

          All this information is widely available on the Internet, I am not asking you to believe. I just don't think that it is right, to condemn someone for their belief based on erroneous information. Example: I know nothing about the Catholic Faith, therefore, I would not condemn it. I have many friends of all faiths, from Hindu to Buddhist, who believe in God in their own way, I cannot tell them how to worship, that is between God and that person.

            #9.2 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 9:36 PM EST
            Angry Left-532262

            I'm not going to get into an anti mormon rant here...it's not quite time yet....thats for after willard gets the nomination....but feeling generous here is a well organized site that has some basic anti mormon stuff.....

            I will be willing to debate you on anyone of these 22 interesting facts.....after Willard gets the nom anyway.

            22 Shocking FACTS the Mormon Church Does NOT Want YOU to Know!

            • 1 vote
            #9.3 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 9:50 PM EST
            Jensen-576947

            Funny thing is, it did not offend me, and I read the whole link. I may be misled, by someone, but that does not mean that I am wrong. If someone leads me off a cliff, and they have deceived me in doing so, I am not to be blamed, for I intended no harm to anyone. My statement was that a person should not be judged by his true beliefs. It cannot be a belief if it was perpetrated as a lie.

              #9.4 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 10:44 PM EST
              Reply
              jmorris

              "At the end of the day, the movement will come together to defeat Barack Obama," Kremer said.

              Since there isn't a True Conservative, like say Satan, on the ballot, I guess the Tea Party will have to stick to it's real purpose (getting rid of "that @!$%#er in the White House") and support the Moderate Mormon "Obama-lite" Romney.

              • 3 votes
              Reply#10 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 6:20 PM EST
              Andy Horning

              What the heck do "conservative" and "liberal" mean anymore? Those terms have swapped poles so many times that I doubt you can find two people to agree to a definition for either.

              In fact, "liberal" now means exactly the opposite of what it did when Ludwig von Mises wrote the book, "Liberalism." (hint: liberal/libertarian meant the same thing for hundreds of years until the New Deal changed everthing to NewSpeak)

              • 1 vote
              #10.1 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 6:48 PM EST
              Reply
              Angry Left-532262

              Tea party: Warming or resigned to Mitt Romney

              More like just following orders and voting for whatever (R) they put up there.

              • 2 votes
              Reply#11 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 6:50 PM EST
              magnoliaave

              Oh, well, it's sorta like the Democrats have no one, but Obama! Ain't life something?

                Reply#12 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 7:59 PM EST
                Arizona Sportsman

                This Tea Party Republican PC will stay home in November if Obomney is our alternative. It means Washington elitists still have too much power.

                  Reply#13 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 8:20 PM EST
                  Mofongo

                  The TeaGaggers are faced with the need to compromise and their biology will simply not allow that. The ensuing brain seizures and uncontrolled muscle spasms will be hilarious as they struggle to cope with the concept their new friend, Mitt the Mormon. I hope they swallow their tongues.

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#14 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 9:32 PM EST
                  Kareem in my Coffee

                  The baggers don't want to vote for a Mormon. That's how they roll.

                  End this insanity and vote Democrat.

                    Reply#15 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 10:50 PM EST
                    Jose-491908

                    The teabags and Romney are a perfect fit neither one knows what they stand for. I'm convinced that it doesn't matter which Republican gets the nomination all they want is to get that Kenyan socialist out of the White-house because he's not like them nor does he share their christian core beliefs. Its funny how in 2008 these people were making so much noise and pretended they were a force to reckon with and then all of a sudden very little is heard from them. I think its because some of their followers got pissed off that they gave up their bingo games to hear the same crappy promise of lower taxes and smaller Government.

                      Reply#16 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 4:08 AM EST
                      keck

                      there is no difference between obama and romney.

                      they are both liberals.

                      what gets me abour romney is the mormon thing, and how the mormon church did not allow black folks until the mid 70s.

                      lawrence odonell pointed this out the other night on "the last word", but i guess the rest of the media will wait until romney is the nominee before they start saying it too.

                      when that happens, the mormon church...and romney will be painted as "racist".....and for once the media will be right...it was very racist.

                      so, if romney gets the nomination....we will have to endure four more years of the obama.

                        Reply#17 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 10:23 AM EST
                        JC-1439099

                        Really? That's the left's big campaign strategy? Religious bigotry and racism? Really? WOW!! This ought to be just great for the country.....

                        • 1 vote
                        #17.1 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 11:02 AM EST
                        Angry Left-532262

                        Please....at least we aren't calling Romney a kenyan,socialist communist, manchurian candidate hell bent on destroying America.

                          #17.2 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 11:08 AM EST
                          JC-1439099

                          Angry Left - does that mean you are endorsing the religious bigotry and racism approach?

                          • 1 vote
                          #17.3 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 11:27 AM EST
                          Angry Left-532262

                          I'm saying karma is a real bitch and what goes around comes around.

                          Sorry, but with the way the righties have acted for the last three years they have no room to complain.

                          ...and I can't wait to have Willard get the nomination.....ALL that creepy mormon @!$%# will come out...even the parts that the mormons think is "secret".

                            #17.4 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 2:05 PM EST
                            JC-1439099

                            Sorry, but with the way the righties have acted for the last three years they have no room to complain.

                            Excellent. The old "Waaaaaaaaaah!!! But they did it first!" justification for bad behavior. That's certainly got to make everyone feel better.

                            I have little doubt that people will attempt to make Mormonism an issue, just as they once tried to make Catholicism an issue when Kennedy ran. Hopefully they will be just as successful as they were last time.

                            It's truly enlightening to watch the "tolerant liberals" frothing at the mouth, just waiting for the opportunity to engage in as much religious bigotry as they possibly can (which is really saying something given the amount that is displayed on the Vine on a regular basis).

                            • 1 vote
                            #17.5 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 4:01 PM EST
                            Angry Left-532262

                            Hey,

                            @!$%# talking worked pretty well for the GOTP in 2010.

                            ...and you don't have to go as far back as Kennedy to see some good old fashioned religious bigotry....just mention "Hussein" Obama or Rev Wright to a republican and watch them have a conniption.

                            Personally, I could car less who did what first....and you hear any bitching ass crying from me. I say lets go.....lets see who can not only fling the most poop but lets see who more sticks to.

                            I'm ready for some hate.

                              #17.6 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 4:48 PM EST
                              JC-1439099

                              You sound "Angry" :)

                              • 1 vote
                              #17.7 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 4:58 PM EST
                              JC-1439099

                              As troubling as it is, I do have to agree with your assessment of the "Hussein" comments. They are uncalled for and a sad commentary on those that choose to do so.

                              Rev. Wright, on the other hand, is not really the same. That is really a matter of association, not a matter of religion. It is more a question of whether President Obama agrees with some of the anti-U.S. statements that the reverend made.

                                #17.8 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 5:07 PM EST
                                Angry Left-532262

                                Alright, so guilt by association then???

                                How about Paul Sr's 1st hand connections with white supremacists and neo nazis....you know that hacked info Anonymous dug out from Stormfront???

                                Of course that is totally different right??

                                  #17.9 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 5:19 PM EST
                                  JC-1439099

                                  I am not familiar enough with the Paul subject to make an intelligent response other than to say that I hope the information is false.

                                    #17.10 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 5:50 PM EST
                                    Angry Left-532262

                                    Anonymous Hacks White Supremacist Site, Finds Direct Links to Ron Paul

                                    Ron Paul, the American Third Position Party and Stormfront (includes a picture of Paul with the neo nazi leader)

                                    Paul received financial support from other white power groups, such as the online hate forum Stormfront, founded by Don Black, a white supremacist. There is even a photograph of Paul with Black, a former Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan and a current member of the American Nazi Party. He was reportedly attracted to Paul because he believed the Republican's followers would be receptive to his white supremacist views. He described Paul as "implicitly white" and started to actively organise Paul's events.

                                      #17.11 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 6:02 PM EST
                                      Reply
                                      Andy Horning

                                      Sheesh and oy vey, people...this Romney versus Obama thing misses the point that the bankster/moneychangers that run both faces of the demorepublicrat uniparty have been unchallenged for over a hundred years. If you're going to vote for ANY entrenched status-quo party candidate, you've got some e'splainin' to do!

                                      • 1 vote
                                      Reply#18 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 11:20 AM EST
                                      BLOGER-486140

                                      Why not Mittens is sounding more like a hard core conservative every day. The empahsis is on sounding.

                                        Reply#19 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 6:23 PM EST
                                        Leave a Comment:
                                        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                        You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                                        (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                                        Newsvine Privacy Statement
                                        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                        FUN STUFF:
                                        • Leaderboard |
                                        • E-Mail Alerts |
                                        • Top of the Vine |
                                        • Newsvine Live |
                                        • Newsvine Archives |
                                        • The Greenhouse
                                        COMPANY STUFF:
                                        • Code of Honor |
                                        • Company Info |
                                        • Contact Us |
                                        • Jobs |
                                        • User Agreement |
                                        • Privacy Policy |
                                        • About our ads
                                        LEGAL STUFF:
                                        • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                                        • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                                        • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com