Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

House seeks to unload unneeded government property

Tue Feb 7, 2012 2:53 PM EST
politics, us, government, property
Jim Abrams, Associated Press
Advertise | AdChoices

WASHINGTON — The House on Tuesday backed legislation to sell off or consolidate some of the thousands of underused or unneeded federal buildings, potentially saving taxpayers billions of dollars.

The House bill takes its cue from past efforts to close military bases, setting up a commission that would make recommendations on streamlining federal property that Congress could either accept or reject, but could not alter.

The Obama administration last May came up with a similar plan modeled after the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission, or BRAC.

But, as is generally the case in today's partisan atmosphere, there was discord even on a measure that enjoyed bipartisan support.

The White House, in a statement, said it "appreciates" that the bill would pursue reform of the government's real estate portfolio, but voiced concerns it did not go far enough. The administration, and House Democrats, also said the bill discounts environmental factors in deciding which properties should be disposed of.

The vote was 259-164 with 21 Democrats voting for the bill. It now goes to the Senate, where a companion bill has been introduced.

The aim of the bill, said its sponsor, Rep. Jeff Denham, R-Calif., "is to shrink the federal real property footprint and save billions of taxpayer dollars by selling what we don't need and better utilizing what we keep."

The federal government, he said "has a horrible track record of selling properties that aren't being used. In fact, we sold 82 properties in the last 25 years."

He cited estimates that in the 2009 budget year the federal government wasted more than $1.7 billion in operating costs for underused buildings and that his bill could save taxpayers $15 billion over the next decade.

Denham cites as examples of government waste a courthouse in Los Angeles that was proposed more than a decade ago but never built despite the spending of tens of millions on design and administration costs; and the Old Post Office building, a landmark in downtown Washington D.C., that is now vacant and costs $6.5 million a year to maintain.

Rep. Daniel Webster, R-Fla., said federal executive branch agencies control some 429,000 buildings, and that an Office of Management and Budget report estimated that in 2007 the government held $18 billion in unneeded property. He also pointed to a Congressional Research Service study that found that in 2009 the government spent $134 million to maintain some 10,000 unneeded buildings.

Denham's bill would form a nine-member Civilian Property Realignment Commission to consolidate federal government properties. As in the BRAC process, Congress can approve or disapprove the commission recommendations en bloc only, decreasing the possibility of political fighting over specific properties.

Within six months of enactment, the commission would be charged with coming up with plans to sell at least five high-value federal properties worth at least $500 million.

The board would not have jurisdiction over military installations, properties deemed essential to national security and national parks.

© 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Jim Abrams's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (7)
reddirthippy

Just make sure it is not something they are going to buy back at four times the price 2 years from now and that sweet heart deals are not provided to friends.

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 3:16 PM EST
Citizen Kane-473667

Maybe they should move out of the rented buildings and into the owned buildings first.

  • 3 votes
#1.1 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 9:45 PM EST
reddirthippy

that is a good idea!

  • 1 vote
#1.2 - Wed Feb 8, 2012 9:04 AM EST
reddirthippy

a ban on selling national parks and public land should be included.

  • 1 vote
#1.3 - Wed Feb 8, 2012 10:39 AM EST
Reply
BLOGER-486140

I hope someone monitors who the properties are sold to and the price paid.

  • 2 votes
Reply#2 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 6:29 PM EST
Citizen Kane-473667

And those properties should be banned from being resold for twenty years...

  • 2 votes
#2.1 - Tue Feb 7, 2012 9:47 PM EST
Reply
Better Careful

Knowing Republicans as I do, I expect their intent is to pay some political favors by making some cronies rich. They like their government spending and partnerships a lot, so long as they're making money. We ought to expect the worst; we've no reason to expect anything else. History is their judge.

  • 2 votes
Reply#3 - Wed Feb 8, 2012 8:04 AM EST
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
(XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
Newsvine Privacy Statement
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
FUN STUFF:
  • Leaderboard |
  • E-Mail Alerts |
  • Top of the Vine |
  • Newsvine Live |
  • Newsvine Archives |
  • The Greenhouse
COMPANY STUFF:
  • Code of Honor |
  • Company Info |
  • Contact Us |
  • Jobs |
  • User Agreement |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • About our ads
LEGAL STUFF:
  • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com