Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

6 of 10 on ethics panel quit Waters case

Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:32 PM EST
politics, ethics, maxine-waters, shakeup, house-ethics-committee, house-ethics, democrat-maxine-waters
Larry Margasak, Associated Press

FILE - In this July 30, 2011 file photo, Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif,. leaves a Democratic caucus on Capitol Hill in Washington. In an extraordinary development, six of the House Ethics Committee's 10 members Friday dropped out of the investigation of longtime Democratic lawmaker Maxine Waters of California, saying they wanted to ensure there was no bias in the case. (AP Photo/Harry Hamburg, File)

Advertise | AdChoices

WASHINGTON — All five Republicans on the House ethics committee and the panel's ranking Democrat withdrew from a long-standing investigation of Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters of California on Friday to avoid further questions about their impartiality.

The extraordinary development came more than two years after the panel began examining whether Waters tried to steer money from the 2008 financial bailout to a minority-owned bank while her husband was a shareholder and board member of the institution.

The mass recusal came in one of the committee's most troubled cases, after past allegations of bias by Republican members forced the panel to hire an outside lawyer last July to investigate the committee and its handling of the Waters case.

The committee's Republican chairman, Rep. Jo Bonner of Alabama, said the outside attorney, Billy Martin, requested the recusals. But Bonner said the recusals "are not based on any indication of any wrongdoing or inappropriate partisanship by the members."

Waters, a high-ranking member of the Financial Services Committee, was accused by the panel of trying to use her influence to obtain federal aid for a minority-owned bank where her husband is an investor.

During an investigation that has gone on for more than two years, Waters, one of the longest-serving African-American lawmakers, has consistently denied wrongdoing, saying her efforts were focused on helping a number of minority-owned banks that were in financial trouble.

In addition to the five Republicans on the committee, its senior Democrat, Rep. Linda Sanchez of California, also withdrew from the case — even though she was not a committee member when the allegations of bias surfaced. In fact, all five of the Democrats on the committee in 2010 quit the panel when Congress convened in January last year, saying new members were needed to take a fresh look at the Waters case. However, all five Republicans decided to stay on.

The five Republicans stepping down were Bonner and Reps. Michael McCaul of Texas, K. Michael Conaway of Texas, Charles Dent of Pennsylvania and Gregg Harper of Mississippi. Replacements have already been named to allow the Waters case to continue.

The chairman said Martin advised the committee that, to date:

_He has not discovered any evidence to indicate bias or partiality in the investigation.

_He has not discovered evidence that should cause a mandatory removal of anyone from the case.

_There is no conflict that would require disqualification of any current member or staff of the committee.

The six members, Bonner said, "believe that, out of an abundance of caution and to avoid even an appearance of unfairness, their voluntary recusal will eliminate the possibility of questions being raised as to the partiality or bias of committee members considering this matter." He said the investigation is continuing "in a fair and unbiased matter."

Replacement members are Republican Reps. Bob Goodlatte of Virginia, Steven Latourette of Ohio, Mike Simpson of Idaho, Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia and Tim Griffin of Arkansas and Democratic Rep. John Sarbanes of Maryland.

In August 2010, the committee charged the 11-term congresswoman with three counts of alleged ethics violations. Waters asked for a proceeding that would amount to an ethics trial, but it never took place after internal committee turmoil erupted over the case.

The investigation revolved around whether Waters helped OneUnited Bank obtain federal bailout funds in late 2008. Her husband, Sidney Williams, served as a member of OneUnited's board of directors from January 2004 until April 2008 and is a shareholder in the bank.

Waters asked the Treasury Department to meet representatives from the National Bankers Association, a trade group representing minority-owned and women-owned banks including OneUnited. The discussion focused on OneUnited, the committee said.

Waters contended that the National Bankers Association requested the meeting and insisted it was held on behalf of the association, not OneUnited. OneUnited eventually received $12 million in bailout money, but federal officials have said Waters was not involved in the decision.

The trial was postponed indefinitely after internal committee memos surfaced that showed the two staff attorneys working on the case were communicating solely with Republican members of the committee. The Democratic chairman at the time, Rep. Zoe Lofgren of California, dismissed the lawyers, angering Republicans who said they did nothing wrong.

When the outside counsel was hired last July, the committee said, "Serious allegations have been made about the committee's own conduct in this matter by Representative Waters and others. The committee has not taken these allegations lightly. The entire membership of the Committee on Ethics believes that its work must always comport with the highest standards of integrity."

© 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Larry Margasak's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (11)
Phil-1006700

This is all Bush's fault! The dems are always squeaky clean and do no wrong. Plus the republicans are demons according tho Waters. This woman is sickening. Any day now she should be walking on water.

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 2:01 PM EST
fernando-2143457

I wish I could walk on water. That is an amazing talent she has if she can actually walk on water.

All politicians take advantage of their position, I would think that most of them start off wanting to do good for the country, but once they figure out they can't, they say screw it and line their pockets.

  • 1 vote
#1.1 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 2:50 PM EST
Ron Christman

RE: #1 and #1.1 - Do you two even have a clue as to any facts of the case? Care to share just what is it that makes her guilty?

  • 4 votes
#1.2 - Sat Feb 18, 2012 8:40 AM EST
fernando-2143457

Ron- I don't have any facts about her guilt or innocence. She is guilty of one thing, being a politician, so she probably is a liar.

    #1.3 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 5:04 PM EST
    Reply
    Unbelievable-895817

    Can you say (R) Witch Hunt??

    Bwaahahahah!! They tried to catch Maxine doing her thing to help minority banks and cant find her doing anything wrong!!!

    Bwahahahaha!!

    • 4 votes
    Reply#2 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 6:50 PM EST
    Phil-1006700

    Unbelievable, Her husband is an invester with that bank. I guess you don't understand the abuse of power. Be it someone with an R and you'd be screaming foul.

    • 1 vote
    #2.1 - Fri Feb 17, 2012 8:28 PM EST
    Ron Christman

    Phil - C'mon clarify the facts. Rep. Waters was working to support a group of minority banks (that weren't on Wall St.) during the bank credit crisis. The bank in question is a minority bank that is a member of the minority bank group. Her husband had previously resigned from the board but continued to keep some of his investment in the bank (not at all unusual for a former board member). But still, anytime there connections between someone in government and a private firm, there is good reason to check what was done. But just the length of the investigation brings up questions.

    If it is so clear cut that she abused her power, why is it that the investigation has taken so long?

    Why were the investigating lawyers only communicating with the Republicans on the committee? Why were they then removed from the investigation?

    Why have those same Republicans now resigned from the committee?

    It seems that at this junction that the ones abusing power are those Republicans who sought the investigation in the first place.

    BTW - If you really want to take a look at abuse of power and connections to those outside of government, take a look at the right wing members of the Supreme Court. When you make arguments about that bunch you'll actually have some credibility.

    • 4 votes
    #2.2 - Sat Feb 18, 2012 8:56 AM EST
    DS12

    The trial was postponed indefinitely after internal committee memos surfaced that showed the two staff attorneys working on the case were communicating solely with Republican members of the committee. The Democratic chairman at the time, Rep. Zoe Lofgren of California, dismissed the lawyers, angering Republicans who said they did nothing wrong.

    Fair and unbiased? This is just another example of a political witch hunt if you can look at it objectionably.

    • 3 votes
    #2.3 - Sat Feb 18, 2012 12:39 PM EST
    Reply
    news42

    How does someone with a sociology degree become a member of the Financial Services Committee ?

      Reply#3 - Mon Feb 20, 2012 1:04 AM EST
      Unbelievable-895817

      Senority.......

        #3.1 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 5:00 PM EST
        news42

        No wonder Washington is a mess

          #3.2 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:04 PM EST
          Reply
          Leave a Comment:
          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
          You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
          (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
          Newsvine Privacy Statement
          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
          FUN STUFF:
          • Leaderboard |
          • E-Mail Alerts |
          • Top of the Vine |
          • Newsvine Live |
          • Newsvine Archives |
          • The Greenhouse
          COMPANY STUFF:
          • Code of Honor |
          • Company Info |
          • Contact Us |
          • Jobs |
          • User Agreement |
          • Privacy Policy |
          • About our ads
          LEGAL STUFF:
          • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
          • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
          • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com