Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Newark mayor seeks probe of NYPD Muslim spying

Wed Feb 22, 2012 3:09 AM EST
us-news, us, new-jersey, intelligence, nypd, new-york-police-department
David Porter, Associated Press
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 14 photos
<p>Imam Abdul A. Muhammad of the Masjid Imam K. Ali Muslim mosque in Newark, N.J., speaks in his clothing and accessories store regarding surveillance of the Muslim community by the New York Police Department, Wednesday, Feb. 15, 2012. Americans in New Jersey’s largest city were subjected to surveillance as part of the New York Police Department’s effort to build databases of where Muslims work, shop and pray. The operation in Newark was so secretive, even the city’s mayor says he was kept in the dark. For months in mid-2007, plainclothes NYPD officers snapped pictures of mosques and eavesdropped in Muslim neighborhoods. The result was a 60-page report, obtained by The Associated Press. It cited no evidence of crimes. It was just a guide to Newark’s Muslims. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)</p>

Imam Abdul A. Muhammad of the Masjid Imam K. Ali Muslim mosque in Newark, N.J., speaks in his clothing and accessories store regarding surveillance of the Muslim community by the New York Police Department, Wednesday, Feb. 15, 2012. Americans in New Jersey’s largest city were subjected to surveillance as part of the New York Police Department’s effort to build databases of where Muslims work, shop and pray. The operation in Newark was so secretive, even the city’s mayor says he was kept in the dark. For months in mid-2007, plainclothes NYPD officers snapped pictures of mosques and eavesdropped in Muslim neighborhoods. The result was a 60-page report, obtained by The Associated Press. It cited no evidence of crimes. It was just a guide to Newark’s Muslims. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

Advertise | AdChoices

NEWARK — The mayor of New Jersey's largest city called for state authorities Wednesday to investigate a widespread spying operation conducted in Newark's Muslim neighborhoods by the New York Police Department that he characterized as "deeply offensive."

At about the same time Newark Mayor Cory Booker made his remarks, Gov. Chris Christie, once New Jersey's top federal law enforcement official, called the surveillance "disturbing" and said Attorney General Jeffrey Chiesa was already looking into the reports.

In mid-2007, the NYPD's secretive Demographics Unit fanned out across Newark, photographing every mosque and eavesdropping in Muslim businesses. The findings were cataloged in a 60-page report, obtained by The Associated Press, that served as a police guidebook to Newark's Muslims. There was no mention of terrorism or any criminal wrongdoing.

Officials reacted strongly on Wednesday. Booker and Newark's current and former police directors said they were misled by the NYPD, which they said asked a limited number of questions but didn't hint at the depth or breadth of the planned investigation.

"If anyone in my police department had known this was a blanket investigation of individuals based on nothing but their religion, that strikes at the core of our beliefs and my beliefs very personally, and it would have merited a far sterner response," Booker told The AP.

Newark Police Director Samuel DeMaio, who was deputy chief of the department at the time, said the NYPD asked to be shown around the city. New York police said it was part of an investigation but never revealed what it was about, DeMaio said.

"We really want to be clear: This type of activity is not what the Newark PD would ever do," he said.

Garry McCarthy, who was Newark's police director in 2007 and is now Chicago's police superintendent, told The AP that Newark officers were "absolutely not" involved in the operation.

"The bottom line is that the NYPD reached out to us as a courtesy when they were coming into Newark," he said. "We did not conduct surveillance or gather intelligence with the NYPD."

Newark authorities who investigated how the NYPD operation was carried out concluded McCarthy received the 60-page report from the NYPD, according to a Newark official. The official, who insisted on anonymity because the inquiry was ongoing, said there was no evidence that McCarthy circulated the report to anyone else.

Such surveillance has become common in New York City in the decade since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Nearly 3,000 Americans died when al-Qaida terrorists hijacked airliners and flew them into the World Trade Center in New York, the Pentagon near Washington and a field where one crashed in Pennsylvania.

Police have built databases showing where Muslims live, where they buy groceries, what Internet cafes they use and where they watch sports. Dozens of mosques and student groups have been infiltrated, and police have built detailed profiles of local ethnic groups, from Moroccans to Egyptians to Albanians.

But the NYPD's intelligence unit also operates far outside its jurisdiction and has worked to keep tabs on Muslims across the Northeast. The department has cataloged Muslim communities in Long Island, conducted undercover operations in New Brunswick, N.J., and has turned often innocuous Internet postings by Muslim student groups into police files.

NYPD spokesman Paul Browne did not respond to a message seeking comment on the Newark effort Wednesday. He has previously denied the existence of the Demographics Unit.

At a news conference discussing his budget Wednesday, Christie, New Jersey's U.S. Attorney in 2007, said he didn't remember the NYPD ever approaching him about surveillance in Newark or a threat that would justify it.

"The NYPD has at times developed a reputation of asking forgiveness rather than permission," he said.

The documents obtained by the AP show, for the first time in any detail, how the NYPD's intelligence-gathering efforts stretched outside the department's jurisdiction. New Jersey and Long Island residents had no reason to suspect the NYPD was watching them. And the department is not accountable to their votes or tax dollars.

NYPD conducted similar operations in Suffolk and Nassau counties on suburban Long Island, according to police records. The NYPD frequently operates outside its jurisdiction without telling federal or local officials.

The report left Newark Muslims grasping for explanations as they saw pictures of their mosques and businesses in police files.

"All of these are innocent people," Nagiba el-Sioufi of Newark said recently while her husband, Mohammed, flipped through the NYPD report.

Egyptian immigrants and American citizens, the couple raised two daughters in the United States. Mohammed works as an accountant and is vice president of the Islamic Culture Center, a mosque a few blocks from Newark City Hall.

"If you have an accusation on us, then spend the money on doing this to us," Nagiba said. "But you have no accusation."

___

Online:

Read the documents:

Newark, N.J.: http://apne.ws/wBk7Hg

Nassau County: http://apne.ws/xhHxNx

Suffolk County: http://apne.ws/zmCvMU

___

Associated Press writers Matt Apuzzo and Adam Goldman contributed to this report. Angela Delli Santi contributed from Palisades Park.

Contact the AP's Washington investigative team at DCinvestigations (at) ap.org Follow Apuzzo and Goldman at http://twitter.com/mattapuzzo and http://twitter.com/goldmandc

© 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • David Porter's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: American Freedom of Worship, Anti-Discrimination, Combating Racism & Xenophobia, cweSpring2012, Hate Watch, Human Rights Vine, Islam Anti-Defamation League
  • Regions: United States , New York
  • Public Discussion (34)
Samoore4

Are we not yet tired of our citizens being spied on, profiled as if they have done something wrong when the only thing they have done is to be born with a certain skin color..or believed in a religion..no matter how you look at it, it's wrong.

  • 5 votes
Reply#1 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 4:01 AM EST
Vikramjit Singh (India)

yeah its wrong but discrimination and racism is at the heart of such behavior. America has a long way to go.

  • 2 votes
#1.1 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 4:41 AM EST
Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle

Well, when folks of Muslim descent crash airliners into the biggest buildings in New York, the Pentagon, and attempt to do the same with the White House, then some overreaction is to be expected.

Since that time, SOME Muslims living in America have been caught supporting terror groups, mostly by raising money for same. They wouldn't have gotten caught, but they have to learn that internet posts, cell phone usage, and communicating on the internet are not necessarily secure.

Spying on our own citizens is never good, but due to the exceptional circumstances where thousands of Americans died as a result of the actions listed above...it was bound to happen.

Look at the bright side. Unlike World War 2, we didn't start interning Muslims. And if American Muslims REALLY care about these things, then they should speak out in force against terrorism, otherwise they have no reason to whine.

Compared to the Sedition Act of World War 1, and a few other events in American history, this spying effort is rather tame.

  • 6 votes
#1.2 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 5:22 AM EST
Vikramjit Singh (India)

Do you mean muslims or individuals from Saudi Arabia which is an ally of US ? Yeah the sept 11 attacks were abrupt and resulted in large scale killings but so did the Iraq war. Stereotyping happened on both sides .

Regardless of the above, racism is an ever burning issue in the US and unless the white majority accepts people of color and different religions as equals you will continue to be a litigious society.

  • 2 votes
#1.3 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:17 AM EST
CaptainObviousSays

NYPD built secret files on NJ, Long Island mosques

Good.

I have no problem with that...

Cheers :)

  • 4 votes
#1.4 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:06 AM EST
NotThePest

From a New York resident (Brooklyn) they have also built secret files on people of color who are not of the Muslim faith, I guess that is O.K. too? It's called, Stop & Frisk and those who they stop & frisk are placed in a database even if they are law-abiding citizens. The claim is that they are looking for illegal guns. If you think that is not an issue, just think when someone tries to get a job that needs security clearance, it pops up.

    #1.5 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 5:48 AM EST
    Vikramjit Singh (India)

    From a New York resident (Brooklyn) they have also built secret files on people of color who are not of the Muslim faith, I guess that is O.K. too? It's called, Stop & Frisk and those who they stop & frisk are placed in a database even if they are law-abiding citizens.

    That is utterly disturbing if one is not white and shows that the concept of "melting pot" etc is at some level a "lip service".

    The claim is that they are looking for illegal guns. If you think that is not an issue, just think when someone tries to get a job that needs security clearance, it pops up.

    Not just that ..the underlying racist stereotyping is bad and will cause society to become polarized and more litigious.

    • 1 vote
    #1.6 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 9:42 PM EST
    Reply
    Steve-1205334

    Nobody cares.

    • 3 votes
    Reply#2 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 4:48 AM EST
    Vikramjit Singh (India)

    nobody white cares.

    • 5 votes
    #2.1 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:18 AM EST
    Reply
    Yearning

    I wonder why NY keeps taking the rap for the Patriot Act. Second time this week.

    This is the corporate press speaking here... It's not like the AP investigated this... it was leaked, and authorized to be leaked. No Julian Assange outrage here.

    So who the heck would want to bust NYPD's chops for doing the same thing the feds are doing?

    The feds? Is the Party testing for public reaction to disclosure? I can't imagine the DemocratsandRepublicans would care what the public thinks about anything.

    Is this "leak" going to be used by politicians for fund raising or something? You know, like, "my mayorship is proactive against the infidels"?

    Curious, this.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#3 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 6:55 AM EST
    NC Slim

    #3 Yearning

    AP has been investigating this story on the NYPD spying on Muslims, Moroccans, Egyptians, Albanians for a very long time. Recently, AP won a prestigious award for the, I believe, the body of work.

    I know I'm tired of BIG BROTHER. What is so egregious is Bloomberg and the NYPD have breached the rights of people in other states without the permission from the governors, mayors and other state officials. Where do they come off invading and snooping around. Scooping up Intel on anyone who looks"foreign."

    Yale is in Connecticut. The University of Pennsylvania is not under the jurisdiction of billionaire Bloomberg and NYPD Commish Ray Kelley. Quasi-martial law? The world has been to the stormtroopers ball before!

      #3.1 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 12:38 AM EST
      Reply
      Adam31

      Yes after 9/11 stuff like this will carry on for probably a hundred years.

      Yes Obama as usual does not speak out against profiling

      Yes libs will still vote for him.

      • 2 votes
      Reply#4 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 7:04 AM EST
      hvymtl83

      Did it ever occur to you that just maybe many so-called libs aren't against profiling? After all, 9/11 wasn't brought about by 60 yr old grandmothers from Boise.

      • 4 votes
      #4.1 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 7:46 AM EST
      NC Slim

      #4

      If the president speaks out about profiling, he'll be accused of only caring about black, red, yellow and brown people. The numb nuts will snap and snarl about him allegedly being a racist and against white people.

      Still voting for Obama!

        #4.2 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 12:45 AM EST
        Reply
        Americanpatriot12

        So cry me a river!

        Hate to have to point it out -- but MUSLIMS, we were told, were the perpetrators of those 911 Events! MUSLIMS, we were told, were apprehended and fortunately stopped from perpetrating other acts of terrorism in our country. MUSLIMS, we were told, were behind those bombings in Europe!

        Thus it makes perfect sense if our police forces do remain vigilant against further outrageous terrorist acts -- by potential MUSLIM terrorists!

        I don't give a damn if this is "profiling." Given the propensity of terrorist attacks being carried out or instigated by MUSLIMS, it would be the height of lunacy to put every Lutheran or Episcopalian church, for example, under close scrutiny.

        • 3 votes
        Reply#5 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:34 AM EST
        Goes

        And if I was one of those under the microscope and I have nothing to hide, and I wanted to clear my faith's image, why would I dislike such an act that is preventing similar acts from happening again, and how many attacks were stopped by such profiling?

        Most of the terror acts around the world is being committed by Muslims, so the most likely coming attack will be from their side, and it is our security personnel's duty to protect us from similar threats. Don't blame people for trying to protect Americans, blame people who want to kill Americans.

        • 5 votes
        #5.1 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:15 AM EST
        Vikramjit Singh (India)

        Profiling is wrong and shows that underlying racist attitudes exist in the US.Stereotyping an entire group based on the actions of a few is always the first step to justify racist behavior and acts.

        Racism will remain an issue as long as people of color are treated 'differently' no matter what the justification or excuse.

        • 2 votes
        #5.2 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 7:37 AM EST
        Reply
        bart martin-3773750

        If it was mafia, alqiuada or nazis they would be investigated also If it was Tibetans or other groups also.The Muslim terrorists are such a terrible threat that they should be glad the terrorists among them are being weeded out.If I was a Muslim I would understand it and support it.AND many do.It´s necessary and must continue.If the Mulsims don´t like it they can leave the country.that they chose to come to.If only 10% of the Muslims in the U.S were terrorists that would be a huge problem.And this figure is not unreasonable,The surveillance must continue and even increase, It is neither profiling or any other such claims.Just common sense.!!

        • 2 votes
        Reply#6 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:33 AM EST
        euterpe-1641499

        Well, it's the nature of Americans to have a difficult time relating to other Americans: this type of persecution, and the acceptance of it, has happened before. Americans being targeted today will endure, as others before them have done, and - in a generation or two - the wrong will be brought to light. There will be retributions and apologies. And anyway, by then we will have moved on to persecuting a different group of Americans - maybe even against those who claim ambivalence towards the plight of those being persecuted today.

        I guess it's too much to ask to have some forethought in our actions, maybe even some insight into the upcoming consequences for the choices we make and the things we support... But maybe I'm asking too much.

        • 3 votes
        Reply#7 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:45 AM EST
        euterpe-1641499

        A history lesson for the likes of Americanpatriot12:

        Irish persecution in America - primarily due to the fear they would imbalance the economy, but also because of latent British sentiments against the Irish.

        Italian persecution in America - first because they weren't white and then because they were considered a threat during WWII - some were put in interment camps and arrested indiscriminately.

        Anti-semtism - obviously due to racism

        Persecution of the Chinese in America - economic reasons

        Persecution of the Japanese - first economic, then WWII - they were placed in internment camps also

        Persecution of Germans in America during WWII - placed in internment camps

        Persecution of Hindus in America - due to both economic reasons and racism

        I won't add links for the persecutions of Native Americans, Blacks, or Hispanics. Presumably, you are aware of them.

        Safe to say that your family suffered from these legalized forms of persecution in the past, and you've gotten over it enough to use the handle that you do. Most likely, future generations of Muslims will feel as you do today. I hope that fact doesn't bother you.

        As you can see, we Americans are really good at persecuting our fellow Americans in the name of safety.

        Further FYI:

        Persecution:

        1. The act or practice of persecuting on the basis of race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or beliefs that differ from those of the persecutor.
        2. The condition of being persecuted.

        Persecute:

        1. To oppress or harass with ill-treatment, especially because of race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or beliefs.
        2. To annoy persistently; bother.

        And yes, being followed into your place of worship for no other reason than the fact that you share the same religion as terrorists would be, I would think, bothersome to say the least. It would certainly be a violation of the rights granted under the First Amendment the Constitution.

        • 1 vote
        #7.1 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 7:59 PM EST
        NC Slim

        #7.1 Euterpr

        Wow. Native Americans, Blacks and Hispanics can't even get a link. As you may recall, the State of Texas, the biggest buyer of textbooks in the US, has marginalized and whitewashed them from history.

        Texas Textbook Changes:

        • Juxtaposed Abraham Lincoln’s ideas with those of Jefferson Davis
        • Slave trade renamed the Atlantic triangular trade
        • Learn about violent philosophy of the Black Panthers versus non-violence of Dr. King
        • Numerous attempts to add the names or references to important Hispanics in history denied; reference allowed 20th century labor movement through Cesar Chavez & Dolores Huerta
        • No mention of Malcolm X

          #7.2 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 1:44 AM EST
          euterpe-1641499

          Wow. Native Americans, Blacks and Hispanics can't even get a link.

          I was pointing out the less known cases, since Americanpatriot thinks what is happening to the Muslims today is no big deal. I was hoping he could connect to their suffering, knowing his immigrant forefathers had probably suffered something similar at some point in this country.

          But I'm out of here - it seems I'm being bated - see post #10. Can't get banned just before it really starts to get cooking, can I?

          See you in better quarters, NC Slim ;~)

          • 2 votes
          #7.3 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:27 AM EST
          NC Slim

          #7.3 euterpe

          No "jumping on you" intended on my part. Many visit the site with no knowledge of history or even recent events like the Texas textbook fiasco. We have to keep repeating and reminding. My bad--if I came off like a knucklehead.

          I looked at #10--Whoa! I guess his/her forebears were not dumped on the shores of a land that belonged to someone else.

          • 1 vote
          #7.4 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 11:10 AM EST
          euterpe-1641499

          No worries, NC Slim. I could tell you hadn't made it down to Americanpatriots comments yet. Take a gander at #8. It's quite illuminating. ;~)

          Whoa! I guess his/her forebears were not dumped on the shores of a land that belonged to someone else.

          That would make him/her one of the First People - and I highly doubt that - given the lack of empathy in the posts.

          • 1 vote
          #7.5 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 11:15 AM EST
          NC Slim

          Yikes!! No compassion for all killed and maimed. Yes, we must remain vigilant, but if we allow the trouncing of our Constitutional rights-- we are lost.

            #7.6 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 1:27 PM EST
            Reply
            Americanpatriot12

            WHAT persecution, euterpe-1641499 ? ? ?

            It's "persecution" to be suspicious of Muslim activity, given the horrific crimes, not just here in OUR country, but also in Europe, attributed to Muslim terrorists?

            Have the police arrested or charged anyone on mere suspicion regarding this article? Assuming the answer is "NO", there has not been the slightest incident of your claimed persecution!

            I am sick of this eyewash over those "poor Muslims." I remind you of the nearly 3,000 dead Americans -- victims of those 911 Events. Also of many victims (living and injured or dead) due to Muslim train and transportation bombings carried out in European nations. Then there's the matter of those fortunate failed terrorist attacks -- failed due to the vigilance of our law enforcement officials, or due to merely very good luck on our part. Do you recall those botched Muslim perpetrated attacks on airports in England a few years ago?

            Yet you can blather that insufferable nonsense in your above post?

            • 1 vote
            Reply#8 - Wed Feb 22, 2012 5:48 PM EST
            Vikramjit Singh (India)

            Do you also remind yourself of Iraq war in the same breath ? You have a body count of that ?

            or is it one way logic for you ?

            • 3 votes
            #8.1 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 12:35 AM EST
            bart martin-3773750

            The war in iraq was a multinational effort of several countries.It was because Iraq swallowed up Kuwait and said it no longer existed.When they were thrown out of Kuaiat they signed an agreement to disarm and open up their country.After several years of cat and mouse games the accords were enforced.If Iraq had really opened up i`s country as required they never would have been invaded.The same will happen toIiran.In both cases it was a multinacional alliance and in both case it means the end of 2 horrible and defiant regimes.Saying this .as bad as Iraq was Iran is a much bigger danger.due to their terrorism on 6 continents..And YES all Muslims must be suspect.If it were Tibeten.s,or Irish or Dutch it would be the same.!!

            • 2 votes
            #8.2 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 9:31 AM EST
            Vikramjit Singh (India)

            multinational effort my a**. we all know which country comprises 90% of the military there and we also know where the WMD's were.. They were in North Korea but hey ..we got the geography a bit wrong and cooked up some false evidence and killed a few million people in Iraq ...too bad..then we realized it's a waste of a war so withdrew our forces en masse after about 10 years of screwing around in Iraq.

            Now killing a few million Iraqis by imposing a "shock and awe" war on them for Sept 11 is surely a good way to create more terrorists if you ask me !

            • 2 votes
            #8.3 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 12:43 PM EST
            Reply
            Vikramjit Singh (India)

            Yes most of the terror attacks are happening in muslim countries but I also find another fact to be equally interesting. Most of the disturbances in the muslim world are being created by the US and Western countries by waging unjustified and reckless wars such as the war in Iraq or other wars by proxies in other middle eastern countries.

            so while it's ok to focus on terrorism..it must be noted that terrorism has a larger brother called racism and the war that racism breeds eventually causes terrorism to flourish.

            • 4 votes
            Reply#9 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 12:33 AM EST
            euterpe-1641499

            Good points. If you haven't already, you must see the movie "Syriana". It illustrates what you say quite well.

            • 1 vote
            #9.1 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 12:23 PM EST
            Reply
            Americanpatriot12

            The best answer to euterpe's whine -- KEEP MUSLIMS out of Western Nations! Deny them permission to immigrate to Western countries -- in Europe, North America or Australia. Western nations were never meant to be a dumping ground for the world's surplus populations.

            • 1 vote
            Reply#10 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:40 AM EST
            Vikramjit Singh (India)

            with that logic the American Indians would like to dump you back to where you came from...or is it that you really don't know where you came from ?

            • 2 votes
            #10.1 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 9:38 PM EST
            Reply
            Plantsmantx

            It's estimated that 25% of the Muslim population of the United States consists of native-born black people. Then of course, there are the native-born descendants of Muslim immigrants, black and otherwise.

            • 1 vote
            Reply#11 - Thu Feb 23, 2012 7:12 PM EST
            Leave a Comment:
            You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
            You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
            (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
            Newsvine Privacy Statement
            As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
            FUN STUFF:
            • Leaderboard |
            • E-Mail Alerts |
            • Top of the Vine |
            • Newsvine Live |
            • Newsvine Archives |
            • The Greenhouse
            COMPANY STUFF:
            • Code of Honor |
            • Company Info |
            • Contact Us |
            • Jobs |
            • User Agreement |
            • Privacy Policy |
            • About our ads
            LEGAL STUFF:
            • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
            • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
            • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com