Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Official: 2 more US troops killed in Afghanistan

Sat Feb 25, 2012 2:03 PM EST
politics, us, white-house, afghanistan, barack-obama, leon-panetta
Pauline Jelinek, Associated Press
AP correspondent Heidi Vogt reports two NATO personnel have been shot dead after gunfire erupted inside a government building in Kabul.
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 11 photos
<p>Afghan policemen march towards an anti-U.S. demonstration in Mehterlam, Laghman province east of Kabul, Afghanistan, Saturday, Feb. 25, 2012. Protesters threw rocks at police, government buildings and a U.N. office in eastern Afghanistan on Saturday, kicking off a fifth day of riots sparked by the burning of Qurans at a U.S. base, officials said. (AP Photo/Rahmat Gul)</p>

Afghan policemen march towards an anti-U.S. demonstration in Mehterlam, Laghman province east of Kabul, Afghanistan, Saturday, Feb. 25, 2012. Protesters threw rocks at police, government buildings and a U.N. office in eastern Afghanistan on Saturday, kicking off a fifth day of riots sparked by the burning of Qurans at a U.S. base, officials said. (AP Photo/Rahmat Gul)

Advertise | AdChoices

WASHINGTON — A U.S. official says two more American troops have been killed in Afghanistan, the latest in a series of attacks following protests over the burning of the Quran.

The official said details of the killings Thursday in Southern Afghanistan are still unclear but officials believe there were three attackers, two of whom were subsequently killed. He said the third may be in custody.

The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak on the record.

© 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Pauline Jelinek's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: Afghanistan , Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (10)
American Spirit

Pentagon press secretary George Little says in a written statement that Panetta believes Saturday's killings in Kabul are unacceptable

Of course they are unacceptable but they are predictable. When you are standing in a pool of gas, quit throwing a match! Why is it not ingrained into those entering that country as to things that have in the past/and will again cause a reaction of death and violence?

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Sat Feb 25, 2012 2:22 PM EST
Baron Brian

With friends like these, as the old saying goes...

  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Sat Feb 25, 2012 4:05 PM EST
don-72

It is time to move up the date to remove all troops from Afghanistan. Like ASAP and leave them to there fate what ever that is.

The idea that we can change a country has again been debunked. We should have learned that in Vietnam Iraq and now Afghanistan.

The sad thing is that there are still people who want us to attack Iran. They have not learned a thing about our past miss adventures. To think we can change a country by Military Force has not worked in the past and is not going to work .....

    Reply#3 - Sat Feb 25, 2012 8:26 PM EST
    Repoman-1208817

    Someone burns a Koran and the middle east wants to kill everyone and starts attacking US troops which causes our President to apologize. It is unfortunate the Koran was burned and the second they people started acting like barbarians our gov should have issued a statement saying the burning was regrettable and if the violence against US interest continues we will launch a scorched earth campaign.

    My other thought is @!$%# these people. I am tired of going over there and rebuilding their country and trying to help them be free. If they want to live like animals...let them. Let's just withdraw and let the whole region go to @!$%#. If they come after us...we can bomb them back a couple decades (not that they are too far remved from the stone age).

      Reply#4 - Sat Feb 25, 2012 8:27 PM EST
      American Spirit

      we will launch a scorched earth campaign.

      Oh that's a real bright idea when you have troops on the ground in THEIR nation.

      trying to help them be free

      If they wanted to be free of whatever group we are after, they'd do it themselves. Perhaps the lives of their loved ones are more important to them than the chance of having them killed by starting a conflict.

        #4.1 - Sat Feb 25, 2012 8:32 PM EST
        Repoman-1208817

        You obviously do not know what a scorched earth strategy is which makes your response kind of silly. Scorched earth means destroying everything which might be useful to the enemy while withdrawing from the area...in other words it is causing so much damage during your withdrawal the enemy cannot or will not pursue you force.

          #4.2 - Sun Feb 26, 2012 11:56 AM EST
          American Spirit

          And you obviously don't know how dangerous this type of talk is when we have troops on the ground. Get it?????

            #4.3 - Sun Feb 26, 2012 12:13 PM EST
            Repoman-1208817

            Holy crap, are you serious? It is dangerous to make a blog post suggesting we toughen up against an enemy killing our service members because our enemy might be upset by it? I guess it is better to roll over and bare our throats to this enemy. Appologists are so irritating.

              #4.4 - Sun Feb 26, 2012 12:37 PM EST
              American Spirit

              because our enemy might be upset by it

              When our troops are among them, yes.

              Appologists are so irritating.

              Try "preventivtist" instead. These incidents are preventable. Get it yet? Reaction to injustice rarely has reason. If reason had been involved in the equation, the injustice would be gone.

                #4.5 - Sun Feb 26, 2012 5:03 PM EST
                Reply
                ralphlopez

                This article is pure hogwash, uncritically accepting the premise that the US has been concerned about rebuilding Afghanistan. It's been ten years and now 60% of Afghan children are malnourished as opposed to 35% five years ago. The US is not and never has been concerned with rebuilding Afghanistan. 3/4 of the population still does not have clean water and it has the third highest infant mortality rate in the world. Unemployment is between 40-80 percent, higher in rural areas. Now the New York Times has reported that dozens of children have frozen to death in the last months due to lack of warm baby clothes, food, blankets and shelter. The reason is that the US has been strenuously ignoring and underfunding the only development program in the country which works, the Afghan National Solidarity Program (NSP) which is at arm's length from the Karzai government and which gets management help from the World Bank. Even the U.S. Special Inspector General for the Afghanistan Reconstruction has said of the NSP: "We found that [the controls instituted by the NSP] provided reasonable assurance that NSP funds were used as intended."

                "US Special Inspector Gives Glowing Report on Afghan-Run Development Program"

                The NSP focuses on many small, basic infrastructure projects like irrigation, clearing the canals, clean water projects, and improving dirt roads. This helps all other parts of the traditional economy of agriculture and small business. Labor is provided by Afghans wherever possible.

                Instead the US has wasted billions on showcase projects that Afghans never asked for, using Washington-connected American contractors who take 40% or more in profit before the work ever begins. For this see:

                OXFAM report "Aid Effectiveness in Afghanistan"

                In the meantime $2 billion per WEEK in military hardware and supplies criss-crosses the country by truck convoy, and the Pentagon pays insurgents hundreds of millions of dollars a year to let it through unmolested, thus making the Taliban stronger and enabling it to buy more weapons. No wonder Afghans are mad.

                When the Quran gets burned it's the straw which breaks the camel's back. If in ten years the rate of child malnutrition doubles, you are doing something wrong. Devote one month's worth of military spending to the National Solidarity Program, through the World Bank which manages donor nations' contributions, and stability in Afghanistan will follow as troops withdraw. Instead the NSP is chronically short of funds to complete projects, even though its minister has come to Congress begging for funds and to explain his strategy.

                "US Shortchanging Afghan Development" Wired Magazine:

                Best of all, in the middle of such misery, guess who is always hiring and paying the good wage of $10 a day? The Taliban!

                "The Ten Dollar Taliban":

                What the US is doing is a recipe for further war and instabilty. War is profitable. Nothing comes close to the rate you can bilk the taxpayers at than in war. Why things remain the same is obvious: this is exactly the way congress and the president want it, for their campaign contributors in the war business.

                A CRASH COURSE IN AFGHANISTAN:

                "Afghans are bitterly disappointed by broken promises"

                "$2 Billion a week in war costs (not civilian aid), most expensive war in history"

                Department of Defense Funding the Taliban - CBS News:

                Children freezing to death, New York Times:

                NBC News: 60% of Afghan Children Malnourished:

                Video on the Afghan National Solidarity Program

                "The Road to Taliban Land" by Ann Jones:

                For more information:

                  Reply#5 - Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:32 PM EST
                  Leave a Comment:
                  You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                  You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                  (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                  Newsvine Privacy Statement
                  As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                  FUN STUFF:
                  • Leaderboard |
                  • E-Mail Alerts |
                  • Top of the Vine |
                  • Newsvine Live |
                  • Newsvine Archives |
                  • The Greenhouse
                  COMPANY STUFF:
                  • Code of Honor |
                  • Company Info |
                  • Contact Us |
                  • Jobs |
                  • User Agreement |
                  • Privacy Policy |
                  • About our ads
                  LEGAL STUFF:
                  • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com